Rusija vs. Ukrajina aka. "Putin - še sladkih 16 let na oblasti?"

Zcall je včeraj ob 11:20:23 izjavil:

Windlass je včeraj ob 10:58:14 izjavil:

Zcall je včeraj ob 10:51:33 izjavil:

Če ima Dugin dejansko dostop do Putina (kar je sicer vprašljivo), ...

Ah, vendarle si šel na hitro pogooglat, da ni znano, da bi se Putin in Dugin sploh poznala. Super.

A se lahko zdaj premaknemo stran od tvojega vehementnega pričakovanja, da se bo Putin v imenu Dugina naslednji teden ˝maščeval˝ Ukrajincem za 4 leta star atentat, za katerega se ne ve kdo ga je naročil?

govorim o vsakem napadu.
vsaki zadeti rafineriji. vsakem mrtvem civilistu. vsakem mrtvem otroku.

Velik problem je kako ustaviti Rusijo sedaj ko je jasno, da sankcije ne delujejo.

Zcall je včeraj ob 10:14:42 izjavil:

Ne razumeš pa ne razumeš.
Saj smo navajeni.

Ne gre za to, da je edini, gre za to na kakšni poziciji je in kaj to pomeni za samo vojno.

Treba je ločit med realnostjo in ideološkimi prepričanji. Realnost je, da je Dugin eden najvplivnejših mož ene najmočnejših vojsk na svetu. Seveda ni edini starš, je pa eden redkih ki lahko svoje žalovanje spremeni v goreče maščevanje. Nikakor to ni opravičilo, je pa kruta realnost. Take poteze so neumne.

Neverjeten posnetek dronovskega bojevanja: ukrajinski kopenski dron z mrežo onesposobi približujoči se ruski zračni dron.

Leif je včeraj ob 16:06:51 izjavil:

Mreže se uporablja že kar nekaj časa

https://x.com/RadarFennec/status/178315...

Pac-Man je včeraj ob 16:15:09 izjavil:

OK, sem pa kliknil na tvojo povezavo in se OP ukvarja s širjenjem ruske propagande

https://x.com/RadarFennec/status/210618...

Ukrajinski prometni znak v zahodni Ukrajini, ki označuje, v kateri »razred državljana« spadajo ljudje iz posameznih regij. Prav zabavno je, ko se ti ni treba izmišljati alegorij. 🙃

pod njim pa community note na čakanju:

To ni prometni znak v zahodni Ukrajini, temveč predvolilni plakat iz ukrajinskih predsedniških volitev leta 2004, ki ga je pripravila ekipa Viktorja Janukoviča. Na njem so Viktorju Juščenku očitali, da državljane deli na tri »vrste«.

https://24tv.ua/politichna_reklama_v_uk...

Dobesedno gre za desetletja produciranja propagande, ki se potem na različne načine reinterpretira in trga iz konteksta.

Leif je včeraj ob 16:39:35 izjavil:

Pro ukrajinski accounti pač ne bodo objavljali stvari, ki mečejo slabo luč na Ukrajino, podobno kot proruski ne obratno. Ne vem kaki hudi ideološki nazori so tu zadaj lol

Brussels has rebuffed Ukraine's request for additional financial support this year, demanding that Kyiv implement promised reforms before receiving further EU funding.

The reforms Ukraine must deliver to receive the funds include the abolition of a VAT exemption for small parcels and the introduction of new taxation rules for digital platforms.

European commissioners Valdis Dombrovskis and Marta Kos wrote a letter to the Speaker of Ukraine's parliament, underscoring that additional financial assistance in 2026 was still available to Ukraine if it fulfilled the requested reforms.

For Ukrainians, a Bad Peace Beats a Worsening War

It is time to talk about victory in the Russia–Ukraine War. Politicians and the media regularly use the word, yet it has come to signify nothing. In Ukraine, a political battle is breaking out over which narrative of victory will be accepted by the people.

For some, a 10-year-old dancer with a prosthetic leg is a living advertisement for Ukraine’s “unbreakability.” But a growing number of Ukrainians are done participating in that story. Incessant preaching about “resilience” while the situation on the ground only worsens has exhausted their patience. Many now say Kiev should become more open to a compromise peace to prevent injuries and gruesome wounds that would haunt Ukraine’s children for the rest of their lives. Outside the world of political sloganeering, “unbreakability” produces broken bodies and a maimed generation.

