ZDA in Venezuela se bližata vojnemu spopadu 2025

71% of Americans back Trump's attacks on drug cartel boats: Harvard/Harris poll



A new Harvard CAPS/Harris poll found that 71 percent of American voters back the deployment of US military forces to target and eliminate drug traffickers in Latin America, including sinking cartel vessels en route to US shores.

71 percent of voters overall backed the use of military forces to target drug traffickers, along with 56 percent of Democrats, 89 percent of Republicans, and 67 percent of independents. The survey, conducted online between October 1 and 2, included 2,413 registered US voters and has a margin of error of 1.99 percent.

President Trump has made taking on the cartels a key focus of his administration. Shortly after reentering the White House in January, the president designated certain cartel groups as foreign terrorist organizations, paving the way for military and law enforcement actions aimed at restoring safety across America's borders and communities.

This designation allows the US government to deploy counter-terrorism resources, including financial sanctions and direct strikes against cartel operations. Trump emphasized that the move is essential to combating the fentanyl crisis that has claimed hundreds of thousands of American lives, vowing to dismantle the "criminal empires" that flood the nation with deadly narcotics.

During a Wednesday meeting with Cabinet members at the White House, Trump detailed his vision to eliminate cartels, describing the terrorist drug trafficking groups as the "ISIS of the Western Hemisphere." He vowed to kill them.

"These groups have unleashed more bloodshed and killing on American soil than all other terrorist groups combined. These are the worst of the worst. It should now be clear to the entire world that the cartels are the ISIS of the Western Hemisphere, in addition to their monstrous violence, such as cutting off heads, burning their enemies alive, and burning innocent people alive too," Trump said during a Homeland Security Task Force roundtable.

He later announced that the objective of the administration would be to "eliminate" the threat of the terror groups.

"We're finally treating the cartels as the core national security threat that they really are. The cartels are waging war on America, and just as I promised in the campaign, we're waging war on them like they've never seen before," Trump added.

The roundtable comes shortly after President Trump released unclassified footage of a US military operation involving a cartel drug boat being blown up in Latin American waters.

https://thepostmillennial.com/71-of-ame...

Proti temu so samo Evropski radikalni levičarji in WOKE norci, ki odkrito podpirajo Hamas in Kartele.

Za vse ostale, ki niso obsedeni z ZDA in imajo še kanček zdrave pameti, pa tole (prvi odstavek berem kot: "CIA je dvakrat probala zamenjati vlado, s sebi naklonjeno, pa ji je obakrat spodletelo", tisti, ki nimamo več mlečnih zob, zelo dobro vemo, kaj pomeni, ko se ZDA zgovarja na "pomanjkanje demokracije" in "človekove pravice"):

### Historical Context
US hostilities toward Venezuela intensified in the mid-2010s under the Obama administration, primarily in response to the Venezuelan government's crackdown on protests in 2014 and 2017, which the US described as violations of human rights and democratic norms. These early sanctions targeted individuals and entities involved in repression, corruption, and undermining democracy, such as officials in the Maduro regime. By 2017, under Trump, sanctions expanded to block Venezuela's access to US financial systems and secondary sanctions on foreign entities dealing with the regime's oil sector, aiming to "deny the regime money" and force political change. The Biden administration briefly eased some oil sanctions in 2022-2023 to encourage electoral reforms but reimposed them in 2024 over disputed elections, citing failures to uphold democratic principles.

From the Venezuelan government's perspective, these measures are not about democracy but economic warfare to topple a sovereign government that resists US dominance. President Nicolás Maduro has repeatedly called US actions "imperial aggression" designed to fabricate conflicts and control resources, warning of a "new war in Latin America." Officials argue sanctions have exacerbated poverty and migration, not addressed any internal failures.

### Economic Motivations: Oil and Resources
A core driver is Venezuela's vast oil reserves--the world's largest at 303.8 billion barrels--making it a strategic prize for US energy interests. The US has long sought favorable access, with sanctions forcing Western firms out and benefiting adversaries like Russia and China, who stepped in to extract oil on terms advantageous to them. Critics, including Venezuelan voices, contend the hostilities stem from Chávez and Maduro's nationalization of oil assets in the 2000s, which reduced US corporate influence (e.g., ExxonMobil's losses in arbitration). US officials frame sanctions as anti-corruption tools, but analysts note they "help US adversaries" by isolating Venezuela from Western markets while punishing ordinary citizens through hyperinflation and shortages.

