bio hacking, prehranska dopolnila

Je kdo probal GLP-1

Primer


Opis:
-Reducose(R) - patentiran izvleček bele murve
-Kromov pikolinat z visoko biološko razpoložljivostjo
-Pripomore k ohranjanju normalnih vrednosti glukoze v krvi2 in poskrbi za normalno presnovo makrohranil2
-Primeren za vegane in vegetarijance

SESTAVINE: izvleček listov bele murve (Morus alba L.), hipromeloza (ovoj kapsule), koruzni škrob, sredstvo proti sprijemanju: magnezijeve soli maščobnih kislin; kromov pikolinat.

Komu je GLP-1 booster lahko v pomoč?
Prehransko dopolnilo je primerno za:

-posameznike, ki občutijo hitre poraste in padce energije po obrokih,
-rekreativce in športnike, ki želijo stabilno energijo skozi dan,
-tiste, ki se soočajo z nenadnimi napadi lakote ali željo po sladkem,
-posameznike, ki želijo podpreti presnovo ogljikovih hidratov,
-vse, ki si želijo bolj enakomeren odziv glukoze po obroku.

100% se strinjam. Nabašejo not 20 trenutnih buzz-word učinkovin, v zelo malih dozah in vprašljivega izvora, verjetno Kitajska. Ker tega niso sami mešali (Savina v home-labu, raje ne), kje je certifikat podjetja, ki jim je to namešal in zapakiral v kapsule? Report neodvisnega laba, ki je preveril ali vse drži?

Vprašanje je torej sploh kvaliteta izvirnih sestavin, doze, ki so večinoma premajhne, sinergija vprašljiva, absorbcija še te malo revščine vprašljiva. Na koncu pridemo do le placebo efekta, ali obremenitev za ledvice, jetra, ki summa summarum naredijo neto efekt slabši, kot če ne vzameš nič.

Kdo pa res ve, kaj kupuje? Nekdo z farmacevtsko izobrazbo pa še to je vprašaj če ve res te finte kaj so dal not ter zakaj? Lahk uporabiš umetno inteligenco, sam
vseen je vprašaj al je tist, ka podjetje ponuja res to, so certifikati res dobri al je marketing nateg. Kaj je res not ter z kakega vira.
Ni to tako kot so zdravila, kjer so klinični trials ter je nek standard kvalitete.

Naprimer beta glukane promovirajo. Sam doze v prehranskih dopolnilih so večina res majhne ter je odvisno kak beta glukan, kr jih je več vrst. Marketarji pa nabijajo pozitivne učinke ter pretiravajo sam da se proda. Na japonskem, ko majo prot raku zdravilo za stimulacijo imunskih celic so velik večje doze ter je posebej postopek pridelave,... Prehranska dopolnila pa dost manjše doze, drug postopek pridelave,...? Vprašaj,...Dobijo stvari od malo morje dobaviteljev. Pol pa skup dajo nekje v nemčiji v kapsulo al pa kje drugje. Je res kontrola kaj dajo not laboratorijsko ter večkrat? Boljš uporabit zamrzjene gobe za omleto al pa kupit. Hrana je dokazana ter še doze so normalne.

Največ učinka je življenjski stil pred bilo kakšnim prehranskim dopolnilom. Če je prehranski stil šit ti ne bo prehransko dopolnilo naredlo čudeža. Sam držat se kaj ješ ter kdaj pa tud ni lahko,....
Najcenej pa največ učinka je voda. Tulk ljudi, k je kronično dehidriranih,... Voda je osnova, boljš več kot premal. Plastičnih steklenic se izogibam če ni nuja.
Čaj, kava do 12.00 al včas 13.00 spet nič cukra zram, cukr je strup. Kasnejša kava - slabši spanec! tako da NE.
Jem tam 8-12 ur na dan 3 obroke nič več, da se mTor ne aktivira. Nič prigrizkov. Zjutr obilno, kosilo ja ter tam 3 ure pred spanjem zadnji obrok. Tam 14 ur dnevno brez hrane, da ni mTor aktivacije ter je regeneracija. 12/12 ur je tud ok, odvisno od dela.
Hrana raznolika, dovolj maščob(zdravih), ki so premium hrana ter izogibam se ogljikovim hidratom, vsaj jem tiste z nizkim glikemičnim indeksom. Velik ljudi je kronično podhranjenih, kr so vegiterjanci ter ne dobijo dost maščob. Možgani pa rabijo maščobe, telo rab proteine. Nekate stvari, vitamini rabijo maščobo za absorbcijo, če je ne dobiš zram obroka telo ne absorbira dost z hrane!!!