“The only way to stop these sufferings of all Ukrainians is the soonest possible peace,” Sofia Stuzhuk, a mother of five and a Ukrainian blogger with several million followers, told me. “And all sensible Ukrainians understand this.”

Public opposition to the controversial forced mobilization has reached a boiling point. Despite what you may hear from supposedly pro-Ukraine Western voices, ordinary Ukrainians of limited means often see evasion and resistance as signs of dignity and honor. Mobilization centers have become synonymous with torture, unexplained conscript deaths, and rampant corruption. Yet a former U.S. presidential adviser, Keith Kellogg, is calling for the mobilization of women. His daughter, Meaghan Mobbs, provoked a wave of outrage when she posted this message about a Ukrainian man who drowned in a river while fleeing mobilization officers: “He died a coward. He could have died a hero.”

Russian strikes have escalated and widened to the point that Kiev, far from the front, now feels like a near-frontline city. That alarming development comes after President Volodymyr Zelensky’s much-advertised 40-day “pressure” operation, which, in practice, is ongoing and has predictably led to a counterescalation by Moscow. Russian forces are tearing up railways and other logistical lines, choking agricultural exports, wrecking what was left of the metallurgical industry and the power system, and hitting gas stations and warehouses for basic goods. As a cold winter approaches, a humanitarian disaster looms. Meanwhile, corruption scandals have consumed the Zelensky government, and the fiscal situation is rapidly deteriorating.

People draw opposite conclusions from these developments. Some want to double down on the tactics that produced these results, while others see an urgent diplomatic end to the war as the only way out. Zelensky is part of the first group. He promises “revenge” after every attack, even as each new exchange of strikes takes more from Ukraine’s people and its economy than from Russia’s. But online, more and more Ukrainian voices now call for a realistic peace and challenge Zelensky’s understanding of what “victory” even means.

In 2022, winning meant getting all the land back. Officials even talked about reclaiming the Russian-occupied Crimean Peninsula. Back then, ordinary Ukrainians argued over which they’d rather recover first: the sunny subtropical tourist resort on the Black Sea, or the industrial core situated in the eastern Donbas region.

But by now the mood has changed entirely. Even a poll conducted by Kyiv International Institute of Sociology—a private organization perceived to be friendly to Ukraine’s leadership—found that 61 percent of Ukrainians would support a comprehensive peace deal that included territorial compromises. For some, that still feels like surrender or defeatism. But with Russian strikes getting progressively more damaging and Ukrainian losses rising, the case for such a peace is hard to ignore.

Western countries pouring aid into a war of attrition, year after year, has become good business for the arms makers and for politicians controlling public budgets. But five years into the war, this aid has not given Ukrainians real protection nor put the economy on anything resembling a firm footing. If this goes on, can Ukraine—a country where every third budget dollar comes from foreign aid—even continue to provide basic services, much less beat Russia on the battlefield? For all the talk of Russia’s “war economy,” Moscow is still spending only around 7 percent of GDP on defense, against Kiev’s 44 percent, and its debt-to-GDP ratio is practically the same it was before the war. Russia also has between two and four times as many men of mobilization age.

Attritional warfare has always favored Russia historically. While its army may lose battles, the capacity of Russians to endure exhaustion confers a significant advantage on Russian governments, including President Vladimir Putin’s present system. Russia is capable of spending lives and resources for as long as it takes, and it remains prepared to do so now.

Ukraine has reached the point where the only victory worth believing in requires accepting a bad peace rather than sustaining or escalating a horrific war. At least the former would give Ukraine a chance to survive as an independent country. By contrast, the present course—with flagrant corruption, fiscal crisis, escalating Russian strikes, and a worn-out, demoralized population—probably leads to Ukraine losing not just the war, but its independence and its future.

Windlass je včeraj ob 18:31:45 izjavil:

Ne vem, stari, ponovil si svoj tipičen modus operandi.. Točno isto si naredil kot zadnjič z ˝naključno ukrajinko˝ Marto Havryshko in ˝naključnim, vendar proruskim˝ cajtngom, katerega ime sem že pozabil, ker je bil tako specifičen in obskuren. Daj se vprašaj zakaj smo zdaj že vsaj 3jič končali na isti točki po tem, ko si predstavil izredno cherry-pickane stvari kot nevtralne.

