Žitije Donalda Trampa

jype je 20. jun 2017 ob 02:33 izjavil:

To je normalen odziv na napad na zahodno civilizacijo. Republikance je treba uničiti, sicer bodo oni uničili civilizacijo.

Trump 2016-2024.

jype je 20. jun 2017 ob 03:00 izjavil:

PaX_MaN je 20. jun 2017 ob 02:39 izjavil:

Trump 2016-2024.

Mhm, tko kot Hitler 33-45.

Na koncu je itak samo en možen rezultat: Fašisti končate tam, kjer vam je mesto.

Hočeš rečt proto nazi FDR?

https://slo-tech.com/forum/t699856/p552...

janex je 20. jun 2017 ob 09:42 izjavil:

Kurzweil je 20. jun 2017 ob 09:23 izjavil:

gledam po SSKJ in ne najdem neke besede oz. konteksta

Smo se morali boriti proti nacistom, da smo lahko obdržali slovenski jezik, kulturo in tradicijo.

Še marsikaj drugega je bilo potrebno, ne samo boj proti nacistom. Rad imam Slovenski jezik, zato me še vedno zanima kaj ta beseda pomeni in prav nič mi nisi odgovoril!

Če bo preveč direkten bo čez čas PNG.

Tako je, ko so čustva drugih pomembnejša.

Zgleda ti ne sprocesira. No ko vpišem v brskalnik "žitije" mi vrne izključno rezultate v "srbo-hrvaškem" (pa recimo že vedno temu tako) jeziku. Kaj je tvoja težava ne vem, ampak očitno imaš neke resne probleme. Kaj ti ni razumljivo od tega, kar sem napisal? In konec koncev, zakaj ne bi vprašal tudi na ST in ne samo s Franom in Googlom? Če ne znaš odgovorit in si sem prišel stresat svoje frustracije ali pesek iz vagine, potem bolje, da ne odgovarjaš več mojim komentarjem, ker so povsem brezpredmetni in še vedno nisem od tebe dobil nobenega odgovora, zgolj nagladanje in blodnje nekega zafrustriranega človeka.

Me ne moti niti malo. Sicer bi raje videl kakšno bolj ustrezno besedo. Če pa me že kaj moti, pa je to odnos janexa in kako je smešno izpadel. Jaz sem samo iskreno vprašal, če ne bi bilo blodenj in nakladanja janexa, bi bil ta topic že mimo in je potreboval samo en komentar in ne pol strani teme, ker ima janex neke blodnje oz. upam, da samo slab dan. Kot rečeno pa nimam nič proti, precej se piše tudi v angleščini in še kakšnem jeziku, vendar res ne vem zakaj nebi uporabljali zborno slovenščino, ko pa imamo čisto lepe namenske besede. In pa sorry za offtopic, ampak zanj je kriv izključno janex, jaz sem direktno spraševal po naslovu tega topica.

https://sh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hagiograf...

Če ne bi kongres zaviral Trumpa in podpiral toliko isis predvsem Đon Mcckejn in podlasca kot je Grahm bi Putin in Trump že uničila Isis.

Trump je genijalac jaz ga občudujem.

Delovnih mest pa vseeno ne bo. Se ena v seriji donaldovih nategov

Kakšna žetev, lepo vas prosim.
To pride na koncu, ne po 5 mesecih. Če ravno ne gre za pasulj.
Jurček, demenca sploh ni najhujše, kar se ti lahko zgodi.
Bolj nevarna je politična asimetrija. Zvija hrbtenico, obupno v levo stran pri tvoji diagnozi.
Še trugo ti bojo moral ukrivit u vinkl!

Demokrati so zmetali milijone (vsaj 25) skozi okno:
Karen Handel Wins Georgia Special Election, Fending Off Upstart Democrat

Če bi te milijone raje investirali v delovna mesta, bi jih volilci resneje jemali.

vostok_1 je 20. jun 2017 ob 00:14 izjavil:

jype je 19. jun 2017 ob 23:57 izjavil:

vostok_1 je 19. jun 2017 ob 23:47 izjavil:

A še vam ni jasno, da ko se popušča skrajni levici v alliance z Islamisti, se bo tudi desnica prej ali slej prebudila.

