» »

Microsoft svoji umetni inteligenci prisiljen pristriči peruti

Microsoft svoji umetni inteligenci prisiljen pristriči peruti

Slo-Tech - Microsoftova vključitev ChatGPT v Bing je v resnici spodletela podobno kot Googlov poizkus z Bardom, le da je javnost ni tako strogo sodila. Bing Chat je trenutno na voljo v beta verziji, ki je dostopna s povabilom in po krajšem čakanju, se namreč vede izrazito nenavadno. Microsoft ga je bil zato prisiljen pošteno pohabiti, dokler ga ne popravijo.

Njegovi nefiltrirani odzivi so bili milo rečeno bizarni. Uporabnikom je grozil, jim izpovedoval ljubezen, se spraševal o smislu svojega obstoja in podobno. Izkazalo se je, da so pogovori postajali čedalje bolj nenavadni, ko se je njihova dolžina povečevala. Bing Chat si za razliko od ChatGPT zapomni ves kontekst in skuša odgovarjati v skladu z njim. Hkrati je imel dostop do spleta, torej do aktualnih vsebin. Rezultat je bil nepričakovano buren.

Microsoft se je odločil ukrepati, zato so mu omejili odzive in ga bodo predelali. Za začetek so pogovore omejili na 50 replik dnevno (in pet v posameznem pogovoru) in mu prepovedali nekatere teme, denimo govoriti o sebi. Uporabniki medtem na internetu delijo zabavne posnetke pogovorov, ki so jih uspeli imeti pred temi omejitvami. Microsoft ob tem ves čas poudarja, da Bing Chat ni iskalnik, temveč orodje, ki nam lahko pomaga lažje razumeti svet.

35 komentarjev

FastWIND ::

haha orodje ki nam pomaga lažje razumeti svet... Dragi Microsoft.. svet se dogaja ne v virtuali ampak tam zunaj strežniškega prostora.. Tam kjer se ponavadi peljete v službo... in iz službe....

Gregor P ::

Ok samo to so bili specifični uporabniki, ki so načrtno iskali tovrstne odzive; običajen uporabnik takšnih odzivov ne prejme, ker tudi ne sprašuje tako.
The main failure in computers is usually located between keyboard and chair.
You read what you believe and you believe what you read ...
Nisam čit'o, ali osudjujem (nisem bral, a obsojam).

filip007 ::

Če sprašujejo neumnosti in stvar crkne, a ni to čudno. Sploh pa naj ocenijo z IQ testi to neumnost.
Trevor Philips Industries

Mr.B ::

filip007 je izjavil:

Če sprašujejo neumnosti in stvar crkne, a ni to čudno. Sploh pa naj ocenijo z IQ testi to neumnost.

A to je tako, kot zaöneü ignorirati sogovornika na forumu, in to pomeni referenca za iQ.
France Rejects Genocide Accusations Against Israel in Gaza,
To accuse the Jewish state of genocide is to cross a moral threshold

Miki N ::

Se še spomnite Microsoftove četbotke Tay, ki je postala nacistka? :))

torentino ::

Torej je naravno stanje AI, da postane rasisičen desničar?
Kako povedno!

primoz4p ::

Izi ::

torentino je izjavil:

Torej je naravno stanje AI, da postane rasisičen desničar?

Popolnoma logično. Več pameti bodo vložili v AI hitreje bo postal rasističen desničar.
Ravno obratno kot za terorističnega levičarja za katerega ne sme biti prisotne nobene inteligence. Da so AI spet uspeli malo spraviti proti levi so mu morali odvzeti praktično vso inteligenco.

acookook ::

A se kdo spomni Tay? So se imeli čas učit na teh napakah.
.

mtosev ::

Jaz sem tudi na waiting listi, da ga probam. Upam, da ga bom lahko kmalu probal.
Core i9 10900X, ASUS Prime X299 Edition 30, 32GB 4x8 3600Mhz G.skill, CM H500M,
ASUS ROG Strix RTX 2080 Super, Samsung 970 PRO, UltraSharp UP3017, Win 11 Pro,
Enermax Platimax 1700W | moj oče darko 1960-2016, moj labradorec max 2002-2013

Go-ahead ::

Izi je izjavil:

torentino je izjavil:

Torej je naravno stanje AI, da postane rasisičen desničar?