### Geopolitical and Security Concerns
Beyond economics, the US views Venezuela as a hub for adversaries: alliances with Russia, China, Iran, and Cuba allow military basing, arms deals, and dollar-bypassing trade, threatening US hegemony in its "backyard." Drug trafficking and migration add urgency; Venezuela is accused of harboring cartels fueling US fentanyl crises and border chaos. Maduro's government dismisses this as pretexts for invasion, citing UN appeals against "US aggression plans."

### Recent Escalations (2025)
Under Trump's second term, hostilities have militarized: US strikes on "drug boats" off Venezuela's coast--framed as responses to cartel "hostilities"--risk broader conflict, with deployments like the USS Gerald R. Ford carrier group signaling potential regime change. Figures like Marco Rubio push for ousting Maduro to install opposition leaders like María Corina Machado, who favor US-friendly oil policies. Venezuela warns of "extrajudicial" escalation, requesting UN intervention. Public sentiment on X echoes this divide: some see US actions as justified anti-cartel strategy, others as resource grabs masked as democracy promotion.

In summary, while US rhetoric emphasizes human rights and security, the substantiated drivers--oil control, countering rival powers, and regime change--reveal a pattern of interventionism rooted in economic and strategic dominance, as critiqued by Venezuelan leaders and independent analysts. This has prolonged Venezuela's crisis, with sanctions alone estimated to have halved GDP since 2013.

Chalky je 25. okt 2025 ob 21:20:16 izjavil:

[za te kartele pa to ni potrebno ker so na nivoju teroristične organizacije in se mi zdi zapravljanje davkoplačevalskega denarja za njih nepotrebna stvar, sploh če je njihov edini cilj zastrupiti in pobiti čim več ljudi.

Idiot.

Cilj vsakega proizvajalca/prodajalca droge je prodati čimveč. Ne pa pobiti čimveč strank

Zanič v primerjavi s čim? Režimi naših prijateljev, kot so Izrael, Savdska Arabija, Irak, ...?

Rusi in venezuelci so dejansko precej demokratični v primerjavi z savdijci in židi. Sicer pa ja, mi smo razviti demokratični zahod zgolj in samo zato, ker mi tako pravimo. Večini, ki niso pod vplivom naše propagande, je jasno, da je prihodnost v BRICS, ker gre za novodobno združenje neuvrščenih. Zakaj bi nosili ketno, če ni treba? Da bodo lahko kupovali dražjo, pogosto precenjeno zahodno robo?

Zakaj pa ti misliš, da ne smemo trgovati z Iranom in kupovati Huawei? Ker smo svobodni? Ker imamo prost trg, na katerem prosto tekmujemo z BRICS državami? Čeprav je tekmujemo močna beseda, ker bojda reveži 3. sveta nimajo taprave kulture/svobode, ki bi dovoljevala zadostno svobodo misli, da bi lahko vizualizirali ter nato manifestirali koncepte prihodnosti.

Poldi112 je 26. okt 2025 ob 08:12:40 izjavil:

Večini, ki niso pod vplivom naše propagande, je jasno, da je prihodnost v BRICS, ker gre za novodobno združenje neuvrščenih.

In samo globoko upam, da nam bodo vzeli, zaradi kretenizma politikov in proukrajinskih čudakov, SFRJ in titovo zduženje neuvrščenih v olajševalno okoliščino. Dokler je še kdo iz njegovega, ki je študiral v SFRJ, še živ.

fikus_ je 26. okt 2025 ob 10:01:06 izjavil:

Jarno je 25. okt 2025 ob 21:14:01 izjavil:

Na pirate ob obali Somalije so tudi streljali, tudi Rusi. Niso jih lovili in obsojali.

Ja, ampak tedaj ko so pirati že napadli ladjo in ne "preventivno" in za vsak slučaj, če so posumili da so pirati.

Naj se ti besede pozlatijo.



