Spopad strankarskih programov pred novimi volitvami

Mah, Jansa je izbranec Evrope, Merklove, tako da je zgodbe za slovenske kucance, ki so iz zgledne drzave naredili PIIGSS drzavo, konec. EU je odpovedala srecanja z Lukasenkom, potem ko so po sodiscih vlacili Timosenkovo, mislim da nihce od slovenskih kucancev ni tako nor da bi to napako ponovil. Potem so opleli za vse vecne case, drugace pa brez skrbi, Evropi je zgodba o drugorazrednih drzavljanih in velikih pokih ze dolgo casa znana.

Košer hrana ima solucijo. Če nekdo želi svinjski zrezek, je dovolj, da vržeš recimo goveji šnicel na tla in prašiči lahko svobodno dihajo

Se opravičujem, ker sem malo zastal. Virtualne ljubice so tudi boleča stvar. Prebral sem, da je nina na eno nogo sicer svobodna, na drugo pa ne. In ti tipi, ki se je držijo za nogo in jih vlači za sabo, so najhujši. Tako da sem malo zaskrbljen


Ostali smo pri programu Nove Slovenije - krščansko demokratske stranke.

Najprej samo čisto telegrafsko:
Program je v bistvu zelo podoben programoma SDS in SLS. Poudarek je na krščanstvu in čuti se tak poizkus povečati vlogo RKC ne samo v civilni družbi, pač pa tudi v spošnejši sferi, kot je recimo šolstvo in nemara kar kultura na splošno? No o tem pa lahko kdo razpravlja. Sam bom program prebral še enkrat, če nisem kaj spregledal.

Šrot? Muhahahaha....

Kaj ko bi ti napisal en koherenten sestavek, ne pa trosil samih blodenj? A? Je to mogoče?

Zakaj je mogoče default najboljša rešitev:

Lessons from Argentina

In the 70's and 80's Argentina was plagued by a serious of dictatorships interspersed with brief and ineffective democracies. Neoliberals descended on the country pumping money into useless huge projects for the benefit of foreign investors. By 1983 unemployment was at 18%. Democracy was back in vogue and with the new president came a new currency--the Austral. But the government had severe debt from the previous corrupt governments and, in 1989, Argentina could not repay the debt. Inflation rose to 5000% making the currency essentially useless. The president fled the country and Carlos Menem took office. He eventually restored the peso and fixed its value to the US dollar, guaranteeing that the peso could be exchanged for the dollar at any bank. He did this by keeping a reserve of US dollars in the Central Bank. This stabilized the currency allowing Argentina to recover.

But Argentina still had this enormous debt and Menem kept borrowing more. Stabilizing the currency lowered inflation and encouraged imports into the country. Dollars in turn left the country with purchase of goods. Menem had to keep getting loans to keep a supply of US dollars in banks. Additionally, as wages stabilized, industry slowly leached out of the country seeking greener low wage pastures in other countries. Factories began to close and unemployment rose.

Menem's government was famous for corruption, tax evasion by the rich and money laundering. Public debt rose precipitously under his watch. Yet, perhaps because he was friends with the Bushes, the IMF did not flinch, they continued to loan Argentina money.

By the end of Menem's rule in 1999, the dollar's value had dropped, Argentina's trade problems had spread to Mexico and Brazil, and state industries that had been privatized were being abandoned. Unemployment was back to critical levels and the economy stagnated. Yet the IMF insisted on maintaining the PEG to the US dollar and demanded austerity.

In a statement released this week, a group of unions opposed to Menem issued a statement noting that during his 10 years in office beginning in 1989, the IMF "looked the other way when waste, corruption and the introduction of mafias into the state constituted the aims of this administration, which left the country in 1999 with a fiscal deficit of more than $11 billion, with its industrial base and agriculture destroyed, with the greatest unemployment in its history, poverty reaching levels never before seen and a currency fictitiously attached to the dollar." The statement likewise recalled that Menem maintained "carnal relations" with the US--a phrase coined by his foreign minister--and later cemented both a personal friendship and business ties with the Bush family.

Meanwhile, IMF officials have reportedly insisted that the Argentine Congress issue a public declaration promising not to pass legislation extending the moratorium on mortgage foreclosures and not to amend a newly enacted bankruptcy law. This politically humiliating demand is a measure of the agency's lack of confidence that any government will be able to enforce the conditions it is imposing in Argentina.--WSWS

By 2002 unemployment was at 20%, rioting had broken out and people were quite literally dieing of starvation.