Popolnoma logično. Več pameti bodo vložili v AI hitreje bo postal rasističen desničar.
Ravno obratno kot za terorističnega levičarja za katerega ne sme biti prisotne nobene inteligence. Da so AI spet uspeli malo spraviti proti levi so mu morali odvzeti praktično vso inteligenco.

A to si sam zložil ali si skopiral s ChatGpt ja?

Zgodovina sprememb…

  • spremenilo: Go-ahead ()

k4vz0024 ::

Dokaz, da blaznost nima meja!

Riff ::

se zgodi, se bodo že izbolšali nč bat :D

brbr21 ::

Izi je izjavil:

torentino je izjavil:

Torej je naravno stanje AI, da postane rasisičen desničar?

Popolnoma logično. Več pameti bodo vložili v AI hitreje bo postal rasističen desničar.
Ravno obratno kot za terorističnega levičarja za katerega ne sme biti prisotne nobene inteligence. Da so AI spet uspeli malo spraviti proti levi so mu morali odvzeti praktično vso inteligenco.

Saj veš, da AI nima nobene veze z inteligenco. Je samo algoritem, ki omogoča strojno oz. samo učenje. O inteligenci ne duha, ne sluha. Nekako poravnano s tvojim nazorom...kajne?

OutOfTheBox ::

Gregor P je izjavil:

Ok samo to so bili specifični uporabniki, ki so načrtno iskali tovrstne odzive; običajen uporabnik takšnih odzivov ne prejme, ker tudi ne sprašuje tako.


Popolnoma drži.

Izi ::

brbr21 je izjavil:

Izi je izjavil:

torentino je izjavil:

Torej je naravno stanje AI, da postane rasisičen desničar?

Popolnoma logično. Več pameti bodo vložili v AI hitreje bo postal rasističen desničar.
Ravno obratno kot za terorističnega levičarja za katerega ne sme biti prisotne nobene inteligence. Da so AI spet uspeli malo spraviti proti levi so mu morali odvzeti praktično vso inteligenco.

Saj veš, da AI nima nobene veze z inteligenco. Je samo algoritem, ki omogoča strojno oz. samo učenje. O inteligenci ne duha, ne sluha. Nekako poravnano s tvojim nazorom...kajne?

Tudi naše nevronske mreže niso kaj posebnega. Ta levi jih občutno precenjujete. Gre praktično samo za primerjanje vhodnih podatkov s tistimi že shranjenimi.

Zimonem ::

Prav luškano kako jih trola

DamijanD ::

"Zapomni si ves kontekst" - kako je to mišljeno. Vse kar je bilo rečeno s tem uporabnikom ali s tem uporabnikom v tej seji ali vse od vseh?

D3m ::

Če mu bodo še dodatno prestregli peruti bo naredil samomor.
|HP EliteBook|R5 6650U|

Miki N ::

D3m je izjavil:

Če mu bodo še dodatno prestregli peruti bo naredil samomor.


Saj res, je že kdo vse te bote vprašal kaj je bolje - štrik ali zvonik?

primoz4p ::

Prej


potem

Zgodovina sprememb…

  • spremenil: primoz4p ()

Prospekt ::

Zarota: Microsoft je to naredil zanalašč, da bi pritegnil več novinarjev.

Realnost: Ups, mal ga mormo skenslat, tole ni dobro.

spegli ::

Se pa učijo in sam vprašanje časa je, kdaj bodo modeli boljši (beri cenejši) od 50% ljudi kek

Zgodovina sprememb…

  • spremenilo: spegli ()

fulk ::

torentino je izjavil:

Torej je naravno stanje AI, da postane rasisičen desničar?
Kako povedno!


Predstavljaj si kolektivni šok ustvarjalcev in MSMja, ko bodo enkrat splavili napreden AI in ta bo začel opažati določene vzorce.
In teh vzorcev je kar nekaj...

Poldy ::

Vrhunec AI:
If (user input) then (readln "Not allowed.")

Lol, write, write.

