Je zgodba že vnaprej določena?

Ravno zato želim, da bi Thomas prišel nazaj.

Saj ni - ampak dokler ga dovolj od blizu gledaš, se obnaša, kot da je.

Timurlenk je 9. apr 2012 ob 12:23 izjavil:

ni mi jasno, kakšno vezo ima prevladujoče levo članstvo na forumu (ki pa sploh ni) z znanstvenimi debatami

V kolikor to ne bi držalo, bi bila znanost popolnoma neuporabna.

Ko bodo prepovedali igre na srečo zaradi takšnega stroja, potem se lahko realno zamislimo nad tem - prej ne).

First, she won $5.4 million, then a decade later, she won $2million, then two years later $3million and in the summer of 2010, she hit a $10million jackpot.

The odds of this has been calculated at one in eighteen septillion and luck like this could only come once every quadrillion years.

Harper's reporter Nathanial Rich recently wrote an article about Ms Ginther, which calls the the validity of her 'luck' into question.

First, he points out, Ms Ginther is a former math professor with a PhD from Stanford University specialising in statistics.

A professor at the Institute for the Study of Gambling & Commercial Gaming at the University of Nevada, Reno, told Mr Rich: 'When something this unlikely happens in a casino, you arrest ‘em first and ask questions later.'

jype je 9. apr 2012 ob 12:11 izjavil:

oracle> Makroskopsko je v zelo veliki meri vse ekstrapolacija preteklosti.

Seveda. Nikakor pa ni v popolni meri, kar je razlika med determinističnimi modeli in tem, kar vesolje v resnici je.

Za dokazat, da determinizem ne velja, je dovolj že omenjen (in zelo preprost) eksperiment z dvojno režo (če lahko razumeš, da isti delec potuje skozi obe reži hkrati, kadar ne gledaš, skozi katero potuje - kar ni intuitivno, je pa resnično).