WTC_What Was In Building 7 in kaj se je dejansko dogajalo 9/11 -

za tisti stolp bi za kakršnokoli resno debato potrebovali posnetek.
Za avto pa je na voljo tisoč in en razlog. Sploh pa je očitno, da je nanj nekaj padlo in ni misteriozno zagorel pod vplivom bog in batina žarka.

Samo demolekulizirat beton v nekaj manj trdnega pa se mi ne zdi ne vem kaka znanstvena fantastika.

Ne, res ni. To jaz vsak vecer doma v garazi delam. For pure fun!

Je zajeban vodit debato, ko imaš recimo deset dejstev, ki jih določena web stran omeni in opiše zelo podrobno.

No, jaz sem se vsako tako 'dejstvo' demantiral. Potem so pa zaceli moje poste ignorirati. Baje zato, ker me je strah in pisem v strahu.

Lahko pa spet poizkusiva. Si za to? Napisi prvo dejstvo.

ehhh

breveze se trudiš BigWhale

poglej kaj je meni uspelo z natančno takim pristopom

odgovor za stolp
se je pač sesul - nič spornega

odgovor za zažgane avtomobile
ja a še nikol niste vidl česa tazga?
http://images.google.si/images?hl=sl&q=...

Matev, izpuhti ti 80-90% stavbe v zrak in ti mene sprašuješ, kakšne odgovore hočem od tebe.

s tabo in enakimi beboti se jaz ne morem menit nič..

Hmm, ja, kako se je zmečkal ?

Neej!

Če boste dobro pogledali, boste videli, kako vam žuga.

Hmm, ja, kako se je zmečkal ?

podirajoča se bajta in avto, ki stoji zraven nje - ti da to kak namig???

Ah dej no z bedastimi vprašanji, ko je bajta gorela in se sesula, je pač kak kos nanj padel. Zaradi tega bi se še hitreje lahko vžgal, če je bil tak kos razžarjen in je prišel v stik z bencinom.

Mal logike je treba tut pokazat, pa mal lastnega razmišljanja. Ne vsega verjet kar povedo v takih oddajah, pa vsega kar pri poročilih povedo tudi ne. neka meja mora bit. Ne verjamem, da so američani čist nedolžni pri 9/11, ampak vseeno ne vem, če bi imel jajca tok ljudi ubit (sicer velja pregovor, da če nega ubiješ je to umor, če jih pa miljon je pa statistika, ampak vseeno...).

Malo mi je pa to čudno, ker ti dve stolnici sta bili potrebni temeljite obnove, kar se danes sicer nikjer ne pove, pa tut tisti zapisi, ki so obstajal so zginli in jih ni več na netu, vendar so kako leto prej govorili o tem, da bodo morali obnoviti dvojčka in da je to ogromen projekt. Ampak zavarovali so ju pa za ogromen znesek kak mesec pred nesrečo, prej pa 3 leta nista bili zavarovana za take primere. Torej je nekdo s to "nesrečo" zelo zelo zaslužil z njima, pa še odpadno železo in jeklo, ki ga je bilo ogromno v teh dveh stavbah se da draqo prodati.

Recimo:


Paprija pa okoli kolk ces?!

Round cylindrical holes in WTC 5/6



Clean vertical cut on the north wing of WTC 4, material on other side of cut is missing



WTC 4 cut being in direct path of the South Tower's north wall



Cars with missing engine blocks



Front of police car toasted while rear is in pristine condition. Plastic red light on top survived



Front of fire truck wilted, where its engine?



Vir:KLIK

Bom prilepil še tole zraven, linkov tk noben ne gleda:


The Director of Public Affairs at the Directed Energy Directorate, Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico says Dr Judy Wood's 9/11 directed energy weapon evidence is "interesting and worthy of further consideration".


Read on...


March 16, 2007: Former Clemson University Professor of Mechanical Engineering Dr Judy Wood files a Request for Correction with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) regarding the 9/11 NIST Report. Dr Wood cites fraud and deception, and shows clear evidence that the World Trade Center was destroyed by directed energy weaponry.

Dr Judy Wood is represented by attorney Jerry Leaphart.

Dr Wood's Request for Correction (RFC) is archived on the US Government's Department of Commerce website in PDF format:

RFC (March 16, 2007):
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandP...

Supplement#1 (March 29, 2007):
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandP...

Supplement#2 (April 20, 2007):
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandP...



April 7, 2007: Dr Wood sends letter to

* The Head of U.S. Air Force Directed Energy Directorate
* The Office of Management and Budget Deputy Director for Management
* The Board of Directors of Directed Energy Professional Society

The main question of this letter: "Are the effects set forth in RFC filed with NIST consistent with the destructive effects that would result from the use of directed energy weapons?"

See here for full letter with additional comments by Jerry Leaphart:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/DEW...