Glede Venezuele pa se situacija še ni razvila, flotilja je lahko tudi samo argument moči, gotovo pa TACO ne bo namočil špicljev v tovarnah fetanila.

Jarno je 26. okt 2025 ob 11:35:22 izjavil:

Glede Venezuele pa se situacija še ni razvila, flotilja je lahko tudi samo argument moči, gotovo pa TACO ne bo namočil špicljev v tovarnah fetanila.

Fentanil se dela na Kitajskem, šverca pa v ZDA preko Mehike in Kanade...

Chalky je 25. okt 2025 ob 23:06:41 izjavil:

71% of Americans back Trump's attacks on drug cartel boats: Harvard/Harris poll

A new Harvard CAPS/Harris poll found that 71 percent of American voters back the deployment of US military forces to target and eliminate drug traffickers in Latin America, including sinking cartel vessels en route to US shores.

71 percent of voters overall backed the use of military forces to target drug traffickers, along with 56 percent of Democrats, 89 percent of Republicans, and 67 percent of independents. The survey, conducted online between October 1 and 2, included 2,413 registered US voters and has a margin of error of 1.99 percent.

President Trump has made taking on the cartels a key focus of his administration. Shortly after reentering the White House in January, the president designated certain cartel groups as foreign terrorist organizations, paving the way for military and law enforcement actions aimed at restoring safety across America's borders and communities.

This designation allows the US government to deploy counter-terrorism resources, including financial sanctions and direct strikes against cartel operations. Trump emphasized that the move is essential to combating the fentanyl crisis that has claimed hundreds of thousands of American lives, vowing to dismantle the "criminal empires" that flood the nation with deadly narcotics.

During a Wednesday meeting with Cabinet members at the White House, Trump detailed his vision to eliminate cartels, describing the terrorist drug trafficking groups as the "ISIS of the Western Hemisphere." He vowed to kill them.

"These groups have unleashed more bloodshed and killing on American soil than all other terrorist groups combined. These are the worst of the worst. It should now be clear to the entire world that the cartels are the ISIS of the Western Hemisphere, in addition to their monstrous violence, such as cutting off heads, burning their enemies alive, and burning innocent people alive too," Trump said during a Homeland Security Task Force roundtable.

He later announced that the objective of the administration would be to "eliminate" the threat of the terror groups.

"We're finally treating the cartels as the core national security threat that they really are. The cartels are waging war on America, and just as I promised in the campaign, we're waging war on them like they've never seen before," Trump added.

The roundtable comes shortly after President Trump released unclassified footage of a US military operation involving a cartel drug boat being blown up in Latin American waters.

https://thepostmillennial.com/71-of-ame...

Proti temu so samo Evropski radikalni levičarji in WOKE norci, ki odkrito podpirajo Hamas in Kartele.

Glede na to da je TACO in NATO nazadnje zmagovito zaključil svojo predstavo z drugo iraško invazijo od takrat dalje pa je bolj ali manj uspešen pri ubijanju tistih ki se ne morejo branit, se seveda lahko brez težav vprašamo, kateri so ti, v tvojem statističnem zaokroževanju podpornikov.

Če ne drugega, vemo da TACO zanika, obstoj …


In če že misliš da imaš kaj pojma glede vojskovanje in opreme, No ne bom te prcnil z F35, ampak kar vprašal, kaj je Ameriška vojska, ko za njen obstoj rabijo donacije 130mijonov. Sej razumeš, da v tam konktestu postane Ameriška vojska na plačilni listi Ameriške oligarhije, torej privatana vojska njih, ki so pisali tvojo statistiko.
PS: se pa seveda lahko vprašamo koga je tako star epstin listine, da je pripravljen plačat 130 miljonov..

The pair of B-1B bombers are now approximately 20 miles from Venezuela's Isla Margarita and about 70 miles from the mainland.

This movement is likely intended as a show of force, incorporating elements of an attack demonstration near Venezuelan airspace.



https://x.com/Global_Mil_Info/status/19...

