NATO in Rusija

Medtem v ta drugi bananarepubljik. Resnica pač ni za plebs. Kaj vam bo resnica, če imate bulšit.



Ampak celo postmodernitsti, ki so "presegli" univerzalnost in univerzalne vrednote in trdijo, da resnice niso absolutne ampak pogojene s skupnostjo, izhajajo iz skupnosti, ne povedo kaj dosti o odnosu med resnico in skupnostjo, torej kaj se zgodi, ko skupnost ostane brez (skupne) resnice. Ali lahko skupnost brez resnice sploh obstane, ali nujno razpade na dve ali več skupnosti / resnic.

Meni se zdi bolj verjetno, da nas bodo fentali razni PR mojstri, ki jih ni sram lagati, ki jim ni problem reči česarkoli za trenutni kratkoročni efekt in niso in se niti ne rabijo trudit biti zadosti brihtni, da bi ostali konsistentni v svojih lažeh, ker se lahko vedno obrnejo na naše strahove in naše udobje in privilegije. Ampak dolgoročno bi morali ostati konsistentni, to dobro vejo religije, ki v to vlagajo velik trud, sicer jim bo to prej ali slej eksplodiralo nazaj v glavo.

Lahko našteješ ljudi, ki sta jih do sedaj zastrupili MI6 in CIA?

Poldi112 je 4. apr 2018 ob 14:04 izjavil:

No, Castrota so že hoteli, samo jim ni uspelo. To ne šteje?

Če bi hotel Castra mrtvega, bi to tudi bil.

Poldi112 je 4. apr 2018 ob 14:23 izjavil:

O, lej ga, pravljičar. A ni mal zgodaj za sanje?

Castro je umrl 2016. Prepozno, ne prezgodaj...

windigo je 4. apr 2018 ob 14:41 izjavil:

638 Ways to kill Castro

Lepo te prosim. Koliko si star?? Tri leta, da verjameš tole...

Pac-Man je 4. apr 2018 ob 15:25 izjavil:

Še kdo?

Operacija Condor.

Drone Assasination Program.

Cervantes je 4. apr 2018 ob 17:33 izjavil:

Ne, CIA nikoli ni hotela ubiti ali ubila nikogar.
Kdor trdi drugače, laže.

Lažeš in zavajaš. Kot vedno.

Cervantes je 4. apr 2018 ob 17:33 izjavil:

Ne, CIA nikoli ni hotela ubiti ali ubila nikogar.
Kdor trdi drugače, laže.

ampak, ampak, .... CIA je good guy, vse k so oni potamanili so si zaslužl.
Še collateral žrtve so si zaslužle, če CIA ne ve pa že žrtve vejo zakaj.

Samuel irelevantna in neargumentirana žalitev incoming 3.2.1...

Pac-Man je 4. apr 2018 ob 13:29 izjavil:

Lahko našteješ ljudi, ki sta jih do sedaj zastrupili MI6 in CIA?

Cia
1951 Pont-Saint-Esprit mass poisoning @ Wikipedia

ZDA vlada
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/gover...

ZDA mornarica
Operation Sea-Spray @ Wikipedia


btw, tale novičuk je nekako čuden (taista zadeva, ki naj bi v 30 sekundah lahko pomorila 500 ljudi), da lahko modela potem še 4 ure hodita po mestu, hčerki se je vid izboljšal, nekdo je zadnje dni dostopal do njenega vk računa.
Ruskemu konzulu dostopa do obeh ne omogočijo.
Vse skupaj se bere kot false flag, ki vsak dan bolj razpada v lažeh.

Upam, da je cilj tega scama res samo zyebat fuzbal v Rusiji.
Sicer smo ga vsi...

windigo je 4. apr 2018 ob 17:10 izjavil:

Pac-Man je 4. apr 2018 ob 15:25 izjavil:

Še kdo?

Operacija Condor.