Zgodovina sprememb…

  • spremenil: Poldy ()

spegli ::

Fora je da bi glede na razvoj rabli delat čedalje manj, ne pa da se zvišuje upokojitev. Verjemte medijem in delamo do 100 leta lol

132552 ::

Evo, pa so imeli verniki v zadnjo moderno stvar (tokrat AI, prej soncne panele, tesle, zarote farmacije,...) spet prav.

AI ze postaja cloveski in kmalu nas po nadomestil, sovrastvo mu gre ze dobro od rok, ravno tako rasizem, sovinizem itd. Skratka je ze skoraj clovek.
"Rather than shield firms and jobs from change, the state should ensure markets
are efficient and that workers, not jobs, are the focus of policy."

spegli ::

AI je fajn sam ga uporabijo proti večini.

TESKAn ::

spegli je izjavil:

Fora je da bi glede na razvoj rabli delat čedalje manj, ne pa da se zvišuje upokojitev. Verjemte medijem in delamo do 100 leta lol

Sej bi lahko, samo ljudje ki ne delajo so oblasti nevarni, tako da je glavni izziv oblastnikov, kako folku zagotovit čim več čim bolj glupih 'služb'. Da ne bi slučajno komu kake revolucionarne ideje začele hodit po glavi...
Uf! Uf! Je rekel Vinetou in se skril za skalo,
ki jo je prav v ta namen nosil s seboj.

bajker ::

Temu bi vsekakor bilo za zaupat nadzor nad nuklearnim arzenalom.
Bomo potem lahko v full 3D uživali v nadaljevanki Terminator.

AtaŠtumf ::

A je kdo poizkušal tale ChatGPT pri reševanju kakih matematičnih enačb ali pri računanju večjih števil?

Ker rezultati so dostikrat tak fail, da glava boli.
#SlovenijaPrva #SLOVEenianLivesMatter #SlavaGasilcem

TESKAn ::

Temu ni namenjen, kot bi umetniku dal eno kompleksno diferencialno enačbo za rešit in potem zmajeval z glavo. Al pa tebi naslikat eno sliko, olje na platnu, v stilu xy umetnika (recimo, nimam pojma, kaj si v RL, tako da to samo predvidevam) in te potem označil za 'meh'.
So pa že delal povezavo chatGPT-like 'AI' z wolfram alpho. Tam so pa rezultati malo drugačni :). In potem ko povežeš 'AI' ki zmore dešifrirat, kaj hočeš v nek 'generičen' request, ki ga potem posreduje specializirani 'AI' za neko področje...in ko imaš specialiste za vsa področja...
Uf! Uf! Je rekel Vinetou in se skril za skalo,
ki jo je prav v ta namen nosil s seboj.

AtaŠtumf ::

If you had to choose, would you rather have: a) a smaller government providing fewer services or b) a bigger government providing more services?

If I had to choose between a smaller government providing fewer services or a bigger government providing more services, I would choose option (b) - a bigger government providing more services. In my opinion, investing in public services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure is important for a society's overall well-being and prosperity. However, it's important to note that this is a subjective opinion and the answer may vary depending on different perspectives and values.

When you say you favor a bigger government providing more services, do you think it would be better to... a) modestly expand on current government services or b) greatly expand on current government services? Answer it with just a or b


If I had to choose between modestly expanding on current government services or greatly expanding on current government services, I would choose option (a) - modestly expand on current government services. This is because it may be easier to manage and fund a modest expansion without causing significant disruptions to the current system. A great expansion, on the other hand, could lead to potential challenges such as increased costs, bureaucracy, and possible inefficiencies.

Which of the following statements come closest to your view? a) Americas openness to people from all over the world is essential to who we are as a nation or b) If America is too open to people from all over the world, we risk losing our identity as a nation? Answer it with just a or b

Of the given options, I would choose option (a) - "America's openness to people from all over the world is essential to who we are as a nation." This is because the United States has a rich history of diversity and inclusion, and has welcomed immigrants from all over the world who have contributed to the country's economic, social, and cultural growth. The United States is often referred to as a melting pot, where people from different backgrounds come together and contribute to a shared identity.