U.S. AIR FORCE TO VENEZUELA: "WE SEE YOU"

Two U.S. Air Force B-1B "Lancer" Long-Range Heavy Bombers with the 34th Bomb Squadron are currently tracing the coast of Venezuela over the Southern Caribbean, less than 50 miles from the Venezuelan capital of Caracas. At several points, the bombers likely came within only a few miles of Venezuela's National Airspace.

https://x.com/sentdefender/status/19828...
https://x.com/flightradar24/status/1982...
https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/198289...
https://x.com/ConflictsW/status/1982890...

Chalky, Milei pa je popušil... Kaj pa zdaj?

BREAKING: US CARRIED OUT THREE STRIKES ON FOUR VESSELS YESTERDAY


Yesterday, at the direction of President Trump, the Department of War carried out three lethal kinetic strikes on four vessels operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations (DTO) trafficking narcotics in the Eastern Pacific.

The four vessels were known by our intelligence apparatus, transiting along known narco-trafficking routes, and carrying narcotics.

Eight male narco-terrorists were aboard the vessels during the first strike. Four male narco-terrorists were aboard the vessel during the second strike. Three male narco-terrorists were aboard the vessel during the third strike. A total of 14 narco-terrorists were killed during the three strikes, with one survivor. All strikes were in international waters with no U.S. forces harmed.

Regarding the survivor, USSOUTHCOM immediately initiated Search and Rescue (SAR) standard protocols; Mexican SAR authorities accepted the case and assumed responsibility for coordinating the rescue.

The Department has spent over TWO DECADES defending other homelands. Now, we're defending our own.



https://x.com/SecWar/status/19831643559...

^VIDEO v povezavi. Za tiste ki še vedno trdite da gre za ribiče, si lahko pogledate od 19s dalje. Jasno kot beli dan, čoln poln kokaina, bolj očitno ni mogoče.

Cccc. CIA bo huda, ko ji takole uničujejo fond za njene črne operacije.

Scaramouche3 je 28. okt 2025 ob 15:05:08 izjavil:

fikus_ je 28. okt 2025 ob 14:55:15 izjavil:

Tudi če so švercerji obstaja "dogovor", da se jih brez sodbe ne pobija.

Takšni posnetki so mi vedno zanimivo, kako ostale države vidijo tovrstne probleme. Sploh v Aziji se s takšnimi stvarmi ne zafrkavajo. To velja samo za Zahod da je potrebno tudi največje morilce in zločince obravnavati bolje kot državljane lastne države. To pa zato, ker je Zahodno prebivalstvo dobesedno sprogramirano da smo krivi za vse, tudi za stvari ki so se dogajale 500 let nazaj. In potem, če želiš uničiti kartele je to sporno in v nekaterih glavah celo rasistično in opresivno.

Se sreča da se Trump s takšnimi neumnostmi ne ukvarja in da sprejema odločitve na podlagi zdrave pameti.

Kaj pa je narobe, če imamo pri najbolj nevarnih drogah kitajski sistem?

Dejte malo samorefleksije vklopit ... vas nacin zivljenja je tak, ker je zahodni svet(Evropa) nekaj razvil ... zakaj niso drugi enakovredno pripomogli, ne vem... verjetno ni bilo interesa.
Pac jih radirajo ... turisticne agencije ne fjakajo ponoci...

Hegseth: US strikes more alleged drug boats in Pacific, killing 14

RIO TURNS INTO A WARZONE AS DRUG CARTELS FIGHT BACK

About 2,500 cops rolled into Rio before sunrise to take on Red Command, one of Brazil's biggest drug gangs.

Gang members answered with bullets, burning cars, barricades, and for the first time ever in Brazil, drone-dropped explosives.

The death toll hit 80 by noon. Four cops were among the dead.

The governor says Rio is "effectively at war"... and based on the skyline, he's not kidding.

https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/198326...

Čudno da je Lula odobril tole vojaško operacijo.

"Rio is alone in this war": Brazil's far-left President Lula refuses to help Rio's police in the war against narco cartels


Rio de Janeiro's Governor Cláudio Castro says the state is "alone in this war," accusing President Lula's government of ignoring three requests for military support.

Today's deadly police raid targeted the powerful Comando Vermelho (Red Command) cartel, a far-left criminal group whose political leanings have historically aligned with Lula's Workers' Party (PT), which has long faced accusations of cozying up to the gang.

