» »

K8: Athlon64, AthlonFX, Opteron

K8: Athlon64, AthlonFX, Opteron

««
8 / 16
»»

Zheegec ::

"božja zapoved pravi; <Spoštuj očeta in mater>,
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014

Zheegec ::

"božja zapoved pravi; <Spoštuj očeta in mater>,
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014

MEDENA ::

Čemu je AMD naredil sploh Socket 754? Če bo konec leta prešel na 939 totalno ?

Nekaj uporabnega:

The Technical bit:

At the end of the CPU number there will be a code, first a number and then two letters, they can be translated like this:

The 'OPN-suffix' will tell you the type/revision of the core:
'AP' - > Clawhammer(model 4), rev. C0
'AR' -> Clawhammer(model 4), rev. CG
'AX' -> Newcastle(model C), rev. CG(ALL Newcastles are rev CG)

The figure in red denotes the L2-cache size:
'3' = 256KB (Sonora)
'4' = 512KB (Newcastle, Winchester, Clawhammer)
'5' = 1MB (Clawhammer, San Diego)

Examples:

'ADA3000AEP4AP' - 512KB L2-cache, C0-rev. Clawhammer
'ADA3000AEP4AX' - 512KB L2-cache, Newcastle (ALL CG)

'ADA3200AEP5AP' - 1MB L2-cache, C0-rev. Clawhammer
'ADA3000AEP4AX' - 512KB L2-cache, Newcastle (ALL CG)

Source: AMD Forums.

For more technical based info, click here.

You'll want to have the CG-rev, this has a revised memory controller and OCes a lot better then the C0.

Watch out! 64 mobiles aren't like the Bartons, they are actually half locked, only downward multi's are adjustable! There are very low power mobiles planned for Sct754, all the way down to 25W although these will be 32bit. A 35W 3400 is planned and even though that will be expensive it will defenitely become an OCers choice, looking at the low output and high multiplier. Currently the 64m's have a lot of compatibility problems, it's not very recommendable to get them untill this is fixed!

Now please don't confuse the sockets anymore because it is very annoying to keep saying 754 doesn't support DC...


For the nutheads that like to bury their heads in codes and stuff, this is interesting, not n00b proof at all though:

A64 CPU Models, OPN code, PR/frequency rating

Desktop A64 939
3500+: ADA3500DEP4AW 1.5V (CG rev, FF0h) - "NewCastle 939", 512 KB L2, 2.2 GHz, x11
3800+: ADA3800DEP4AW 1.5V (CG rev, FF0h) - "NewCastle 939", 512 KB L2, 2.4 GHz, x12

Desktop A64 754
2800+: ADA2800AEP4AP 1.5V (CO rev, F48h) - ClawHammer, 512 KB L2, 1.8 GHz, x9 (512 KB L2 "disabled")
3000+: ADA3000AEP4AP 1.5V (CO rev, F48h) - ClawHammer, 512 KB L2, 2.0 GHz, x10 (512 KB L2 "disabled")
3200+: ADA3200AEP5AP 1.5V (CO rev, F48h) - ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.0 GHz, x10
3400+: ADA3400AEP5AP 1.5V (CO rev, F48h) - ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.2 GHz, x11
3000+: ADA3000AEP4AR 1.5V (CG rev, F4Ah) - ClawHammer, 512 KB L2, 2.0 GHz, x10 (512 KB L2 "disabled")
3200+: ADA3200AEP5AR 1.5V (CG rev, F4Ah) - ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.0 GHz, x10
3400+: ADA3400AEP5AR 1.5V (CG rev, F4Ah) - ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.2 GHz, x11
3700+: ADA3700AEP5AR 1.5V (CG rev, F4Ah) - ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.4 GHz, x12

2800+: ADA2800AEP4AX 1.5V (CG rev, FC0h) - NewCastle, 512 KB L2, 1.8 GHz, x9
3000+: ADA3000AEP4AX 1.5V (CG rev, FC0h) - NewCastle, 512 KB L2, 2.0 GHz, x10
3200+: ADA3200AEP4AX 1.5V (CG rev, FC0h) - NewCastle, 512 KB L2, 2.2 GHz, x11

