Telemach slabo deluje? @ Slo-Tech

Forum » Omrežja in internet »
Telemach slabo deluje?

Telemach slabo deluje?

jerry2000 :: 10. jan 2003, 00:16

Ali se zadnje tedne še komu dogaja, da Telemach Ljubljana slabo deluje? Kot bi se paketek ustavil in ga ne bi hotelo resendati. To se pozna pri surfanju po webu, recimo začne odpirati Slo Tech pa neha in lahko čajam minuto ali dve. Če dam refresh je ponavadi takoj naloženo. Pa zdi se mi da je v ciklih, nekaj minut dela super, potem pa kar to, kar sem opisal, da je včasih prav moreče že...

Zdaj pa... je to moj modem, moj računalnik ali se še komu dogaja kaj takega? Pa dozdeva se mi da ob takih urah okoli polnoči mi pa bolje deluje, vsi ti problemi so pa začeli pri meni pred novim letom...

Jerry

San :: 10. jan 2003, 01:02

Se mi zgodi občasno, vendar ne, da bi me motilo. Če ti kaj pomeni imam skoraj ves čas polno hitrost DLa in dobre pinge v igrah po netu. Drugače pa je vozlišče narejeno pri moji hiši, tko da zna bit tudi kaj na temu.

MitjaM. :: 10. jan 2003, 09:21

SunTrace kateri modem imas? ker mi ni jasno, da meni dela tok pocasi?!?
Npr. za test sem potegnil dol en file iz ftp.telemach.net pa je bla najvisja hitrosti 5 k/s???
Da ne govorim, da se sploh ne da surfat po netu k gre vse tok kur**evo pocas! Aja imam Nemo modem...

Zgleda da bo treba ISPja zamenjat... A ma kdo od vas izkušnje z Amis, k2.net, perftech, volja???

LP, MitjaM.

0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO
http://mitjam.4ever.cc
0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO

San :: 10. jan 2003, 10:41

Modem je Thomson. Tvoj Nemo je še ta star standard, moj pa je DOCSIS, ne vem pa koliko ima to vpliva. Nekaj že.

the_unborn :: 10. jan 2003, 11:59

Nimam nobenih tezav, sem pa tako kot suntrace pri vozliscu in sem dalec na okoli deini kablas na tem odseku, pravtako thompson (docsis)

MitjaM. :: 10. jan 2003, 13:12

Mah pol bo zgleda to da mam Nemo modem

narobe da nc ne dela. Zgleda bom mogu spet težit na TM da mi bodo zrihtal, čene pa spet položnic ne bom plačeval pa bo. >:D

Hvala za info obema.

LP, MitjaM.

0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO
http://mitjam.4ever.cc
0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO

Jinxy :: 10. jan 2003, 17:30

Nic ne bodo zrihtal ker jih za tiste z Nemo modemi boli k*. Tudi meni je Nemo 2 leti delal vecinoma cisto v redu, jeseni se je pa zacelo: obupni pingi, izgubljanje paketkov, prenosi so skakali od 0-80 kB/s - bolj proti 0 (paket imam 512).

Nekajkrat sem tezil in so vsakic kao popravili, pa je blo se vedno isto. Pol so mi pa predlagali, da naj grem na Docsis sistem in da bo v redu....in res je v redu, razlika je 100%! V racun so mi vzeli Nemota za 10k, pa 20 sem se doplacal za Thomsona.

Po mojem zanalasc motijo delovanje Nemo modemov, da bi folk cimprej presaltal na Docsis, oni bi pa zraven se dodatno zasluzili, ceprav bi morali po mojem mnenju vsem na starem sistemu ZASTONJ dati Docsis modeme!!

jerry2000 :: 13. jan 2003, 19:55

Hm, jaz imam LanCity in sem v Mostah. Moj kolega je za Bežigradom in mu dela enako kot meni (on ima nemo)... Ali so kaj spreminjali ali kaj na Telemachu?

Dela mi fino 30 sekund potem pa nikamor več ne gre, vsaj www strani ne, napiše "waiting for reply" pa je konec :-( Potem dam refresh in včasih potem takoj naloži...