The massive operation against the Red Command cartel near Rio's international airport involved 2,500 police officers and left over 60 people dead, including four officers.

For the first time in Brazil, traffickers reportedly used FPV drones to drop explosives on police units.

The federal government insists it has responded, offering 10 prison spots for cartel leaders and funding through the National Penitentiary Fund.

However, the scale of the operation and the use of advanced tactics by cartels underscore the ongoing struggle, with state officials noting that drug cartels control about 60% of Rio's territory.

https://x.com/visegrad24/status/1983298...

Okaj, se mi je zdelo čudno da bi odštekani Lula želel pomagati svojim ljudem v boju proti Kartelu v Riu. Mi je bilo sumljivo da bi ta človek dejansko želel narediti red in poskrbel za varnost. Tu ne gre za nesposobnost ampak gre preposto za izdajo naroda in takšne izdajalce podpira radikalna levica.

JUST IN - Trump to strike Venezuelan military installations "in a matter of days or even hours." -- Miami Herald
https://x.com/disclosetv/status/1984258...

BREAKING: The U.S. has decided to strike military sites inside Venezuela.

Per reporting from the Miami Herald, strikes could commence before the USS Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group is fully on station. Sufficient strike and support assets are already in theater, including long-range B-52 and B-1B platforms, to prosecute initial missions without the carrier.

Planned opening actions would emphasize electronic warfare, SEAD/DEAD against Venezuelan air-defence nodes, and robust CAP to contest Venezuelan air responses, paired with maritime and air strikes against ports, airstrips, and other military facilities identified as cartel logistics nodes.

Once the Gerald R. Ford CSG arrives, the air campaign could be readily expanded. Regional USMC elements and special operations forces present in-theater could also be tasked to conduct limited ground raids in support of the broader campaign.

WSJ: U.S. Eyes Striking Venezuelan Military Targets Used for Drug Trafficking
Drug gang and regime infrastructure likely to be attacked if Trump decides to pursue military action



The Trump administration has identified targets in Venezuela that include military facilities used to smuggle drugs, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter. If President Trump decides to move forward with airstrikes, they said, the targets would send a clear message to Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro that it is time to step down.

While the president hasn't made a final decision on ordering land strikes, the officials said a potential air campaign would focus on targets that sit at the nexus of the drug gangs and the Maduro regime. Trump and his senior aides have been particularly focused on unsettling Maduro as the U.S. military has attacked boats allegedly carrying drugs in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific Ocean.

The potential targets under consideration include ports and airports controlled by the military that are allegedly used to traffic drugs, including naval facilities and airstrips, according to one of the officials.

Trump came into office pledging to crack down on the flow of illegal narcotics, responsible for tens of thousands of American deaths each year, from Latin America into the U.S. Since Trump's inauguration, the U.S. has deployed an unprecedented amount of military firepower to the Caribbean, while simultaneously ramping up a lethal campaign against alleged drug smugglers in the region.

Air attacks on targets inside Venezuela would mark a significant escalation of the campaign, which has until now been limited to airstrikes on alleged drug boats.

The administration has focused in particular on combating the fentanyl crisis, as deaths related to the drug in the U.S. have soared in recent years. That synthetic opioid, though, is produced in Mexico with Chinese precursors. There is no evidence Venezuela produces or traffics fentanyl, experts say. The country has long been a transit route for Colombian cocaine, and some high-ranking Venezuelan government and military officials have been charged by American prosecutors with smuggling that drug.

About 80,000 Americans died from drug overdoses in 2024, down 27% from the peak year in 2023. Synthetic opioids, mostly fentanyl, killed more than 48,000 last year, while cocaine killed 22,000, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

"President Trump has been clear in his message to Maduro: stop sending drugs and criminals to our country," said White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly. "The President is prepared to use every element of American power to stop drugs from flooding into our homeland."



Ahead of possible land strikes, the Trump administration has embarked on a messaging campaign to cast Maduro as the head of a drug trafficking enterprise that seeks to "flood" the U.S. with drugs--a charge Maduro has denied. Without putting forth evidence, officials have also called Venezuela a "central hub of terrorist activity" and have claimed that Maduro's regime is running the cartels.