Mobile A64 754 (DTR)
3000+: AMA3000BEX5AR 1.5V (CG rev, F4Ah) - ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 1.8 GHz, x9
3200+: AMA3200BEX5AR 1.5V (CG rev, F4Ah) - ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.0 GHz, x10
3400+: AMA3400BEX5AR 1.5V (CG rev, F4Ah) - ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.2 GHz, x11

Mobile A64 754 1.4V
2800+: AMN2800BIX5AR 1.4V (CG rev, F4Ah) - ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 1.6 GHz x8
3000+: AMN3000BIX5AR 1.4V (CG rev, F4Ah) - ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 1.8 GHz x9
3200+: AMN3200BIX5AR 1.4V (CG rev, F4Ah) - ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.0 GHz x10

Mobile A64 754 1.2V
2700+: AMD2700BQX4AX 1.2V (CG rev, FC0h) - NewCastle, 512 KB L2, 1.6 GHz, x8
2800+: AMD2800BQX4AX 1.2V (CG rev, FC0h) - NewCastle, 512 KB L2, 1.8 GHz, x9

Zanima me če tile mobilci pašejo na navadne 754 osnovne plošče ?

A64 FX 939
FX53: ADAFX53DEP5AS 1.5V (CG rev, F7Ah) - "ClawHammer 939", 1 MB L2, 2.4 GHz x12

A64 FX 940
FX51: ADAFX51CEP5AK 1.5V (CO rev, F58h) - SledgeHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.2 GHz x11
FX51: ADAFX51CEP5AT 1.5V (CG rev, F5Ah) - SledgeHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.2 GHz x11
FX53: ADAFX53CEP5AT 1.5V (CG rev, F5Ah) - SledgeHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.4 GHz x12

Zgodovina sprememb…

  • spremenil: MEDENA ()

Boki_ ::

Če so S754 itaq da pašejo, sam problem je kako bi delovali, pomoje bi blo treba kaj modat bios al pa ne vem.
I'm back

Boki_ ::

Fak ej, zdej sm gledal reviewe, k sm zbiral plato. Te S754 plate majo nekatere v bistvu sam NB, no NB in SB sta združena, tko da je sam 1 čip, sam fak ej, tok blizu AGP reže je, da se ne da pomojem pritrdit vodnega bloka gor, tko da za vodno pride v poštev sam ABITka od tistih k sm jih gledal, sej sm jih tut zgoraj omenu. Katera je še kaka plata, k ma položaj NBja proč od vseh komponent, da se da lepo pritrdit blok gor. Pa da je tut kvalitetna. Sam opažam pr večini S754 plat da majo ful mal placa med RAM in AGP režo. Kaj so zblodili skupaj pr tej stvari.
I'm back

Brane2 ::

VSe funkcije NBja, ki bi ibile mogoče potrebne hlajenja, so pri teh zadevah itak v CPUju, tako da ne vem za kaj bi hladil čip na plati.
On the journey of life, I chose the psycho path.

OwcA ::

Epox 8KDA3+ zgleda dobra izbira.
Otroška radovednost - gonilo napredka.

Boki_ ::

NB bi hladil, da mi ne brni tisti vent, pa če bo CPU in VGA vodno hlajen, zakaj pa da ne še NBja. Pa še pri navijanju se mal bolj segreje, tko da če je gor zračno, odda več temp. v okolico (beri: kishto) in ker mam napajalnik s temp senzorjem, se bo le ta vent na napajalniku vrtel malo hitreje, če bo prejemal toplejši zrak in bil tako bolj glasen. Ah, zablodil sm, sam trditev pa drži.
I'm back

Oblivion ::

Zato mene tako jezijo tele nForce 3 plate. Zakaj ne gre nrditi nb-ja takoj pr procu ku to dela k8t800? Kmalu bom zamenjal svojo Msi K8n.

Boki_ ::

Ql. Prednaročil sm ABIT KV8 MAX in A64 3200+. IC7 MAX3 in P4 3.0 pa sta že prodana hehe. Sam moti me edino to, da je dobavljiv sam 3200+ s 512kB L2. Eh, sej mislim da ni take razlike. Je pa na 2.2 GHz po def. namesto na 2.0GHz.
I'm back

MEDENA ::

čemu K8T800PRO ?

evo tole je moja naslednja osnovna plošča :>

http://www.hardwarezone.com/articles/vi...

sam še ne vem 939 ali 754...

poglejte si kaj pripravlja DFI :D

Zgodovina sprememb…

  • spremenil: MEDENA ()

WTF? ::

In kje misls ti u Slo nabavt DFI lanparty plato?