April 27, 2007: Wood and Leaphart are contacted and have telephone conversation with

The Director of Public Affairs
Directed Energy Directorate
Air Force Research Laboratory/DEO-PA
Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico



May 3 2007: Leaphart sends letter to the Director of Public Affairs:
http://drjudywood.com/pdf/070503_letter...



May 4, 2007: Leaphart receives the following FAX from the Director of Public Affairs at the Directed Energy Directorate, Kirtland Air Force Base (emphasis added):

===================================
MESSAGE: I received your fax yesterday and your FedEx package today, and had a chance to review the materials you sent. During our telephone conversation I outlined a variety of directed energies that might have future weapons applications but I'm not aware of any that are mature enough to cause the damage at the World Trade Center. Lasers are the most likely candidates for nearer-term weapons use and, to that enc, we have conducted laboratory tests to evaluate the effects of laser energy on different materials. For the most part, those materials have been metals, not concrete structures. Effects on metals are from the heat generated by an intense beam of coherent light, which cause the metals to weaken and split. Given sufficient heat, metals would melt (become liquids) and, given significantly more heat, could turn to gases. Since we haven't tested concrete I don't know if the effect would be dust. You report phenomena that we cannot explain here, either because we don't have enough data or because the phenomena are not within our area of expertise. While on a personal level I may find Dr Wood's investigation interesting and worthy of further consideration, on a professional level we are unable to devote our limited resources to activities outside of our charter, I wish you success in your endeavor and am available to answer whatever directed energy questions may arise.
===================================

See here for a scan of the original FAX document:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Gar...


Dr Wood's 9/11 directed energy weapon evidence is "interesting and worthy of further consideration"!


--------------------------


June 29, 2007: The Chief of the Management and Organization division at NIST replies to Dr Wood, and states they need more time to respond to her RFC:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIS...

NIST needs **more time** ??

Evo, zdaj sem vam dal materiala da ga lahko v miru pregledate, tudi PREBERETE seveda.

Pa Matev prosim te ne vletavaj z neumnostmi.

kiks!
Bemtis, papir med podiranjem bajte odnese stran lahko tudi kilometre dalec in v zrak. Medtem ko avto na cesti gori in zgori, papir sele na tla pade...

Ampak ok. Sedaj smo presli iz rusenja s pomocjo eksploziva na rusenje s pomocjo nekega skrivnega orozja! We're making progress!

zanimiv kako eni res nočejo odpreti oči
zdej, al se jim jebe za to temo in samo smetijo in provocirajo ostale, al pa so dejansko "zabetonirani" v svojih pogledih in jim ni pomoči

zanimivo, le zakaj so se ukvarjali z razstrelivi, če pa so načrtovali in uporabili neko über energijsko orožje.

Sam bi se splačal pobirat tale papir. Kakšne "coorporate secrets" so ble gor zapisane.... Uf, uf... =)

IMO imate vsi prav. Glavni "blame" je na US of A (administraciji), izvajalci so bili pa pač teroristi. Tud teroristi so lahko v službi vlade "napadene" države. Ane?

A smo vsi happy? Vsak dobi del svoje resnice in to je to?

Pacific blue, si že kdaj hodil po orenk zaprašeni makadamski cesti? Kaj se zgodi, ko stopiš v tisti prah?

Ali pa če si že kdaj s kako macolo tolkel po betonu? Kaj se zgodi pod macolo, ko udari na beton?


Ja, prah se dvigne in to precej. Če imaš pa mnogo ton, ki pritisne na beton, se dvigne pa tudi mnogo ton prahu. Ne rabiš nobenega razstreliva ali ultramodernega orožja - beton gre sam v prah.

Oni se zelo radi ukvarjajo z magijo....

kdo?
lepo bi bilo ce bi napisal po imenih...

Ma ko vas je**.

Z vašo trmoglavostjo res ne bomo kam prišli.
Tako da jaz se umikam, nočem biti zadnji..torej najbolj neumen..ali kako že gre on pregovor.

Zakaj bi nas pa diskreditiralo, da nismo prej omenili DEW? Hja fant, poglej kake probleme imaš že z dojemanjem te resnice, da so bila podtaknjena eksploziva..treba v takih situacijah po korakih.

Kje pa je kak dokaz o tem? Eksploziva niso nikjer našli, niti ostankov eksploziva ne. Očitno imaš ti probleme z dojemanjem.