Ali so v Win2k kakšne nastavitve, da bi bolje delalo? Čeprav napaka ni pri meni, ker imam 3 računalnike in na nobenem ne dela več v redu :-(

Na TM pravijo, da ni nikjer nič narobe. Pa kaj bi to bilo, malo dela, potem spet čisto počasi... Naj gledam na traceroute kje se zatika? Nekaj Kb se namreč prenese, potem pa mrk, kot bi se povezava za nekaj stotink prekinila... Noro...

Obupani

Jerry

the_unborn :: 13. jan 2003, 21:29

to bo verjetno packet loss, nisem pa shure, probaj pingat kaksen tuj page, recimo tale je fajn hiter www.track.nl, pa pingaj recimo 50x ali pa 100x (ping -n 50 www.track.nl) pa bos videl ce bos dobil vse reply-e nazaj

Zgodovina sprememb…

spremenilo: the_unborn (13. jan 2003 ob 21:29)

darh :: 13. jan 2003, 21:33

Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=243
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=191ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=150ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=134ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=285ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=504ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=308ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=166ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=83ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=913ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=243
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=243

Ping statistics for 212.19.205.134:
Packets: Sent = 50, Received = 48, Lost = 2 (4% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 38ms, Maximum = 913ms, Average = 106ms

Excuses are useless! Results are priceless!

jerry2000 :: 13. jan 2003, 21:53

To je noro, strani ne morem odpreti: Connecting to .... ping je pa takle:

Send: 50, received: 50, loss: 0%
Minimum: 30ms, maximum 80 ms, average: 42ms...

To mi ne zveni slabo, dela pa tudi ne...

SasoS :: 14. jan 2003, 00:32

Ne da bi bil pesimist...ampak kdaj pa telemach dela uredu? Sam sem po letu in pol obupal. Evo pingov iz Amisovga kabla (hkrati z 60K/s downloada, zato malenkost niha

)

Pinging www.track.nl [212.19.205.134] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=240
Reply from 212.19.205.134: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=240

Ping statistics for 212.19.205.134:
Packets: Sent = 50, Received = 50, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 35ms, Maximum = 64ms, Average = 41ms

MitjaM. :: 14. jan 2003, 06:30

Mah jest mam tut 100% packet loss ;((

Kur**ev Telemach !!!"!!!!!!
Zgleda bo treba res novga ISPja najdt. Me mika da bi sel na AMIS sam mi je mal predolgo obdobje 3 leta...
A ma kdo izkusnje s K2.net?
Oni ponujajo isto kabelski dostop pa ne pogojujejo časa podpisa pogodbe + imaš možnost uporabe USENETA...

MitjaM.

0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO
http://mitjam.4ever.cc
0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO

[D|g|t] :: 14. jan 2003, 08:04

jest mam tud nemota in tud iste probleme.... :( (kok v bistvu se splaca zamanat modem?)

iration :: 14. jan 2003, 12:03

a je tako težko zamenat isp-ja? če telemach serje, pa živiš v mestu, zakaj ne bi prešaltov na adsl? če se bo pa kdaj adsl pokvaru (podražil) pa pač zamenaš na bolje. sedaj je leto 2003 in ne 1998, ko ni bilo nobene poštene variante, edino telesmeh za 100.000.

Tudi jaz bi imel kakšno pravico rad v življenju. Npr. pravico do tega, da delam
12 ur na dan in sem za to nagrajen s strani delujočega ekonomskega prostora, ne
pa kaznovan s strani Salmoneličevih gremlinov. - NavadniNimda

Sumo :: 14. jan 2003, 12:15

Tudi jaz imam probleme z odpiranjem www strani, zanimivo pa je, da mi v igrah deluje cisto normalno, pingi so v redu, nic packet lossa. Zgleda se nekaj dogaja na portu 80...

the_unborn :: 14. jan 2003, 15:16

le vkup, le vkup uboga gmajna...v cimvecjem stevilu klicte tja, mogoce bojo pogruntal, da je nekaj narobe
$:\$

Soprano :: 14. jan 2003, 16:50

Ali pa veselo zamenjajte ispja s Telemacha na Amis. Net vam bo delal OK, Telesmeh pa se bo (upam) tudi zamislil in zakupil večjo pipo v svet

jerry2000 :: 14. jan 2003, 19:36

In kako lahko zamenjam iz Telemacha na Amis, če sem v Mostah, kjer je samo Telemach in Arnes?

