UFO tehnologija

Ej stari ti si ful car.... NOT

zakaj majo američani tolk satelitov za prisluškovanje, ki pošiljajo signale v vesolje ?znanstveniki so prepričani da obstaja življenje na drugih planetih ,kar je samoumevno ,na miljone planetov in če so dobri pogoji, je na njih sigurno življenje še v koranu omenjajo ljudi z drugih planetov,v rimu imajo teleskop v cerkvi in priznavajo, da je lahko življenje na drugih planetih leta 2010 bo nasa lansirala velik satelit, na katerem bo montiran velikanski teleskop, za opazovanje oddaljenih planetov

> manjko velike lune okoli takega planeta

Zakaj je to kakršenkoli faktor za earth-like planet? Velika luna okoli planeta namreč.

zakaj majo američani tolk satelitov za prisluškovanje, ki pošiljajo signale v vesolje ?znanstveniki so prepričani da obstaja življenje na drugih planetih ,kar je samoumevno ,na miljone planetov in če so dobri pogoji, je na njih sigurno življenje

Nekoč je nekdo rekel, če smo sami v vesolju je to ena zelo velika potrata prostora.
So "marsovci" kje? Po moje da? So med nami? Morda, morda ne.
Ampak o teh "marsovčkih" mi vedno razmišljamo kot o nekih super inteligentnih bitjih ki so tisočletja pred nami z tehnologijo. Kaj pa če so komaj v kameni dobi?

nima veze v kašni dobi so ,važno je da so ,in da sigurno nekje so ,sj če ni lune pa tega ,so pa drugi planeti, ki služijo gravitaciji vesolje je tako veliko, da so prepričani da obstaja življenje tudi na drugih planetih ,sj gravitacija deluje na vse planete v vesolju zato je pa najboljši pogon na antigravity

Zakaj imajo američano toliko satelitov za prisluškovanje?

Preprosto - poglej kam so obrnjeni. K Zemlji - ne v vesolje.

Tu je vse razloženo:

Conspiracy Theories

Fascinating New Scientist article (for subscribers only, but there's a copy here) on conspiracy theories, and why we believe them:

So what kind of thought processes contribute to belief in conspiracy theories? A study I carried out in 2002 explored a way of thinking sometimes called “major event - major cause” reasoning. Essentially, people often assume that an event with substantial, significant or wide-ranging consequences is likely to have been caused by something substantial, significant or wide-ranging.

I gave volunteers variations of a newspaper story describing an assassination attempt on a fictitious president. Those who were given the version where the president died were significantly more likely to attribute the event to a conspiracy than those who read the one where the president survived, even though all other aspects of the story were equivalent.

To appreciate why this form of reasoning is seductive, consider the alternative: major events having minor or mundane causes -- for example, the assassination of a president by a single, possibly mentally unstable, gunman, or the death of a princess because of a drunk driver. This presents us with a rather chaotic and unpredictable relationship between cause and effect. Instability makes most of us uncomfortable; we prefer to imagine we live in a predictable, safe world, so in a strange way, some conspiracy theories offer us accounts of events that allow us to retain a sense of safety and predictability.

Other research has examined how the way we search for and evaluate evidence affects our belief systems. Numerous studies have shown that in general, people give greater attention to information that fits with their existing beliefs, a tendency called “confirmation bias”. Reasoning about conspiracy theories follows this pattern, as shown by research I carried out with Marco Cinnirella at the Royal Holloway University of London, which we presented at the British Psychological Society conference in 2005.

The study, which again involved giving volunteers fictional accounts of an assassination attempt, showed that conspiracy believers found new information to be more plausible if it was consistent with their beliefs. Moreover, believers considered that ambiguous or neutral information fitted better with the conspiracy explanation, while non-believers felt it fitted better with the non-conspiracy account. The same piece of evidence can be used by different people to support very different accounts of events.

This fits with the observation that conspiracy theories often mutate over time in light of new or contradicting evidence. So, for instance, if some new information appears to undermine a conspiracy theory, either the plot is changed to make it consistent with the new information, or the theorists question the legitimacy of the new information. Theorists often argue that those who present such information are themselves embroiled in the conspiracy. In fact, because of my research, I have been accused of being secretly in the pay of various western intelligence services (I promise, I haven’t seen a penny).

Lots of good stuff in the article, including instructions on how to create your own conspiracy theory.