Leif je včeraj ob 19:43:16 izjavil:

Jaz se sprenevedam ? UKrajina je od 2022 ukinila/prepovedala 329 medijev

Windlass je včeraj ob 19:58:02 izjavil:

Po 24. 2. 2022 so sankcionirani kanali:
-Nash
-Maxi TV
-112
-NewsOne
-ZIK
-UkrLive
-Pershyi Nezalezhnyi

Windlass je včeraj ob 18:57:18 izjavil:

Predstavil si jo kot ˝ukrajinska begunka˝

Windlass je včeraj ob 18:57:18 izjavil:

Z obema izrazoma si zakamufliral dejstvo, da si šel iskat potrdilo za zelo specifičen (da ne rečem proruski) bias/vidik in ga z generičnim opisom podanih virov poskušal prodati kot: ˝poglejte, mnenje iz Ukrajine˝

Windlass je včeraj ob 20:33:34 izjavil:

Aleluja. Prvič slišim, a nisi ti nevtralen?

windigo je včeraj ob 20:30:32 izjavil:

In zdaj čakam, da končno poveš, zakaj si Ukrajina zasluži biti država, ti človek esenc, ki se tukaj rad norčuje iz ljudske volje in samoodločbe kot zadostnemu temelju za državnost.

Leif je včeraj ob 20:57:03 izjavil:

Windlass je včeraj ob 20:10:50 izjavil:

esel je včeraj ob 20:09:20 izjavil:

Leif je včeraj ob 19:43:16 izjavil:

Jaz se sprenevedam ? UKrajina je od 2022 ukinila/prepovedala 329 medijev

Leif je znova udaril! Ko si do vratu v Putinovi riti, pa se sprašuješ ali smrdi, ker so kmetje pognojili njive. Go Leif, go.

Ja to z 329 prepovedanimi mediji.. nevem a je to pobral direktno z Insajderja, Lord Bebo-ta ali pa MMC komentarjev..

Ne vem kak LordBebo, to cifro je izpljunil Grok, sicer je razdelal da jih od tega bilo direktno bananih zaradi vsebine 76, kar je še vedno ogromno. 21 političnih strank je bilo tudi bananih zaradi ruskega bombardiranja ?

Windlass je včeraj ob 21:16:33 izjavil:

Prosim. Zadnjič si nam pokazal, da niti koncepta samo-odločbe narodov ne razumeš, pa bi spreminjal neko državno ureditev. Vzdrži se tega. Sranje se je zgodilo, ker je nekdo sranje naredil. Predestinirano ni nič.

windigo je včeraj ob 20:30:32 izjavil:

In zdaj čakam, da končno poveš, zakaj si Ukrajina zasluži biti država, ti človek esenc, ki se tukaj rad norčuje iz ljudske volje in samoodločbe kot zadostnemu temelju za državnost.

windigo je včeraj ob 21:53:05 izjavil:

Še vedno čakam, da me razsvetliš:

windigo je včeraj ob 20:30:32 izjavil:

In zdaj čakam, da končno poveš, zakaj si Ukrajina zasluži biti država, ti človek esenc, ki se tukaj rad norčuje iz ljudske volje in samoodločbe kot zadostnemu temelju za državnost.

Windlass je včeraj ob 22:03:00 izjavil:

windigo je včeraj ob 21:53:05 izjavil:

Še vedno čakam, da me razsvetliš:

windigo je včeraj ob 20:30:32 izjavil:

In zdaj čakam, da končno poveš, zakaj si Ukrajina zasluži biti država, ti človek esenc, ki se tukaj rad norčuje iz ljudske volje in samoodločbe kot zadostnemu temelju za državnost.

Ne razumem kaj hočeš od mene. Ali obstaja podlaga za ukrajinsko državnost se je od-arbitriralo 35 let nazaj. Kolikor vem od takrat podlage niso magično izginile. To je tako kot da me sprašuješ zakaj si katerakoli druga današnja država zasluži biti država.

Windlass je včeraj ob 22:03:00 izjavil:

Ne razumem kaj hočeš od mene. Ali obstaja podlaga za ukrajinsko državnost se je od-arbitriralo 35 let nazaj. Kolikor vem od takrat podlage niso magično izginile. To je tako kot da me sprašuješ zakaj si katerakoli druga današnja država zasluži biti država.