So long, pro suckers - a ste res morali leteti vsi SJW norci na Anthropic kot prašiči v buče?
Short answer:
mostly yes on Claude Code, but the picture is a bit more nuanced. Public reporting from April 2026 says Anthropic briefly removed Claude Code from the $20 Pro plan on pricing/docs, then said it was a small test affecting about 2% of new prosumer signups; current Pro and Max subscribers were said not to be affected, and later coverage noted the Pro listing returned.
wheresyoured What seems to be happening Anthropic has already been pushing heavier Claude Code usage toward higher tiers. Max was introduced as the higher-usage plan, and multiple reports say the company has been tightening limits as agentic usage and compute demand rose. In that context, moving Claude Code to Max-only for new signups looks like a monetization and capacity-control move, not just a wording change.
pcworld Why the sporadic credits The “sporadic credits” are more likely tied to product transitions and usage-accounting changes than to a general giveaway strategy. Reports in early April say Anthropic emailed some users one-time credits to help with the shift to pay-as-you-go “extra usage” for third-party harnesses, and official support docs say API credits expire after one year. That fits a pattern of Anthropic buffering users during billing changes, not random generosity.
news.ycombinator Likely interpretation So the best read is: Anthropic is
testing or gradually reshaping access so heavy Claude Code usage pays more, especially on new signups, while keeping existing subscribers from immediate disruption. The credits are probably part of smoothing that transition and offsetting sudden billing changes, especially around “extra usage” and third-party tool support.
theregister Practical takeaway If you rely on Claude Code regularly, assume the plan boundaries may keep changing and that Max or separate usage billing may become more important over time. If you want, I can also map out the current Pro vs Max vs API/extra-usage structure in a simple table.
arstechnica 
