Predsednik ZDA Donald Trump - 2. mandat

Bellator je včeraj ob 17:54:31 izjavil:

Bolj me sicer zanima kaj levaki menite glede tiste nesreče pod vplivom drog, in pa predvsem na senatorkino postopanje po nesreči?

Zakaj te pa to zanima? Kdorkoli je, nisem nisem gledal, ampak glede na tvoje fašistične preference domnevam, da gre za demokratko. Naj za storjeno odgovarja, ane.
In če se obeša na kakšno imuniteto ali kaj podobnega, to mi je samo padlo na pamet, fuck off, ane. Debili so povsod, le da jih je med vami, škodoželjnimi hujskači, vključno s teboj, krepko, ampak res krepko več.

Ja, seveda ste radikalizirani fašisti problem. Tako tisti, ki koga povozite, kot tudi tisti, ki ga ne. Tvoj point je pa?

Bellator je včeraj ob 18:05:40 izjavil:

Levakinja pod vplivom drog povzroči nesrečo z dvema smrtnima izidoma, ter zagrozi očetu družine naj ne bo preveč glasen, problem je pa v meni, "škodoželjnemu juskaču"?

Kle piše, da so "laboratorijski testi pokazali, da ni bila pod vplivom alkohola ali drugih substanc, ki bi lahko vplivale na zmožnost vožnje."
https://urbanmilwaukee.com/2023/02/10/f...

Plus, kle se vid, da desnjakarji ne razumete, da levaki ne podpiramo politikov ampak pravno državo. pri vas je ravno obratno.

Kle piše, da so l"aboratorijski testi pokazali, da ni bila pod vplivom alkohola ali drugih substanc, ki bi lahko vplivale na zmožnost vožnje."
https://urbanmilwaukee.com/2023/02/10/f...

Plus, kle se vid, da desnjakarji ne razumete, da levaki ne podpiramo politikov ampak pravno državo. pri vas je ravno obratno.

Odlično, sem upal, da bo nekdo zagovarjal levakarsko govno, ker je levak tudi sam. Pred nesrečo je bila podvržena zdravstvenemu posegu, in kot edina v državi dobila izjemo, da lahko vozi (izjemo je dobila retroaktivno), kar kaže na izrazito koruptivnost levakarjev.

Če navedeno drži, za to ni nobenega opravičila in naj za to odgovarja, ane. Sploh ne vem, kaj Bellator tu praska.
Takoj podpišem za svet, kjer vsak človek odgovarja za svoja dejanja. Sumim pa, da bi ostalo v tem primeru vas fašistov precej malo. Kao levi so pa tako ali tako vsi, ki vam povedo, da ste s svojo škodoželjno, hujskaško držo podenj človeštva.

Bellator je včeraj ob 18:19:00 izjavil:

nejclp je včeraj ob 18:17:24 izjavil:

Bellator je včeraj ob 18:14:53 izjavil:

nejclp je včeraj ob 18:11:44 izjavil:

Bellator je včeraj ob 18:05:40 izjavil:

Levakinja pod vplivom drog povzroči nesrečo z dvema smrtnima izidoma, ter zagrozi očetu družine naj ne bo preveč glasen, problem je pa v meni, "škodoželjnemu juskaču"?

Kle piše, da so l"aboratorijski testi pokazali, da ni bila pod vplivom alkohola ali drugih substanc, ki bi lahko vplivale na zmožnost vožnje."
https://urbanmilwaukee.com/2023/02/10/f...

Plus, kle se vid, da desnjakarji ne razumete, da levaki ne podpiramo politikov ampak pravno državo. pri vas je ravno obratno.

Odlično, sem upal, da bo nekdo zagovarjal levakarsko govno, ker je levak tudi sam. Pred nesrečo je bila tem podvržena zdravstvenemu posegu, in kot edina v državi dobila izjemo, da lahko vozi (tudi to izjemo je dobila retroaktivno)

A jo zagovarjam? Eksplicitno sem napisal, da zagovarjam pravno državo, za posameznike mi pa dol visi oz. hočem, da za svoje zločine odgovarjajo. Pri vas je ravno obratno, še fino se vam zdi, če je politik lažniva pizdica.

To je zagovarjanje:

nejclp je včeraj ob 18:11:44 izjavil:

Kle piše, da so "laboratorijski testi pokazali, da ni bila pod vplivom alkohola ali drugih substanc, ki bi lahko vplivale na zmožnost vožnje.