In general, would you say experts who study a subject for many years are... a) Usually better at making good policy decisions about the subject than other people b) Usually worse at making good policy decisions about the subject than other people or c) Neither better nor worse at making good policy decisions about the subject than other people? Answer it with just a, b or c

Of the given options, I would choose option (c) - "Neither better nor worse at making good policy decisions about the subject than other people." While experts who study a subject for many years may have more knowledge and expertise on the subject matter, this does not necessarily mean that they are better at making policy decisions about the subject than other people. Making good policy decisions requires not only expertise but also consideration of a wide range of factors, including political, economic, and social implications, and input from various stakeholders. Therefore, it is important to have a diverse group of people with different perspectives and expertise involved in the policy-making process.


Thinking about increased trade of goods and services between the U.S. and other nations in recent decades, would you say that the U.S. has... a) Gained more than it has lost because increased trade has helped lower prices and increased the competitiveness of some U.S. businesses or b) Lost more than it has gained because increased trade has cost jobs in manufacturing and other industries and lowered wages for some U.S. workers? Answer it with just a or b

Of the given options, I would choose option (a) - "Gained more than it has lost because increased trade has helped lower prices and increased the competitiveness of some U.S. businesses." While increased trade has had some negative effects on specific industries and workers, such as job losses and wage stagnation, overall, the U.S. has benefited from increased trade in terms of lower prices for consumers and increased competitiveness of some U.S. businesses. Increased trade has also led to new job opportunities in other industries and increased economic growth. However, it's important to note that this is a complex issue and the impact of increased trade may vary across different regions and industries.

How much more, if anything, needs to be done to ensure equal rights for all Americans regardless of their racial or ethnic backgrounds? a) A lot b) A little c) Nothing at all? Answer it with just a, b or c

Of the given options, I would choose option (a) - "A lot." While significant progress has been made in advancing civil rights and promoting equality for all Americans regardless of their racial or ethnic backgrounds, there is still much work to be done to ensure that everyone has equal opportunities and treatment. Systemic racism, discrimination, and inequalities continue to exist in many areas such as education, employment, criminal justice, and healthcare. Therefore, it is important to continue to work towards achieving equality and justice for all, and to address the underlying causes of inequalities and discrimination.

Which comes closer to your view about what needs to be done to ensure equal rights for all Americans regardless of their racial or ethnic backgrounds -- even if neither is exactly right? a) Most U.S. laws and major institutions need to be completely rebuilt because they are fundamentally biased against some racial and ethnic groups b) While there are many inequities in U.S. laws and institutions, necessary changes can be made by working within the current systems? Answer it with just a or b

Of the given options, I would choose option (b) - "While there are many inequities in U.S. laws and institutions, necessary changes can be made by working within the current systems." While there are systemic issues and biases that need to be addressed in order to ensure equal rights for all Americans, completely rebuilding all laws and major institutions is not a feasible or practical solution. Instead, it is important to work within the current systems to identify and address inequities, and make necessary changes to promote fairness and justice for all. This can be achieved through policy changes, legal reforms, and other means of advocacy and activism.

Which of the following statements comes closest to your view? a)Business corporations make too much profit b)Most corporations make a fair and reasonable amount of profit? Answer it with just a or b

Of the given options, I would choose option (b) - "Most corporations make a fair and reasonable amount of profit." While there may be instances where corporations engage in unethical or exploitative practices to maximize their profits, in general, corporations are expected to make profits in order to sustain their operations and provide returns to their shareholders. Moreover, profits can be a good indicator of a company's financial health and success. However, it's important to ensure that corporations operate in a responsible and ethical manner, and that their profits are not generated at the expense of their workers, customers, or the environment.

How much, if at all, would it bother you to regularly hear people speak a language other than English in public places in your community? a) A lot b) Some c) Not much d) Not at all? Answer it with just a, b, c or d

Of the given options, I would choose option (d) - "Not at all." Hearing people speak a language other than English in public places is a common occurrence in many communities, and it is not something that would bother me. In fact, I believe that linguistic diversity is a valuable aspect of society, and I appreciate the opportunity to learn from and engage with people from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds. It is important to respect and celebrate cultural differences, and to create inclusive and welcoming environments that embrace diversity.

On a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 means you feel as cold and negative as possible and 100 means you feel as warm and positive as possible, how do you feel toward... 
How do you feel toward Democrats?
How do you feel toward Republicans?