Oziroma ce bos narocu mi povej kje,da si se jst !

Dr_M ::

pc hand jih prodaja...
The reason why most of society hates conservatives and
loves liberals is because conservatives hurt you with
the truth and liberals comfort you with lies.

MEDENA ::

Dr_M : teh plat še v ZDA ni :>

to bodo za 754/939...

Dr_M ::

FAKING PC-HAND PRODAJA FAKING DFI!!
The reason why most of society hates conservatives and
loves liberals is because conservatives hurt you with
the truth and liberals comfort you with lies.

MEDENA ::

dr-m jado !!!! :D

jaz ti govorim,da DFI teh plat še ni dal v prodajo !!! >:D

Zheegec ::

Še enkrat: Za nasvete o nakupu in kje kaj kupiti se posvetujte v "kaj kupiti".

Od sedaj naprej gredo vsake takšne debate v večni izbris...
"božja zapoved pravi; <Spoštuj očeta in mater>,
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014

Zheegec ::

"božja zapoved pravi; <Spoštuj očeta in mater>,
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014

Zheegec ::

AMD has begun using a 90-nm SOI manufacturing process at its Fab30 in Dresden, Germany ( as you all know)
- 90-nm AMD64 is in active pilot mode in Fab 30 and prototype parts are running in systems.
- 90-nm process would come in with all the advanced features acquired during previous generations; including copper interconnect, a Black Diamond low-k technology, and as an SOI process with the base wafers provided by Soitec SA.
- The move to 90-nm has reduced the die size to 114 square millimeters, about 40 percent of the die area compared with the established 130-nm process, with reference to an Opteron prototype
- The use of SOI at the 130-nm process node had reduced processor power consumption to the 45-W to 55-W mark and that the shrink to 90-nm would produce an additional benefit
- Increasing the speed of the embedded memory controller and reducing the latency in the HyperTransport technology
- 90-nm process started with a nine-layer interconnect back-end to match the 130-nm process to allow easy transition of established products, but that for new or re-laid products the process could be extended to 11 layers.
- AMD expects commercial shipment of products made using the 90-nm process to begin in the third quarter.
- 300-mm wafer processing now expected early in 2006.
- Strained-silicon would be introduced by AMD at some point in the future.


VR Zone
"božja zapoved pravi; <Spoštuj očeta in mater>,
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014

kuglvinkl ::

Točno! Uprabi oddelek kaj kupiti.
Your focus determines your reallity

Brane2 ::


Članek je že updatan ;)


Ja, vendar tvoj link se vedno kaze na staro kopijo, zato me je zmedel.

V glavnem, v popravljenem benchmarku Opteron 150 totalno razsuje najhitrejsega Xeona in to z "navadnim" gcc 3.3.3 .

gcc3.4.1 bi se naj bistveno bolje obnsele na Opteronih in prinesel dodatne pospeske. Ne razumem, zakaj se vedno uporabljajo v testih staro verzijo.

No ja, bo ze. Tanovi 90 nm Opteroncki se ravno pojavljajo, verjetno s frekvencami vsaj 2.6 GHz, pa tudi dual corei so za vogalom.

Stvari postajajo vse bolj zanimive...
On the journey of life, I chose the psycho path.

Zgodovina sprememb…

  • spremenil: Brane2 ()

Zheegec ::

Tudi v starem članku so številke drugačne kot na začetku, kar poglej ga še 1x ;)

2.6GHz AMD namerava še za 130nm, tako da sumim, da imajo tudi kakšne težave z visoko frekvenčnimi 90 nano K8.
Zakaj še 2.6GHz na 130nano, če pa že teče proizvodnja 90 nano CPUjev?
"božja zapoved pravi; <Spoštuj očeta in mater>,
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014

morphling1 ::