Ne, to je citat iz članka, ki sem ga poiskal, ker nisem imel pojma, za kaj gre.

Bellator je včeraj ob 18:19:00 izjavil:

Polarizacija je taka, da se delimo na leve in ne-leve. Resnica je takšna, da je fašistov precej več na tvoji strani, ravno zato se ljudje odmikajo od levičarjev.

Ne, ljudje se umikate, ker ste sebične, pogosto pa tudi škodoželjne riti. Zgolj in samo zato.

nejclp je včeraj ob 18:24:46 izjavil:

Bellator je včeraj ob 18:21:24 izjavil:

Ne, to si napisal v njen zagovor.

Ne, to sem citiral, ker si ti trdil, da je vozila pod vplivom substanc. Če bi ti rad, da bi bilo nekaj res, še ne pomeni, da je res.

Torej praviš, da gre za tako dober zagovor, da si zmagal debato

Squirrel je včeraj ob 18:22:01 izjavil:

Bellator je včeraj ob 18:19:00 izjavil:

Polarizacija je taka, da se delimo na leve in ne-leve. Resnica je takšna, da je fašistov precej več na tvoji strani, ravno zato se ljudje odmikajo od levičarjev.

Ne, ljudje se umikate, ker ste sebične, pogosto pa tudi škodoželjne riti. Zgolj in samo zato.

Skrajni levičarji in skrajni desničarji, pa slednji niso tisti, o katerih nam mediji trobijo zadnja desetletja, ampak tisti, ki nasprotnike likvidirajo, tako kot ste vi Kirka, imate precej več skupnega. Mi na sredini smo samo kolateralna škoda vas, skrajnih norcev.

Lep dan še naprej.

Bellator je včeraj ob 18:26:52 izjavil:

nejclp je včeraj ob 18:24:46 izjavil:

Bellator je včeraj ob 18:21:24 izjavil:

Ne, to si napisal v njen zagovor.

Ne, to sem citiral, ker si ti trdil, da je vozila pod vplivom substanc. Če bi ti rad, da bi bilo nekaj res, še ne pomeni, da je res.

Torej praviš, da gre za tako dober zagovor, da si zmagal debato

To ni zagovor je citat iz poročila "Bewleyjeva je po nesreči oddala vzorec krvi na analizo, laboratorijski izvidi pa kažejo, da ni bila pod vplivom alkohola ali drugih škodljivih snovi." To je dejstvo. Trdiš, da so laboratorijski izvidi ponarejeni? Policija podkupljena? Kaj pravzaprav hočeš povedati in zakaj si to vpeljal v temo?

Če ste že pri mučeniku Kirku.. Trump šestim osebam preklical vizume, ker so popljuvali Kirka na družbenih omrežjih. Ena za v anale.

WSJ reports that Beijing's strategy is to tank the stock market and force Trump to offer big concessions.
Chinese leader Xi Jinping thinks president will fold before launching new tariffs that would roil markets



In its trade standoff with Washington, Beijing thinks it has found America's Achilles' heel: President Trump's fixation on the stock market.

China's leader, Xi Jinping, is betting that the U.S. economy can't absorb a prolonged trade conflict with the world's second-largest economy, according to people close to Beijing's decision-making. China is holding a firm line because of its conviction, the people said, that an escalating trade war will tank markets, as it did in April after Trump announced his so-called Liberation Day tariffs, prompting Beijing to hit back.

China expects that the prospect of another market meltdown ultimately will force Trump to negotiate at an expected summit with Xi late this month, the people said.

Beijing continued playing hardball this week, escalating the trade fight Monday by sanctioning the U.S. units of South Korean shipping company Hanwha Ocean. The move whipsawed U.S. markets on Tuesday, triggering a sharp early selloff as hopes for easing tensions faded, before major indexes partially rebounded and steadied in the afternoon.

Last week, Beijing imposed sweeping restrictions on the export of rare-earth minerals, which are vital to consumer electronics and the tech industry. Trump then threatened additional 100% tariffs on China starting Nov.

Both sides have vacillated between tough talk and de-escalation in recent days, but the rhetoric took a harder turn on Tuesday. China's commerce ministry accused the U.S. of "double standards" regarding tariff threats and it vowed that China would "fight to the end" in the trade dispute.

