☰

» »

Amis internet - pogostost izpadov?

Amis internet - pogostost izpadov?

klik ::

Presedlal bom s Siola na Amis optiko, zato me zanima, kako pogosti so kaj izpadi internetne povezave na območju Lj?

Mavrik ::

Hmm, jaz na Amis ADSLu nisem mel v enem letu nobenega, ki bi bil posledica delovanja na njihovi strani. Tako da so precej zanesljivi.
The truth is rarely pure and never simple.

connel ::

Pri meni tudi super deluje, sedaj sem, hm, mislim da več kot dve leti pri njih in še ni bilo nobenega izpada.

urosh ::

Imel 1 izpad. Napovedan. Telekom nekaj upgrejdal, tak da v treh letih :)

elchejek ::

brez skrbi....izpadi so redki....če pa so že pa gre za vzdrževalna dela katera so napovedana....tak da go for it....

Matheeew ::

Optika je ključna beseda. Kar vzemi.

ABX ::

Stara tema, ampak relevantna zame. :)

Razmišljam da bi šel na Amis iz Siola (optika), zanima me kako je z latency mrežnih povezav v tujino. Siol ima to urejeno v nulo in pred letim ko sem bil na T-2 so bile občasne težave zaradi njihovih partnerjev v tujini. Kako je stanje pri Amis?
Vaša inštalacija je uspešno spodletela!

Jinto ::

Izpadov tujine ni veliko, če sploh kaj.

Glede latence pa, če napišeš kak IP ti lahko traceroute naredim.

ABX ::

Siol Optika Izola.

64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=10 ttl=60 time=11.6 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=11 ttl=60 time=11.5 ms
11 packets transmitted, 11 received, 0% packet loss, time 10015ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 11.446/11.554/11.683/0.105 ms


ping www.pingtest.net
PING cs62.adn.edgecastcdn.net (93.184.219.82) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 93.184.219.82: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=19.7 ms
--- cs62.adn.edgecastcdn.net ping statistics ---
16 packets transmitted, 16 received, 0% packet loss, time 15023ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 19.738/19.937/21.441/0.401 ms
Vaša inštalacija je uspešno spodletela!

Jinto ::

Amis ošo Komen.

ping 8.8.8.8

Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=54
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=54
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=54
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=54

ping www.pingtest.net
Pinging cs62.adn.edgecastcdn.net [93.184.219.82] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 93.184.219.82: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=58
Reply from 93.184.219.82: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=58
Reply from 93.184.219.82: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=58
Reply from 93.184.219.82: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=58


Morda bi bilo boljše kak drug IP, ker ta dva sta verjetno na CDNjih.

Zgodovina sprememb…

  • spremenilo: Jinto ()

ABX ::

Verjetno, samo kaj ki ne vem kaj bi izbral. Grem googlat. :)
Vaša inštalacija je uspešno spodletela!

ABX :: 

 ping 104.16.27.33
PING 104.16.27.33 (104.16.27.33) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 104.16.27.33: icmp_seq=1 ttl=61 time=23.0 ms
64 bytes from 104.16.27.33: icmp_seq=2 ttl=61 time=23.1 ms
64 bytes from 104.16.27.33: icmp_seq=3 ttl=61 time=23.1 ms
64 bytes from 104.16.27.33: icmp_seq=4 ttl=61 time=23.0 ms
64 bytes from 104.16.27.33: icmp_seq=5 ttl=61 time=23.2 ms
64 bytes from 104.16.27.33: icmp_seq=6 ttl=61 time=23.1 ms
64 bytes from 104.16.27.33: icmp_seq=7 ttl=61 time=23.1 ms
64 bytes from 104.16.27.33: icmp_seq=8 ttl=61 time=23.1 ms
64 bytes from 104.16.27.33: icmp_seq=9 ttl=61 time=23.1 ms
64 bytes from 104.16.27.33: icmp_seq=10 ttl=61 time=23.2 ms
64 bytes from 104.16.27.33: icmp_seq=11 ttl=61 time=23.2 ms
64 bytes from 104.16.27.33: icmp_seq=12 ttl=61 time=23.1 ms
64 bytes from 104.16.27.33: icmp_seq=13 ttl=61 time=23.2 ms
64 bytes from 104.16.27.33: icmp_seq=14 ttl=61 time=23.1 ms
64 bytes from 104.16.27.33: icmp_seq=15 ttl=61 time=23.1 ms
64 bytes from 104.16.27.33: icmp_seq=16 ttl=61 time=23.2 ms
64 bytes from 104.16.27.33: icmp_seq=17 ttl=61 time=23.2 ms
64 bytes from 104.16.27.33: icmp_seq=18 ttl=61 time=23.0 ms
^C
--- 104.16.27.33 ping statistics ---
18 packets transmitted, 18 received, 0% packet loss, time 17016ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.056/23.166/23.276/0.111 ms


P.S: Ti si na optiki?
Vaša inštalacija je uspešno spodletela!