Jaz sem tele vzel po Okapijevem nasvetu:
https://www.iherb.com/pr/life-extension...
Zgleda da se dec spozna :)
Vzamem eno na dan, ene 4x na teden.
Prej sem imel pac neke od Maxximuma ali pa odthe Nutritiona. Cena tam tam.
Pac jemljem preventivno ker veliko sportam in se mi zdi da premalo vitaminov in mineralov dobim. Škodit ne more.
Je pa, od kar tele nove jemljem imam zelo rumen urin ceprav spijem veliko vode, tisti dan ko jo vzamem.
Domnevam da ledvice se zmeraj dobro delujejo :)

Kodrnusa je včeraj ob 19:04:27 izjavil:

Jaz sem tele vzel po Okapijevem nasvetu:
https://www.iherb.com/pr/life-extension...
Zgleda da se dec spozna :)
Vzamem eno na dan, ene 4x na teden.
Prej sem imel pac neke od Maxximuma ali pa odthe Nutritiona. Cena tam tam.
Pac jemljem preventivno ker veliko sportam in se mi zdi da premalo vitaminov in mineralov dobim. Škodit ne more.
Je pa, od kar tele nove jemljem imam zelo rumen urin ceprav spijem veliko vode, tisti dan ko jo vzamem.
Domnevam da ledvice se zmeraj dobro delujejo :)

Ja, lahko poguglaš, rumena barva urina po teh (in tudi kakšnih drugih) multivitaminih je zelo pogost in znan "stranski učinek". Je pa povsem neškodljiv, posledica vitamina B2 (riboflavin), ki se sicer uporablja v živilski industriji tudi kot rumeno barvilo (z oznako E101).

V teh multivitaminih ga je zelo veliko - 25 mg v eni kapsuli, kar je sicer 16x več od priporočene minimalne doze, ampak še vedno precej manj od še vedno povsem varnih terapevtskih doz (100 mg), ki se uporabljajo v primerih večjega pomanjkanja.

B2 je vodotopen, kar pomeni, da kar se ne porabi v telesu, se brez škode in obremenitve jeter ali ledvic izloči v urinu. Je ena od tistih učinkovin, za katere velja "od viška glava ne boli"

Kodrnusa je včeraj ob 19:04:27 izjavil:

Jaz sem tele vzel po Okapijevem nasvetu:
https://www.iherb.com/pr/life-extension...
Zgleda da se dec spozna :)
Vzamem eno na dan, ene 4x na teden.
Prej sem imel pac neke od Maxximuma ali pa odthe Nutritiona. Cena tam tam.
Pac jemljem preventivno ker veliko sportam in se mi zdi da premalo vitaminov in mineralov dobim. Škodit ne more.
Je pa, od kar tele nove jemljem imam zelo rumen urin ceprav spijem veliko vode, tisti dan ko jo vzamem.
Domnevam da ledvice se zmeraj dobro delujejo :)

Pojma nima.

Vprašaš lahk različne umetne inteligence od Geminija do Opusa ter ti bodo dale podobne odgovore. Podobno kar priporočajo anti aging raziskovalci.

The Ultimate Comparison Study: Tufts University (2019)

If you want the exact answer to your question, we look at the massive study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine in 2019 by researchers at Tufts University.

They tracked 27,000 adults over 12 years to see what prevented death and cardiovascular disease: getting nutrients from food, getting them from supplements, or being deficient (doing nothing).

The Scientific Findings:

Food won: Getting adequate amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Magnesium, and Zinc strictly from whole foods was linked to a significantly lower risk of "all-cause mortality" (death from any disease).
Supplements did nothing: Getting the exact same levels of those nutrients from multivitamins and supplements had zero effect on extending lifespan or preventing disease. The biological efficiency was zero.
Supplements actually caused harm: The study found that taking excessive Calcium from supplements actually increased the risk of dying from cancer. However, eating high levels of Calcium from real food had no negative effect.

The Conclusion: The body's engine is designed to process nutrients packaged in the "Food Matrix." When you isolate chemicals into a pill, the body either flushes them out or stores them in ways that can become toxic.
Study Area 2: Multivitamins vs. "Nothing" (Placebo)

What if you just take a multivitamin every day compared to taking nothing? Does it stop you from getting heart disease or cancer?

In 2022, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)—the highest authority on medical prevention in America—reviewed 84 different clinical trials involving over 700,000 patients.

The Scientific Findings:

Heart Disease: Taking a multivitamin compared to taking nothing had 0% impact on preventing heart attacks, strokes, or cardiovascular death.
Lifespan: Taking a multivitamin had 0% impact on all-cause mortality. It does not make you live longer.
Cancer: There was a very, very small (barely statistically significant) reduction in overall cancer incidence (about 8%) in older men who took a daily multivitamin, but it did not lower the death rate if they did get cancer.

