TTIP in CETA

RELEASE: New #TiSA Annex on Telecommunications which rewrites the rules for the internet in EU, US + 22 other states

Smrekar1 je 28. okt 2016 ob 07:57 izjavil:

mtosev je 27. okt 2016 ob 22:19 izjavil:

CETA is back.google it

Kul. Upam da nas pamet sreča tudi pri TTIP.

Smurf je 28. okt 2016 ob 08:33 izjavil:

xmetallic je 28. okt 2016 ob 08:29 izjavil:

Ne vidim da bi EU trenutno kaj manjkalo. Smo najmočnejša gospodarska velesila. Ni se nam treba podrejat kot to počnejo Kitajci.

GDP EUja je enakega velikostnega reda kot Kitajski (in Ameriski).

Smrekar1 je 28. okt 2016 ob 08:39 izjavil:

xmetallic je 28. okt 2016 ob 08:34 izjavil:

Zakaj se ne gremo sporazumov z Rusijo? Njihovi standardi glede GSO in ostale kemije so precej višji od ameriških.

Zato:

In zato, ker nam Rusija nima ničesar za ponuditi. Od njih kupujemo energente, drugega ne znajo delati, za uvoz pa tudi nimajo več denarja. Zakaj bi torej podpisovali sporazume z Rusijo?

xmetallic je 28. okt 2016 ob 08:56 izjavil:

Že večkrat povedano sporazumi se sklepajo brez privolitve prebivalcev. Na koncu bomo mi tisti, ki bomo na krožnik dobili monsanto & co sranje. Sporazumi se sklepajo v tajnosti, prebivalci nimajo nobene besede pri odločanju. Najvišja oblika demokracije, ni kaj.

Smrekar1 je 28. okt 2016 ob 09:08 izjavil:

xmetallic je 28. okt 2016 ob 08:56 izjavil:

Že večkrat povedano sporazumi se sklepajo brez privolitve prebivalcev. Na koncu bomo mi tisti, ki bomo na krožnik dobili monsanto & co sranje. Sporazumi se sklepajo v tajnosti, prebivalci nimajo nobene besede pri odločanju. Najvišja oblika demokracije, ni kaj.

Dajmo odpret temo o težavah genetsko spremenjene hrane. Zdi se mi, da je marsikdo tule kupil laži nasprotnikov napredka.

Smrekar1 je 28. okt 2016 ob 09:31 izjavil:

Lahko prosim citiraš dele sporazuma, kjer to piše?

http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2...

The peace of the Brussels’ summer was indeed troubled by the annoying news that the Commission has asked the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the EU’s food safety watchdog, for its advice on whether, under certain conditions, some genetically modified organisms (GMOs) could be given a “lighter” safety evaluation than the rigorous checks they must currently undergo. The exemption would apply to GMOs that are not intended for sale on the EU market but are available in other countries, and which may have found their way in small amounts[1] into food exports from these countries to the EU.

The EU currently has a “zero tolerance” policy for non-approved GMOs for food uses. Any shipment found to contain unauthorised GM food is immediately turned back. This guarantees no GM food, be it at low levels, can enter the EU without having passed all the EU safety tests required by our GMO approval system. The Commission’s move is nothing but the first step to do away with the EU’s current approach.

How not to make the link with the on-going trade talks, when both US and EU agri-food businesses trading food across the Atlantic have called for TTIP to promote a “commercially viable Low Level Presence policy”, i.e. one that would allow low levels of GM contamination and cost them less money? And when the EU has already conceded to Canada that it will “cooperate internationally on issues related to biotechnology such as low level presence of genetically modified organisms” as part of the CETA agreement?


EU spreminja ZERO TOLERANCE v "0.9%". == NIŽANJE STANDARDOV == PODREJANJE KORPORACIJAM

The Commission’s mandate to EFSA suggests 0.9% would be considered as a low level. This is the threshold above which the presence of GMOs in food/feed must be labelled.

Matako je 28. okt 2016 ob 09:41 izjavil:

Ironično: najbolj mi zadnje dni nabijajo proti CETA točno isti liki, ki so me nedolgo nazaj prepričevali kako grozen je Brexit.

Dafuq? Še dobro da imamo BMK gibanje, da ni vse samo histerija in panično letanje po sobi.