Liter mleka 3 eur

Dragi sport je to, za reveze nedosegljiva kvaliteta. Itak, da so orescki iz afrike in indije, kjer 5 letni otroci pakirajo, starsi pa spricajo nasade je vse bio. Seveda je vse bio, sej noben ne gre dol preverjat xD

Bojim se, da še vedno vas 95% živi v la-la landu.

Bo padec toliko smešnejši.

Povzetek?

Selling Hope in a Jar

Want more?

Citat:

What That Nutrition Label Is Really Saying
It should come as no surprise that selling health (or the illusion of health) is hugely
profitable. In fact, it is so profitable that it has spawned an entire exploding industry of
products marketed as "functional foods"--one that pulled $37.3 billion in 2009 in the
United States alone. Naturally, companies have a lot of tricks up their sleeves for
snagging a share of this hugely pro?table (and rather bogus) market; witness, for
example, the cash cow known as "one-hundred-calorie packs," which cleverly allow
manufacturers to create smaller servings typically at twice the price. In industry
parlance, this is a well-known strategy called selling "perceived health and wellness,"
with the major word here being "perceived."
This illusion of "healthy" is perpetuated by the fact that many of us don't know what
many of the marketing buzzwords really mean; and of course marketers work hard to
keep it that way. A national survey conducted by the Shelton Group found that, when
asked whether we'd rather buy a product billed as "natural" or "organic," we choose
"natural," "thinking organic is more of an unregulated marketing buzzword that means
the product is more expensive," says Suzanne Shelton, who conducted the survey. But
she explains, "In reality, the opposite is true: 'Natural' is the unregulated word." And
other popular buzzwords--like "organically grown," "pesticide free," "all-natural," and
"no artificial ingredients"--actually mean very little.
Given how freely companies throw these terms around, one can hardly blame us for
being confused. For example, in a clever bit of bait-and-switch marketing, when Silk
Soymilk recently introduced a line of milk made from nonorganic soybeans, it simply
switched its organic soy milk to a green box and began selling the new, nonorganic
version in the original red packaging, with only one perceptible change: replacing the
word "organic" with the word "natural."19
Companies have gone to great lengths to convince us that "natural" equals "healthy,"
but that couldn't be further from the truth. Believe it or not, because the term is
unregulated by the FDA, a company can dub just about any product "natural." Potato
chips made from actual potatoes instead of potato flakes may technically be natural, but
they are still processed, high in fat, high in sodium, and lacking in nutritional value.

Kaj pa Halal?

Your religion dictates that you can only eat foods designated "halal,"
which is an Arabic term defined as "lawful" or "permitted" (among other things, this
excludes pork and its by-products, animals not properly slaughtered, carnivorous
animals, and alcohol). Now, historically, buying halal food meant going to a Muslim
grocer or butcher, who cut the meat in accordance with Islamic principles. Such a
person might not be hard to ?nd in downtown Baghdad, but here in the States, there
aren't exactly Muslim butchers on every corner. Which is why food companies have
begun to o?er thousands of new products boasting the halal label. This business,
according to the Halal Journal, is worth roughly $632 billion per year--a staggering 16
percent of the global food industry.
Today companies are slapping the halal label on everything from food to makeup to
even furniture (in this case, it could be the oil, paint, or soap used to stain the wood that
claims halal certi?cation). Canadian drug companies even sell halal vitamins, which
claim to be "free of the gelatins and other animal derivatives that some Islamic scholars
say make mainstream products haram, or unlawful," and there are multiple halal
cosmetics lines, including a brand called OnePure, which has supposedly been certi?ed
in Malaysia by the same Islamic body responsible for certifying meats. "People are
always looking for the next purity thing,"

In še en za konec:

Whether the brand's promise is health, happiness, or enlightenment, what all the
marketing ploys we've been talking about in this chapter have in common is that they
tap into our very human desire to return to the earth. To reclaim an innocence
untainted by money or by the stresses of contemporary life. They're all about selling us
inner peace, spiritual fulfillment, and a better life.
And selling us hope, as well. This is nothing new; companies have been selling hope
in one way, shape, or form for the past hundred years. Because hope works. We crave it.
We need it. And we buy it. Charles Revson, the founder of Revlon, was clearly onto
something when in 1967 he was quoted as saying: "In the factory, we make cosmetics;
in the drugstore, we sell hope in a bottle."