Ampak! Kako hudica pa imajo UFO tehnologijo, ce se na Luni niso pristali!??!?

;>

jah, po pričanju očividcev in nekdanjih vpletenih, pravjo ,da je ufo padel dol v roswellu in v mehiki ,katerga so pobral američani ,rekli so pa ,da je bil vremenski balon
Larry King live video-tema ufo,samo nalaga nekam počas

se bolj zanimiv je da en poba iz slovenije pozna pravice predsednika USA za dostop do podatkov. Res zanimivo.

poglejte si larry king live na to temo, link na mojem postu višje,predstavnik vlade, se je skoz norca delal in mel sabo alien igračke ,zakaj se samo oni delajo norca in si izmišljajo smešne zgodbice iz tega ,očitno zavajajo javnost

antonija: eni so informirani drugi so pa aml bl zaplankani

George bush starejši je edini še živeči ki sprot ažurira vseskup, seveda to zato ker je biv neki cajat agent CIA in pa sodelujaoč pri MJ12

Sej bush je za v dom upokojencev sam mora nekako bit na tekocem ce hoce isnkotu drzat glavo nad gladino... Sem pa se vedno fasciniran od kje folku informacije do kje imajo predsedniki drzav dostop. Se zame ne vejo do kje imam dostop, pa tega ne varuje nobena agencija.

Jest ti predlagam, da se skrijes... Ker ce te kdo izsledi na tem forumu... ;>

A niste gledali Enemy of the State? Tudi če piše iz javnih računalnikov, pa priletijo s tistimi črnimi neslišnimi helikopterji in ga ustrelijo z zastrupljeno kroglo... pol pa pravi obdukcijsko poročilo "infarkt".

Zakaj si pa pol sploh se ziv? Al mamo na ST forumu cist tapravega James Bonda ki sicer nima na voljo vseh dragih igrack, nima hudih bejb, ne zna igrat pokera, ve pa vse detajle o ameriskih obvescevalnih agencijah, verjetno celo vec kot rusi in izraelci skupaj.

Ce enkrat ugotovis da je vecina folka neumna/nima pojma, se ti pomojem splaca premislit ce nisi slucajno ti tisti ki nima prav. Al pa reces da je svetovna zarota in si "home free".

zato ker nosim aluminjasto kapo ki odbija EM valovanje....ne morjo me izsledit

Jaz pa mam tisto kapo od onga tipota v Dukes of Hazzard

še novica za vse omejene fizikalce starega kola ki misljo da ne gre nč hitrej od svetlobe........no neki hitrejšga so njadl
http://www.dailytech.com/German+Scienti...

The two scientists say they have now tunneled photons "instantaneously" across a distance of up to one meter. Their conclusion, stated in a recent paper, is that the speed limit of special relativity has been violated. Dr. Nimtz claims quantum tunneling is a little understood process that is "the most important" aspect of quantum physics, one that may be responsible for the computational efficiency of the human brain.

Being able to violate the speed of light would undermine our current understand of space and time, and lead to a number of bizarre effects, such as being able to travel backwards in time.

Ker je v prihodnosti tako fino, da nihče noče nazaj.

Na naslednjem NESTu organizirajte tinfoil hat delavnico.

Ochack:

Zadnji odstavek si pa pozabil qoutat?

''However, Dr. Aephraim Steinberg, from the University of Toronto, disagrees with the findings. He says its all just a matter of interpretation. The "wave packet" of the virtual photon exceeded the speed of light, but no actual information was transmitted that fast. Therefore, according to Steinberg, Einstein's cosmic speed limit remains safe.''

Fake, poglej tukaj:

Okrog druge minutke kjer se vidi kako je miška poletela čez zaslon, svojo podgano skrij nekam v kod in jo ne diraj da te nebo zmotilo.

Ja, res je fake, tukaj se lepo vidi miška na ekranu.

Pa ne samo to, ampak tudi palme naj bi bile čisto identične:
UFO over Haiti - Proof of fake

ta pa zih ni fake, se pa lepo vidi kako se formirajo v kolono in zginejo v onstranstvo

bl je hec kje so kšne priče pa tko pa zakaj je video sam tok dovg, ne vrjamem da bi sam tok mal posnev če smo že skeptiki, en lep primer orginal vide je na prejšnm linku, kjer model še snema pol tud k ni nč vupanje če ker ufo nazaj prleti