Zate še vedno nismo čisto ziher, a si skrajna desnica ali islamski fundamentalist. No, razlika je res infinitezimalna. Za ZaphodBBja pa že vemo, on sovraži vse tiste komponente islama, ki niso fašistične.

vostok_1 je 19. jun 2017 ob 23:47 izjavil:

Najraje bi videl, da se vas take leve in desne sorte, extremiste vseh barv, preseli nekam, recimo na atlandito, pa tam pusti da mate svojo žurko.

No, pa sej se loh prostovoljno izseliš, meje so baje odprte tudi za ekstremiste.

Cute taktika. Kdo te je je naučil, Che Guevara al Mao?

Sicer pa je ta letni čas lepo vreme dol, kr hitro na pot predlagam.

Najs. Tudi Che je hotel svoj fašizem tako, kot ga je je imel Chiang pred ero Maoa. Slednjemu je vsaj uspelo rahlo demokratizirati fašizem.

Trump je ravnokar tweetnil nekaj, kar bo desničarjem zelo všeč:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/sta...

RedState je konzervativni blog.

RedState @ Wikipedia

http://www.redstate.com/jaycaruso/2017/...

Donald Trump and Republicans exhibit weakness when they blame the media and Democrats for their problems. Trump never takes responsibility for his problems. Unfortunately for him, the public doesn’t want to hear his whining, and they’re expressing it in job approval numbers that parallel George W. Bush towards the end of his presidency.

A new CBS poll came out today, and Trump’s support is at the lowest point since he took office in January

...

Let’s retake a step in time to try and gain an understanding of where we are and why we are here:

Who was it that hired Paul Manafort and used Carter Page as an advisor despite their ties to Russia that could prove to be problematic?

Who was it that shouted at campaign stops, “I love Wikileaks!” and would then read from hacked emails? Emails everybody in the IC knows got to Wikileaks via Russian hackers?

Who steadfastly refused to acknowledge that Russia tried to interfere with our election process even after being shown a report from the DNI stating the NSA, CIA, and FBI all believed Russia sought to interfere and that their preference in the election was one Donald J. Trump?

Who had to be dragged kicking and screaming to acknowledge what the intelligence community concluded?

Who was it that brought in Michael Flynn as his National Security Adviser, knowing he was already under investigation by the FBI?

Who was it that chose an Attorney General who had to recuse himself from any involvement in the inquiry because of his contact with the Russian ambassador during the campaign?

Who was it that tweeted nonsense about President Obama tapping his phones in Trump Tower before the election?

Who was it that asked his FBI director for an oath of loyalty?

Who was it that asked his FBI director to back to off the investigation of Michael Flynn?

Who was it that kept behaving as though the FBI director was supposed to be his PR person?

Who was it that fired James Comey, claiming he did it on the advice of Rod Rosenstein, and then changed his mind saying he did it all on his own?

Who undermined his own Deputy Attorney General to the point he had no choice but to appoint a Special Counsel?

Who was it the day after Robert Mueller was named who took to Twitter and called the investigation a witch hunt?

Who is it that continually calls the Russian interference into our election a “made up story” and a “hoax” perpetrated by Democrats despite acknowledging the intelligence community’s report that Russia did indeed attempt to interfere?

...

The president’s problems are of his making because he cannot allow any slight, no matter how minor, to go unaddressed. Whereas Barack Obama, George W. Bush and Bill Clinton let staff and a communications team handle the usual nonsense related to presidential administrations, Trump can’t stop tweeting when he thinks he’s been wronged. The former three got things done because they didn’t sweat the small stuff. Donald Trump consumes his presidency with the little things.

His impetuous nature, along with being the most thin-skinned man alive and an inability to tell the truth, is the reason he’s below 40 percent in job approval polls.

Vsak čas! Vsak čas!

D3m je 23. jun 2017 ob 11:17 izjavil:

Ahhhhh Paco.

238 Arrested in Major Hollywood Pedophile Ring Bust

In potem klikneš na LA Times vir.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-m...

