Irak ll. Mogoče se bo pa komu posvetilo :)

Pa še tole..
Vir: WTC


View of a Military Expert:
Why the Towers of the World Trade Center collapsed
The airplanes did not a have true effect on the destruction of towers; they were needed to give an excuse for odd Orwellian wars at the same time when the USA is turned into a police nation, like the German Third Reich, to some extent. The towers took the impacts of crushing Boeing 767's. The towers were originally built to take impacts of Boeing 707's, which are approximately of the same size and was widely used in the 1970's.
Fires that kindled from the fuel in the planes were too shortlasting and weak to be able to severely damage the structure of the skyscrapers. Even in the extreme situation, the heat from a kerosene fire cannot threat the durability of a steel trunk. With the temperature of carbohydrate fires that reaches only 825 °C (approx. 1517 °F) steel weakens at 800 °C (approx. 1470 °F) and melts at 1585 °C (approx. 2890 °F). In the skyscrapers of the WTC the surroundings were not at all ideal as there were far too many steel columns and they led heat away from the burning area. WTC 1 burned for 102 minutes and WTC 2 for 56 minutes only. A fire burning much longer, from 10 to 20 hours, could slowly increase the burning temperature down to perhaps 1100 °C (approx. 2010 °F). Provided there is more substance to burn, such a fire will damage concrete and irons, but not severely heavy steel constructions.

Lahko se vprašamo, kdo je od teh napadov imel največ profita? Sadam? Talibani? /bin/laden? Ponavadi se vse začne in konča pri denarju. Kdo je dal put opcije ravno na prave letalske firme par dni prej?

Uradna zgodba je tukaj conspiracy theory, v tem je problem. Na ta dan je vse magično odpovedalo. Debate, ali je rumen curek, ki je tekel ob zgradbi pravega odtenka rumene da bi lahko bil termit, so tukaj nepomembne, ker jim ne moremo priti do dna. Look at the big picture.

EDIT: words missing

Hmm, jaz se ponavadi opravicim, ce napisem dvojni post - vcasih se mi enostavno zdi potrebno. 7 zaporednih postov po moje se nikoli nisem videl.

Uau!

EDIT: Tole sem zacel pisati, preden sta bila zgoraj odgovora uporabnikov Sago in perfect. Namenjeno je bilo seveda PacificBlueu in malce moderatorjem.

Pa hvala za to temo. Res. Sem rabil nekaj takega za prebirat danes.

Da pa ne bom cisto offtopic, bi postavil dolgoletnemu raziskovalcu paranormalnih pojavov in svetovnih zarot (PacificBLue aka Ramzes baje) vprasanje, zakaj kopira tekste nekredibilnih virov in posnetke iz Youtube, ko pa trdi, da si je ze ustvaril jasno predstavo o vsem (v desetih letih bi pa nasel ze tudi kaj kredibilnega)? Zakaj lahko na dolgo in siroko na forumu govori o svetovnih zarotah - in se mu ocitno vsaj v zadnjih nekaj dneh ni nic zgodilo - ampak se tako blazno boji povracila, ce bi povedal tisto nekaj, "kar samo on ve"?

Hvala za odgovore.

Če že kdo želi kaj ''konspirativnega'' načet, naj prvo poizkusi pri bolj oprijemljivih stvareh.
Iluminati to niso..WTC pa je..

Torej, naj mi nikdo pove zakaj hudica bi poleg obeh stolpnic podrli se WTC7. Res me zanima.

Dobro prašanje BigWhale. V tej bajti so bile baje tudi neke expoziture FBI CIE in še neki drugi ''organi''
Baje so se tam hranili tudi fajli ENRON-a (če poznaš primer).V tej bajti je blo tudi zaklonišče v katerga so povabli župana
ob dogodku 9. 11. Baje se ga ni hotel poslužit.Jaz se ga tudi nebi..:)
Pa še to je zanimivo pod katero komando so bili ti kompleksi.Ampak to vam pa ne povem.
Zakaj bi vam pa dajal potuho :)

Tole bi pa posetil vsem Tomažkom.Prav tak text sem nekako hotel sam napisat tukaj
pa sem na netu naletu na podobnega.
Super,mi nebo treba pisat..:)
Sicer se bolj nanaša na njegov članek (zgoraj link)..ampak bo dober tudi na splošno

Evo ga:


People might comment on this article by calling it a conspiracy theory. This is their usual way of dismissing the facts. I ask you, where exactly is there “theory” on this page? What elements of this article are in dispute? This is not a theory, this article poses questions that have not been answered and the people who call the results of the independent 9/11 research community “conspiracy theories” have yet to qualify their assertion. You can not simply call something a “theory” just because you have not looked closely enough to see the facts that have been presented. If you call this a theory you are in denial. Very simply put, you can not debate this issue. Many people will dismiss this, as they do all evidence that goes against what they want to believe, yet when asked what their criteria is for discerning between theory and fact, they will not have a logical answer. This is not theory and neither are the facts that have been brought to light by the many people involved in the legitimate independent 9/11 research community.

ajnštajn je reku da je imagination more important kot knowledge
kdo mislš da ma bolj prov ajnštajn al edison

Pa še tole ti mimo grede povem.Meni je tole zabava.
Moram pač z volkovi tulit.Če bi mi šlo pa za kaj več
bi si pa kak drug forum izbral.
Ti si pa kakšnega Gargamela najdi pa se z njim heci.

Azrael
Pozabil sem ti tole pripet za uvod.
http://www.leyada.jlm.k12.il/proj/edsnt...
Domačo nalogo pa sam nared.