AMD RX Serije

D3m0r4l1z3d je 24. apr 2017 ob 14:02 izjavil:

Ti tako misliš, to je pa vse.

D3m0r4l1z3d je 24. apr 2017 ob 18:03 izjavil:

Slonic, nič ti tile yt ne pomagajo. V 2 igrah povede ostalo pa krš, navita do amena, ti si sanjal o 1070 ekvivalentu a končno 1060 ujame. Koliko še misliš vztrajati? Do Navi mogoče.

As for the competitive landscape then, AMD's situation has improved, though I fear by not enough. Across the full spread of games in our benchmark suite, the RX 580 and GTX 1060 6GB change lead a few different times, so the RX 580 is able to best NVIDIA's best in absolute performance in the right games. The problem for AMD is that those games appear to be too few; as a result the RX 580 trails the GTX 1060 by an average of 7% at both 1080p and 1440p. AMD has narrowed the gap somewhat - this was an 11% deficit with the RX 480 - but not by enough. And coupled with AMD's worse power efficiency, this puts AMD in a tough spot. The biggest challenge right now is that GTX 1060 prices have come down to the same $229 spot just in time for the RX 500 series launch, so AMD doesn't have a consistent price advantage. That's the one thing AMD can change, and it's likely to be where they need to look next.

This clock increase results by a 6% performance uplift over the RX 480 when averaged over our benchmarking suite at 1080p resolution, which is the recommended resolution for this card. NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is 5% behind, and the GTX 1060 3 GB is 15% slower. NVIDIA's next-fastest SKU is the GTX 1070, which is around 25% faster than the Sapphire RX 580.

In the context of its modern contemporaries, though, Radeon RX 580 helps make up some of GCN's lost ground against GeForce GTX 1060 6GB in the DirectX 11-based apps where it trailed previously, and extends AMD's lead in a growing list of DX12 titles. That means you get playable performance at 2560x1440 using the highest quality settings. Or dial back to 1920x1080 and add anti-aliasing.

The RX 580 was a notch faster compared to the RX 480, but really a bit all over the place; fast in fill-rate limited games, a little less with GPU stringent ones but overall you are looking at a product that still competes with the GeForce GTX 1060, 970 and Radeon 380 series. Our 8GB model is often in performance bracket of the Radeon R9 390 series as well. Overall though any RX580 8GB is an excellent choice for 1080p and even 1440p gaming.

D3m je 24. apr 2017 ob 21:20 izjavil:

Anandtech bo posodobil igre šele pri testu Vege.

m0LN4r je 25. apr 2017 ob 09:12 izjavil:

AMD SSD in AMD RAM ze mamo - je ze kdo sprobal kok boosta prinese en tak AMD Combo z Ryzenom ?

m0LN4r je 25. apr 2017 ob 09:20 izjavil:

Ah jaz AMDjasem vec ne zaupam tej reklami, smo ze veliko reklame dali skozi.
Se spomnim kako so ptickice tukaj pele razne finte: HBM APU, HSA, TrueAudio, LiquidVR ipd. pa se po enem letu vec ne pogovarjamo o tem. Isto se izogibamo debati o "4GB HBM is future" debati. Ze od 2015 se vlece, Mantle/DX12/Vulkan zgodba, pa je se vedno vseskupi bogo... So bli userji, ki so te pojme pisali v vsak drugi post. Isto smo morali poslusat celo leto o HBM, ker bo Fury X extra varcna in hladna, na koncu pa meh. Povozeno s strani GDDR5, kot v porabi in performancu.

Ideje od AMDja so vedno bile fensi, ampak dlje od beta izvedbe niso prisli.

Mislim no, sej lepo zgleda ta slikca. AMPAK ponavadi se izkaze vse to za meh in pol ni res.

Isto se spomnimo izjav, da 290x ne porabi veliko, na to pa AMD naredil slajd z 290x in Fiji na katerem kazejo kak potratna je bila 290 serija lol.
Zdej si se morajo izmislit dober marketing za Freesync 2, ker so za Freesync govoril, da je future in boljsi od G-Sync. Cemu potem F2 ;)

GDDR5 ni boljši od HBM pa se lahko na tripalnice postaviš. :)

Grey je 25. apr 2017 ob 09:31 izjavil:

Sej fora ni v tem HBMu. Vsi tile Radeoni in Fury do zdaj od 200 serije naprej so bili "paving the road to Vega/Navi". Vedno so bili dovolj konkurenčni da so se prodajali, kar je glavno. Big Bang pride pa sedaj. Novica tam novica tu, pa sestaviš celotno sliko, kaj se gredo.

AMD-ja ker so kao lagali. Ko pa potegneš črto pa vidiš, da dejansko niso nikoli.

RejZoR je 25. apr 2017 ob 09:37 izjavil:

Folk skeptičen okol vsega iz AMD-ja ker so kao lagali. Ko pa potegneš črto pa vidiš, da dejansko niso nikoli. Polaris, torej RX480 je bil točno vse kar so govorili da bo. Power target so mal zasral, ampak je bil prej glitch kot pa nekaj resnega, sploh ker so kasneje zadeva enostavno zrihtali z driverjem. Pač niso pričakoval tak astronomski outrage čez nekaj tolk trivialnega. Whatever. Moving on to Ryzen, again, čist nikjer niso nič lagal. Zadeva je prinesla točno tisto kar so obljubili. 16 nitni procesor za 500-600€, ki v 90% primerov konkurira 1200€ 6900k. Seveda imaš debilen folk, ki se ti bo obešal na preostalih 10% in čist ignoriral razliko v ceni, but again, whatever, niso debili kr tko.
Folk ima kr ene neumne predsodke okoli AMD-ja čeprav vedno dostavijo točno tisto kar rečejo (+- tipične PR bedarije, ki jih delajo VSI brez izjeme).