Nakup zvočnikov za TV

Na način in za ceno, ki jo imaš v mislih to ni izvedljivo.

Aktivnih zvočnih omaric (to je zvočnih omaric z vgrajenim ojačevalcem) z HDMI vhodom žal ne boš dobil za noben denar (razen če nimaš v mislih Logiheca :) Da se sicer kakšne dobit s priloženim adapterjem HDMI v USB, ampak to je eksotika.

Če želiš HDMI povezljivost moraš obvezno vzet:

a.) Sounbar.

b.) AV receiver in zvočnih omaric kolikor pač želiš in dopušča denarnica.


V kolikor se odpoveš HDMI povezljivosti pa sta opciji tudi dve:

a.) klasični aktivni multimedijski spikerji z vgrajenim blutut (npr. Mackie, Edifier, ... možnosti je milijon). Pozoren moraš biti le, da imaš na TV variabilni audio izhod ali pa, da imajo spikerji daljinca;

https://www.thomann.de/gb/mackie_cr5_bt...
https://www.amazon.de/dp/B00O3K7GP0/ref...

b.) Mini ojačevalnik z blutut, optiko, DAC, daljincem in klasične pasivne zvočne omarice (npr. SMSL AD 18 + Q Acoustic 3020i) kar pa znese minimalno 2,3 kratnik predvidenega budžeta.

Imam EDIFER S2000 pro za prenosnik, tablico. So super zadeva a krepko nad budgetom.

https://www.amazon.com/Edifier-S2000pro...

30% kupcev z Amazona ni zadovoljnih z Mackie CR5.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Mackie-CR5BT-M...

Pod primerjavo pa so tudi zanimi komentarji npr. Mackie vs JBL:

Hi! With the recent drop in reatail price JBL LSR305 monitors became even more affordable than ever. This is a bad news for monitors like Mackie CR5 BT as its price is now very close to price pair of JBL's. We will take a closer look at those two today. Build quality wise JBL is more sturdy and has more solid, less resonant plastic front plate than the one in Mackie. Another advantage of JBL is it's fully active internals (2 amps per box), considerably higher power rating (164W vs 50W in total per pair !!!) and the tone controls for treble and bass. Mackie lacks any tone controls but has a Bluetooth connectivity and volume controls on the front panel which is nice. Sound wise Mackie suprised me positively. Judging by the specs and the previous encounters with CR line, I expected bigger differences between those two. Lower power of CR5 has less impact on sound quality on low to normal listetning levels, but this becomes obvious as the level rises, this is where JBL shows its muscles. Mackie due to lower power and the resonant front panel, introduces a lot of colourations on higher levels, bass becomes muddy and boomy and the lower midrange becomes boxy. Overall tone of Mackie is a bit more forward with treble and upper midrange pushed slightly forward. CR5's bass is suprisingly deep but there is too much boom in the upper ranges to my liking. JBL on the other hand is better balanced with all frequencies coming together at similar level. JBL is a bit more natural, speacious and 3D, more detailed top to bottom, more dynamic speaker. At the current prices JBL is a no brainer and gets my recommendation. Mackie is more of a multimedia solution rather than proper studio tool, it is not bad at all, but You can do better than that. What do You think? Do you agree with my assesment? Let me know below! Cheers!

Vsak ima pa svoja uha

Če bodo zvočniki boljši od soundbara za isti keš ?
Itak.

Ps.:
Teli JBL ali Yamaha HS so pa itak največ muzike za svoj dnar. Nimajo pa blutut. Niti nič od kakršnihkolih bombončkov. Reče se jim studijski monitorji. In mnogi se jih bojijo ko hudič križa. Pa ne govort okol, da sem ti omenil studijske monitorje. To je baje samo za studio
Hecam.

Ejejej!
Zakaj ne zapakiraš svoje škatle v avto in greš do strička na pivo ali kofe ter sprobaš kaj pride iz audio izhoda TV-ja?

Vse je odvisno od TV-ja ali boxa (saj TV ni v "luftu"). Audio signal lahko komot vzame tudi iz boxa kamor ima TV priključen.

Audio Jack za slušalke je zagotovo variabilen.
Analogen RCA je najverjetneje programabilno nastavljiv.
Digitalen Toslink je pa fiksen.

Ker bo striček nad tvojimi HS5 navdušen, mu jih pustiš tam, kaj pa vem, tako med brati, za pol cene.

Z malo dodatka se lahko takoj upgrejdaš na nove JBL 308P MkII.

Win - Win kombinacija.
Kakor, da bi že hodil Božiček.