Rusija vs. Ukrajina aka. "Putin - še sladkih 16 let na oblasti?"

Leif je 15. jun 2026 ob 15:35:25 izjavil:

Čisto možno, sicer ne bi čakal da Ukrajincev da zgradijo vojsko. Mogoče je pa samo nesposoben, kdo ve.
Sicer pa je iluzija da o vsem odloča Putin sam, podobno kot v Ameriki ne odloča Trump.

Leif je 15. jun 2026 ob 13:22:42 izjavil:

Mogoče bi proti oznaki ukronacijev pomagalo, če ne bi prekopavali mrtvih nacijev z državniškimi častmi...

Leif je 15. jun 2026 ob 17:12:13 izjavil:

Lahko, imaš moje dovoljenje

Ivan Ilyin je bil v različnih govorih večkrat citiran s strani ruskega predsednika Vladimir Putin, zato ga nekateri opazovalci smatrajo za pomemben ideološki navdih za Putina. Putin je odredil prenos Iljinovih posmrtnih ostankov nazaj v Rusijo in leta 2009 obiskal ter posvetil njegov grob.

Ob ruskem novem letu 2014 so vsi visoki državni uradniki in predstavniki lokalnih oblasti prejeli izvod knjige *Our Tasks* (*Naše naloge*), posmrtno izdane zbirke Iljinovih člankov iz let 1948–1954.

Na Iljina so se v svojih nastopih ali zapisih sklicevali tudi Dmitry Medvedev, Sergey Lavrov, Patriarch Kirill of Moscow, Vladislav Surkov in Vladimir Ustinov.

30. septembra 2022 je Putin v govoru ob ruski priključitvi štirih ozemelj v Ukrajini citiral tudi Iljina.

Ivan Ilyin je na Mussolinija in Hitlerja gledal kot na zgledna voditelja, ki Evropo rešujeta z odpravo demokracije.

17. maja 1933 je Iljin v pariškem časopisu *Vozroždénije* objavil razvpit članek z naslovom »Nacionalsocializem. Novi duh« (*National Socialism. A New Spirit*), v katerem je podprl nacistični prevzem oblasti v Nemčiji. Pri tem je časopise *Berliner Tageblatt*, *Vossische Zeitung* in *Frankfurter Zeitung* obtožil, da so proboljševistični. (Le kratek čas pred tem so nacisti izvajali javna sežiganja knjig.)

Iljin je ostro napadal »judovski meščanski tisk« Weimarske Nemčije, za katerega je trdil, da je prosovjetsko usmerjen in da nikoli ni resnicoljubno poročal o Rusiji.

Novembra 2013 je Putin izsiljeval Janukoviča: če bi si drznil podpisati sporazum z EU, bi Putin po besedah Hennadija Moskala (2018) okupiral velike dele Ukrajine. Litovski predsednici Grybauskaitė je Janukovič priznal, da ga Putin izsiljuje.

Windlass je 15. jun 2026 ob 15:03:07 izjavil:

O fak no, Polona Frelih. Đizas Krajst. Psihiatrija.

Stane2 je 16. jun 2026 ob 06:50:22 izjavil:

https://x.com/kozako01/status/206661842...

Lukashenko apologized to Zelensky and stated that Belarus will not undertake any military action against Ukraine

"If Volodymyr has been offended, I apologize for my words (at one point I put my foot in it, at another I screwed up). I shouldn't have said them, considering that, after all, he is at war. He understands perfectly well that from Belarus, and especially from me, no military action is to be expected"

If Ukraine starts attacking Belarus in the same way it attacks Russia, we will be very vulnerable. We understand that, which is why we don't want war, stated the Belarusian dictator, Lukashenko

"Because Belarus is within reach of the Ukrainian army. We understand perfectly well that our main vital, productive, and logistical targets will be affected. As they have stated, they have already identified 500 targets of this type on Belarusian territory"

* the accomplice of the Russian war criminal, the dictator Lukashenko, smells that something is not right.

Stane2 je 16. jun 2026 ob 06:50:22 izjavil:

https://x.com/kozako01/status/206661842...

Lukashenko apologized to Zelensky and stated that Belarus will not undertake any military action against Ukraine

"If Volodymyr has been offended, I apologize for my words (at one point I put my foot in it, at another I screwed up). I shouldn't have said them, considering that, after all, he is at war. He understands perfectly well that from Belarus, and especially from me, no military action is to be expected"

If Ukraine starts attacking Belarus in the same way it attacks Russia, we will be very vulnerable. We understand that, which is why we don't want war, stated the Belarusian dictator, Lukashenko

"Because Belarus is within reach of the Ukrainian army. We understand perfectly well that our main vital, productive, and logistical targets will be affected. As they have stated, they have already identified 500 targets of this type on Belarusian territory"

* the accomplice of the Russian war criminal, the dictator Lukashenko, smells that something is not right.