Argentina's gross domestic product has fallen 20 percent compared to four years ago. Salaries have remained frozen while the cost of living has climbed 60 percent. Unemployment has soared to an official rate of 20 percent, and fully half of the country's households have fallen below the official poverty line, unable to afford minimum food, shelter and clothing.

In recent weeks Argentina, once among South America's most prosperous nations and a food exporter to the world, has been rocked by reports that up to half a million children are in danger of starving. The country's newspapers have carried stories of children eating dirt together with pictures reminiscent of Biafra. In the impoverished northern province of Tucumán, four children starved to death in the space of two weeks.--WSWS

While the IMF insisted that austerity was necessary to fix Argentina's financial woes, Argeninians lost faith in political leaders seen as taking the well being of foreign industry and bankers over the well being of the nation's people. The call came for a change in government.

Among the most persistent demands being made by the IMF in recent weeks are political guarantees that the Argentine government will comply with any agreement that is signed. Duhalde has seen his popular approval ratings fall to single digits. He was appointed by the Legislative Assembly at the beginning of this year to fill out the remainder of the term of Radical party president Fernando de la Rua, who was forced out by a popular uprising.

Duhalde pledged to call early elections in March and turn over power to a newly elected government in May. While the IMF had pushed for the early vote, it has said little about the issue in recent months, while sections of the Argentine ruling elite are pressing for a return to the scheduled date next October.

No candidate has emerged within any of the traditional parties enjoying any degree of support. "Que se vayan todos," or kick them all out, the slogan of the mass demonstrations of last December, remains the popular sentiment towards the country's politicians. Former Peronist President Carlos Menem, whose corruption, sweeping privatizations and close ties to the US are blamed by most Argentines for the country's current crisis, has indicated that he will be a candidate. --WSWS

The Default

In October of 2002, Argentina could take no more. Owing $16 billion over a 14 month period, she defaulted on her first billion dollar loan. The president attempted to restructure the loan with the IMF but the Fund insisted on further austerity and reversal of any meager measures Argentina had taken to help its people.

In particular, the IMF has objected to Duhalde's announcement of a reduction in the Argentine sales tax from 21 to 19 percent. It has also demanded that the government raise public utility rates and move ahead aggressively in foreclosing on a quarter of a million mortgages that are now in default. Driving tens of thousands of families from their homes is seen by the agency as a necessary measure to restore investor confidence. --WSWS

Sound sort of familiar so far?

Unwilling to continue the same methods to "restore investor confidence" that the IMF had insisted on for years, the Argentine government announced its intent to stop payment.

"We're not saying the blame for what's wrong should be pinned on the fund (IMF)," Mr Atanasof said.
"We assume the responsibility as a country... but what we are saying is the bureaucracy at the Fund has promoted the policies that put us in this situation." --BBC

The immediate aftermath was severe. The remaining foreign investors fled the country shutting down almost all industry. Argentina was isolated from the rest of world financially. For six months the country suffered with essentially no national currency. Fortunately for the people of Argentina, years of currency instability created a multitude of local currencies which survived the collapse.

Then a minor economic miracle occurred. The people took charge.

During the economic collapse, many business owners and foreign investors drew all of their money out of the Argentine economy and sent it overseas. As a result, many small and medium enterprises closed due to lack of capital, thereby exacerbating unemployment. Many workers at these enterprises, faced with a sudden loss of employment and no source of income, decided to reopen businesses on their own, without the presence of the owners and their capital, as self-managed cooperatives.

Worker managed cooperative businesses range from ceramics factory Zanon (FaSinPat), to the four-star Hotel Bauen, to suit factory Brukman, to printing press Chilavert, and many others. In some cases, former owners sent police to remove workers out of these workplaces; this was sometimes successful but in other cases workers defended occupied workplaces against the state, the police, and the bosses.

A survey by an Argentina newspaper in the capital found that around 1/3 of the population had participated in general assemblies. The assemblies used to take place in street corners and public spaces, and generally gathered to discuss ways of helping each other in the face of eviction, or organizing around issues like health care, collective food buying, or conducting free food distribution programs. Some assemblies started to create new structures of health care and schooling, to replace the old ones that were not working. Neighborhood assemblies met once a week in a large assembly to discuss issues affecting the larger community. In 2004, Avi Lewis and Naomi Klein (author of No Logo) released the documentary The Take, about these events.