JUNE 21 2016, 11:31 AM

Jay Huso in Loretta?

Yep, dobro so spisali ta nov skrivnostni Trumpcare health bill. Let the suffering begin!. V desetletju ali dveh se bo nabralo za ene X-krat toliko 9/11 žrtev, ampak nihče ne bo mogel s prstom direktno pokazat na te pozabljene Američane, volit pa tudi ne bodo morali pod zemljo. Bistvo vsega pa seveda tax cuts for the rich, baby! MAGA.

A vsega so menda krivi demokrati, ker naj bi bili obstruktivni, lmao.. Potem veš, kako je zadeva monstruozna, ko še v Swampu ne najdejo nobene vsaj malo bolj prepričljive laži oz. boljšega BS argumenta.

ZaphodBB je 23. jun 2017 ob 11:25 izjavil:

Vsak čas! Vsak čas!

Bogi Scott, demenca ga daje.

ZaphodBB je 23. jun 2017 ob 17:18 izjavil:

If you like your Obamacare you can keep your Obamacare je moto novega zakona!

No, but your state's corrupt officials can.

Eh, demokrati majo še precej dela, preden bodo postali resna socialistična stranka in dejansko zmagali na volitvah.

WaPo z magnum opusom. Vprašanje kdo vse je postal zgovoren.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics...

Early last August, an envelope with extraordinary handling restrictions arrived at the White House. Sent by courier from the CIA, it carried “eyes only” instructions that its contents be shown to just four people: President Barack Obama and three senior aides.

...

The intelligence captured Putin’s specific instructions on the operation’s audacious objectives — defeat or at least damage the Democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton, and help elect her opponent, Donald Trump.

...

The material was so sensitive that CIA Director John Brennan kept it out of the President’s Daily Brief, concerned that even that restricted report’s distribution was too broad. The CIA package came with instructions that it be returned immediately after it was read. To guard against leaks, subsequent meetings in the Situation Room followed the same protocols as planning sessions for the Osama bin Laden raid.

...

Over that five-month interval, the Obama administration secretly debated dozens of options for deterring or punishing Russia, including cyberattacks on Russian infrastructure, the release of CIA-gathered material that might embarrass Putin and sanctions that officials said could “crater” the Russian economy.

But in the end, in late December, Obama approved a modest package combining measures that had been drawn up to punish Russia for other issues — expulsions of 35 diplomats and the closure of two Russian compounds — with economic sanctions so narrowly targeted that even those who helped design them describe their impact as largely symbolic.

Obama also approved a previously undisclosed covert measure that authorized planting cyber weapons in Russia’s infrastructure, the digital equivalent of bombs that could be detonated if the United States found itself in an escalating exchange with Moscow. The project, which Obama approved in a covert-action finding, was still in its planning stages when Obama left office. It would be up to President Trump to decide whether to use the capability.

...

The intelligence on Putin was extraordinary on multiple levels, including as a feat of espionage.

For spy agencies, gaining insights into the intentions of foreign leaders is among the highest priorities. But Putin is a remarkably elusive target. A former KGB officer, he takes extreme precautions to guard against surveillance, rarely communicating by phone or computer, always running sensitive state business from deep within the confines of the Kremlin.

...

Officials at the State Department and FBI became alarmed by an unusual spike in requests from Russia for temporary visas for officials with technical skills seeking permission to enter the United States for short-term assignments at Russian facilities. At the FBI’s behest, the State Department delayed approving the visas until after the election.

Meanwhile, the FBI was tracking a flurry of hacking activity against U.S. political parties, think tanks and other targets. Russia had gained entry to DNC systems in the summer of 2015 and spring of 2016, but the breaches did not become public until they were disclosed in a June 2016 report by The Post.

...

Brennan convened a secret task force at CIA headquarters composed of several dozen analysts and officers from the CIA, the NSA and the FBI.

The unit functioned as a sealed compartment, its work hidden from the rest of the intelligence community. Those brought in signed new non-disclosure agreements to be granted access to intelligence from all three participating agencies.

