Nemci pomagajo Rusom obiti Ukrajino ?

D3m je 22. sep 2015 ob 11:52 izjavil:

Računice se lahko jutri spremenijo.

Pa si sploh prebral kaj si linkal. Tuliš o plinski cevi linkaš pa probleme Savdijcev in o njihovem vzdrževanju "luksuza" in porabi nafte + dodatnem zaslužku.

Brane22 je 22. sep 2015 ob 11:58 izjavil:

- transport elektrike ni tako poceni kot transport ogljikovodikov (na prenešeno kWh)
- s tem preneseš svojo odvisnot z Rusije & Co. na Tunizijo & Co.
- ogljikovodike hraniš veliko lažje in ceneje od štroma
- kako poceni bo tam zemlja, enkrat ko se tovrstna področja zbudijo in odgovorijo na tržne pritiske ?

Brane22 je 22. sep 2015 ob 12:02 izjavil:

In kaj bo ko se doli spuntajo zaradi izkoriščevalskega zahoda in presekajo kabl ?

Sledi kaj - bombardiranje folka med solarpaneli ?

Cene pravoza štroma maš na vsakem računu. Enako je s ceno prevoza kurilca.

Obe dajeta dobro osnovo vsaj za red velikosti stroškov.

Smrekar1 je 22. sep 2015 ob 13:10 izjavil:

Malo matematike za našega ljubega Braneta:
6 > 1

Smrekar1 je 22. sep 2015 ob 11:58 izjavil:

Ni fora v tem zakaj savdijci gradijo sončne elektrarne. Fora je v tem, da so očitno ugotovili, da jim je to za njihove potrebe cenovno najboljša odločitev. Kako tudi ne, saj imajo ogromno sonca in sicer neuporabne, prazne puščave.

Smrekar1 je 23. sep 2015 ob 07:14 izjavil:

Gavran je 22. sep 2015 ob 17:51 izjavil:

Površina ne more biti katerakoli - med enim in drugim jezerom mora biti čim manjša horizontalna razdalja in istčasno čim večja višinska razlika. Sedaj pa najdi prostor za obe jezeri. Tisti statistični promili površine so povsem neuporabni.

Od kje ti pa ideja, da narediš samo eno tako elektrarno? Račuamo za celoto, ker je tako lažje. V realnosti pa jih narediš veliko po celi državi. Za manjša jezera je več kot dovolj prostora.

Druga možnost so res veliki posegi v prostor, kjer bi žrtvovali kakšno goro ali dve na robu Ljubljanske kotline. Pri Preddvoru, denimo, bi dobili 500 m višinske razlike na razdaliji manj kot 2 km. Takih in podobnih lokacij je še kar nekaj.

D3m je 23. sep 2015 ob 08:34 izjavil:

Boš moral dobiti soglasje za tako prostorsko uničevalni projekt.

jest10 je 23. sep 2015 ob 10:38 izjavil:

Iz riti vleče prfliknjene ideje, samo da bi zameglil dejstvo, da Evropa potrebuje ruski plin.

jest10 je 23. sep 2015 ob 11:05 izjavil:

Pravljice še nikoli niso bile dejstva.

Smrekar1 je 23. sep 2015 ob 10:59 izjavil:

D3m je 23. sep 2015 ob 08:34 izjavil:

Boš moral dobiti soglasje za tako prostorsko uničevalni projekt.

Ma dej, a res?

Tudi za novo jedrsko elektrarno boš moral dobit soglasje. Pa za vsako drugo stvar tudi.

Jaz rad žrtvujem en hrib za boljšo atmosfero in bistveno zmanjšanje človekovega vpliva na okolje in podnebje. Zraven še drastično zmanjšamo mahinacije držav, ki imajo zaradi geografske sreče neprimerno visok vpliv. To je pomemben korak naprej pri razvoju človeštva.

jest10 je 23. sep 2015 ob 10:38 izjavil:

Iz riti vleče prfliknjene ideje, samo da bi zameglil dejstvo, da Evropa potrebuje ruski plin.

