Množičen protest Googlovih zaposlenih

FormerUser je 6. nov 2018 ob 20:15 izjavil:

Glavna stvar, ki si jo želijo moški je validacija s strani drugih moških, evolucija nima nič s tem, to je posledica patriarhalne vzgoje,

poweroff je 6. nov 2018 ob 21:28 izjavil:

Kot prvo, niso pregledali vseh primerov. Kot drugo, pokazali so na bias sistema. Ki ne temelji vedno na materialnih dokazih, pač pa zadostuje pričanje. Ženske. Bi bilo pa zanimivo videti, ali velja tudi obratno. Da zgolj na podlagi pričanja enega moškega (brez materialnih dokazov), obsodijo žensko.

Mehmed je 6. nov 2018 ob 23:07 izjavil:

Dva nacina imas, da si po krivem obsojen pa oproscen posilstva.
Nekdo si lahko izmisli posilstvo ali pa nekdo pokaze na napacnega.
Ce je recimo zrtev bela pa storilec crn je ene 8x vec sans, da obsodijo napacnega. Napacne prepoznave so tisto kar zagotavlja delo innocence projectu, ne krive ovadbe.

FormerUser je 7. nov 2018 ob 11:16 izjavil:

windigo je 7. nov 2018 ob 09:45 izjavil:

Kakšen vir za tole, ali je to morda tvoja osebna vera?

To je moje mnenje ustvarjeno na podlagi opazovanja ter branja in ja gotovo obstajajo tudi študiji, ki to potrjujejo.

FormerUser je 7. nov 2018 ob 11:10 izjavil:

Od kar so na voljo DNK forenzične analize, je zmota zaradi napačne prepoznave takorekoč neobstoječa

FormerUser je 7. nov 2018 ob 11:10 izjavil:

kar vse odvrača fokus od bistva problematike, ki je še vedno v tem, da je samo 3/4 posilstev prijavljenih policiji

poweroff je 7. nov 2018 ob 11:35 izjavil:

Kot smo pokazali, se moške včasih obsoja na podlagi zgolj pričanja in brez kakršnihkoli materialnih dokazov. Torej, DNK analiza sploh ni uporabljena.

poweroff je 7. nov 2018 ob 11:35 izjavil:

Po moje je prijavljenih manj kot 5% posilstev. Seveda govorim o posilstvih, kjer so žrtve moški, storilke pa ženske.

FormerUser je 7. nov 2018 ob 11:35 izjavil:

Invictus je 7. nov 2018 ob 11:25 izjavil:

Če greš na slovenska družinska sodišča, je beseda ženske vredna 100x več od moškega. Ne glede na laži, ki so izrečene...

To je še en lažni stereotip, ki se rad širi, resnica pa je ta, da je analiza Varuha za človekove pravice, ki so jo naredili par let nazaj, pokazala, da obstaja cca. 50/50 možnost, da moški in ženska v družinskem sporu na sodišču dosežeta svoj prav.

FormerUser je 7. nov 2018 ob 11:42 izjavil:

poweroff je 7. nov 2018 ob 11:35 izjavil:

Po moje je prijavljenih manj kot 5% posilstev. Seveda govorim o posilstvih, kjer so žrtve moški, storilke pa ženske.

Imagodei želi dvigniti nivo debate, za vsako tako tako trditev je treba sedaj predložiti peer reviewed študijo. Tako da, izvoli.

V bistvu današnje ženske tipa Hipatija izkoriščajo trpljenje vseh žensk v zgodovini za to, da si danes neupravičeno oz. v nasprotju z načelom enakopravnosti priborijo privilegije.

Mehmed je 18. nov 2018 ob 00:11 izjavil:

Ta folk se je za denar odrekel pravici iti na sodisce in tlakoval teren za raznovrstno sranje.

Fifty-nine percent of sexual assault exonerees are African Americans, four-and-a-half times their proportion in the population; thirty-four percent are white. Unlike murder, these numbers are way out of line with the racial composition of sexual assault convictions. As of the end of 2014, 22% of American prisoners convicted of sexual assault were black, 44% were white and 19% Hispanic.24 Judging from known erroneous convictions, a prisoner serving time for sexual assault is three-and-a-half times as likely to be innocent if he is black than if he is white.
Ninety-nine percent of the victims in sexual assault exonerations—like more than 90% of all
sexual assault victims in the United States25—are women. Strangers commit only about one-fifth of sexual assaults on women,26 but they account for 71% of the false convictions that result in exoneration (204/289).
The leading cause of false sexual assault convictions is eyewitness misidentification of defendants who are strangers to the victims. In 79% of sexual assault exonerations (228/289), the identity of the man who committed the rape was the only issue at trial;27 86% of those cases were rapes by strangers (195/228), and 88% included mistaken eyewitness identifications (200/228). There were eyewitness misidentifications in 69% of all sexual assault exonerations (200/289), including 86% of the cases in which the defendants were strangers to the victims (176/204). The rate of eyewitness errors is much higher for innocent black defendants—79% (135/170)—than for whites, 51% (50/99).
In half of all sexual assault exonerations with eyewitness misidentifications, black men were convicted of raping white women, 28 a racial combination that appears in less than 11% of sexual assaults in the United States.29 According to surveys of crime victims, about 70% of white sexual assault victims were attacked by white men and only about 13% by black men.30 But 57% of white victim sexual assault exonerees are black (101/177), and 37% are white—which suggests that black defendants convicted of raping white women are about eight times more likely to be innocent than white men convicted of raping women of their own race.
There are many possible explanations for this disturbing pattern, but the simplest is probably the most powerful: the perils of cross-racial identification. One of the oldest and most consistent findings of systematic studies of eyewitness identification is that white Americans are much more likely to mistake one black person for another than to mistakenly identify members of their own race.