Zgodovina sprememb…

  • spremenilo: ABX ()

Jinto :: 

ping -t 104.16.27

Pinging 104.16.27.33 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 104.16.27.33: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=58
Reply from 104.16.27.33: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=58
Reply from 104.16.27.33: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=58
Reply from 104.16.27.33: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=58


Tracing route to 104.16.27.33 over a maximum of 30 hops

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  router [192.168.88.1]
  2     2 ms     1 ms     1 ms  asr-po.amis.net [212.18.32.169]
  3     2 ms     2 ms     2 ms  postojna3-te-3-3.amis.net [212.18.44.197
  4     2 ms     2 ms     3 ms  mx-lj1-te-1-3-0.amis.net [212.18.44.174]
  5    12 ms    11 ms    12 ms  mx-vi1-te-0-0-0.amis.net [212.18.44.142]
  6    11 ms    10 ms    11 ms  vix.edge01.vie01.as13335.com [193.203.0.
  7    10 ms    11 ms    10 ms  104.16.27.33


Optika, ja.

Zgodovina sprememb…

  • spremenilo: Jinto ()

ABX :: 

Tracing route to 104.16.27.33 over a maximum of 30 hops

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  PETRA [192.168.0.1]
  2    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  BSN-176-255-245.dynamic.siol.net [95.176.255.245]
  3    17 ms     6 ms     6 ms  BSN-176-253-5.dynamic.siol.net [95.176.253.5]
  4    10 ms    10 ms    10 ms  BSN-176-253-11.dynamic.siol.net [95.176.253.11]
  5    23 ms    23 ms    23 ms  edge01.fra01.cloudflare.com [80.81.194.180]
  6    23 ms    23 ms    23 ms  104.16.27.33


Zgleda kar hiter ta Amis. Hvala ti za info.
Čeprav sept ni to 100%, Siol gre čez Nemčijo, AMIS pa če Avstrijo. Kar težko razumet kdo ima boljšo povezavo, ampak po tem omejenem testu AMIS gladko zmaga.
Vaša inštalacija je uspešno spodletela!

Zgodovina sprememb…

  • spremenilo: ABX ()

Jinto ::

Ker je druga lokacija:

23 ms    23 ms    23 ms  edge01.fra01.cloudflare.com [80.81.194.180] - frankfurt
vix.edge01.vie01.as13335.com - dunaj

ping 80.81.194.180

Pinging 80.81.194.180 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 80.81.194.180: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=59
Reply from 80.81.194.180: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=59
Reply from 80.81.194.180: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=59
Reply from 80.81.194.180: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=59

francek1 ::

Sem na bakru, 4300 m od centrale, pa dela zadeva izredno zanesljivo. Prej je pa bila optika na Telemachu katastrofa...
Kdor se je že rodil učen se lahko reži...

flisko ::

Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=54
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=54
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=54
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 16ms, Maximum = 17ms, Average = 16ms

C:\Windows\system32>


telemach optika

ABX :: 

ping 80.81.194.180
PING 80.81.194.180 (80.81.194.180) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 80.81.194.180: icmp_seq=1 ttl=62 time=22.4 ms
64 bytes from 80.81.194.180: icmp_seq=2 ttl=62 time=22.5 ms
64 bytes from 80.81.194.180: icmp_seq=3 ttl=62 time=22.3 ms
64 bytes from 80.81.194.180: icmp_seq=4 ttl=62 time=23.1 ms
64 bytes from 80.81.194.180: icmp_seq=5 ttl=62 time=22.3 ms
64 bytes from 80.81.194.180: icmp_seq=6 ttl=62 time=22.3 ms
64 bytes from 80.81.194.180: icmp_seq=7 ttl=62 time=22.2 ms
64 bytes from 80.81.194.180: icmp_seq=8 ttl=62 time=22.3 ms
64 bytes from 80.81.194.180: icmp_seq=9 ttl=62 time=22.7 ms
^C
--- 80.81.194.180 ping statistics ---


Kar se tiče hitrosti ni neke razlike vredne omembe. Vprašanje je zdaj zanesljivost teh povezav. Od kar sem na Siolu 5-8 let, samo enkrat se spomnim da bi bile težave z povezavo v tujino.
Vaša inštalacija je uspešno spodletela!

Zgodovina sprememb…

  • spremenilo: ABX ()

Vredno ogleda ...

TemaSporočilaOglediZadnje sporočilo
TemaSporočilaOglediZadnje sporočilo
»

Visok ping ob določeni uri? (Amis)

Oddelek: Pomoč in nasveti		61417 (1262) čuhalev
»

Zakaj ping pri "dobri" povezavi??

Oddelek: Omrežja in internet		132156 (1778) Tr0n
»

ping www.klimahit.si

Oddelek: Omrežja in internet		212012 (1715) suse80
»

Slo-Tech preseljen

Oddelek: Novice / Obvestila		372794 (2794) Bakunin
»

ADSL vs kabel

Oddelek: Omrežja in internet		372813 (2032) Jinxy

Več podobnih tem