AMD Phenom- uporabne informacije: CPUji, plošče, BIOSi, izkušnje- držite se teme, prosim !

Ne vem koliko to paše v to temo, a vseeno:

Two AMD Shanghai processors beaten by a single Intel i7-965
http://www.formortals.com/Home/tabid/36...

Hmnja.. Živi bili pa vidjeli..

Mimogrede, vsak Watt, ki ga potrošiš je treba še ohladiti, kar spet pomeni porabo energije, prezračevanje zahteva prostor in vzdrževanje... Npr. za Google je strošek elektrike ena pomebnejših postavk v bilanci.

Nocem konverterjev, hocem DVI.

Mal sem se zlagal, da bi me pustili pri miru s tistim konverterjem.

Stvar je sledeca. Na ta racunalnik bi priklopil CRT TV in CRT monitor. Sele dons sm se spomnil, da nobena od teh plat nima S-video izhoda.
M3N-H/HDMI sploh nima analognega izhoda, M3N78-EM pa ima d-sub, nevem pa koliko si lahko s tem pomagam.

Res bi si rad nabavil AMD sistem, ker je Nvidia 8300 veliko boljsi od Intelovega G45 in veliko bolsi in cenejsi od AMDjevih resitev.
Tko da, ce ni nic uporabnega, bom verjetno vseeno nabavil G45, ker ze imam en odvecni procesor (E2160).

Pa, če me spomin ne vara, si kazal svojčas navitje 985tke na 3.5 GHz kot trivialno stvar.

Meni je na SB750 plati uspelo naviti 9950tko na 3.4GHz ne ravno trivialno in ne ravno stabilno in to novi, 125W model.
Nihče drugi tu ni poročal o čem boljšem, zato domnevam,d a je to vsaj zaenkrat najboljši rezultat na ST.

Če je tako, je razlika med tvojimi in mojimi rezultati očitna.

Glede na to se ne bi preveč ogreval nad tistimi 4GHz.

In BTW, zakaj bi sploh kdo šel v to ? QC so že tako deklarirani za ne ravno majhno moč.

Zakaj bi jih šel navijat za tistih do 30% in s tem žrtvoval praktično vse živo, pridobil pa nič pametnega ?

Ne mi reč, da vsi laufate jedrske simulacije, za katere je kvečjemu 4+ GHz ok...

ja Brane jas ne navijam ravno kaj malega... s tem se da je tako navijanje bedaRIJA SE STRINJAM.

Tole je za one " strokovnjake" ki pravijo: kupi intela se da bolj navit, ter na jesta Mxxx in nekatere ki niso verjeli da deneb gre na 4400 mhz. Gre pa na 5000 in več celo 6000.

Še ena posredno vzpodbudna novica za Deneba na x bitu:

First-Generation Intel Core i7 Chips Will Never Become Mainstream – Slides.

Intel Core i7 Microprocessors Will Remain a Niche High-End Product

[11/19/2008 06:02 PM]
by Anton Shilov
Although Intel Corp.’s initial Core i7 lineup includes a central processing unit that sells below $300, the new microprocessor family may never become mainstream, at least, based on Intel’s plans. Apparently, the quad-core Core i7 will have a tiny share among Intel’s desktop shipments even in three quarters from now.

According to Intel’s plans that X-bit labs has learnt, Intel pushes its highest-performing Core i7 chips based on Nehalem micro-architecture only into personal computers aimed at consumers. But even on that market Intel has no plans to be really aggressive with promotion of the new platform or flood the market with processors, while reducing the supplies of existing Intel Core 2 Quad central processing units (CPUs).

The share of Intel Core i7 chips is expected to be below 1% of all microprocessors that Intel will ship in Q4 2008, slides from certain product planning documents claim. Moreover, the proportion of Core i7 chips will hardly rise above 3% even in Q2 2009. In fact, even in the third quarter of next year, when Intel releases the first mainstream market-oriented Nehalem-based quad-core chip code-named Lynnfield, the share of Core i7-based platforms is projected to be below 5% of all CPUs sold by Intel.

The comparatively slow adoption rate of a new microprocessor design may be easily explained by the fact that Intel Core i7 chips require a completely new infrastructure: new core-logic sets, new mainboards, new sockets, cooling systems and so on, which is why system integrators might not demand rapid transition. In fact, since Lynnfield will use different infrastructure and code-named Ibex Peak core-logic compared to currently-shipping Core i7/Bloomfield (which is supported by Intel X58-based mainboards), its adoption rate may also not be fast.

Transitions to new micro-architectures along with new infrastructures have never been rapid neither for Intel nor its smaller rival Advanced Micro Devices. This time is not an exception, but gloomy economic outlook may further slowdown adoption of Intel’s Nehalem.

Officials from Intel did not comment on the news-story.

na suhi led pri -190