Drone Assasination Program.

Skripal je bil zastrupljen.

Iščemo specifično zastrupitve.

Cervantes je 4. apr 2018 ob 17:33 izjavil:

Ne, CIA nikoli ni hotela ubiti ali ubila nikogar.
Kdor trdi drugače, laže.

Nisem napisal, da ni nikogar ubila. Ampak zanima me, koga je zastrupila.

Se je pa pred leti zgodila neko malo čiščenje hiše in reforma.

Church Committee @ Wikipedia

The Church Committee was the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, a U.S. Senate committee chaired by Idaho Senator Frank Church (D-ID) in 1975. The committee investigated abuses by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The committee was part of a series of investigations into intelligence abuses during the mid-1970s, including the Watergate Hearings, the Rockefeller Commission, and the Pike Committee. One result of the committee's efforts was the establishment of the permanent U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

nsa_ag3nt je 4. apr 2018 ob 19:18 izjavil:

Spet nikogar ciljno eliminiranega.

Ruski dopisnik za Telegraph.

https://twitter.com/ASLuhn/status/98152...

The foreign ministry spokeswoman is currently arguing that an 1885 article by Friedrich Engels accusing Russia of involvement in London bombings proves the Skripal poisoning is part of an anti-Russian smear campaign

More evidence the UK probably poisoned Skripal, according to the Russian foreign ministry: In 1867, Jules Verne wrote in the novel In Search of the Castaways that British colonists killed indigenous Australians with...POISON!

nsa_ag3nt je 4. apr 2018 ob 19:18 izjavil:

btw, tale novičuk je nekako čuden (taista zadeva, ki naj bi v 30 sekundah lahko pomorila 500 ljudi)

Leta 2004 je razlivanje divodikovega (I) oksida pobilo četrt milijona ljudi, večinoma v Indoneziji.


Posledice razlivanja divodikovega (I) oksida v provinci Banda Aceh, 2004.

Kljub temu lahko ljudje dobro toleriramo manjše količine te smrtno nevarne kemične substance in jo pogosto dodajamo hrani, zdravilom ...

Organofosfati in številni drugi bojni strupi so olja, ne plini. Na stotine pobije kot aerosol (majhne kapljice, suspendirane v zraku), dokler je nekje namazan in tega ne primeš z roko ali kakšnim drugim deloma telesa. Za razliko od filmov učinek ne bo takojšen, saj se mora strup raztopiti v koži. Ker gre za nepolarne interakcije in pasivno difuzijo to lahko traja ure in ure preden se razvijejo simptomi. Kot aerosol ima zadeva bolj filmski učinek. Če vlečeš življenjske odločitve na podlagi tega, kar vidiš v filmih in tretjerazrednih nanizankah (tu prednjači CSI) imam zate nekaj res ugodnih poslovnih ponudb, začneva lahko z mostom čez Ščavnico ...

Če pustimo politiko USA-RF-GB in Skripal ob strani, če odločitev DE čisto gospodarske narave! Zakaj bi kupovali dražji USA plin, namesto Ruskega?! Preko političnih pritiskov skušajo USA sforsirati prodajo svojega dražjega plina DE in EU!

Smrekar1 je 5. apr 2018 ob 13:20 izjavil:

fikus_ je 5. apr 2018 ob 12:46 izjavil:

Zakaj bi kupovali dražji USA plin, namesto Ruskega?!

Ameriški plin ima ceno v evrih (ali dolarjih), ruski v truplih. Meni se zdi to dovolj dober razlog.

Kronski dokaz, da se modelu rola.

fikus_ je 5. apr 2018 ob 12:46 izjavil:

Če pustimo politiko USA-RF-GB in Skripal ob strani, če odločitev DE čisto gospodarske narave! Zakaj bi kupovali dražji USA plin, namesto Ruskega?! Preko političnih pritiskov skušajo USA sforsirati prodajo svojega dražjega plina DE in EU!