Jerry

_Mortal_ :: 15. jan 2003, 18:38

včeri sm se znebil Telesmeha in prešaltal na ADSL. Strani se odpirajo hitro (pa čeprav nisem še preklopljen na 2M) v primerjavi z telesmehom k mi sploh ni odpiral strani

Is reading in the bathroom considered as multi-tasking?

Kleman :: 20. jan 2003, 11:52

TELEMACH ze od kar obstaja slabo deluje << Zalivanje rožic. --Moderator >> zato vsi letimo na ADSL. Vse kar rabm morm prej se 60k na LOTU zadet in to je to.

[Windows XP Professional (5.1 - 2600)] CPU: [1-AMD , 1540MHz, 256KB ]. Video Card: [ RADEON 7000 Series ]. ScreenInfo: [ 1024x768 32bit 75Hz ]. RAM [Usage: 174/512MB (33.98%) ]. Space On [ C: 55.88 GB. Total: 55.88 GB ]

Zgodovina sprememb…

spremenil: Ziga Dolhar (20. jan 2003 ob 17:45)

Ziga Dolhar :: 20. jan 2003, 17:29

Kleman, obnašaj se.

koyotee :: 21. jan 2003, 20:16

kaj ko bi si adsl nabavu? men dela supr!

kerga dika? :: 1. feb 2003, 16:05

poln k***c mam že tega Telemacha. Odkar so šli na DOCSIS sistem mi moj kilavi Nemo (pa ne samo meni) štrajka. Po enem mesecu klicanja na non-stop zasedeno naročniško službo in dobivanja debilnih in nesramnih odgovorov na e-mail ali pa sploh ne odgovarjanja na maile, sem se odločil da bom svoj modem (ki ga imam v najemu) lepo odšraufal in ga osebno nesel na Telemach, kjer bom zahteval takojšnjo odjavo pa še pritožil se bom na račun.
Meni so dokurčili do te mere da se mi ne morejo več odkupit tudi če mi dajo 4 Mbit za 500 sit/mesec. Kaj mi bo če ne dela tako kot je treba!!!! Grem na ADSL pa klinc gleda Telejajca.

Tisti ki še imate voljo pa se jim ne pustit zajebavat, ker pošteno plačujete za 24 urni dostop in imate do le-tega tudi pravico.

Vsazga dika!