Some businesses have now been legally purchased by the workers for nominal fees, others remain 'occupied' by workers who have no legal standing with the state (and in some cases reject negotiation with the state on the grounds that working productively is its own justification). The Argentine government is considering a Law of Expropriation that would transfer some occupied businesses to their worker-managers.--Wiki

The result was pure economic magic:

Argentina has managed to return to growth with surprising strength; the GDP jumped 8.8% in 2003, 9.0% in 2004, 9.2% in 2005, 8.5% in 2006 and 8.7% in 2007. Though average wages have increased 17% annually since 2002 (jumping 25% in the year to May 2008),[21] consumer prices have partly accompanied this surge; though not comparable to the levels of former crises, the inflation rate was 12.5% in 2005, 10% in 2006 and is believed by private economists to have approached 15% in 2007 and to exceed 20% during 2008[citation needed](even if the Ministry of Economy refuses to acknowledge inflation greater than 10%). This has prompted the government to increase tariffs for exporters and to pressure retailers into one price truce after another in a bid to stabilize prices, so far with little effect.

While unemployment has been considerably reduced (it has been hovering around 8.5% since 2006), Argentina has so far failed to reach an equitable distribution of income (the wealthiest 10% of the population receives 31 times more income than the poorest 10%). This disparity, nevertheless, compares quite favorably to levels seen in most of Latin America.--Wiki

Poverty in Argentina
Date of
measurement Extreme
poverty Under
poverty
line
May 2001 11.6% 35.9%
October 2001 13.6% 38.3%
May 2002 24.8% 53.0%
October 2002 27.5% 57.5%
May 2003 26.3% 54.7%
2nd sem 2003 20.5% 47.8%
1st sem 2004 17.0% 44.3%
2nd sem 2004 15.0% 40.2%
1st sem 2005 13.6% 38.5%
2nd sem 2005 12.2% 33.8%
1st sem 2006 11.2% 31.4%
2nd sem 2006 8.7% 26.4%
2nd sem 2007 5.9% 20.6%
1st sem 2008 5.1% 17.8%
2nd sem 2008 4.4% 15.3%
The table...shows statistics of poverty in Argentina, in percent of the population. The first column shows the date of the measurement (note that the method and time changed in 2003; poverty is now measured each semester). Extreme poverty is here defined as not having enough money to eat properly. The poverty line is set higher: it is the minimum income needed for basic needs including food, clothing, shelter, and studies.--Wiki

But what about the debt?

The Argentine government kept a firm stance, and finally got a deal in 2005 by which 76% of the defaulted bonds were exchanged by others, of a much lower nominal value (25-35% of the original) and at longer terms. In 2008, President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner announced she was studying a reopening of the 2005 swap to gain adhesion from the remaining 24% of the so-called "holdouts", and thereby fully exit the default with private investors.

In 2005, as a large and consistently growing fiscal surplus made it possible, Argentina shifted to a policy of "disindebtment" towards the IMF: paying the IMF in schedule, with no negotiation whenever possible, with the intention of gaining independence from it. On December 15, 2005, following a similar action by Brazil, President Kirchner suddenly announced that Argentina would pay the whole debt to the IMF. The debt payments, totaling 9.810 billion USD, were previously scheduled as installments until 2008. Argentina paid it with the central bank's foreign currency reserves.--Wiki

That's right---Argentina defaulted and said it wouldn't pay a dime of the debt until the terms were rewritten. They stood firm. Not only did they survive, but they flourished, and the banks caved. The debt was made reasonable and payable and Argentina got out of debt making its government and its economy its own again.

vir: daily kos

Čestitam, odkril si toplo vodo.

O.

Čaj poznam. Vseh 372 vrst z dodatki vred. Posebej zato, ker me ne zanima in ne pijem

Tole kar je nalepil in šnelprevedel s strani->http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/11/1...