Ker je ruski plin cenejši samo, če imaš dostop do alternative ali pa si Rusija s tem kupuje geopolitične koristi.



Republikanka malo spitballa.

https://twitter.com/CheriJacobus/status...

+ Wondering if perhaps Stone was involved in orchestrating the email hackings and then having the emails "laundered" through WikiLeaks.
https://twitter.com/CNNPolitics/status/...

Roger Stone, on the day he sent an email claiming he dined with Julian Assange, also predicted that “devastating” WikiLeaks documents about the Clinton Foundation would be disclosed

+ So it's not a stretch then to see how Stone and Trump could simply have arranged for anyone they thought was a threat to be hacked so that they could use personal info against that person.

- Is Stone actually smart enough to manage that? Serious question (maybe I'm underestimating him b/c he always looks so insane).

+ He's not smart enough to avoid being caught. Old timey criminal like "Red" in Shawshank Redemption. He can operate in his little pre-Trump POTUS world but on the outside (when this s**t gets real) he's in over his head. That Mueller hasn't yet talked to him is all u need to know.

+ Mueller also hasn't interviewed Lewandowski. Two key players. saved for last. If they aren't scared half to death then they are as stupid as I suspected they are. Especially Lewandowski.

Medtem, ko eni MAGAjo in se drugi igrajo z raketami in bombami, tretji

Mr.B je 5. apr 2018 ob 16:07 izjavil:

When China wants to dominate the world, they send engineers and money to the country and says hey, let's build some roads...

... and then they extend you the credit saying no worries until you are actually unable to pay it back and the country is theirs.

Okoli Indije tole ne bo šlo.

Samuel je 5. apr 2018 ob 17:13 izjavil:

Okoli Indije tole ne bo šlo.

Jp oboji grejo okoli ameriskega interesa

Chabahar port is an unlikely litmus test for the US in Iran

Iran signs deal with China to connect key port to rail network

Have fun.

https://slo-tech.com/forum/t720365/p587...

In a study published this month, the CGD identified 14 countries in addition to Djibouti where planned Chinese lending to existing Belt and Road projects threatens to cause financial "distress", with seven where it is likely to push the local economy to the brink of a debt crisis.

The most vulnerable include the Indian Ocean archipelago of the Maldives

...

Other overextended countries include Tajikistan, the Kyrgyz Republic and Mongolia (...) And then there is Pakistan, where China is lending some US$50 billion at market rates to finance a range of ambitious infrastructure projects, few of which stand any chance of generating sufficient cash in the near to medium term to cover the cost of their interest payments.

...

The end result will be either a sovereign default, with all its attendant economic miseries, or debt restructuring. This too is a troubling prospect. China has not signed up to the Paris club of international creditors, whose rules govern best practice in debt restructurings. And in recent years, Beijing has exacted a heavy price from borrowers looking to restructure. In 2011 China demanded Tajikistan give up thousands of square kilometres of territory in return for a debt write-off. And in 2017 China scored a debt-for-equity swap with Sri Lanka that saw it walk away with a 99-year lease on the strategically located port of Hambantota.

Pac-Man je 5. apr 2018 ob 18:08 izjavil:

Have fun.

https://slo-tech.com/forum/t720365/p587...

In a study published this month, the CGD identified 14 countries in addition to Djibouti where planned Chinese lending to existing Belt and Road projects threatens to cause financial "distress", with seven where it is likely to push the local economy to the brink of a debt crisis.

The most vulnerable include the Indian Ocean archipelago of the Maldives

...

Other overextended countries include Tajikistan, the Kyrgyz Republic and Mongolia (...) And then there is Pakistan, where China is lending some US$50 billion at market rates to finance a range of ambitious infrastructure projects, few of which stand any chance of generating sufficient cash in the near to medium term to cover the cost of their interest payments.

...