darh :: 1. feb 2003, 16:25

PING 213.143.85.1 (213.143.85.1): 56 octets data
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1473.7 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xc3 but was 0xc2c2 a7 3a 3e c ca 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1394.6 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xc4 but was 0xc3c3 a7 3a 3e 55 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1537.4 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xc5 but was 0xc4c4 a7 3a 3e 54 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=1445.1 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xc6 but was 0xc5c5 a7 3a 3e 56 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=2132.3 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xc8 but was 0xc6c6 a7 3a 3e 53 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=1658.3 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xc8 but was 0xc7c7 a7 3a 3e 53 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=2132.1 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xca but was 0xc8c8 a7 3a 3e 54 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=1673.4 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xca but was 0xc9c9 a7 3a 3e 53 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=1725.7 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xcb but was 0xcaca a7 3a 3e 58 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=1894.5 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xcc but was 0xcbcb a7 3a 3e 6b b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=2217.0 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xce but was 0xcccc a7 3a 3e 3e b6 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=2189.6 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xcf but was 0xcdcd a7 3a 3e 53 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=2734.5 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xd0 but was 0xcece a7 3a 3e 55 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=2750.9 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xd1 but was 0xcfcf a7 3a 3e 55 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=2265.2 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xd2 but was 0xd0d0 a7 3a 3e 55 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=1660.3 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xd2 but was 0xd1d1 a7 3a 3e 54 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=1676.0 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xd3 but was 0xd2d2 a7 3a 3e 54 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=1044.7 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xd4 but was 0xd3d3 a7 3a 3e 54 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=1135.0 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xd5 but was 0xd4d4 a7 3a 3e d8 b7 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=1040.7 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xd6 but was 0xd5d5 a7 3a 3e 55 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=1543.8 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xd7 but was 0xd6d6 a7 3a 3e 57 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=21 ttl=64 time=1500.8 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xd8 but was 0xd7d7 a7 3a 3e 54 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=22 ttl=64 time=1553.5 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xd9 but was 0xd8d8 a7 3a 3e 54 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=23 ttl=64 time=1602.7 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xda but was 0xd9d9 a7 3a 3e 55 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=24 ttl=64 time=1130.8 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xdb but was 0xdada a7 3a 3e 54 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=25 ttl=64 time=1202.7 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xdc but was 0xdbdb a7 3a 3e 54 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=26 ttl=64 time=1350.0 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xdd but was 0xdcdc a7 3a 3e 55 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=27 ttl=64 time=1330.8 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xde but was 0xdddd a7 3a 3e 54 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=28 ttl=64 time=1320.0 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xdf but was 0xdede a7 3a 3e 58 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=29 ttl=64 time=1283.8 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xe0 but was 0xdfdf a7 3a 3e 55 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=30 ttl=64 time=1177.4 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xe1 but was 0xe0e0 a7 3a 3e 54 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=31 ttl=64 time=1421.2 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xe2 but was 0xe1e1 a7 3a 3e 54 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=32 ttl=64 time=1968.8 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xe3 but was 0xe2e2 a7 3a 3e 59 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=33 ttl=64 time=1938.5 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xe4 but was 0xe3e3 a7 3a 3e 55 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=34 ttl=64 time=1739.8 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xe5 but was 0xe4e4 a7 3a 3e 52 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=35 ttl=64 time=2660.6 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xe7 but was 0xe5e5 a7 3a 3e 58 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=36 ttl=64 time=2970.1 ms
wrong data byte #0 should be 0xe8 but was 0xe6e6 a7 3a 3e 58 b4 9 0
8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
64 octets from 213.143.85.1: icmp_seq=37 ttl=64 time=2248.7 ms

--- 213.143.85.1 ping statistics ---
145 packets transmitted, 141 packets received, 2% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 627.3/1698.9/2970.1 ms

kul ane ?
sem jim učerej mail poslal z linkom do fajla v katerm je tole... tko da bom v logu vidu.. če je sploh kdo šu pogledat.... v ponedeljek, če ne bodo odgovoril, jih pokličem... (tole je moj gateway... fletno ane?)

Excuses are useless! Results are priceless!

Fury :: 2. feb 2003, 00:24

Ping statistics for 213.143.85.1:
Packets: Sent = 50, Received = 50, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 8ms, Maximum = 41ms, Average = 15ms

Amis kabl rox. :)

Uporabnik :: 3. feb 2003, 21:19

potem k sm prešaltal iz nemo na docsis (thomson) gre nekako takole do gatewaya:

#1 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#2 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#3 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#4 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#5 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#6 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#7 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#8 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#9 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#10 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 31 ms
#11 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#12 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#13 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#14 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#15 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#16 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#17 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#18 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#19 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 16 ms
#20 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#21 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#22 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#23 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#24 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#25 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#26 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#27 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#28 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#29 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#30 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#31 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#32 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#33 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#34 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#35 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#36 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#37 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#38 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#39 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 31 ms
#40 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 16 ms
#41 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#42 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#43 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#44 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 16 ms
#45 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#46 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#47 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#48 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#49 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms
#50 (213.143.83.1): Echo Reply, ttl=255, 0 ms

Statistics: Out 50, in 50, loss 0%, times (min/avg/max) 0/2/31 ms

jerry2000 :: 4. feb 2003, 23:35

Jaz sem na Lancity pa spletne strani mi napol odpre, potem pa konec. Moram dati refresh, paćše enkrat, pa še enkrat. Ostali porti (email, ftp) delajo pa brez problema...