->Leiito pa mi je zanimiva novost. Živel sem v utopiji, da večna židovska troika ima popolno moč. In kopernikanski obrat zame pomeni, da ima moč mojega kurca. In sesuvajo, ali renovirajo jih v bodoče, tako interesi (pre)zadolženih EU, kot tudi USA. Da jih ne bi razbili kot romunski parlament, se seveda trudijo na vse pretege z lobiranjem okoli najpopularnejših politikov. In jim uspeva.

A realna ognjena moč, pa ne doseže niti pospravit CheGuevaro, v kolikor bi ta ne bil malo ruknjen. Dejansko jim danes stojijo ob boku le interesi......????

Malce OT, pa vseeno zame popolnoma nova motivacija za brskanje po knjigah o židovski troiki, državah ki so se uspešno, ali neuspešno uprle in potem nazaj na malo prašičje korito in razpored hranjenja pujskov:)

Nazaj na programe strank. Sicer prebiram ameriške trockiste in iščem sledove takega socializma pri nas...pa jih ne najdem. V ZDA pa so, kar udarni. Seveda pa marginalni. Imajo tudi Michaela Hardta, ki je prijatelj in sodelavec Antonija Negrija, obtoženega za rdeče nemire v Italiji in celo za botrstvo rdečim brigadam, ki so leta 1978 pospravile Alda Mora. No potem so pa italijani temeljito pospravili z militantno levico:)Pomeni zveneča zmerjanja z ekstremnimi levičarji in na drugi strani včeraj Štrajn, z ekstremnimi desničarji, so precej za lase privlečena.

NSi s programom ni izzvala zanimanja. Sekularizacija in de-sekularizacija, pa je problem, s katerim se kar pogosto ubadajo diplomanti naših socio faksov. En tak ne nov, pa vendar spet zanimiv podatek, sem našel pri brskanji po teh nalogah, na brzino. Američani so precej bolj pobožen narod kot Evropejci, pa Slovenci smo manj pobožni od povprečja Evrope. Potem nekako tudi ni več skrivnost, zakaj NSI, ne kaže ravno briljantno. Se pa nekateri sociologi ubadajo s temo zanimivo. Poudarjajo pomen obrata nazaj v de-sekularizacijo, kar ima za posledico učinkovitejšo ali homogenejšo družbo, ali....in preštudirati bi moral, pa (še) nisem. Vsekakor izziv.

Sledi zame letos skrivnostni Jelinčič. Sicer trdi, da ga mediji namenoma režejo in ne kličejo na razgovore in da zato nekako izveneva v prazno, ampak v to sam rahlo dvomim. Nekako tudi sumim, da si ne zna izmisliti notranjih in zunanjih sovražnikov, kot vedno do sedaj, čeprav je res, da Hrvati niso več ravno najaktualnejši in izbrisani in džamija tudi ne. Oborožili so se z metlami s katerimi bodo pometli slovensko nesnago, to je simbolika, morda sublimno ciljajo, da na metli poleti katarina, skupaj z njimi, iz parlamenta?

In zdaj grem gledat program. Paradoks je takoj na začetku in poznamo ga vsi. Podpora partizanom, sicer pa neoliberalna konstrukcija, vsaj po glavnih medijskih izjavah sodeč. Usoden paradoks? Moram najprej prebrati 'AKTUALIZIRANA PROGRAMSKA IZHODIŠČA'.

Jelinčiča je po svoje res enigma, ker tako anemične kampanje pa še ne, toda zdi se, da se je nek miselni preskok vendarle zgodil. Volivci bodo sicer še vedno volili ljudi in ne programe, toda delno so ipak spregledali, vidijo da po 20 letih Plemenitija v parlamentu razen polnih žepov in enega poslanca v zaporu + dva ovadena, SNS nima pokazati ništa, ampak res ništa. Razumel bi, da ljudje volijo nacionaliste, skrajno desnico, da nekdo kupita ta prazen pofl od Jelinčiča, svašta res.

Don, re: Aldo Moro, petelina so fizično pritisnile Brigade, toda dejansko so ga ubili ljudje, za katere je mislil, da so mu prijatelji. Il Divo je odličen film o Andreottiju in s tem o ozadju italijanske politike po 2. vojni. Drug aspekt je pa Operacija Gladio, ki ima btw paralelno zgodbo tudi v Turčiji.

Tisti zgornji pamflet o Argentini me je pošteno nasmejal.