@Raptor

Lahko se strinjam, da je kupovanje manjših porcij slabša varianta, pogosto dražja z več preostale embalaže, razen ko se to izrecno izplača, tako kot v primeru omenjenih 250g bio oreščkov iz Hoferja, ki stanejo 3,99 saj 1 kg oreškov v rinfuzi v bio trgovini pride od 24-30 evrov.

Vse ostalo se mene ne tiče, ker sem nadpovprečno osveščen potrošnik, vsaj kar zadeva hrano, znam brati deklaracije, poznam različne certifikate... in definitivno ne padam na fore omenjene v odlomkih iz knjige, ki si jih navedel.

Unknown_001 je 25. okt 2018 ob 21:29 izjavil:

Torej trdiš, da nalepka BIO dejansko nosi neko težo ? Američani pač imajo te fore ala Natural in Organic. Realno gre za isti šit.

Ne, ne gre za isti šit. Vsak proizvajalec lahko da na embalažo besede kot so "naravno", "organsko"... ekološki certifikat pa samo tisti, ki ga je pridobil, od ustrezne inštitucije, ki te stvari kontrolira. In slovenski ekološki kmetje imajo vsako leto vsaj eno nenapovedano kontrolo, kjer morajo pokazati račune in embalažo od semen, gnojil, škropiv... gledajo se pleveli, vzorči se zemlja, delajo se analize produktov... ni to krneki.

Unknown_001 je 25. okt 2018 ob 21:29 izjavil:

Mandljevo mleko je pač ena od butičnih bedarij, ki pritiska ravno na to točko. Buy, because you have to be responsible. In ni fora da marketing prisili tebe, ampak da ti sproži mehanizem zaradi katerega se "osvestiš" in nato neracionalno kupiš.

Ne bi rekla, mandlji so popularni ker imajo, poleg arašidov, od oreščkov največ beljakovin 21/100g kar je pomembno za vegane, pa tudi ostale, ki želijo uživati dovolj beljakovin pa ne želijo kar naprej jesti meso ampak bolj pestro hrano, torej gre tukaj bolj za zdravstvene razloge kot karkoli drugega.

In za koji kurac (pardon izrazu) ne moreš tistih mandljev pojest kot človk? A komu slučajno zobje falijo al kaj, da je treba v vod namakat pa nek nagravžn mlek delat. Pa to od bedarije ne vete kaj bi počel.

Gosposko vzameš pest, nabašeš v usta in melješ.

In zakaj bi to počel in first place?

Zakaj morjo vegani svoje jedi poimenovat kot "zrezek", "mleko", "sir"... zakaj sploh iščejo nadomestke?

Mar ni to za njih ekvivalent poimenovanja "mrhovinarske prehrane".

Mislm, če si vegič bodi stabilen v svojih prepričanjih. Ne pa da se tolažiš z nadomestki, potem pa na skrivaj žreš doručke, ko ti život dojadi.

neverlucky je 25. okt 2018 ob 22:23 izjavil:

Jaz ti samo pomagam razumet njihovo razmisljanje. Seveda so poimenovanja mandljevo mleko, spinacni zrezek, krompirjevo jajce itd. neumna. Tako pac je. Jaz tudi ne razumem teh poimenovanj. Najbrz se potem lazje prepricas, da ni razlike med temi imeni in si potem boljsi, ker jes rastlinski produkt in ne zivalskega.

Ampak jaz jih NOČEM razumeti prijatelj. Ker v osnovi vem, za kaj se gre in kaj hočejo doseči. V ozadju pa teče velik biznis ki ga v dobri veri financirajom. Mandljevo mleko žal ni noben nadomestek. Kvečjem pofarbana voda z okusom.