They worked exclusively for two groups of “customers,” officials said. The first was Obama and fewer than 14 senior officials in government. The second was a team of operations specialists at the CIA, NSA and FBI who took direction from the task force on where to aim their subsequent efforts to collect more intelligence on Russia.

...

Throughout his presidency, Obama’s approach to national security challenges was deliberate and cautious. He came into office seeking to end wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. He was loath to act without support from allies overseas and firm political footing at home. He was drawn only reluctantly into foreign crises, such as the civil war in Syria, that presented no clear exit for the United States.

Obama’s approach often seemed reducible to a single imperative: Don’t make things worse. As brazen as the Russian attacks on the election seemed, Obama and his top advisers feared that things could get far worse.

...

Some of the most critical technical intelligence on Russia came from another country, officials said. Because of the source of the material, the NSA was reluctant to view it with high confidence.

...

In early September, Johnson, Comey and Monaco arrived on Capitol Hill in a caravan of black SUVs for a meeting with 12 key members of Congress, including the leadership of both parties.

The meeting devolved into a partisan squabble.

“The Dems were, ‘Hey, we have to tell the public,’ ” recalled one participant. But Republicans resisted, arguing that to warn the public that the election was under attack would further Russia’s aim of sapping confidence in the system.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) went further, officials said, voicing skepticism that the underlying intelligence truly supported the White House’s claims. Through a spokeswoman, McConnell declined to comment, citing the secrecy of that meeting.

Key Democrats were stunned by the GOP response and exasperated that the White House seemed willing to let Republican opposition block any pre-election move.

...

When U.S. spy agencies reached unanimous agreement in late September that the interference was a Russian operation directed by Putin, Obama directed spy chiefs to prepare a public statement summarizing the intelligence in broad strokes.

With Obama still determined to avoid any appearance of politics, the statement would not carry his signature.

On Oct. 7, the administration offered its first public comment on Russia’s “active measures,” in a three-paragraph statement issued by Johnson and Clapper. Comey had initially agreed to attach his name, as well, officials said, but changed his mind at the last minute, saying that it was too close to the election for the bureau to be involved.

...

The statement was issued around 3:30 p.m., timed for maximum media coverage. Instead, it was quickly drowned out. At 4 p.m., The Post published a story about crude comments Trump had made about women that were captured on an “Access Hollywood” tape. Half an hour later, WikiLeaks published its first batch of emails stolen from Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta.

...

The Situation Room is actually a complex of secure spaces in the basement level of the West Wing. A video feed from the main room courses through some National Security Council offices, allowing senior aides sitting at their desks to see — but not hear — when meetings are underway.

As the Russia-related sessions with Cabinet members began in August, the video feed was shut off. The last time that had happened on a sustained basis, officials said, was in the spring of 2011 during the run-up to the U.S. Special Operations raid on bin Laden’s compound in Pakistan.

The blacked-out screens were seen as an ominous sign among lower-level White House officials who were largely kept in the dark about the Russia deliberations even as they were tasked with generating options for retaliation against Moscow.

...

The assumption that Clinton would win contributed to the lack of urgency.

Instead, the administration issued a series of warnings.

...

A month later, Obama confronted Putin directly during a meeting of world leaders in Hangzhou, China. Accompanied only by interpreters, Obama told Putin that “we knew what he was doing and [he] better stop or else,” according to a senior aide who subsequently spoke with Obama. Putin responded by demanding proof and accusing the United States of interfering in Russia’s internal affairs.

...

Despite the dire warnings, there were no meltdowns in the United States’ voting infrastructure on Nov. 8, no evidence of hacking-related fraud, crashing of electronic ballots or ma­nipu­la­tion of vote counts.

The outcome itself, however, was a shock.

...

“The White House was mortified and shocked,” said a former administration official. “From national security people there was a sense of immediate introspection, of, ‘Wow, did we mishandle this.’ ”

...

Whatever the case, work on Russia did not resume in earnest until after Thanksgiving, in part because Obama made his last foreign trip.

Rice again ordered NSC staffers to finalize a “menu” of punitive measures to use against Moscow. The list that took shape was a distillation of ideas that had been circulating for months across three main categories: cyber, economic and diplomatic.

