"samostojna država" Irak

bluefish je 17. apr 2013 ob 13:21 izjavil:

Sliši se lepo, vendar je realnost v Iraku taka, da konkretnejšega gospodarstva še dolgo ne bodo videli.

ABX je 17. apr 2013 ob 13:41 izjavil:

USA je zanima samo nafta, zdaj to imajo pod kontrolo, ostalo se jih ne tiče.

Vprašanje je samo če je umrlo več ljudi zdaj ali prej ki so imeli diktatorja.

mtosev je 17. apr 2013 ob 15:18 izjavil:

baje,da se počasi gredo na boljše za razliko od afghanistana kateri je podobnem dreku kot je bil pred prihodom američanov

bluefish je 16. apr 2013 ob 19:19 izjavil:

Je bil v nedeljo na SLO2 super dokumentarec Vojna proti demokraciji (The War On Democracy), ki obravnava zgodovino s strani ZDA podprtih državnih udarov in njihovih vojaških posredovanj - seveda daleč od tega, da bi se dejansko zavzemali za svobodo prebivalstva, dvig standarda,...

galu je 17. apr 2013 ob 17:44 izjavil:

Je slučajno pisalo, kdaj bo ponovitev?

bluefish je 17. apr 2013 ob 15:20 izjavil:

V vseh letih Sadama je bilo ubitih in mučenih manj civilistov kot tekom ameriškega uvažanja kvazi demokracije.

O svobodni državi bi tudi lahko debatirali.

Smurf je 18. apr 2013 ob 18:56 izjavil:

Meni nekaj ni jasno in to opazam, da je kar pogost pojav. Ljudem ni vsec, ce se Amerika vmesa, prav tako jim ni vsec, ce se ne vmesa. What do you want :P?

mtosev je 18. apr 2013 ob 20:15 izjavil:

Smurf je 18. apr 2013 ob 18:56 izjavil:

Meni nekaj ni jasno in to opazam, da je kar pogost pojav. Ljudem ni vsec, ce se Amerika vmesa, prav tako jim ni vsec, ce se ne vmesa. What do you want :P?

večina folka na svetu itak sploh ne ve kaj si želi tak da tole ni presenetljivo

ps amerika je naredila edino napako,da saddamčka niso vrgli že leta 1991 iz oblasti

nekje v 1980s se je prijateljstvo med njim in USA končalo

According Walter Lang, senior defence intelligence officer for the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency at the time, "the use of gas on the battlefield by the Iraqis was not a matter of deep strategic concern" to Reagan and his aides, because they "were desperate to make sure that Iraq did not lose." He claimed that the Defense Intelligence Agency "would have never accepted the use of chemical weapons against civilians, but the use against military objectives was seen as inevitable in the Iraqi struggle for survival".[96] The Reagan administration did not stop aiding Iraq after receiving reports of the use of poison gas on Kurdish civilians.[148][149]

The provision of chemical precursors from United States companies to Iraq was enabled by a Ronald Reagan Administration policy that removed Iraq from the State Department's list of State Sponsors of Terrorism. Leaked portions of Iraq's "Full, Final and Complete" disclosure of the sources for its weapons programs shows that thiodiglycol, a substance needed to manufacture mustard gas, was among the chemical precursors provided to Iraq from US companies such as Alcolac International and Phillips. Both companies have since undergone reorganization and Phillips, once a subsidiary of Phillips Petroleum is now part of ConocoPhillips, an American oil and discount fossil fuel company, while Alcolac International has since dissolved and reformed as Alcolac Inc.[24] Alcolac was named as a defendant in the Aziz v. Iraq case presently pending in the United States District Court (Case No. 1:09-cv-00869-MJG).

T-h-o-r je 18. apr 2013 ob 20:24 izjavil:

kot sem napisal, sranje naredijo, ko bi morali dati mir

in mir dajo, ko bi morali narediti sranje

in vojska ostane, ko bi mogla oditi

in vojska odide, ko bi morala ostati še lep čas