On his Truth Social platform, Trump said the U.S. is considering "terminating business" with China on cooking oil and other "elements of Trade," because of China's refusal to buy U.S. soybeans--a decision Beijing has said is retaliation for Trump's own tariffs.

The stock market has remained one of the few checks on a president who has wielded executive power aggressively.
Trump frequently wields the market as a real-time barometer of his economic stewardship. He has taken to social media to trumpet record market highs, crediting his administration's policies such as deregulation and tax cuts. Conversely, when the market has faltered, particularly in response to his aggressive trade policies, he has tended to retreat or float the prospect of new deals.

While Trump hails the strength of the U.S. economy, Chinese officials see weaknesses that would worsen during a trade war. With hiring slowing, manufacturing contracting and prices rising, many economists say the U.S. isn't positioned to absorb another major trade fight with China. The market's sharp negative reaction on Friday to China's new rare-earth restrictions and the potential U.S. retaliation served as a reminder of the economic vulnerability Beijing seeks to exploit.

China's own economy has been in a protracted downturn, weighed down by a collapsed property market, ever-rising debts and weakening consumer confidence. However, Xi is far less beholden to market swoons, even though the Chinese economy faces a precarious outlook.

Speaking to reporters at the White House on Tuesday, Trump projected a mix of his usual stated personal affinity for Xi and open confrontation when addressing the trade dispute with China. Trump framed the conflict through his relationship with the Chinese leader, whom he called a friend.

"I have a great relationship with Xi," Trump said, before quickly adding: "But sometimes he gets testy."
Acknowledging the severity of recent Chinese actions ranging from its new rare-earth export controls to the latest shipping-related sanctions, Trump said, "We have a lot of punches being thrown."

He then pivoted to defend his economic strategy against fears of a market downturn, portraying the U.S. as impervious to pressure. "We are the most successful we have ever been as a country," Trump said.
Beijing softened its tone on Sunday after Trump reacted furiously to the rare-earths restrictions, but its de-escalation appeared to be a tactical pause.

According to the people close to Beijing's decision-making process, Xi's hard-line strategy is based on the belief that Trump will ultimately fold and offer concessions rather than deploy Washington's own significant leverage. This confidence was fueled, the people said, by a U.S.-China trade truce struck in May. Trump had imposed tariffs of more than 100% on Chinese products but relented after Beijing used its leverage as the world's most important exporter of rare-earth magnets.

"It is precisely China's belief that Trump will fold--as he appeared to do on magnets earlier this year--that has led them to massively escalate," said Rush Doshi, a scholar at Georgetown University and the Council on Foreign Relations who previously served in the Biden administration.

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CNBC on Tuesday that senior officials in Washington and Beijing held discussions about the latest trade tensions on Monday, saying both sides "will be able to work through it."
People familiar with the matter said the U.S. ambassador to China, David Perdue, has been trying to arrange a phone call between Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who leads the U.S. negotiation team, and his Chinese counterpart, Vice Premier He Lifeng.

Attention now turns to the expected summit between Trump and Xi when both attend a gathering of Asia-Pacific leaders in South Korea later this month.

"The meeting will be the message. There will not be major breakthroughs," said Ryan Hass, director of the China center at the Brookings Institution think tank and a former senior national-security official. "Xi will want to use the meeting to project greater stability and predictability. Trump could look for assurances on flows of rare-earth elements. They may announce an extension of the trade truce that limits tariff escalation."

https://www.wsj.com/world/china/china-t...

Zaenkrat Xi-ju ne gre ravno najbolje glede nato da je ameriški delniški trg 2% od ATH. Bo moral poskusiti kaj bolj drastičnega.

DarwiN je včeraj ob 18:54:16 izjavil:

Če ste že pri mučeniku Kirku..

Must watch! :)))

Chalky je včeraj ob 12:33:01 izjavil:

Medtem je šel kitajski delniški trg v nebo in sicer zaradi tega ker naj bi se deflacija stabilizirala pri 2.3% kljub temu da trend ne prikazuje da bi se lahko vse skupaj umirilo. Consumer prices je recimo še dodatno zdrsnil. Kitajski casino je očitno še boljši od ameriškega?

Super. Od deflacije imajo korist tudi nižji sloj, od inflacije pa samo bogati. Ergo ZDA bo prej propadla.