xgi graficne kartice

ko bodo, pa nc prej. ce se pa splaca kupit, pa nevem se... za1x nc ne kaze dobr.

aja samoa si gledal slovenski cenik ker ta kartica ti si jo omenil ti( OZZI) je njihova najzmoglivejsa pa ce mi lahko poves kje si to gledal prosim

110k sit za graficno, ki se ne more primerjat niti z fx5700ultra...

spet napaka mislil sem na hitrosti radeona 9700 pro

za zacetek si tole poglej.
pa nadaljuj s tem

nevem kje si ti dubu ksno primerjavo z r9700pro, ce pa zaostaja celo za fx5600 ultra...pa za 110k sit, dubis ze 5x hitrejso graficno, bodisi 9800xt bodisi fx5950.

Po tistem ko sem prebral test na xbitlabs, lahko mirno in resno rečem, imam raje svojega radeona 9000 pro, kot pa tegale V8 duo. Pa ne le zato, ker sta pri večini iger po mojem kar nekako poravnana, ampak tudi zato, ker se reč greje kot parna lokomotiva, ropota pa tudi nekako tako.

110 jurjev za 6.7 fps v Haloju pri 1024? Gotovo obstajajo tudi bolj neumni načini za zapravljanje denarja, le ne spomnim se sedajle nobenega...

So se zaenkrat odlocili hudo znizat cene pri XGIju-sam sem pozabbil kje sem videl ta clanek. Dejansko jih zafrkavajo driverji.
Se vedno.

Potem pa baje, da bodo kar konkurencni.

Bomo videli.

Tole je čist ql mašina...samo driverji so problem

What causes such low performance or a seemingly promising graphics processor? We assume that it is primarily because of raw and unfinished drivers. However, it would be unfair to blame only drivers for this failure.

The major reason of this low performance has probably a lot to do with the Volari’s inefficient architecture, starting from the elementary caching algorithms and finishing with complex pixel shader 2.0 processing. The fillrate problems also contributed to the product’s low speed. And the reason for such poor fillrate comes from the very low levels, which is perfectly proven by the driver “optimizations”. As you remember, XGI Reactor drivers recognize familiar applications and reduce the texture level of detail, which automatically reduces the caches workload, because there are less texturing data to be processed. The performance grows up. This definitely indicates that Volari does have problems with texturing speed.
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/xgi-volari_31.html

Resnična škoda, ker testov očitno nihče več ne bere...