Again, the discussion ran into roadblocks.

Spy agencies wanted to maintain their penetrations of Russian networks, not expose them in a cyber-fusillade.

Treasury Department officials devised plans that would hit entire sectors of Russia’s economy. One preliminary suggestion called for targeting technology companies including Kaspersky Lab, the Moscow-based cybersecurity firm. But skeptics worried that the harm could spill into Europe and pointed out that U.S. companies used Kaspersky systems and software.

Several senior administration officials called for imposing sanctions on Putin personally or releasing financial records or other information that would embarrass him. Some objected that the latter proposal would send the wrong message — the United States would be engaging in the same behavior it was condemning. In any case, it was not clear how long it would take U.S. spy agencies to assemble such a Putin dossier.

...

Obama’s decision to order a comprehensive report on Moscow’s interference from U.S. spy agencies had prompted analysts to go back through their agencies’ files, scouring for previously overlooked clues.

The effort led to a flurry of new, disturbing reports — many of them presented in the President’s Daily Brief — about Russia’s subversion of the 2016 race. The emerging picture enabled policymakers to begin seeing the Russian campaign in broader terms, as a comprehensive plot sweeping in its scope.

...

The expulsions and compound seizures were originally devised as ways to retaliate against Moscow not for election interference but for an escalating campaign of harassment of American diplomats and intelligence operatives. U.S. officials often endured hostile treatment, but the episodes had become increasingly menacing and violent.

In one previously undisclosed incident on July 6, a Russian military helicopter dropped from the sky to make multiple passes just feet over the hood of a vehicle being driven by the U.S. defense attache, who was accompanied by colleagues, on a stretch of road between Murmansk and Pechenga in northern Russia. The attempt at intimidation was captured on photos the Americans took through the windshield.

...

The compounds were even higher on the FBI’s wish list.

At one point in the White House deliberations, intelligence analysts used aerial images of the facilities to show how they had been modified to enhance their espionage capabilities. Slides displayed in the Situation Room showed new chimneys and other features, all presumed to allow for the installation of more-sophisticated eavesdropping equipment aimed at U.S. naval facilities and the NSA headquarters at Fort Meade in Maryland.

...

When FBI agents entered the sites, they found them stripped of antennas, electronics, computers, file cabinets and other gear, officials said, their hasty removal leaving visible markings on floors, tables and walls.

...

The most difficult measure to evaluate is one that Obama alluded to in only the most oblique fashion when announcing the U.S. response.

“We will continue to take a variety of actions at a time and place of our choosing, some of which will not be publicized,” he said in a statement released by the White House.

He was referring, in part, to a cyber operation that was designed to be detected by Moscow but not cause significant damage, officials said. The operation, which entailed implanting computer code in sensitive computer systems that Russia was bound to find, served only as a reminder to Moscow of the United States’ cyber reach.

But Obama also signed the secret finding, officials said, authorizing a new covert program involving the NSA, CIA and U.S. Cyber Command.

...

The cyber operation is still in its early stages and involves deploying “implants” in Russian networks deemed “important to the adversary and that would cause them pain and discomfort if they were disrupted,” a former U.S. official said.

The implants were developed by the NSA and designed so that they could be triggered remotely as part of retaliatory cyber-strike in the face of Russian aggression, whether an attack on a power grid or interference in a future presidential race.

Officials familiar with the measures said that there was concern among some in the administration that the damage caused by the implants could be difficult to contain.

...

U.S. intelligence agencies do not need further approval from Trump, and officials said that he would have to issue a countermanding order to stop it. The officials said that they have seen no indication that Trump has done so.

xmetallic je 23. jun 2017 ob 19:11 izjavil:

Smer v katero nas pelje skrajna levičarska ideologija:

To trdi desničarska propaganda. Resnica je drugačna.

Smer, v katero nas pelje skrajna levičarska ideologija:

xmetallic je 23. jun 2017 ob 19:11 izjavil:

Smer v katero nas pelje skrajna levičarska ideologija:

Skrajni desnicarji so povzrocili KKK, skrajna levica pa prost konec tedna