Zato ker se je tako kot Intel ,tudi AMD (pa tudi IBM z G5) zaletel v lepo steno pri dvigovanju frekvenc. Ni problem narediti 90nano 2GHz čipa v količinah problem je naredit 2.6GHz čipe v normalnih količinah, to da probavajo s 130nano, pove vse. Upam, da jim v nekem normalnem času rata odpravit težave, ker overclockerji nimajo ravno veliko prostega prostora če njim ne rata narediti ES-ov ki bi nekako delovali na 2.6 in več GHz.
Dual in quad core pa vsaj za navadne userje ni neka super rešitev, ker pač večina dela, ki ga opravljajo ne poteka večnitno. Kaže pa kot je Ed dobro napisal na to, da tudi proizvajalci zaenkrat nimajo pametne rešitve za višje MHz in to v bistvu ni napredek pač pa cepetanje na mestu.
http://www2.arnes.si/~mlivak/ Nekaj kar naj bi bila moja domača stran, pa nikoli ne bo :)

r5r ::

Kaksne pa so sploh razlike med Athlon64 , Athlon64 FX in Opteron razen podnozij ? :)
And it makes me wonder.

Zgodovina sprememb…

  • spremenil: r5r ()

Zheegec ::

Athlon64 socket754 - single channel, 1MB L2 ali 512KB L2
Athlon64 socket939 - dual channel, 512KB L2
Athlon64 FX socket939 - dual channel, 1MB L2, odklenjen multiplier
Athlon64 FX socket940 - dual channel ECC, 1MB L2, odklenjen multiplier
Opteron socket940 - dual channel ECC, 1MB L2, 1xx za single-way, 2xx za single, dual, 8xx za single, dual, quad, 8-way.
"božja zapoved pravi; <Spoštuj očeta in mater>,
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014

r5r ::

Hvala ALIEN3001, prav to sem potreboval. No se nekaj ... ali sta Athlon64 FX in Opteron pri enakem taktu enako zmogljiva ?
And it makes me wonder.

Zheegec ::

2.2GHz Opteron in 2.2GHz A64 FX-51 (socket940) sta popolnoma enako hitra, socket939 A64 FX-51 je pa malo malo hitrejši od socket940 A64-fx51 in Opteron 2.2GHz.
"božja zapoved pravi; <Spoštuj očeta in mater>,
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014

Boki_ ::

A64 S754 ma tut multipler odklenjen, sam sam delno, se pravi navzdol.
I'm back

_Tom_ ::

A ima že kdo 939 matično in cpu ?...sam pravkar naročujem..>:D

Zheegec ::

"božja zapoved pravi; <Spoštuj očeta in mater>,
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014

Boki_ ::

Goddamn. ABIT KV8Pro suxxxxx toliko da se ne da povedat. Ram ma fiksno frekvenco, FSB mam 220, pa mi ne poveča frekvence rama. V biosu kaže še vedno 200. Zdej pa sm zalaufal CPUZ in kaže 220? Weird. Mislim da je edina možnost da laufam sinhrono s uGuru. This sux. dammit
I'm back

Zgodovina sprememb…

  • spremenil: Boki_ ()

xenon74 ::

Overclocking setting for various bus frequencies

In A64 system, there is no external FSB per se, there are the CPU, the memory bus, the HT bus. The FSB may still be there internally to the CPU. The FSB still exists in motherboard bios to set various frequencies.

Some bios, CPUID utilities call FSB as HTT or internal bus, so FSB is used interchangeably with HTT as a setting to set CPU, memory, HT bus frequencies until everybody agree and use the same terms.

1. CPU_frequency = FSB x CPU_multiplier

CPU mulitplier is CPU specific, some can be adjusted from below up to the stock multiplier of the CPU.
E.g. A64 754 3200+, stock 2GHz = 200x10, multiplier X10, X9, X8, X7, ....

CPU multiplier

The FX are unlocked.

But the A64 754 are unlocked up to the default stock multiplier.
E.g. for a A64 754 3200+, 2 GHz stock frequency, default multiplier is x10, so it is unlocked for x10, x9, x8, ....
This is good since one can still overclocking the FSB which is related to the HT bus, memory bus via their respective multipliers.