Prepričati Zelenskega da mu iz belorusije ne preti nobena nevarnost.

Pac-Man je 16. jun 2026 ob 08:38:52 izjavil:

Še karikaturistov, za katere sploh še nisem slišal, ne trpijo

The channel reported that the suspected killers most likely numbered two. One was apprehended near the Belarusian Consulate in Biała Podlaska. Unofficial reports identified the suspect as a Belarusian national.

According to DzikMedia, a Belarusian taxi driver drove the killers to the scene; when they pointed a gun at him, he panicked and tried to flee toward the Belarusian consulate.

It was unclear whether the two accounts referred to the same person. Police said they were still searching for the remaining suspect.

- Fuel standards downgrade: Russia has reportedly allowed some refineries to sell gasoline and diesel that fall below Euro-5 standards on the domestic market. Kommersant says the decision was made in fall 2025, was originally supposed to expire on May 1, 2026, and was later extended because of fuel shortages. The lower-quality fuel is allegedly restricted to domestic use, but even this measure does not fully solve the shortage, since many smaller refineries still cannot meet the relaxed sulfur limits.

- Economic and mechanical consequences: This looks like a short-term fix with long-term costs. Modern imported Chinese cars, commercial trucks, and agricultural machinery are generally not designed for higher-sulfur fuel closer to older Euro-3 standards. That could mean damaged emissions systems, clogged filters, shorter service intervals, and higher maintenance costs. Farmers, transport companies, and ordinary drivers may end up paying the price if degraded fuel quality becomes widespread.

- Connection to refinery strikes: The fuel-quality decision may also be connected to Ukraine's ongoing drone campaign against Russian oil infrastructure. OilPrice and other outlets have reported on the impact of Ukrainian strikes on Russian refining capacity and fuel logistics. If refinery damage, repair delays, and reduced output are contributing to shortages, then lowering fuel standards is not a real solution. It simply keeps fuel moving temporarily while pushing future costs onto the economy.

- Northern front pressure: On the northern front, Russia appears focused on disrupting Ukrainian supply routes near the border. The Sumy-Kharkiv highway is an obvious target because it connects important Ukrainian positions and logistics routes. Reports describe repeated strikes across the Sumy line, but with limited Russian movement. Around Kharkiv, Russian forces continue applying pressure and may reduce parts of the city's buffer zone, though there is still no sign of a major breakthrough.

- Lyman counterattacks: Around Lyman and the northern end of the fortress belt, Ukraine appears to be counterattacking after Russian advances created a vulnerable salient. Multiple mapping sources claim Ukrainian forces have pushed Russian troops back near Karpivka, Ridkodub, Zelena Dolyna, and Serednye. The likely goal is to reduce pressure on Lyman, improve security around Svyatohirsk and Oskil River crossings, and limit Russian FPV drone pressure on the Sloviansk-Izyum highway.

- Kostiantynivka sector: Further south, Kostiantynivka looks like the most dangerous sector for Ukraine right now. ISW assesses that Russia may be shifting focus there after failing to achieve major progress toward Sloviansk from the northeast. Reports from the city describe Russian infiltration into built-up districts, including the Central microdistrict, with fighting around basements, industrial areas, and individual blocks. This increasingly looks like heavy urban combat rather than a fast operational encirclement.

- Ukrainian defensive lines: One more positive Ukrainian development is the expansion of obstacle-based defensive lines. Playfra's thread argues that Ukraine has spent the last year and a half building fallback grids, ditch systems, barbed-wire obstacles, fortress towns, and drone-controlled kill zones. These lines are not meant to be packed with infantry constantly. Instead, they slow Russian infiltration long enough for Ukrainian drones, artillery, and small units to identify and destroy advancing groups.

- Overall assessment: The picture remains mixed. Russia is adapting to fuel shortages by lowering quality standards, but that may damage civilian and military equipment over time. On the battlefield, Russia is still applying pressure in Sumy, Kharkiv, and especially Kostiantynivka, while Ukraine is counterattacking near Lyman and improving defensive depth across much of the east. The common theme is exhaustion: both sides are improvising under pressure, but the costs keep rising.

Britansko obrambno ministrstvo preiskuje navedbe, da je ruska vojaška ladja danes v Rokavskem prelivu izstrelila opozorilne strele v bližini jahte, registrirane v Združenem kraljestvu.

Po doslej znanih podatkih naj bi se incident zgodil približno 32 kilometrov južno od otoka Wight, zunaj britanskih teritorialnih voda. Jahta je po navedbah britanskih medijev sporočila, da je nanjo streljalo plovilo ruske mornarice. Poškodovanih ni bilo, prav tako ni poročil o škodi na jahti.

Zakaj preprosto in iskati rešitve, če pa se da komplicirati in provocirati ?
Pa kdorkoli že bil odgovoren.
Vedno bolj se mi zdi, da Putin, Dump, Ši, Macron, Kallas, itd igrajo "se kartami pod mizo".