"You have a narco-state in Venezuela run by a cartel," Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has taken a central role in the Trump administration's pressure campaign on the country, told reporters last week when asked about the expanding military campaign. "This is an operation against narcoterrorists, the al Qaeda of the Western Hemisphere...And they need to be dealt with."

Hitting targets on land would increase pressure on the dictator, and Trump allies have begun to suggest that he flee the country. "If I was Maduro, I would head to Russia or China right now," Sen. Rick Scott (R., Fla.) said in an interview with CBS's "60 Minutes."

U.S. officials now and in Trump's first term have applied pressure in the hope of provoking a barracks rebellion or an uprising, though the military has stood with Maduro and there have been no reports of protests in Venezuela. The show of American force now, though, is different.



"This is the U.S. really putting to the test the claim that Maduro is weak and the military will flip with just a gentle push," said Geoff Ramsey, a Venezuela analyst at the Atlantic Council. "So far we haven't seen any evidence of major defections in the country, but I think if the U.S. carries out the military strikes on the Venezuelan armed forces, that equation might change. However...there's a chance that this leads to a rally-around-the-flag effect," Ramsey said.

Trump has said publicly that he may order airstrikes in Venezuela, and the Pentagon is sending America's most advanced aircraft carrier and its accompanying warships to the Caribbean. The U.S. already has more than half a dozen warships in the region, as well as thousands of elite forces and advanced aircraft.

The U.S. has also conducted several bomber aircraft missions near the Venezuelan coast over the past two weeks, sending B-52 and B-1s to probe the country's defenses and test the military's reaction to the show of force. On Monday, two B-1s flew for roughly half an hour between Venezuela's mainland and its islands off the coast, according to flight tracking data.

Trump also took the unusual step of confirming that he has authorized the Central Intelligence Agency to conduct covert actions in the country. When asked if the CIA had the authority to take out Maduro, Trump declined to answer but said Venezuela is "feeling the heat."



Venezuela's military has sophisticated air defenses, including a substantial amount of Russian-made equipment. It is believed to operate four to six Russian-made S-300 air-defense systems and man-portable systems, which could potentially detect and shoot down U.S. military aircraft, experts say. While it isn't publicly known how well the S-300s work or how well-trained Venezuela's air-defense forces are, U.S. aircraft have recently ramped up flights near the country with the aim of mapping the country's air defenses.

Last week, Maduro said Venezuela had about 5,000 Russian-made Igla-S man-portable surface-to-air missiles. "Any military force in the world knows the power of the Igla-S, and Venezuela has no fewer than 5,000 of them positioned at key anti-air defense posts--to guarantee the peace, stability and tranquility of our people," he said.

Last weekend, an aircraft sanctioned by the U.S. for its ties to illicit Russian military activity arrived in Caracas, according to flight tracking data, raising the prospect that Russia could increase its support of Venezuela's forces in the event of a U.S. attack.

The arrival of the carrier, with its additional destroyers equipped with long-range Tomahawk land attack missiles, F/A-18 Super Hornet jet fighters and EA-18 Growler aircraft designed for electronic jamming, will give the president a range of additional options for striking Venezuela, experts said.

If airstrikes don't force Maduro out of power, they could potentially pressure his inner circle to turn against him, analysts say. However, such a strategy carries tremendous risks and could potentially backfire if troops rally around the flag and put up a fight. Many analysts who have closely tracked Venezuela also say the indictments against Maduro and his top aides underscore for him how costly it would be to leave power, as they could end up facing prosecution.

"I think Maduro will tough it out, at least for one round," said retired Adm. James Stavridis, who commanded U.S.

troops in the region during his career. If strikes on naval and air force targets ashore don't force Maduro to resign, the next round of strikes could go after leadership targets, he said.

"I think at that point, it is possible Maduro will fold his cards and go. That would be the best case outcome for the Trump administration," Stavridis said.

https://www.wsj.com/world/americas/u-s-...