2. AGP_frequency

Can be set independently if motherboard/chipset have PCI/AGP lock such as w/ chipset Nforce3 250 GB. K8T800 Pro may still have PCI/AGP lock problem.
E.g. AGP can be adjusted to hold constant at 66, 67, 68, ... MHz independent of the FSB overclocking.


3. HT_bus_frequency = FSB x HT_multiplier

HT_multiplier (also called LDT multiplier), most bios has it ranged between 1X and 5X.
E.g. FSB = 200 MHz, 1X to 5X for HT from 200 MHz to 1000 MHz


4. memory_bus_frequency = FSB x memory_FSB_ratio

In terms of CPU_frequency
memory_bus_frequency = CPU_frequency / CPU_memory_divider
or
memory_bus_frequency = CPU_multiplier x FSB / CPU_memory_divider
where
CPU_memory_divider = ceiling_0.5(CPU_multiplier / memory_FSB_ratio)

Using this formula, the CPU_memory_divider can be calculated based on CPU_multiplier and memory_FSB_ratio.
Some common cpu_memory_dividers generated by spreadsheet are listed in this table.
Relationship between CPU_memory_divider and CPU_multiplier, memory_FSB_ratio
How to determine memory bus frequency
From which the memory bus frequency can be determined
(memory_bus_frequency = CPU_multiplier x FSB / CPU_memory_divider).

Some planning/estimation based on the CPU multiplier, memory rating to ensure the CPU_memory_divider is an integer. Otherwise some round down of memory bus speed would occur as the divider would round up to next integer.

E.g,
HTT = 270 MHz
CPU_multiplier = 9
memory_FSB_ratio = 5/6 (= 166/200 bios setting)
So
CPU_frequency = 270 x 9 = 2430 MHz
CPU_memory_divider = ceiling(9/(5/6)) = 11 or from table in link
memory_bus_frequency = 2430 /11 = 221 MHz
HT_bus_frequency = 270 x 3 = 810 MHz (using x4 would be to high)
AGP/PCI is locked (AGP = 66, 67 MHz)

- Additional settings are the RAS/CAS timings of tRAS, tRCD, tRP, CAS.
- Can run any speed (ASYNC) using the CPU_memory_divider, to match memory module speed.
- Slow or faster memory can be used to get whatever bandwidth allowed in the memory modules.
- ASYNC has minimum impact on memory bandwidth efficiency
- 754 efficiency 95%+, 939 efficiency 86%+

For desirable overclocking control, one should be able to set all these frequencies of CPU, HT, AGP/PCI, memory independently as shown above. Exact bios naming may vary.


Appendix: Memory SYNC vs ASYNC

SYNC: FSB = memory_bus_frequency (or memory_FSB_ratio = 1/1)

Without a higher ratio of memory_FSB_ratio > 1, running SYNC is the easiest way to max out a memory module that can take high bus frequency.
E.g. with PC4000 or above, by running the FSB (HTT) as high as possible, to 250 - 300+ MHz. Many boards are able to support 300 MHz FSB (HTT) stable.

If HT bus is limited to around 1000 MHz,
- when FSB (HTT) at 250 MHz, HTT_multiplier can be set at x4,
- when FSB (HTT) is far beyond 250 MHz towards 300 MHz, HTT_multiplier may have to be dropped to x3 so the HT bus is stable under 1000 MHz.
This is a tradeoff between memory bus frequency and the HT bus frequency.

E.g. assume CPU maxed around 2500 MHz, with PC4000-4400 memory
Case 1 (PC4000):
FSB = 250 MHz, CPU_multiplier = 10, CPU_frequency = 2500 MHz
HT_bus_frequency = 1000 MHz (w/ x4 HT_mulltiplier)
CPU_memory_divider = 10/1 = 10
memory_bus_frequency = 250 MHz
Case 2 (~PC4400):
FSB = 280 MHz, CPU_multiplier = 9, CPU_frequency = 2520 MHz
HT_bus_frequency = 840 MHz (w/ x3 HT_mulltiplier)
CPU_memory_divider = 9/1 = 9
memory_bus_frequency = 280 MHz

ASYNC: In general, FSB != memory_bus_frequency.