Primer. Da sem jaz tisti, ki odločam v Rusiji (nisem na nikogaršnji strani v vojni, ampak na strani miru.) Jst bi sporočil Ukrajincem, npr. Čez 72 ur bomo zravnali četrt Kijeva z zemljo, imate 3 dni časa, da se umakne te. Ne bi bilo civilnih žrtev. To je samo primer.

A še vedno niste za premirje. V 72 urah bo veš Kijev zravnan z zemljo. Itn. Se mi zdi da bi bilo "specialne v.o." hitro konec.

Windlass je 16. jun 2026 ob 21:51:28 izjavil:

https://www.rtvslo.si/komentar/19833800

Primer. Da sem jaz tisti, ki odločam v Rusiji (nisem na nikogaršnji strani v vojni, ampak na strani miru.) Jst bi sporočil Ukrajincem, npr. Čez 72 ur bomo zravnali četrt Kijeva z zemljo, imate 3 dni časa, da se umakne te. Ne bi bilo civilnih žrtev. To je samo primer.

Tiskovni predstavnik izraelske vojske je dejal, da je evakuacija mesta Gaza "neizogibna", medtem ko se izraelska vojska pripravlja na zavzetje tega največjega mesta v palestinski enklavi. Ob tem je napovedal, da bo vsaka palestinska družina, ki se bo preselila na jug, prejela humanitarno pomoč.

Izraelska vojska je medtem izdala nov ukaz za evakuacijo mesta. Prebivalce soseske Rimal in pristaniškega območja je pozvala, naj se nemudoma odpravijo proti jugu enklave, v t. i. humanitarno cono al Mavasi.

windigo je 16. jun 2026 ob 23:29:34 izjavil:

Evo, Pac-manov bivši frend Ragozin o tem, zakaj beremo o nekih strašnih uspehih ukrajinske vojske, medtem ko Rusi počasi vkotljujejo Kramatorsk in Slavjansk:

https://www.intellinews.com/ragozin-tal...

TL;DR

Besedilo analizira medijsko kampanjo o domnevnem preobratu na bojišču v korist Ukrajine, ki služi kot podlaga za novo politiko stopnjevanja pritiska na Rusijo. Skupina držav E3 (Francija, Velika Britanija in Nemčija) ter Ukrajina želijo s tem spremeniti pogoje za končanje vojne. Avtor to označuje za nevarno igro nepriljubljenih evropskih voditeljev in ukrajinskega predsednika Zelenskega, ki jim nadaljevanje vojne koristi za reševanje lastnih političnih karier. Podobna strategija maksimalnega pritiska iz leta 2021 je po mnenju avtorja že privedla do ruske invazije, trenutno zaostrovanje pa tvega neposredno vojno med zvezo NATO in Rusijo.

Nedavna izjava držav E3 prinaša bistveno nižje in manj maksimalistične cilje kot v prvih letih vojne (vrnitev Krima ali strateški poraz Rusije sploh nista več omenjena). Kljub temu izjava postavlja nerealne pogoje, kot je prekinitev ognja pred začetkom pogajanj, na kar Rusija zaradi trenutne ofenzivne prednosti ne bo pristala. Dokumenti prav tako popolnoma opuščajo vprašanje ukrajinskega članstva v Natu. Avtor poudarja, da bi Ukrajina v preteklosti lahko sklenila bistveno ugodnejši mir in s tem preprečila katastrofalne izgube ozemlja ter prebivalstva.
Razmere na bojišču in informacijska vojna

Ukrajina je v zadnjih mesecih dosegla določene taktične uspehe (npr. oskrbovalna kriza s gorivom na Krimu zaradi napadov z droni in upočasnitev ruskega napredovanja). Vendar pa so ti uspehi neprimerljivi z ukrajinskima protiofenzivama iz let 2022 in 2023. Rusija se trenutno osredotoča na osvajanje utrjenih delov Donbasa (npr. mesta Kostjantynivka), medtem ko se podatki o stanju na fronti v ukrajinskih virih vse bolj prikrivajo ali manipulirajo.

Zahodni in ukrajinski pristop k vojskovanju temelji predvsem na informacijski vojni (PR) in ustvarjanju želene percepcije v javnosti, medtem ko je ruski pristop usmerjen strogo v doseganje realnih rezultatov na terenu.


Medtem ko zahodne prestolnice upajo, da bo Ukrajina zdržala do vmesnih volitev v ZDA, ki bi lahko prinesle novo pomoč, je časovno okno za Ukrajino izjemno majhno. Zaradi uničujočih posledic vojne v Kijevu vlada velika nujnost, saj nekateri ukrajinski uradniki opozarjajo, da je govorjenje o »preobratu« vojne iluzija in da bo do novembra ponovno v ospredju zgolj vprašanje, kako preživeti zimo.