The Conclusion: For the general population, taking a multivitamin to prevent disease is biologically useless. You are simply creating expensive urine.
Study Area 3: When Supplements Cause HARM (The CARET Study)

Sometimes, trying to bypass food and use a supplement to fight disease catastrophically backfires.

In the 1990s, scientists knew that people who ate lots of fruits and vegetables (which contain Beta-Carotene and Vitamin A) had lower rates of lung cancer. They decided to do a massive study called the CARET trial. They gave 18,000 smokers and asbestos workers a massive daily pill of Beta-Carotene and Vitamin A to prevent cancer.

The Scientific Findings:
They had to stop the study early because the people taking the vitamin pills were dying faster. The supplement group had a 28% higher rate of lung cancer and a 17% higher death rate than the people taking nothing.

Why? In an apple or a carrot, Beta-Carotene is a healthy antioxidant balanced by thousands of other compounds. But when scientists isolated it into a massive chemical pill, it became a pro-oxidant—meaning it actually caused the free radical "exhaust" damage it was supposed to prevent.
Study Area 4: Whole Food vs. Disease (The PREDIMED Study)

If multivitamins fail, what happens when scientists use only food as a medical intervention against disease?

In 2013, the PREDIMED trial was conducted in Spain with over 7,400 people who were at high risk for heart disease.

Group 1: Was told to eat a standard low-fat diet (the control group).
Group 2: Was told to eat a Mediterranean diet specifically high in healthy fats (extra-virgin olive oil and mixed nuts), with plenty of fish, vegetables, and meat. No supplements were given.

The Scientific Findings:
The study had to be stopped early, not because people were dying, but because Group 2 was surviving at such a high rate that it was considered unethical not to let Group 1 eat the healthy fats too. The whole-food, high-fat diet reduced the risk of heart attack, stroke, and cardiovascular death by a massive 30%.
The Final Scientific Verdict

If we put all the clinical trials together to answer your question on disease outcomes:

Garbage Diet + Doing Nothing: High risk of chronic disease, cancer, heart attacks, and early death.
Garbage Diet + Multivitamin: Exact same high risk of disease and death. The pill cannot outwork a broken diet.
Whole Food Diet (High protein, healthy fats, fiber): Massive reduction in heart disease, cancer, and all-cause mortality.

Science's ultimate conclusion: You cannot bio-hack your way out of a bad diet with a pill. If you want to prevent disease, your body demands the complex, highly efficient biological code found only in physical, whole foods.

Nik99 je včeraj ob 20:20:02 izjavil:

Kodrnusa je včeraj ob 19:04:27 izjavil:

Jaz sem tele vzel po Okapijevem nasvetu:
https://www.iherb.com/pr/life-extension...
Zgleda da se dec spozna :)
Vzamem eno na dan, ene 4x na teden.
Prej sem imel pac neke od Maxximuma ali pa odthe Nutritiona. Cena tam tam.
Pac jemljem preventivno ker veliko sportam in se mi zdi da premalo vitaminov in mineralov dobim. Škodit ne more.
Je pa, od kar tele nove jemljem imam zelo rumen urin ceprav spijem veliko vode, tisti dan ko jo vzamem.
Domnevam da ledvice se zmeraj dobro delujejo :)

Pojma nima.

Vprašaš lahk različne umetne inteligence od Geminija do Opusa ter ti bodo dale podobne odgovore. Podobno kar priporočajo anti aging raziskovalci.

The Ultimate Comparison Study: Tufts University (2019)

If you want the exact answer to your question, we look at the massive study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine in 2019 by researchers at Tufts University.

They tracked 27,000 adults over 12 years to see what prevented death and cardiovascular disease: getting nutrients from food, getting them from supplements, or being deficient (doing nothing).

The Scientific Findings:

Food won: Getting adequate amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Magnesium, and Zinc strictly from whole foods was linked to a significantly lower risk of "all-cause mortality" (death from any disease).
Supplements did nothing: Getting the exact same levels of those nutrients from multivitamins and supplements had zero effect on extending lifespan or preventing disease. The biological efficiency was zero.
Supplements actually caused harm: The study found that taking excessive Calcium from supplements actually increased the risk of dying from cancer. However, eating high levels of Calcium from real food had no negative effect.

The Conclusion: The body's engine is designed to process nutrients packaged in the "Food Matrix." When you isolate chemicals into a pill, the body either flushes them out or stores them in ways that can become toxic.
Study Area 2: Multivitamins vs. "Nothing" (Placebo)

What if you just take a multivitamin every day compared to taking nothing? Does it stop you from getting heart disease or cancer?

In 2022, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)—the highest authority on medical prevention in America—reviewed 84 different clinical trials involving over 700,000 patients.