Če je kdaj bil kakšen ekonomski čudež, je bila to neverjetno revna Kitajska pod Mao-om. Zelo velik ekonomski čudež je tudi majhno bogastvo argentincev. Zahvala gre tudi peronizmu.

Torej zbral frnikule, prehlastal program.

Še enkrat. Marjanci bi rekli ekstremno levičarski program. Ne samo zelen, ampak socialističen. Pomeni v svetu direktnega udarca v glavo s popolnoma nesocialistične (čeprav uradno skoraj edine socialistične:) Kitajske, nekako nerealen program. Vsaj tako mi nekako izgleda, v današnjih časih.

Bodočnost?

Hja, denimo da bo tako GW, kot bonitete in etika socialne države, enostavno podrla model mravljišča, kjer je sicer vse grajeno na samoodgovornosti, pa vendar je kolektivizem osnovna paradigma! Po moje. Potem to pomeni nemara spet silno prilagoditev novega kapitalizma, z nekakšnim vendarle centralnim dogovornim načrtom, humano etiko, ki se nekako s pomočjo računalnikov in dogovarjanj, danes tako na tiho vendarle s sekiro prebija skozi krize neoliberalizma, na glavna vrata. No prej pa zna priti tudi do hudih katastrof, katerih končni izzid pa je potem lahko tudi povsem nezaželjen z gledišča danšnjega sodobnega Evropejca in tudi Kitajca! Torej TRS. Hrabro, vidim vas pozitivno in kot pomembno opozicijo že čez par let, če ne bo sodnega dne prej

Nič posebej izjemnega. Klasičen socialdemokratki program z enim opaznim poudarkom.
Prihodnost je ženskega spola.
Z njim je LDS izpostavila feminizem in boj za tudi sicer marginalizirane.
Sicer je v programu vse, kar imajo tudi največji:) Povedano samo z drugimi besedami.
Ker je Katarina Kresal kar dobro vodila notranje ministrstvo in je to začelo dajati sploh preko NPU tudi konkretne rezultate, to so ovadbe, aretacije in preiskave mi ni čisto jasno....
Glavni policist je bil inteligenten urejen, da celo lep možakar, ki je vidno prezgodaj osivel...torej kot bi ga določil režiser, za razliko od nekih spakov zlobe prej.....

Hm začelo in končalo se je dejansko z afero Baričevič. In jo pokopalo. In slovenski narod do danes ne ve, kaj se je tam dejansko zgodilo. Najprej je tako, da ne sme vedeti. Se ga ne tiče. Zadeva je povsem privatne narave. Ampak ravno policisti, so izgleda vrlemu drekschleuderju požarju, dali fotografije in grobi opis...in to je pomenilo polet v bistvu najtežjega poleta domišljije, v zadnjih letih slovenskega naroda. Zraven se je tudi razkril kar lep paket konkretnega klientelizma in nepotizma in dejanske neenakosti, ki spremlja višje sfere. Ja tudi LDS, ki je tako zelo zagovarjala ravno liberalistično enakost pred zakonom. Ker partner KK jasno in glasno ne dela za dobro naroda, ampak za denar in dobre plačnike, ki so ponavadi ravno dobri gangsterji, je to pomenilo tudi zlom in krah, nekdaj najmočnejše levičarske stranke po osamosvojitvi.

In kako ven, naprej?

Kot liberalci z istim programom bo huda. Če pa vseeno Senica izvrši par velikih humanitarnih potez, mu pri tem asistira Kresalova, opere feminizem in boj za margine, katerim je obvezno treba dodati sicer ne ravno liberalistične, pač pa socialne reveže in dejansko efektivno najbolj ogrožene, to je lačne in povsem obezpravljene......no potem ni še nič izgubljeno. Janšo in desnico čaka burno obdobje, kjer bodo tudi napake in trpljenje naroda in to je dejansko prilika, da se napolni saržerje.

Evo da za molk končam z domačo nalogo.

Še program stranke Zares. Ker sem malce pozno ugotovil, da pravzaprav po načelih spadam prav v Zares, sem ga šel brat s posebnim zanimanjem. In?

Ja na čase je kompliciran . Poln date, kjer se jasno kaže, da sleherniku manjka znanje, da bi razumel celotno sporočilo. To pa zna biti heba, zlasti če gre za program.