Kaj bi to bilo? Ne more to biti pie meni kaj narobe, kajne?

Alec999 :: 5. feb 2003, 02:36

Ping statistics for 213.250.43.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 481ms, Maximum = 1022ms, Average = 843ms

a se da kj pohitrit tole 0:)

Drgac pa modejm je Terayon .. lokacija Koseze

link_up :: 14. feb 2003, 14:37

folk menjat je treba nemote...modemi so zanic in prekinjajo...povzrocajo packet loss...

MitjaM. :: 17. feb 2003, 21:18

Ej folk vsi k še nimate DOCCIS al kva je že ta tanov standard, menjite modeme (nemo), ker je to to. Men so danes zamenjali modem nemo za thomsona in zdej dela!!!!!
Ping statistics for 213.143.74.1:
Packets: Sent = 25, Received = 25, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 6ms, Maximum = 295ms, Average = 38ms

Strani se spet hitr odpirajo, emula laufa ful (takoj ko sem se konektal je že dljal prek 35k/s)

MitjaM.

0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO
http://mitjam.4ever.cc
0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO

Boyhazard :: 17. feb 2003, 22:19

Ti NEMO modemi so samo za uporabo do 500 uporabnikov (na serveru), kot se ve pa je Telemach največji operater v SLO in tudi največji ološ kar ga je.

Ko se je že pred časom kapaciteta dvignila nad 500 še ni bilo tako hudo, sedaj ko pa je cifra krepko nad 1000 pa so se začeli problemi, vendar Telemach tega noče priznat (služijo na storitvi, ki ne deluje kot bi morala). Tako, da ni problem prehod na EURODOC... Ampak modem NEMO!

Menjajte ga kolikor hitro se da!!! PRIPOROČLJIVO!!!

www.slofotke.com

smash :: 17. feb 2003, 22:34

MitjaM: olk dnarja si mogu doplačat za Thomsona??? men so ga dal na test za 2 tedna pa problemov ni več..so pa rekl da mi ga dajo za 6 jurjov....drgač je pa nov 30 jurjov $:\$

MitjaM. :: 18. feb 2003, 08:23

Modem imam na srečo v najemu, tako da za njega nisem nič plačal verejtno pa bom mogel plačati 6k Sit za menjavo.
Ker če bi bil Nemo moj bi mogel za novega plačati 30k Sit s tem da bi mi Nemota vzel v račun za 10K Sit + 6k za menjavo...

LP, MitjaM.

0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO
http://mitjam.4ever.cc
0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO0oO

Zgodovina sprememb…

spremenil: MitjaM. (18. feb 2003 ob 08:24)

Xplicit :: 18. feb 2003, 08:46

ja kao - k sm jest pred dobre pol leta su na telemach je bil edin modem k so mi ga dal na 'izbiro' un tomson za 30k

Vredno ogleda ...

	Tema	Sporočila	Ogledi	Zadnje sporočilo
	Tema	Sporočila	Ogledi	Zadnje sporočilo
»	KKS > Triera > UPC > Telemach (strani: 1 2 3 4 … 358 359 360 361 ) Spc Oddelek: Omrežja in internet	18009	2601181 (1136)	yoco včeraj 09:41:03
»	Visok ping ob določeni uri? (Amis) PowaAaaaH Oddelek: Pomoč in nasveti	6	1331 (1176)	čuhalev 8. okt 2015 09:30:17
»	Preveliki pingi (strani: 1 2 ) [L4M3RZ] - TinLaDeN Oddelek: Omrežja in internet	52	5152 (4559)	[L4M3RZ] - TinLaDeN 9. okt 2003 20:43:17
⊘	Telemach nove pogodbe? dirtyh Oddelek: Omrežja in internet	25	1947 (1222)	Gandalfar 2. dec 2002 16:49:44
»	Slo-Tech preseljen Primoz Oddelek: Novice / Obvestila	37	2669 (2669)	Bakunin 7. jun 2002 12:05:39

Več podobnih tem

Forum » Omrežja in internet » Telemach slabo deluje?

Telemach slabo deluje?