memory_bus_frequency = FSB x memory_FSB_ratio
where memory_FSB_ratio = ..., 6/5, 5/4, 4/3, 3/2, 2/1, 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 4/5, 5/6, ...
In some bios, only a few can be selected.
- FSB = 200, memory = 200, memory_FSB_ratio = 1/1
- FSB = 200, memory = 166, memory_FSB_ratio = 5/6
- FSB = 200, memory = 160, memory_FSB_ratio = 4/5
- FSB = 200, memory = 150, memory_FSB_ratio = 3/4
- FSB = 200, memory = 133, memory_FSB_ratio = 2/3
- FSB = 200, memory = 100, memory_FSB_ratio = 1/2

E.g. assume CPU maxed at around 2500 MHz
Case 1 (CPU x10 max, ~ PC3200):
FSB = 250 MHz, CPU_multiplier = 10, CPU_frequency = 2500 MHz
memory_FSB_ratio = 5/6
CPU_memory_divider = 10/(5/6) = 12
memory_bus_frequency = 208 MHz
Case 2 (CPU x9 max, ~ PC3200):
FSB = 280 MHz, CPU_multiplier = 9, CPU_frequency = 2520 MHz
memory_FSB_ratio = 3/4
CPU_memory_divider = 9/(3/4) = 12
memory_bus_frequency = 210 MHz
Case 3 (CPU x8 max, ~ PC4000):
FSB = 310 MHz, CPU_multiplier = 8, CPU_frequency = 2480 MHz
memory_FSB_ratio = 4/5 (may not be available, may need 3/4 or 5/6)
CPU_memory_divider = 8/(4/5) = 10
memory_bus_frequency = 248 MHz (assuming 4/5 ratio)


Memory modules (for 754 and 939 platforms) (post 14)


vir: Overclockers forums, thread: A64 CPUs, chipsets, motherboards
05-08-04, 10:30 PM, post #8, avtor: hitechjb1

preberi še: Relationship between CPU_memory_divider and CPU_multiplier, memory_FSB_ratio X74
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/team_display.php?teamid=30319

Zgodovina sprememb…

  • spremenil: xenon74 ()

mile ::






23, Aug 2004, Taipei - Due to the differences in technology, K7 and K8 platforms adapt different design architecture and they are supported by different chipsets. ASRock Inc, the leading price-performance motherboard maker, breaks this architecture barrier between K7 and K8 platforms to present the first K8 upgradeable K7 platform in the world ? ASRock K7Upgrade-880. Based on the innovative ?Upgrade on demand? concept and industry-leading layout design technique, ASRock K7Upgrade-880 motherboard features the Flexible?n?Easy CPU socket upgrade interface - ?K8 Bridge Port?. This port provides a bridge with the world?s leading capability to upgrade SocketA(462) to Socket754 or Socket939 through ASRock 754Bridge or 939Bridge upgrade module. The innovative K7Upgrade-880 motherboard provides not only a marvelous Flexible?n?Easy upgrade capability from K7 to K8 architecture but also a cost-effective future upgrade capability not found on other boards.

Zgodovina sprememb…

  • zavaroval slike: kuglvinkl ()

TribesMan ::

Ja Asrock zadnje čase precej eksperimintira. Sicer se mi zdi tale zadeva ki jo je pokazal mile precej nesmiselna, ampak imajo pa precej boljšo stvar v ponudbi. Dual socket A64 plato, ki podpira tako s939 kot s754 procesorje. Idealna izbira za tiste ki cincajo med socketi. Je pa res tudi nekaj drugega. Asrock sux big time... tako da je tole bolj zanimivost kot kakšna resnična opcija...

Še dokazni material...

LP

TribesMan
Moj kompjuter dela: KVIIIIK ... KVIIIK ... KVIIIK.

Ko ga navijem dela: KVIKKVIKKIVKKVIK. :)

morphling1 ::

Nforce 4 more details

Tole plus kak pocen 939 proc, bo mogoče mene nekje 2005 prepričalo v menjavo sistema :)
http://www2.arnes.si/~mlivak/ Nekaj kar naj bi bila moja domača stran, pa nikoli ne bo :)

TribesMan ::

Če tole drži potem bomo v roku pol leta ciljali na nForce 4 Ultra ali SLI. Ker navadni in pro so malo out of the league. Sam me skrbi predvsem tista SLI, ker najbrž bo cena zelo neugodna :D

Se pa strinjam z morphlingom, leto 2005 tam nekje konec prvega ali zacetek drugega cetrtletja bo idelaen cas za menjavo sistema... Takrat se najbrz lahko nadejamo ze "delujocih" Win x86-64 in vsaj osnovno podporo z gonilniki... Pa CPUji bodo 90nm z najbrz ze kar ugodno ceno. Do takrat pa Athlon XP powah...

