Rusija vs. Ukrajina aka. "Putin - še sladkih 16 let na oblasti?"

"We have over a million victims. These are the killed, missing, and those who died in hospitals."
Pavel Gubarev, former Russian gauleiter of the occupied Donetsk region

Sedaj pa čimpreje dva miljona oz. toliko dokler jih ne sreča pamet in gredo domov.

Verjetno slab Google translate.

Prizadetek oz. Mentalni bolnik SamoRes je zelo zelo verjetno profil enega od zaposlenih na rtv. So indici ;)

Sem vedel da Trump ne bo pustil ukrajino.

Mechel's deputy finance director, Nelli Galeeva, said it had received a three-year deferral on tax and social security payments worth 13 billion rubles ($166 million).

The government support will also include saving an extra 500 million rubles ($6 million) per month through industry-wide assistance measures like deferred mineral extraction tax and social insurance payments, according to the agency Interfax, as cited by The Moscow Times.

Vsi ekonomski problemi se odlagajo v prihodost. Uf, kako bo rusko ljudstvo jezno, ko bo vojne konec.

https://x.com/kvistp/status/19427177439... ... "Vodka production colapses in Russia"

Kolega rus komentiral: "vodka is no longer relevant, fentanyl is king"

Kar odlično razloži vsa obtoževanja, kako približno vsi ne-ruski politiki snifajo bele prahce tu in tam.

Res zelo pametno, da se sredi belega dneva vsi zberejo na kupu, jaoooo!!!

Odlično napisano kaki patetični bedniki so rusi.

The Russian campaign against Ukraine using cheap and militarily not very effective drones has one major parallel in history: Operation Eisbär, the V1 flying bomb campaign against London and towns in southern England. Nazis called the V1 a vengance weapon. They knew the odds of hitting something important to British military were minute, but the damage caused was considerable. The V1 campaign delivered bombs across the Channel at about the same destructive rate as the Blitz did four years prior and caused proportionally more damage and casualties.

It's not a good way to wage war. For one most attacks do not hit anything militarily important, then or now, and even the ones that do will cause limited damage, because the military takes the possibility of such strikes into account and works to minimize damage before they happen. The V1 and Shahed campaigns are both borne out of powerless frustration, the enemy will not relent and the best they can think of is to terrorize their population into submission with brutal attacks that hurt mainly civilians.
The objective of Russian attacks on Ukraine is the same as Nazi objective of the V1 campaign against Britain: it's not really to win the war. Maybe some have the faintest hope terror bombing will somehow work, but both know by now the very idea is counterproductive. The campaign is about inflicing damage, about punishment and hurting the other side, so they can be miserable like they themselves are.

The campaign is not really about the war any more. It's about Russian pathological narcissism. Frustration they can't always be the number one most important nation ever boiled over into distilled malice and the best they dare to do is launch flying bombs against Ukrainian cities, to hurt Ukrainians and punish them for daring to expose Russia for the pathetic little self that it is.

In naj poudarim, da so naši pepčki, ki to podpirajo še 100x slabši.

Jaz samo upam, da bodo droni, ki bodo s šibrovkami streljali na druge drone, uporabljali železne šibre in ne svinčenih ... ker onesnaženje okolja s svincem mentalno negativno vpliva na mnogo naslednjih generacij ...

pegasus je danes ob 14:50:49 izjavil:

... ker onesnaženje okolja s svincem mentalno negativno vpliva na mnogo naslednjih generacij ...

Kaj s tem misliš?

Chalky je danes ob 15:21:03 izjavil:

Ko že ravno omenjaš drone...Ameriški obrambni minister včeraj pred Pentagonom.

https://x.com/SecDef/status/19434014114...

Bojda je cilj da začnejo drone proizvajati v masovnih številkah in sicer tako preprosto kot naboje za pištole.

Med govorom je vmiksan komad Enter Sandman od Metallice

pegasus je danes ob 15:32:53 izjavil:

mikhaair je danes ob 15:02:55 izjavil:

pegasus je danes ob 14:50:49 izjavil:

... ker onesnaženje okolja s svincem mentalno negativno vpliva na mnogo naslednjih generacij ...

Kaj s tem misliš?

https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/p... in še stotine drugih člankov ... Any nonzero amount of lead in blood is not good. Vprašaj folk iz Mežice. Američani ocenjujejo, da je osvinčen bencin v 20. stoletju zbil IQ populacije za 2.6 točke.

Razumljivo. Ampak to se gre za svinec, ki so ga avtomobili in industrija poslali v zrak.
Šibre v tleh pa koliko vplivajo? Ker celotna Z Slovenija ima svinčene šrapnele v tleh. Pa nisem še zasledil panike glede tega.

Proti pehoti so imele železne ali svinčene kroglice.

FireSnake je danes ob 14:45:58 izjavil:

Človek se vpraša: kakšna je smiselnost nakupa protizračne obrambe.

Mislim, da je protizračna obramba še naprej zelo pomembna, še bolj kot prej. Je pa dejstvo, da večinoma ne v trenutni obliki, ne moreš streljati milijon vrednih raket na leteče mopede, ki stanejo manj kot Lada. Tu bo potrebno razviti učinkovite protisisteme. Imam občutek, da razni Gepardi na CIWS sistemi tukaj kar visoko kotirajo, samo doseg imajo klinčev - bolj za point defense kot karkoli drugega.

Sicer pa se precej dela na anti-dronskih dronih. Dolgoročno bo to najbrž stroškovno najbolj smiselna pot.