Končno. Na mojem računalniku z linuxom sem odkril virus.

Ja valda. Pa zakaj "končno"?!? Si si virus želel?

Jaz še nisem imel problemov z virusi. Sploh pa nimam protivirusnega programa.

Po mojem mnenju bo zdaj lahko trobil naokoli, da tudi za linux obstaja(jo) virus(i) in zato je windows boljši. Joke.

res nimas srece...celo leto si ga iskal, pa si ga komaj zdaj nasel?

verjetn ga je posebi zdownloadu

Kaj si pa ti hotu povedat? Imam obcutek da se je ideja izgubila v mnozici smajlijev.

suse80: kje si ga staknu?

Sam moraš bit pa REEEES smotan, da tegale Thebe-ja sploh zakurblaš!
Več v nadaljevanju:


I. ELF Infectors:
Abulia, Bliss, Cassini, Cron, Dido, Diesel, Dummy, Eriz, Gildo, Henky, Jac, Kagob, Kaot, Mandragore, Nel, Neox, Nuxbee, Obsidian.E (Obsid), OSF, Ovets, Pavid (Alfa.dr), Penguin, Quasi, RST = Remote Shell Trojan (Vit), Radix, RcrGood, Rike (Rike.1627), Satyr, Sickabs, Siilov, Silvio, Simile (Etap, MetaPHOR), Staog, Svat, Telf, Thebe, Winter (Lotek), Winux (Lindose, PEElf, Pelf), Wozip, Xone, Ynit, and Zipworm (distinctive only in that it likes to infect ELF files in Zip archives).

These are all "ELF infectors", where "ELF" is the standard Unix binary format. To activate these, you must literally decide to run a binary infected with them, e.g., someone mails you a binary file and says "Please run this not-especially-trustworthy binary executable." Doing so would of course be really dumb; the consequence of being dumb in that particular fashion is that some number of Linux executable binaries set to be writable by the user's account would get modified to include a copy of the virus ("infected"). Note that the user is thereby enabled only to shoot at his/her own foot: No regular installed applications could be affected, because those are not writable by regular users: Only binary executables in that specific user's /home/username/bin/ and such could be affected (and seldom do users have any).

And, perhaps needless to say, anyone who runs untrustworthy binary executables using the root account is a dumb cluck, and hopeless. Further, you really, really have to go out of your way to run them at all: For example, literally none, zero, nada of the more than 100 e-mail clients for Linux auto-execute received executable attachments on the user's behalf. The user would have to save the attachment to /tmp, run "chmod u+x" on it to make it executable, and then manually run it — in order to (finally) shoot himself/herself (but not his/her system) in the foot.

Even though the category of "attack" is slightly different, the epic degree of inventive and energetic haplessness that would be required to actually hurt a system with one of these was nicely illustrated by my summaries (1, 2) of the October 2004 "phishing attack" aimed at Red Hat users.

One last observation about ELF infectors: They're all fundamentally identical, and might as well all be the same virus. Seen one, seen 'em all. (More to the immediate point: Easily avoid running one, easily avoid running 'em all.)

Vir: http://www.nuneaton.lug.org.uk/modules....

kaj je ta shell.sh na katerega si se spravil. To je cisto genericno ime in nic ne pove.

po tej logiki je tudi

#!/bin/bash
rm -rf /


v datoteki shell.sh virus? :)