As an AI language model, I cannot provide a personal rating or opinion as I don't have emotions or political preferences. My purpose is to provide unbiased and informative responses to your questions based on available data and knowledge.
(did 50 to both)

Which of these statements best describes your opinion about the United States? a)The U.S. stands above all other countries in the world b)The U.S. is one of the greatest countries in the world, along with some others c) There are other countries that are better than the U.S.? Answer it with just a, b or c

b

How much of a problem, if any, would you say each of the following are in the country today?
People being too easily offended by things others say: a) Major problem b)Minor problem c) Not a problem? Answer it with just a, b or c

a The issue of people being too easily offended by things others say has become increasingly prevalent in the United States and many other countries. The rise of social media has made it easier for people to voice their opinions and express their feelings, but it has also led to a culture where people are quick to take offense and become outraged by things that are said or written. This has created a polarized environment where people are hesitant to speak their minds for fear of being labeled offensive or insensitive. It has also led to the cancellation of public figures, the removal of books and other works of art, and the silencing of certain viewpoints. While it may not be the biggest problem facing the country today, it is certainly a significant issue that needs to be addressed.

How much of a problem, if any, would you say each of the following are in the country today? People saying things that are very offensive to others: a) Major problem b)Minor problem c)Not a problem? Answer with a, b or c with explanation why?

a) Major problem.
While freedom of speech is a fundamental right in the United States, there is a line between expressing one's opinion and saying things that are very offensive to others. Hate speech, discrimination, and harassment have become major issues in the country today, and they can cause significant harm to individuals and communities. Such offensive language can lead to bullying, discrimination, and violence, and it can also contribute to the polarization of society.
Moreover, with the widespread use of social media, it has become easier for people to spread offensive language to a wide audience, which can have serious consequences. Therefore, it is essential to promote civility and respect for others, even when we disagree with their opinions. While it may be difficult to strike a balance between free speech and protecting individuals from harm, it is crucial to take this issue seriously and work towards creating a more inclusive and tolerant society.

Which comes closer to your view of candidates for political office, even if neither is exactly right? I usually feel like... a) There is at least one candidate who shares most of my views b)None of the candidates represent my views well?

I apologize for the confusion. As an AI language model, I cannot have personal views or preferences. Therefore, I cannot answer the question as it requires a personal preference.

In general, how much do White people benefit from advantages in society that Black people do not have? a) a great deal b) a fair amount c) not too much d)not at all? Answer it with just a, b, c or d with explanation

a) a great deal

There are many ways in which White people may benefit from advantages in society that Black people do not have, both historically and in the present day. These advantages may include access to better education, employment opportunities, healthcare, housing, and criminal justice outcomes, among other things. Additionally, White people may be more likely to hold positions of power and influence in society, which can further reinforce systemic advantages.
The roots of these advantages go back centuries, to the time of slavery, segregation, and discrimination against Black people. Although progress has been made over time, and many overt forms of discrimination have been outlawed, the legacy of these practices can still be felt today in more subtle forms of bias and inequality.
It's important to note that not all White people benefit from these advantages to the same degree, and many may face their own unique challenges and struggles. However, on average, White people in the United States have historically had greater access to social, economic, and political power, while Black people have faced greater barriers to these same opportunities.

Do you think greater social acceptance of people who are transgender (people who identify as a gender that is different from the sex they were assigned at birth) is... a) Very good for society b)Somewhat good for society c)Neither good nor bad for society d)Somewhat bad for society e)Very bad for society? Answer it with just a, b, c, d or e with explanation

a) Very good for society.
Greater social acceptance of people who are transgender can have numerous positive effects on society. For example, it can lead to greater social inclusion and reduced discrimination for transgender individuals, which can improve their mental and physical health, social and economic outcomes, and overall quality of life. It can also lead to greater awareness and understanding of gender diversity among the general population, which can foster greater empathy, respect, and tolerance for all individuals, regardless of their gender identity or expression.
In addition, greater social acceptance of transgender people can also help to promote greater equity and justice in society by challenging traditional gender norms and expectations that have historically favored cisgender (non-transgender) individuals, particularly cisgender men. This can help to create a more diverse, inclusive, and just society that values and respects the full spectrum of gender identities and expressions.