Je že res, da to znanje ni na ravni filozofskih sofizmov in je celo večinoma prosto dostopno na netu.
Ampak nič ne pomaga. Zahteva dodatni, nedvomno prevelik trud za nekoga, ki utrujen pride s šihta in bi se rad spočil. Zaupa v ocenjevanje fac in tu se Golobič ne odreže ravno najbolje. Ne da je grd, ali butast...ampak precej puklast. Kar prevedeno pomeni, da ima obešenih kar nekaj afer in njih zakulisnega upravljanja.

Naj izpostavim: vlaganje v inovativno in visoko izobraženo družbo, vlaganje v socialni kapital, koncept univerzalnega temeljnega dohodka, problematika drog....in še in še detajlno in pedantno. Skratka spet program, ki je popoln, socialdemokratski v jedru, tako kot SDS-ov, pa vendar v detajlih povsem različen.

Kar bi za zaključek pred molkom pomenilo takole.

Skoraj vsi programi so v jedru socialdemokratski in so si precej podobni. Nekaj neoliberalnega podtona nosijo programi deklarirane desnice več in ta bo nedvomno tudi skušan biti izpeljan. Če se uprejo sindikati, opozicija in ulica, potem smo ruk zuk v Grškem scenariju, kjer je možno vse. Če pa JJ s koalicijo uspe prepričati narod, da ima namen vzpostaviti pravično družbo in tako prepričanje obdrži vsaj za 4 leta, potem bo pa šlo na bolje. Ne glede na zategovanje pasu in zapovedane neoliberalne poteze.

Možna je baje celo druga kombinacija. Da Zoki potegne tesno 2 pozicijo in uspe prepričati vse kar diši po levih strankah v močno koalicijo in bi Turk nekako.... Ampak to pa sicer teoretično možno nekako ni higienično in bi bil po mojem velik škandal. Alora do ponedeljka basta od mene, potem pa še pokomentiram rezultate:)

Sicer pa vsebinsko. Dejansko najbolj levičarski program izven globalnega zelenega SMS-Zeleni in TRS.

po anketah sodeč se utegne ponoviti Puckoland. Janša (37) + NSi (4) + SLS (4) = 45 glasov, enako Zoki + Virant + SD + Desus. Tu se bo potem morda našel človek, ki bo čez noč spoznal svojo zmoto in bi prestopil v bogatejši klub, če mu garantirajo, da ne bo le sedel na klopi, toda Pahor je včeraj pokazal precej antipatije in nezaupanja do Zokita + težko si predstavljam Pahorja kot tretjo violino v vladi, še najmanj pa, da je zunanji minister, po Evropi hodi pa Zoki (ki je povedal, da bo, če bo premier, on hodil na sestanke strojevodij).

aplikacija volitve sicer pravi, da bo Janša prisiljen koagulirati z Erjavcem, kar bo še ena koalicija nejevoljnih, kjer bo vsak vlekel na svoje stran.

V težkih časih je pametno biti pameten.
Janez Janša na reklamnem plakatu SDS

Saj je v resnici vse jasno, sedeži so bolj ali manj razdeljeni in Janša brez Viranta ne bo mogel sestaviti vlade, ker ne verjamem, da bi šel Desus v koalicijo z desnimi. In tako ostane samo še vprašanje, ali bo šel Virant z desnimi ali z levimi. Na zadnjem soočenju Virant, po tem, ko so ga zignorirali na Zboru za republiko, nekako ni bil preveč navdušen nad trdo desnico. Na levi bi v koaliciji skoraj sigurno lahko iztržil več, vsaj kar se položaja v vladi tiče.

Razen če si Janković & Co. v resnici sploh ne želijo priti na oblast, ker dobro vedo, da bo zaradi krize naslednjih par let težka jeba, kjer se kaj drugega kot zategovati pas in upati na najboljše itak ne bo dalo narediti. In v takih razmerah je veliko udobneje in varneje biti v opoziciji in samo kritizirati.

O.

Ja, samo tudi za njega velja, da bi v levi vladi skoraj sigurno iztržil več kot v desni. Prav trden seveda četvorček Janković, Pahor, Virant & Erjavec ne more biti, ker je preveč različnih interesov (in mnenj, kako delati).

O.

Okapi je 2. dec 2011 ob 10:58 izjavil:

Ja, samo tudi za njega velja, da bi v levi vladi skoraj sigurno iztržil več kot v desni.

