Bankrot Amerike

Unknown_001 je 29. sep 2013 ob 12:41 izjavil:

Roko na srce oni so preveč odvisni od kitajcev in ostalih da bi si lahko neko sranje z vojno privoščili, edin s svojim lajanjem nam poskušajo podturiti mnenje da na njih svet sloni. Mi brez njih komot živimo, oni brez nas žal ne.

Sem razmišljal zadnje dni; je morda možno, da obtok denarja peha predvsem zaradi povečanja populacije? Hočem reči, denarja (natiskanega) je le toliko, če se populacija veča, ga enkrat mora zmanjkati za vse, sploh če ga nekateri kopičijo.

Si pa predstavljam, da 9/10 vseh ljudi ne vidi dlje od časa svojega življenja, zato pa se tudi nič ne spremeni - kako dolgo bo še trajal ta scenarij dokler ljudje ne začnejo razmišljati o alternativah?

After the deadline passed, President Obama to U.S. troops and Department of Defense staff assuring them that they would get paid.

"If you're serving in harm's way, we're going to make sure you have what you need to succeed in your missions," the president said.

Vitez je 1. okt 2013 ob 10:24 izjavil:

Mislim, da bo prej propadla Slovenija, kot ZDA. Imate vi veleumi, ki rešujete svet na internetu, kakšne pametne ideje, kako se temu izogniti?

Furbo je 1. okt 2013 ob 10:17 izjavil:

Kaj ti pa pomaga en strop, ki se ga po potrebi dviguje? Nič.

Ramon dekers je 1. okt 2013 ob 10:38 izjavil:

Saj gre kar v pravo smer, v ZDA že pošiljajo birokrate domov, samo še večino predpisov, ki ovirajo tiste, ki želijo delati naj skenslajo pa bo.

Upam, da se šališ. Si sploh kdo prebral kdo bo največ škode doživel? Retardirana izjava. Če se zapre kip svobode, nacionalni park, to pomeni en težak minus na strani turističnega sektorja.

Ramon dekers je 1. okt 2013 ob 12:38 izjavil:

kdo pa je nasrkal?

bluefish je 1. okt 2013 ob 12:40 izjavil:

Aja, koliko CEO-tov velikih bank je šlo za zapahe v ZDA?

bluefish je 1. okt 2013 ob 13:16 izjavil:

A se jih? Uspešne in pravnomočne primere prosim.

One reason so few bankers have been jailed is that it has proved difficult for prosecutors to connect wrongdoing low down in a large financial organisation—submitting false LIBOR estimates, say—to senior executives running the bank. Although the bosses may create or perpetuate a culture in which those lower down the ranks feel entitled or expected to abandon morality, there is seldom a chain of e-mails or other direct instructions that actually advocates wrongdoing. A second reason for the paucity of prosecutions is that in capitalist societies where risk-taking is seen as a necessary part of business, it is not actually illegal to run a bank, or any other company, into the ground.

Public outrage is, however, prompting some countries to think again about imposing stricter rules that might make it easier to jail bankers. Britain is considering criminal sanctions for reckless management, as well as a rule that would bar the managers of failed banks from running other companies unless they could prove they were not at fault. Yet stricter liability has its drawbacks. Countries such as the United Arab Emirates that penalise bankruptcy and even threaten debtors with prison are not known for their vibrant start-up cultures. Discouraging risk-taking altogether, in short, can be counterproductive. Rather than spending their time looking for new ways to punish bankers, policymakers would do better to find ways to avoid having to bail out banks out in the first place.
Vir

Tilen je 1. okt 2013 ob 17:24 izjavil:

www.nasa.gov

Due to the lapse in federal government funding, this website is not available.
We sincerely regret this inconvenience.