Neodvisnost od ruskega plina je nekaj, kar bo Evropa nekoč v vsakem primeru potrebovala. Zaloge niso neomejene, poleg tega je vprašanje koliko še lahko uporabljamo atmosfero kot greznico za vse kar pri tem nastaja. Tehnološke rešitve so že tu, ekonomsko so na meji, ko postajajo konkurenčne plinu.
Politično pa je plin tako ali tako že zdavnaj predrag.

Kar zavračaj dejstva, prihodnosti tako ali tako ne boš spremenil

Pri zdajšnji proizvodnji imajo zalog še za 50 let

ekonvencionalne zaloge nafte iz skrilavcev, ki so pri tistih cenah več kot dovolj dobičkonosni in zdaj garantirajo najvišjo ceno nafte pri okoli 70 dolarjih za sod.

Tudi za novo jedrsko elektrarno boš moral dobit soglasje. Pa za vsako drugo stvar tudi.

Russian gas giant OAO Gazprom's Nord Stream 2 may hurt the company's commercial and financial performance. According to a report from credit ratings agency Fitch, Gazprom may face difficulties in financing the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

"The original Nord Stream was funded by project finance. We believe raising multi-billion dollar project financing for Nord Stream 2 in the capital markets would probably be much harder now. This is because Western sanctions have significantly hindered international funding to Russian corporates, even those not directly sanctioned," Fitch said.

...

Over the last couple of years Nord Stream I has been operating at only around 55% capacity because European authorities have restricted Gazprom's usage of the OPAL pipeline, which carries Nord Stream's gas on into Germany. "A solution to this limitation, imposed to ease third-party access to the pipeline, would be necessary if the Nord Stream II's 55bcm capacity is to be fully used," Edelson said.

There is a general belief that such projects as the extension of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline cannot be blocked. However, this is not true. Nord Stream functions because Europe agrees on discretion in the interpretation of EU law and this is a practice that should be abandoned.

...However, according to an unpublished analysis prepared for the Polish government in 2011, the third energy package, which regulates the EU’s energy market, is applicable also in territorial waters of member states. This would suggest that the Nord Stream gas pipeline, which runs under the Baltic Sea from Vyborg (Russia) to Greifswald (Germany), has been erroneously excluded from the third energy package’s jurisdiction. This is supported by a number of arguments presented in the analysis.

First and foremost the analysis points to several recent judicial decisions by international courts which have led to a tendency for the expansion of supranational legal systems, especially in cases which do not imply a territorial component. The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms is an example of such extra-territorial treatment of EU law. In case law it is justified by the guarantee function of provisions, which means that the law must exactly specify as to what is prohibited so that it would be clear that anything else is acceptable.

...

The European Commission may take action regarding an infringement of Treaty obligations against countries where import-gas pipelines are located and which, due to inactivity or active administration support, have led to a situation where EU law is not being applied even though it should be subject to EU jurisdiction. Thereby, the complaint against these states may be addressed in the European Court of Justice.

The European Commission may take action on the same subject against countries that are financially involved in the construction of import gas pipelines on the territory of which EU law is not being followed.

Poland and/or any other EU member state may file a complaint to the European Commission regarding an infringement of the Treaty obligations by these countries. After consideration of any claims by the European Commission, Poland may submit the issue to the Court of Justice.

The Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) may submit recommendations for taking appropriate actions regarding imposing sanctions to the regulatory organs of the countries on the territory of which gas pipelines are located.

In the analysis we find specific legal bases; for example: Art. 258 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Art. 258 TFEU, Art. 259 TFEU and Art. 4 (b) of the Regulation 713/2009/EC.

Mr.B je 23. sep 2015 ob 12:33 izjavil:

Tako da prosim deset lokaciji, primernih za zajezitev in implementacijo teh elektraren, ter tisti pocent gozdov, ki imajo pogled na jug in imajo vsaj 8 ur na dan sonce, ki jih boš posekal, tako da boš imel občutek.

Mr.B je 24. sep 2015 ob 08:19 izjavil:

bom pisal počasi, pa povej ti nekaj primernih lokacij v sloveniji kjer boš to lepo gradil. Prosim ne začeti , se bo potrebno žrtvovati, pa bomo zajezili triglavska jezera. KEr razen "lako čemo" nisi podal ama nič.

D3m je 24. sep 2015 ob 08:42 izjavil:

smrekar1 preko trupel. Ni kaj.