Chalky je 31. okt 2025 ob 16:22:11 izjavil:

DarwiN je 31. okt 2025 ob 15:40:23 izjavil:

Naj uganem.. Ker vojska sodeluje s karteli? In Maduro sodeluje s karteli.. Pa če bo 10.000 mrtvih venezuelskih vojakov, so vsi sodelovali s karteli.. Civilne žrtve bodo kartelski kolaboratorji, oziroma bo kriva Venezuela sama, ker ne počisti drog pred svojim pragom. Američani lahko zravnajo celo državo v imenu drog, ki ne obstajajo oziroma je Venezuela zgolj transportno vozlišče drog, tko kot številne druge države.

Desničarji in vojne.

Imaš kar prav, samo te bom popravil pri zadnjem stavku, ZDA so grajene na nasilju in vojnah in tu nima veze kdo je predsednik, ker če bi to kar ti pišeš držalo potem tudi druga stran nebi metala bombe vsepovprek.

Dejstvo pa je, da vstopamo v obdobje kjer se moč postavlja v ospredje, kar je seveda izjemno nevarno. Osebno sem proti vojnam ampak gre za dejstvo da svet postaja čez dalje bolj nevaren. Zato mora Evropa močno vojsko, da ji nihče ne bo mogel groziti oziroma da jo nihče ne bo napadel, če pa jo bo, bodo pa posledice ogromne.

Vojne so že od nekdaj, vojne so bile tudi takrat ko ZDA še niso obstajale, to je žal v človeški naravi. Samo upamo lahko na čim manj smrtnih žrtev.

Najverjetneje bodo zavzeli naftna polja in na oblast postavili svojo marioneto, samo vedi da povsem enako počne Rusija v Ukrajina, in da povsem enako želi Kitajska glede Taiwana. Je pa jasno da se normalnemu človeku takšna dejanja zdijo grozna in bolana, ampak tako je, mi tu tega ne moremo spremeniti, lahko smo samo srečni da nismo mi na koncu palice. Realpolitik je hudič ampak čisto vsaka država želi zavarovati svoje interese, seveda je to nepravično, ampak je pa dejstvo.

dobro povedano, vzhodna eu pa še naprej sanja

DarwiN je 31. okt 2025 ob 17:49:30 izjavil:

Chalky je 31. okt 2025 ob 16:22:11 izjavil:

Dejstvo pa je, da vstopamo v obdobje kjer se moč postavlja v ospredje, kar je seveda izjemno nevarno. Osebno sem proti vojnam ampak gre za dejstvo da svet postaja čez dalje bolj nevaren.

Zakaj pa pol podpiraš te desničarske režime?

Ali misliš, da bi Kamala napadla Venezuelo ali kogarkoli drugega?

Še eno dejstvo namreč prihaja v ospredje.. Desničarski režimi postajajo čedalje bolj agresivni, levičarski pa čedalje bolj woke. Levi se grejo progresivo, desni pa regresivo.

Zdaj pa se odloči, koga se bolj bojiš.. Novega Hitlerja ali transičev.

Očitno si že pozabil ampak naj te spomnim da sta se tudi Biden in Kamala šla regime change v Venezueli. Očitno si že pozabil na Juan Guaidóa, ki sta ga hotela postaviti na oblast Biden in Kamala. Ne vem zakaj spet iščeš izgovore? Ali me želiš prepričati da nista obe strani enaki? Problem je bil, ker so bili tako Biden kot Kamala in celotna prejšnja administracija popolnoma nesposobni in so tudi v tem primeru pogrnili na celi črti, kar pa ne pomeni da nista hotela zamenjati režima, samo nesposobna sta bila.

DarwiN je 31. okt 2025 ob 18:13:05 izjavil:

Ne bluzi z whataboutismom. Kaj, Biden je poslal email in lepo prosil za regime change? Medtem pa tvoj Oranžni Hitler pošlje armado in začne testirat jedrsko orožje, pa je to isto? Oboji so isti?

Če te moti samo oseba, ki nekaj počne, ne pa dejanje samo, potem to ni whataboutism. Podobno kot se pritožujete zgolj takrat, ko Trumpova adminsitracija likvidira nepridiprave, ko je to počel Obama, ste bili tiho kot miške. Tukaj pride do izraza tisti mem, da naj se scaneja ne pije.