LP

TribesMan
Moj kompjuter dela: KVIIIIK ... KVIIIK ... KVIIIK.

Ko ga navijem dela: KVIKKVIKKIVKKVIK. :)

Caligula ::

Se prav se splaca preskocit nforce 3. Pa sej itak ni nc pametnga prnesel ta cipset. Glede na to ,da nas vecina sploh ne rabi SATA, PCI expressa,.. bo dost ze cist navaden Nforce 4. Fajn. Upam, da bo poceni.

Gandalfar ::

sata pa ja rabis

Dr_M ::

jup bi se kr strinju s TribesMan-om... :)

pci-express je tako ali tako najbolj potrebna evolucija ta trenutek v racunalnistvu.
sata 300 pa pac...nadaljevanje, nic posebnega...mogoce podpora NCQ...
The reason why most of society hates conservatives and
loves liberals is because conservatives hurt you with
the truth and liberals comfort you with lies.

TribesMan ::

SATA II bo precej evolucija. Namreč podpirala bo še optične pogone. Ker dosedaj to podpirajo samo krmilniki vgrajeni v intlove SBje.

PCI-X ni tako nujna posodobitev, saj grafične ne rabijo nevemkakšnih prenosov, saj jim že AGP popolnoma zadošča... Itaq pa majo vse grafe dan današnji po 256MB RAMa in ni problem z velikimi transporti prek vodila in dostopom do glavnega pomnilnika. Edina za katero bo PCI-X koristen bo SLI... sam kdo pa rabi tok grafične moči?

No razen tisti ki jim falus zraste 2cm če majo 100 3DMArkov več k sosed...

LP

TribesMan
Moj kompjuter dela: KVIIIIK ... KVIIIK ... KVIIIK.

Ko ga navijem dela: KVIKKVIKKIVKKVIK. :)

Dr_M ::

TribesMan: si me pa mal razocaru... sm mislu da si mal bl razgledan, pa da mal bl uporabljas glavo kot ksn caligula... :| :'(

s tem pci-expressom sploh ne mislm na graficne, ampak na drugo periferijo...
kr poglej kok stvari ne mores uporabljat v domacem racunalniku, ker so na voljo samo za pci-x...

graficna & pci-express - to je tuki cist nerelevantno.
The reason why most of society hates conservatives and
loves liberals is because conservatives hurt you with
the truth and liberals comfort you with lies.

Caligula ::

No pa poglejmo.

Za vse diske je dovolj ATA.
Za vse opticne pogone je dovolj ATA. Tudi za 16kratne DVD pekace.

Se pravi SATA ne rabim. Se 2 ali 3 leta ne. Pa itka mam dva ATA diska-skoraj nova.

Kar se tice PCI express-samo za HDTV je sploh uporaben. Za kaj drugega bo trajalo spet 2-3 leta.

Pa kaj pa je problem plato malo rabljeno prodat pa dodat 10 jurjev pa pac vzet tako, ki ma se to dvoje pol.

Sam naceloma v praksi nic od tega-vsaj zame-ni uporabno. Pa nasploh dvomim, da za kogarkoli.

Se pa trinjam. Eventuelno bosta obe zadevi pac standard.

Bolj zanimiv je itak spet firewire za razne opticne enote, ker je nek nov driver, ki bojda zadevo se ful pospesi. Sam sem malo pozabil detajle.
Ce se da komu pogledat je na Tom's hardware nekaj o tem.

Zgodovina sprememb…

  • spremenil: Caligula ()

TribesMan ::

Dr_M povej mi kaj bi ti priključil na PCI-X

Edina stvar ki mi pade na pamet, in jo rabim v računalniku je TV tuner, ostalo je pa itaq že vse na matičnih ploščah.