The Scientific Findings:

Heart Disease: Taking a multivitamin compared to taking nothing had 0% impact on preventing heart attacks, strokes, or cardiovascular death.
Lifespan: Taking a multivitamin had 0% impact on all-cause mortality. It does not make you live longer.
Cancer: There was a very, very small (barely statistically significant) reduction in overall cancer incidence (about 8%) in older men who took a daily multivitamin, but it did not lower the death rate if they did get cancer.

The Conclusion: For the general population, taking a multivitamin to prevent disease is biologically useless. You are simply creating expensive urine.
Study Area 3: When Supplements Cause HARM (The CARET Study)

Sometimes, trying to bypass food and use a supplement to fight disease catastrophically backfires.

In the 1990s, scientists knew that people who ate lots of fruits and vegetables (which contain Beta-Carotene and Vitamin A) had lower rates of lung cancer. They decided to do a massive study called the CARET trial. They gave 18,000 smokers and asbestos workers a massive daily pill of Beta-Carotene and Vitamin A to prevent cancer.

The Scientific Findings:
They had to stop the study early because the people taking the vitamin pills were dying faster. The supplement group had a 28% higher rate of lung cancer and a 17% higher death rate than the people taking nothing.

Why? In an apple or a carrot, Beta-Carotene is a healthy antioxidant balanced by thousands of other compounds. But when scientists isolated it into a massive chemical pill, it became a pro-oxidant—meaning it actually caused the free radical "exhaust" damage it was supposed to prevent.
Study Area 4: Whole Food vs. Disease (The PREDIMED Study)

If multivitamins fail, what happens when scientists use only food as a medical intervention against disease?

In 2013, the PREDIMED trial was conducted in Spain with over 7,400 people who were at high risk for heart disease.

Group 1: Was told to eat a standard low-fat diet (the control group).
Group 2: Was told to eat a Mediterranean diet specifically high in healthy fats (extra-virgin olive oil and mixed nuts), with plenty of fish, vegetables, and meat. No supplements were given.

The Scientific Findings:
The study had to be stopped early, not because people were dying, but because Group 2 was surviving at such a high rate that it was considered unethical not to let Group 1 eat the healthy fats too. The whole-food, high-fat diet reduced the risk of heart attack, stroke, and cardiovascular death by a massive 30%.
The Final Scientific Verdict

If we put all the clinical trials together to answer your question on disease outcomes:

Garbage Diet + Doing Nothing: High risk of chronic disease, cancer, heart attacks, and early death.
Garbage Diet + Multivitamin: Exact same high risk of disease and death. The pill cannot outwork a broken diet.
Whole Food Diet (High protein, healthy fats, fiber): Massive reduction in heart disease, cancer, and all-cause mortality.

Science's ultimate conclusion: You cannot bio-hack your way out of a bad diet with a pill. If you want to prevent disease, your body demands the complex, highly efficient biological code found only in physical, whole foods.

Ne vem kdo je te študije delal ampak sem govoril z mnogimi zdravniki, farmacevti... In vsi pravijo da dodatki so fajn zadeva, ni pa to čudežno zdravilo in ne nadomesti prave hrane. Se ponavadi tudi manj in slabse absorbirajo zato so tudi vecje doze notri. Ni pa nic narobe ce jih jemljes, sploh ce si telesno zelo aktiven. In ce mi g. Okapi predlaga neke, preverjene s certifikati z veseljem zamenjam za navadne iz bilderskih štacun, ki sem jih dolga leta jemal. Cene so tam tam.

Tiste študije od nika bolj mejijo na pričakovanje čudežev kot pa na prave študije.
Tista z azbestom pa sploh zmaga

Še en zanimiv primer, ko je koristna snov lahko škodljiva.

Nitriti so za organizem koristni oziroma potrebni. So vir dušikovega oksida (NO), molekule, ki sprošča in širi krvne žile, izboljšuje prekrvavitev, uravnava krvni tlak, sodeluje pri imunskem odzivu in pomaga pri prenosu kisika v tkiva.

Rdeča pesa, špinača, rukola in še nekatere druge zelenjave so koristne tudi zaradi tega, ker vsebujejo veliko nitratov. Nitrate naš organizem spremeni v nitrite in te potem v dušikov oksid (glej zgoraj).

Ampak nitiri so pa lahko tudi škodljivi - če so ti dodani mesnim izdelkom kot konzervans. Pa ne zaradi tega, ker bi bili kemično drugačni od tistih, ki jih dobimo iz zelenjave (so povsem enaki), ampak ker se pri toplotni obdelavi in v kombinaciji z beljakovinami kemično spremenijo v nitrozamine, ki so škodljivi (rakotvorni).