Zakonopljo.si - zbiranje podpisov za predlog zakona

Mipe je 3. nov 2013 ob 14:46 izjavil:

Rak ni ravno mit.

koyotee je 4. nov 2013 ob 13:14 izjavil:

Waaaaaw, kera razlika, kot, da bi odkril toplo vodo!

LitralSM je 4. nov 2013 ob 15:28 izjavil:

Al boš pribit ko svina in boš čutil nič sploh al pa boš nasmejan kot opica je odvisno od sorte in tega, kdaj je zadeva bila trgana.
Zakaj je pa boj izgubljen? Saj je nisi primoran uživati. Se obrneš in odideš oz. se družiš, a vseeno ne kadiš. Mam frende, ki vlečejo na hard pa njuskajo špurice, a to ne pomeni, da mam vsak dan bel nos. Nisem ga imel, sploh!
Bi pa lahko gojenje bilo legalno, za farmacijo na primer. Za posameznika nima smisla, ker vsi vemo, kaj to pomeni. Domači gojitelji postanejo ljudje z doktoratom za marihuanine receptorje, ki vsem na predlog recepta (po domače gotovina) predpišejo določeno z receptom pogojeno dozo vdihavanja. Še bolje. Naj stroka sprejme kanabinoide in kritičnim primerkom predpiše kanabinoidne tabletke - isto kot pri drugih drogah torej.

Massacra je 5. nov 2013 ob 20:18 izjavil:

Pa še link do strani BigThink:
http://bigthink.com/users/carlhart

Čeprav se tipo zaveda, da alkohol, cigareti, kava... povzročajo velike družbene "pretrese", kanabis kljub temu "poriva na stran". OK. Zapečatil si bo prihodnost raziskovalca, ker čez nekaj let bomo ugotovili, kdo ga je plačeval. Bye bye dr. Hart!!!

Ps: Ja, piše se Hart. Nima dosti veze s srcem!

first_line je 6. nov 2013 ob 08:23 izjavil:

Ha ha ha ha, isti osebki ki moralizirajo in pridigajo proti alkotu, tu zagreto podpirajo legalizacijo marihuane!?!
Za kozlat. Za ene bi bilo res bolje, da ste 24/7 zadeti v kotu, tako vsaj preostalim ne delate zgage.

Poldi112 je 6. nov 2013 ob 10:49 izjavil:

Koliko pa prispevajo v blagajno s trošarinami? In koliko prihranijo pokojninski blagajni?

Poldi112 je 6. nov 2013 ob 10:49 izjavil:

Koliko pa prispevajo v blagajno s trošarinami? In koliko prihranijo pokojninski blagajni?

There are about 170 million users of alcohol in the U.S. and 16 million users of marijuana. This 10-to-1 ratio exists because alcohol is legal and marijuana is not. If we legalize marijuana, everyone agrees (even anti-prohibitionists) that we will have far more users. Ooooh, just think of all that revenue. Except we already have a working model for a legal intoxicant we collect taxes for. Let’s see how well that works:

Studies show that the U.S. collects about $8 billion yearly in taxes from alcohol. The problem is, the total cost to the U.S. in 2008 due to alcohol-related problems was $185 billion, and the government pays about 38% of that cost (approximately $72 billion), all due to consequences of alcohol consumption, according to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism. For every dollar the government collects in alcohol taxes, it expends about $9 (for such things as Medicare and Medicaid treatment for alcohol-related health troubles, long-term rehabilitation treatment, unemployment costs, and welfare). Does that seem like a model to emulate?

The legalization of alcohol is grandfathered in, and it is unlikely that major changes will be made. The last thing we should do is replicate this irrational business model. True, even though studies show both drugs are similar, many believe alcohol is worse. But even if we see only half the damages with marijuana, we cannot ignore the math: $4.50 for every $1 we collect is not a good business model.

If we need revenue that badly, why not legalize gambling and prostitution in California? My guess is those would raise more revenue than marijuana. How about a really radical idea—don’t legalize marijuana, prostitution, or gambling, and try spending less