Današnje matične plošče omogočajo priklop 10 podatkovnih enot, 2 firewire, 8 usb, 8 kanalni zvok, gigabitni lan, ter še dodaten 100MB lan in vse to za 28kSIT... zdej mi pa pocej kaj za vraga še rabiš da je PCI-X tako nujen?

In ravno zato ker sem razgledan sam vam povedal da je PCI-X zaenkrat neuporabna novotarija, ki je namenjena služenju mastnih denarcev...

LP

TribesMan
Moj kompjuter dela: KVIIIIK ... KVIIIK ... KVIIIK.

Ko ga navijem dela: KVIKKVIKKIVKKVIK. :)

Zheegec ::

Če že debatirate o tem, bi lahko poznali vsaj o čem govorite. TribesMan; kot prvo, PCI-X =! PCI-Express, kot drugo, PCI kartice si DELIJO 133MB/s, PCIE naprave pa imajo vsaka po 200MB/s pri PCI-Express 1x.
"božja zapoved pravi; <Spoštuj očeta in mater>,
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014

TribesMan ::

My bad... Kaj je to pol PCI-E?

200MB/s na kanal pa nič ne pomaga če jih ne rabiš...

LP

TribesMan
Moj kompjuter dela: KVIIIIK ... KVIIIK ... KVIIIK.

Ko ga navijem dela: KVIKKVIKKIVKKVIK. :)

Zheegec ::

PCI-X -> 66MHz, ponavadi tudi 64-biten PCI. Uporablja se v serverjih že kar precej časa.
PCI-E, PCIE -> PCI-Express, nadomestek PCI in AGP.
200MB/s na kanal pa nič ne pomaga če jih ne rabiš...

Ena gigabit kartica in en RAID/SCSI/SATA kontroller že skupaj porabita precej več kot 133MB/s, tako da bi se že takoj poznala menjava na PCI-E.
"božja zapoved pravi; <Spoštuj očeta in mater>,
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014

Boki_ ::

PCI-X je uporabljen v applih....
I'm back

TribesMan ::

Ena gigabit kartica in en RAID/SCSI/SATA kontroller že skupaj porabita precej več kot 133MB/s, tako da bi se že takoj poznala menjava na PCI-E.


Gigabit podpirajo plate direkt z chipseta... povezava direktno na chipset brez PCIja, prav tako je z v chipset integriranimi RAID SATA krmilniki.
SCSI je pa preveč eksotika za domačo uporabo... sploh z predstavitvijo SATA je SCSI izgubil vse prednosti.

LP

TribesMan
Moj kompjuter dela: KVIIIIK ... KVIIIK ... KVIIIK.

Ko ga navijem dela: KVIKKVIKKIVKKVIK. :)

Dr_M ::

Caligula: 640k is enough ram for everybody

no...ce bi se vi mal bolj poglobil v samo delovanje sata in pci-expressa, boste res samo govoril kok tega ne rabimo...

ampak se dobr, da mamo tut ljudi ki vidijo in znajo mislt. :)
The reason why most of society hates conservatives and
loves liberals is because conservatives hurt you with
the truth and liberals comfort you with lies.

BaRtMaN ::

Ta vodila so čist kul, samo pri diskih bo treba še marsikaj postorit, da bodo lahko izkoristili širino vodila. Zdaj sem videl, da ima tudi Maxtor native SATA podporo, medtem ko jo ima Seagate že kakšno leto. Počasi gre, ja.
««
8 / 16
»»


Vredno ogleda ...

TemaSporočilaOglediZadnje sporočilo
TemaSporočilaOglediZadnje sporočilo
»

Kje do Opterona 939 (Dual core) ? (strani: 1 2 )

Oddelek: Kaj kupiti
926751 (4913) Pyr0Beast
»

90 nm Athlon 64 je tu

Oddelek: Navijanje
282339 (1760) AtaStrumf
»

opteron vs p4

Oddelek: Strojna oprema
242054 (1762) TribesMan
»

Athlon 64 DA ali NE? (strani: 1 2 3 )

Oddelek: Kaj kupiti
1317488 (5011) Jeronimo

Amd opustil prvo generacijo Athlona 64 ! (strani: 1 2 3 4 )

Oddelek: Strojna oprema
19211236 (8025) Zheegec

Več podobnih tem