Amnesty International in Afrewatch opozarjata, da so kobalt za naše telefone izkopali afriški otroci

Mr.B je 24. jan 2016 ob 08:18 izjavil:

PrihajaNodi je 23. jan 2016 ob 22:35 izjavil:

Res bi rad razumel, kaj ima ta graf veze z interno potrošnjo, etc in ostalimi relevantnimi podatki.

Ti logika ne dela dobro? Na podlagi česa se pa interna potrošnja zviša? Daril od božička, davkov, višje inflacije?

Mr.B je 24. jan 2016 ob 21:02 izjavil:

PrihajaNodi,
interna potrošnja ZDA je koliko njenega BDP-ja. Potem pa otresaj neumnosti, ker ta graf brez demografskih gibanj, ne pomeni nič razen trolanje.

Ta graf ti pove točno to da se potrošnja brez dviga plače ne more zogditi. BDP je butast kazalec, ki ne pove nič o plačah prebivalcev.

V končni fazi v Sloveniji BDP raste, pa se razmerje tudi slabša.

Daj spravi se nekam pa nauči se osnov ekonomije. V Sloveniji se stanje slabše, ne glede na to ali bdp raste ali ne, tako kot je to v Angoli.

Nevem kakšne podatke bi ti rad ampak ti jasno piše dvig povprečne plače.

Dej no, bdp je v zadnjih desetih letih v sloveniji narastel za 10 mijard EUR, koliko se je poslabšalo razmer v Sloveniji z grofom, s katerim ti tako veselo opletaš...

Ja, na račun izvoza v Nemčijo. Tako kot se je bdp zvišal v Angoli zaradi nafte.

A veš da je interna potrošnja Kitajske na letnem nivoji raste več kot 10%, kolikšna je kaj pa ameriške ?

Pa? Plače imajo še vedno 3x do 4x nižje od američanov. Torej? Pogledaš še ostale faktorje (cene stanovanja) na Kitajskem in se potem vprašam, kje hudiča ti jemlješ podatke.

A msiliš da je ameriški trg samozadosten ?

Zakaj je to pomembno?

Mislim, da lahko zaključiva saj nimaš niti najmanjšega znanja ekonomije.

Podatke česa? Da BDP ne vpliva na plače delavcev in višjo zaposlenost? Je pa res da se cedijo med in mleko javnemu sektorju.

Ta potrošnja se je verjetno povečala zaradi javnega sektorja (who knows).


For most workers, real wages have barely budged for decades

Tale sprašuje podobna vprašanja kot ti:

Why is it an issue if real wages are flat? Flat, stable real wages indicate that each year people are able to have exactly as much as they had the year before. In a well-developed country, where there isn't explosive economic growth because we are not in the process of industrializing, like China currently is, why should we be concerned about median wages being flat? I, for one, think that it is a sign that we have reached an equilibrium of supply and demand for work (to over-simplify the economics). Obviously, it would be better if real median wages rose, but at the same time it's not really negative if they stay the same - people can still afford to buy new cars, houses, cable TV, computers, cell phones, etc.

In dobi lep odgovor:

It's an issue that real wages are flat because the formula used to calculate inflation is flawed. The cost of living has gone up by double percentage points beyond the inflation figure. Rents have doubled in real money taking inflation into account, the cost of an automobile has more than double again taking inflation into account. The list goes on and on but the only three things that should be used to calculate inflation are housing, food and fuel and these are not even part of the equation... So what if a new TV costs less today than it did 30 years ago (with inflation) It doesn't matter you don't need a TV.. you need eggs and milk and bread and meat. Not to mention gas for your car and electricity to keep you overpriced food cold. These prices have gone through the roof (with inflation). So wages staying flat would be find if the actual inflation rate was used.
Reply

Kaj ti še ni jasno?

Kakšne demografske podatke bi ti rad? Nataliteto, mortaliteto, migracije? Dal sem ti fakte, sedaj pa se izgovarjaš na demografske podatke.