Res? Meni se ne zdi, da bi takrat iztržili kaj manj v Janševi vladi? Pa še do konca mandata so zdržali.

Tako je, natanko to je treba storiti. Z malo sreče bosta NSi in SLS na ta račun pristala pod 4%.

O.

In še Jelinčiča se bomo rešili, in ko bo enkrat zunaj, garant ne pride več nazaj. Zdaj poskuša s kao viralnimi videi, ki ne primejo, ampak je tam nekje na robu, to SNS je treba z glogovim kolom.

Verjetno na to, da moramo voliti Janšo.

da bo pol njevih poslancev pobegnilo na levo stran po volitvah.

Kdo te skrbi?

Evo, sem moral prav pogooglati, kdo je ta "največja moralna avtoriteta sodobne družbe".

2 zanimiva fakta:
- bil predsednik (oz. karkoli že pomeni Char) neke krščanske stranke
- 3x poročen

imagodei je 14. nov 2011 ob 16:52 izjavil:

Pri meni je padla dokončna odločitev, da letos ne bom volil nikogar. Ne zaradi programov, nekatere poteze se mi zdijo v redu. Ne, problem je drugje. Virantova poteza se mi zdi nekako "udarniška" in mu ne zaupam povsem, da ni povezan z Janšo. Takole, tik pred zdajci, še mesec dni nazaj je pa malodane ob večerih sedel na balkonu z Janšo, v stilu Denny Crane in Alan Shore, BFF. Tudi nekaj njegovih programskih usmeritev se mi zdi spornih, ampak OK, v danih razmerah... Se mi zdi sposoben in ker rabimo sposobne ljudi, bi ga še volil, če ne bi v ozadju glodal dvom v dogovor z Janšo.

Zoki... Je svojevrsten patron. Njega bi volil še prej kot Viranta, dokazal se je kot sposoben manager in politik na lokalni ravni, človek naredi, kar si zastavi, dvom v njegovo poštenost je definitivno manjši, kot v Janšo (kot vem, ni proti Jankoviću vložena nobena obtožnica). Na žalost se je oborožil s kretensko ekipo. Kaj, Mencinger za finančnega ministra oz. ministra za gospodarstvo, al kaj?

No, o Janši ni treba zgubljati besed - če ga je še kdo normalen mislil voliti, ga je to minilo, ko se je na kandidatni listi pojavil Stojan Auer. Podn.

Drugim marginalcem, ki nimajo niti resnega programa in filozofirajo v stilu Kumbaja my lord in Here comes the Sun, pa glasu tudi slučajno ne namenim.

Eto. To je to. Od mene letos ni glasu.

Glede na projecirane volilne rezultate sem se premislil in grem v nedeljo na volitve. Preveč se bojim kakih Madžarskih scenarijev. Janševa retorika se je v zadnjih dneh, ko mu javnomnenjske raziskave napovedujejo zmago, spremenila kot dan in noč. Včeraj je naduto in pokroviteljsko zafrkaval Darjo Zgonc, češ da niso družabna ampak družbena omrežja, pa da Twitter nima računov; prav nesramen komentar je bil tudi tisti, da upa, da mu bo (voditeljica) pustila vsaj toliko časa za odgovor, kolikor je ona porabila, da mu ga zastavi. Da ne omenjam nadutega odnosa do ostalih sodelujočih.

Skratka, volk dlako menja, nravi nikoli. In z Janševo zmago si lahko poleg vseh ostalih škodljivih potez obetamo zmanjšano medijsko svobodo, posegi v zasebnost oz. spremembe zakonodaje, ki bo vodila v kratenje zasebnosti, itd.

Koga bom volil, še nisem odločen. Zagotovo pa gre moj glas levici, da le zmanjšam relativno večino SDS. Mislim, da bi podobno morali razmišljati vsi levičarji. 10 minut za oddajo glasovnice boste že našli. Če ne zaradi drugega pa zato, da bo Janša težko sestavil izključno desno koalicijo.

...posegi v zasebnost oz. spremembe zakonodaje, ki bo vodila v kratenje zasebnosti, itd.

Kot, da tega nekateri z "popravki napak" in spreminjanjem policijskih pooblastil ne poskušajo že sedaj?