The end result will be either a sovereign default, with all its attendant economic miseries, or debt restructuring. This too is a troubling prospect. China has not signed up to the Paris club of international creditors, whose rules govern best practice in debt restructurings. And in recent years, Beijing has exacted a heavy price from borrowers looking to restructure. In 2011 China demanded Tajikistan give up thousands of square kilometres of territory in return for a debt write-off. And in 2017 China scored a debt-for-equity swap with Sri Lanka that saw it walk away with a 99-year lease on the strategically located port of Hambantota.

Vpraš se, kdo bo dal Sloveniji za obnovo železnice ?
Da samo če prodaš DB, potem imaš pa le še kitajsko, pa še to pod ?, glede na to da bo šla železnica mimo slovenije, ne glede kako obračaš zemljevid.
Lahko tudi obrneš, katera od teh omenjenih držav je spsosbna sama modernizirat in kasirt.

Pac-Man je 5. apr 2018 ob 18:18 izjavil:

Kako malo je potrebno, da nekateri na okopih branijo globalizacijo. Eno tako precej gnilo verzijo le-te.

Samo odstraniš ZDA.

ZDA je za globalizacijo, samo so jo vsi vključujoč EU prehiteli. Tudi izstopili so iz NAFTA sporazuma, ker so nekonkurenčni. Sedaj so pa kao Kitajci krivi, kot na primer...
Poštat :
But before you scoff and think this is just another example of Beijing disrupting fair trade and tilting the tables in support of their domestic producers, please realize that you’ve pegged the wrong government to be the recipient of your complaints. These super low shipping rates are being subsidized by the U.S. Postal Service. Yes, the United States and, in a roundabout way, the U.S. taxpayer is footing the bill so that Chinese merchants can ship their products to the USA for dirt cheap, essentially losing millions to support a dynamic where domestic American businesses are being undercut by foreign merchants who are immune to any and all intellectual property and consumer safety laws.

Ko gvorimo o cesti,
No iz teherana gre cesta tudi v Sirijo, so jo pa zaradi emeričanov, no začeli graditi malo višje, pač počasi bo ameriko skrbela le dostava z ladjami do amerike, ostalo bo šlo kar z železnico, južno, to irana ali severno, ampak tudi indijska se bo povezala na kitajsko, ker druge tako ne bo imela....

Pac-Man je 5. apr 2018 ob 18:38 izjavil:

Danes ima preveč ljudi preveč časa.

https://twitter.com/PaperMissiles/statu...

Behold: the Russian nuclear-powered #Burevestnik cruise missile, the latest in Russian Small Modular Reactor (#SMR) technology, powering us all the way to Armageddon. I'd say get on the bandwagon, but it, too, is likely contaminated or vaporized.

https://twitter.com/PaperMissiles/statu...

I would have awarded Tom Rogan the General Tommy Ray Franks "Dumbest F--king Thing" award last week, but this week it goes to these paragraphs from a Russian story on the #Burevestnik #cruisemissile, at vesti.ru

In the Pentagon, our rocket has been given its own name: "the unstoppable." Bypassing missile defenses, it can move on absolutely any trajectory. To accomplish this task, the missile is equipped with a small nuclear reactor. And in this, Russian engineers anticipated it all: such a missile defense system does not actually exist now[!] The analogue of the "#Burevestnik" is the American Tomahawk with the only difference being that the maximum range of the Tomahawk is just 2,5 thousand kilometers. The range of our "#Burevestnik" is unlimited in the literal meaning of the word: It is a cruise missile capable of reaching a target [after flying for] several days in a row. There are no analogues for this in the world.

###
That's because almost everyone on the planet isn't dumb enough to strap a few hundred kilotons of nuclear yield on a nuclear reactor and fly it around the world for days; let alone using GLONASS you homicidal pillocks!

In kaj je to zaen revež Thomas Moore, ki ima komaj 209 sledilcev na Twiterju ?