>če bi že bilo tako bi se zrak odvajal skozi razna odprta okna in seveda vhodna vrata,

ja saj se je
a nisi videl posnetka

>poleg tega sem pa dal tudi posnetek, kjer se vidi eksplozija na vogalu stavbe in ni nobenega okna zraven

joj
si trd
je že nekje kak plin puščal ali kaj takega
saj se je stoplnica podirala
je tako težko razumeti da ko se zadeva posra da tudi kaj poči med samim rušenjem

Zdejle sem si pogledal film Zeitgeist (ima tudi slo podnapise) in tudi lepo razloži ozadje napada na WTC, pokaže policaje, gasilce, navadne ljudi, ki so slišali silovite explozije par trenutkov preden je avion trčil v WTC. Kdo zna o tem kj povedat?
911 komisija ni razložila zakaj se je podrl stolp 7.
Najmanj 6 teroristov (od 19, ki naj bi ugrabili letala) je še vedno živih.
En ta terorist pilot, ki se je inštruiral pri lokalnem inštruktorju ni znal letet. Je sam inštruktor povedal, da mu ni jasno kako je lahko pilotiral, če je bil totaln antitalent.
Pentagon avion je izpuhtel, baje je inpact blast in vročina upepelila avion, vendar je komisija dejala, da imajo trupla teroristov in so jih identificirali. Nej mi en razloži kako lahko avion izpuhti, človeško tkivo pa preživi? In tudi tukaj so prec začeli zasipavati prizorišče z zemljo.
V ruševinah WTCja so našli en (1) pasport terorista. Večino stvari zgori, vročina pri eksploziji kerozina je taka, da stali jekleno konstrukcijo, pasport pa preživi?

Pa da se vrnem k Zeitgeist-u. Ljudje so najprej častili (po "božje") Sonce. Potem je nekomu priletela misel in je namesto Sonca postavil človeka. In tukaj se začne manipulacija z nami vsemi. Malo fast forwarda in pridemo do odcepitve oz. razglasitve samostojnosti ameriških kolonij. Vojna naj bi bila predvse zato, ker jim je Anglija prepovedala uporabljati svoj denar. Ja, Anglija je imela centralno banko in posojala denar kolonijam. V filmu je velik citatov predsednikov in kasneje senatorjev v zvezi z bančnim kartelom kako so nas zasužnjili.
Vglavnem, ameriška centralna banka ni v lasti države, samo posoja denar državi z obrestmi.
Včasih je bil dolar oz. denar vezan na zlato, danes ni več. Torej vrednost bankovca nima nobene podlage, nima zaledja. Edina stvar, ki sedaj določa vrednst denarja je količina denarja v obtoku. Torej centralna banka določa vrednost denarja. Aja, centralno banko so ustanovili 4 ljudje.

TO je mal obnove, lahk da sm kj falil. Film se dobi na torentih, če koga zanima.
Pa tazadnih 10 min. je pa kr mal skery, ker govori o zdajšnjih, aktualnih zadevah.

USA Military Officers Challenge Official
Account of September 11

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/47john_lea...

Jaz bi vseeno ostal bližje Zemlji :)

''The years since 9/11/01 have given us the time and space to emerge from the hypnotic trance of the shocks of these attacks and to rationally evaluate the existing and new evidence that has become available.''

Richard Gage makes an intelligent and passionate case for a new independent investigation into the so called collapses of all three World Trade buildings. Richard has been a licensed architect for over 20 years and heads ae911truth.org.


''How the Towers Fell'' (2 hours) (University of Manitoba)

http://www.ae911truth.org/flashmov11.htm

Poglej Jure..Miljarde po svetu verjamejo v kar pač verjamejo.Da je človeška neumnost prav tako brezmejna kot vesolje nam je tudi Einsten že povedal.Zato res ni potrebe,da to s takimi komentarji dokazuješ še ti.;)
Ker ti pač ne verjameš v čudeže bom prav z veseljem prisluhnil tvojemu komentarju na tole:

You may remember that after the planes hit the World Trade Center towers--an epic disaster that melted structural steel designed to withstand a Hellish temperature of 2000 degrees Fahrenheit, incinerated both planes’ cockpit recorders and black-box recorders, and vaporized the flesh and bones of nearly 3,000 human beings--the passport of suspected hijacker Mohammed Atta was found intact, in pristine condition, lying on the sidewalk below.

How this miracle occurred has never been explained--but that is the way with miracles, they cannot be explained, only taken on faith.

I should add that there are two other reasons why we should not doubt the reality of this miracle: (1) It was reported as FACT by the authorities and the mainstream media. (2) It is a well known FACT that, in major news events of this kind, miracles routinely occur, the best known example being the discovery of the Magic Bullet--the bullet which, after tearing through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally’s bodies and smashing through Connally’s wrist, emerged in pristine condition--in fact, was in better condition than if it had been fired through a bale of cotton. Thus, there is a precedent for this kind of thing happening. It happened on November 22, 1963, and it happened again on September 11, 2001, when Mohammed Atta’s passport flew out of the fireball without so much as a scorch, or wrinkle, on it and floated down to the sidewalk to be picked up by someone whose attention was not focused on the flaming wreckage raining down from above.

Kaj pa je sploh bilo v zraku? (Mimogrede videl le kakšno minuto tega dokumentarca)