Unknown_001 je 25. okt 2018 ob 22:05 izjavil:

Ma v bistvu je. Sem tako ali drugače vključen tudi v primarni sektor, pa vidim kje je fora. V državi z normalno regulativo ta BIO za potrošnika efektivno ne pomeni nič. Spiritualno pa verjamem da zelo veliko. Ker vse ostalo je bav bav surprise surprise opisano s strašno besedico:

"kemija"

Buhuhahahhahahahahhaha nočne more za deco

Nimaš prav veliko pojma, dejansko je kar razlika ali kmet pri pridelavi uporablja sredstva, ki v zemlji in pridelkih puščajo ostanke težkih kovin, organoklornih spojin... ki so lahko zdravju škodljive, ali pač ne.

kingsix je 25. okt 2018 ob 22:00 izjavil:

Mandljevo mleko nima kaj veliko veze z mandlji, še manj pa z vsebnostjo beljakovin, ki jih le ti imajo.

Res je, mandljevo mleko nima prav veliko beljakovin, ampak če si ga doma narediš, ponavadi zmletih mandljev, ki si jih pri izdelavi uporabil, ne vržeš stran ampak jih poješ in tako dobiš beljakovine.

jype je 25. okt 2018 ob 23:02 izjavil:

Raptor ne ve, kako bistvene razlike so v predpisih med EU in ZDA.

Tudi to, ja, čeprav se tudi pri nas rado zavaja z raznimi "100% naravno", "domače"....

FormerUser je 25. okt 2018 ob 23:10 izjavil:

Tudi to, ja, čeprav se tudi pri nas rado zavaja z raznimi "100% naravno", "domače"....

Jasno. Imamo celo "bio jablana d.o.o." ali nekaj takega, da je potem legalno.

Moraš bit precej butast, da padeš na tako finto.

tikitoki je 25. okt 2018 ob 23:40 izjavil:

Ker pri nas v marketingu delajo sami idioti in si ne znajo izmisliti drugih fraz.

Fraze ne pomagajo. Znaki, ki zagotavljajo standarde, so zaščiteni z visokimi kaznimi. Dovolj visokimi, da si jih tudi marketing ne more privoščiti.

kingsix je 25. okt 2018 ob 22:00 izjavil:

Mandljevo mleko nima kaj veliko veze z mandlji, še manj pa z vsebnostjo beljakovin, ki jih le ti imajo.

Kako ne? Jaz sem ga včeraj naredil doma - 100g mandljev in liter vode v blender. Kaj tukaj nima zveze z mandlji?

issak je 26. okt 2018 ob 07:25 izjavil:

kingsix je 25. okt 2018 ob 22:00 izjavil:

Mandljevo mleko nima kaj veliko veze z mandlji, še manj pa z vsebnostjo beljakovin, ki jih le ti imajo.

Kako ne? Jaz sem ga včeraj naredil doma - 100g mandljev in liter vode v blender. Kaj tukaj nima zveze z mandlji?

> Mandljevo mleko žal ni noben nadomestek.

Niti me ne zanimajo nadomestki, jaz ničesar ne nadomeščam, mandljevo in ostale sem pil že od nekdaj, zdaj pač poleg tega samo ne pijem živalskega mleka.

> Kvečjem pofarbana voda z okusom.
To lahko rečemo za čisto vsako tekočino, tudi živalsko mleko je v veliki večini voda...

tikitoki je 25. okt 2018 ob 23:40 izjavil:

Seveda se najde kdo, ki dela sir iz mandljevega mleka.

Oja: https://imgur.com/a/hQTgltW iz indijskih oreščkev in rastlinskega 'mleka'.

jype je 26. okt 2018 ob 01:00 izjavil:

FormerUser je 25. okt 2018 ob 23:10 izjavil:

Tudi to, ja, čeprav se tudi pri nas rado zavaja z raznimi "100% naravno", "domače"....

Jasno. Imamo celo "bio jablana d.o.o." ali nekaj takega, da je potem legalno.

Moraš bit precej butast, da padeš na tako finto.

tikitoki je 25. okt 2018 ob 23:40 izjavil:

Ker pri nas v marketingu delajo sami idioti in si ne znajo izmisliti drugih fraz.

Fraze ne pomagajo. Znaki, ki zagotavljajo standarde, so zaščiteni z visokimi kaznimi. Dovolj visokimi, da si jih tudi marketing ne more privoščiti.

Butastih ljudi ne primankuje.