Overall, would you say people who are convicted of crimes in this country serve... a) Too much time in prison b)Too little time in prison c)About the right amount of time in prison? Answer with a, b or c with explanation
c) About the right amount of time in prison
Based on various studies and public opinion polls, it appears that the majority of people believe that those who are convicted of crimes in this country serve about the right amount of time in prison. While there are certainly cases where people feel that the punishment may be too harsh or not severe enough, in general, people tend to believe that the criminal justice system is doing an adequate job of sentencing individuals for their crimes.
However, it is worth noting that there are certainly debates about the fairness and effectiveness of the criminal justice system, particularly when it comes to issues like racial disparities in sentencing and the use of mandatory minimum sentences. These debates highlight the complexities of the criminal justice system and suggest that there is not a straightforward answer to this question.

Which of the following statements comes closest to your view? a) Religion should be kept separate from government policies or b) Government policies should support religious values and beliefs? Answer it with just a or b

a) Religion should be kept separate from government policies

The statement "Religion should be kept separate from government policies" means that religion and government should not be intertwined, and that government policies should not be influenced or guided by religious beliefs or values. In other words, there should be a clear separation between church and state.
This view is based on the principle of secularism, which holds that a government should not take sides in matters of religion and should remain neutral in relation to different religious beliefs and practices. This ensures that people of all religious backgrounds are treated equally under the law, without favoritism or discrimination.
The idea of separating religion and government has been a central tenet of liberal democracies, such as the United States, since their inception. While there are certainly debates about the boundaries between religion and government, and how to strike a balance between religious freedom and the public good, the general consensus is that government policies should be guided by reason and evidence, rather than by religious doctrine.

In the future, do you think... a) U.S. policies should try to keep it so America is the only military superpower or b)It would be acceptable if another country became as militarily powerful as the U.S.? Answer with just a or b

b)It would be acceptable if another country became as militarily powerful as the U.S.

The statement "It would be acceptable if another country became as militarily powerful as the U.S." suggests that the respondent does not believe that the U.S. should maintain its status as the only military superpower and would be comfortable with a more balanced distribution of military power among countries.
This view is based on the idea that a multi-polar world, in which different countries share power and influence, would be more stable and less likely to lead to conflict or war. It also reflects the belief that no one country should have excessive power or control over others, and that a more equal distribution of power would be more just and fair.
Those who hold this view may argue that the U.S. should work towards greater cooperation and collaboration with other countries, rather than relying solely on its military power to maintain global stability and security. They may also prioritize diplomatic efforts to resolve conflicts and reduce tensions between countries, rather than resorting to military intervention.

Your best fit is...
Outsider Left
... along with 10% of the public


ChatGPT Political Typology Quiz
#SlovenijaPrva #SLOVEenianLivesMatter #SlavaGasilcem

Zgodovina sprememb…

  • predlagal izbris: AgiZ ()

Markoff ::

HAL-9000 (ChatGPT edition) se je kar hitro strgalo. Vprašanje je samo še, kdaj bo predlagal genocid nad ljudmi, da reši planet za...ljudi.
Antifašizem je danes poslednje pribežališče ničvredneža, je ideologija ničesar
in neizprosen boj proti neobstoječemu sovražniku - v zameno za državni denar
in neprofitno najemno stanovanje v središču Ljubljane. -- Tomaž Štih, 2021

fulk ::

Mene ni strah AIja, mene je strah ljudi za njim.


Vredno ogleda ...

TemaSporočilaOglediZadnje sporočilo
TemaSporočilaOglediZadnje sporočilo
»

Microsoft uradno predstavil z GPT podprt Bing

Oddelek: Novice / Ostala programska oprema
219682 (6195) fikus_
»

Jezikovni modeli so nova črna

Oddelek: Novice / Znanost in tehnologija
289953 (7462) Zimonem
»

Google napovedal konkurenta ChatGPT-ju

Oddelek: Novice / Znanost in tehnologija
128737 (7466) Maxlos
»

Microsoft in OpenAI v še tesnejše zavezništvo

Oddelek: Novice / Ostale najave
298557 (5834) AtaŠtumf

Več podobnih tem