Evropska Naftna Kriza

Bellator je 4. apr 2026 ob 22:23:29 izjavil:

DeeJay je 4. apr 2026 ob 22:16:37 izjavil:

Odpirali šampanjce ob sprejemu zakona, da bodo lahko obešali Palestince
https://www.24ur.com/novice/tujina/bog-...

"
Odbor OZN za človekove pravice pravi, da je nov zakon vojni zločin. Sojenja bodo potekala na vojaških sodiščih, brez možnosti pritožbe, potrebna bo samo navadna večina sodnikov. Obtoženi bodo izolirani, brez obiskov, tudi odvetnikov, morebiten pogovor za pravno pomoč bo možen samo na daljavo. Obsojeni bodo tisti, ki s svojimi dejanji negirajo obstoj države Izrael, se pravi, da so izločeni morebitni izraelski teroristi, morilci. In sodili bodo Palestincem z ozemlja, ki uradno ni del Izraela, torej z zasedenega Zahodnega brega in Gaze.
"

To podpirate dragi kow, chalky, Stane2, Madmax, ...

Kje si bil Januarja, ko je IRCG pobil 50.000 civilistov? Zda bi morale metati airdrope med prebivalstvo, da so civilisti vsaj tako oboroženi kot je IRCG

Chalky je včeraj ob 21:11:09 izjavil:

Wait, you guys are getting rescued?

Meme dneva

fikus_ je včeraj ob 22:00:01 izjavil:

Za vojasko uporabo je to premalo. Kaj pa sedaj?!

Strel455 je včeraj ob 22:01:55 izjavil:

fikus_ je včeraj ob 22:00:01 izjavil:

Za vojasko uporabo je to premalo. Kaj pa sedaj?!

A je s tabo vse v redu? Imaš kakšno bolezen?
Kolikokrat ti bo treba povedat, da rabiš vsaj 90% časa, da prideš do 60% obogatenega urana... za nuklearno bombo ne rabiš več veliko časa. Si boš to sedaj VENDARLE ZAPOMNIL??

Goran10 je včeraj ob 13:47:12 izjavil:

Kaj pa lahko zgradimo? Po vojni plinovod iz Katarja recimo ali pa jedrske elektrarne in dolgoročne pogodbe s čimveč dobavitelji urana.

Strel455 je včeraj ob 22:26:39 izjavil:

fikus_ je včeraj ob 22:17:01 izjavil:

Pozabil si trust me bro.
Sicer pa Netanjahu že 20+ let govori o mesecih, tednih do Iranske bombe....

Tebi se je blazno poslabšalo v zadnjih mesecih. Niti najbolj enostavnih stvari nisi sposoben najti na webu.

enavlaka je včeraj ob 23:53:02 izjavil:

Ruski tanker je uspešno pretovoril nafto

enavlaka je danes ob 07:23:45 izjavil:

Warmongerji, ki ne znajo nič tipkajo vprašanja v chat-bota in kopirajo odgovor sem.

Strel455 je danes ob 07:43:02 izjavil:

Civiliziran svet je podpisal in ratificiral mednarodno konvencijo UNCLOS, medtem ko je Iran ni ratificiral.

Strel455 je danes ob 07:43:02 izjavil:

Tisti, ki podpirajo Iran (ali bolj sovražijo Ameriko ali Izrael) ter upravičujejo in zagovarjajo, da bi Iran zabil prehod skozi katero koli območje ločitve, zlasti najbolj tvegano območje za Oman, dejansko zagovarjajo piratstvo in mednarodni terorizem, vsaka taka obtožba pa bi bila zgolj izsiljevanje.

Strel455 je danes ob 07:43:02 izjavil:

Ko pride do takšne prisilne pristojbine in ko je moten mednarodni pomorski promet, potem problem rešijo mornarice, ki to zmorejo.

Strel455 je včeraj ob 21:59:07 izjavil:

Za civilne namene ne rabiš 60% obogatenega urana, samo za vojaške.

kow je danes ob 06:30:58 izjavil:

didzej, po tem ko sem vceraj zaplaval v posteljo, sem koncno DOUMEL! Vceraj nistal padla samo dva C130, ampak je padla tudi iranska vojaska tovarna. Vsaj, ce verjamemo padlim porocilom na socialnih omrezjih.

Chalky je včeraj ob 17:26:18 izjavil:

Iran je v tej 35 dnevni vojaški operaciji močno tepen že od prvega dne, samo Iranci tega ne bodo priznali. Bo po operaciji več jasnega. Vojaško so uničeni, če jim uničijo še infrastrukturo se ne bodo pobrali desetletja. Iran lahko obdrži režim, karkoli to sploh pomeni glede nato da je večina voditeljev že pokojnih. je pa res da bodo morale ZDA dobiti tisti Uran, ker bo drugače preveč nevarno za prihodnost.

Če ga poberejo pa Iran postane nepomemben na zemljevidu. Vsekakor Iran v tej operaciji ne bo beležil pozitivnih rezultatov pa lahko navijači Irana pisarijo neumnosti, končni rezultati bodo za Iran grozni. Je pa res da bi bilo za vse vpletene najbolje da pride do dogovora in da Iran lepo preda uran predno izgubijo še za nekaj trilijonov vredno infrastrukturo.

Strel455 je danes ob 09:40:36 izjavil:

Poldi112 je danes ob 08:36:22 izjavil:

In katere mornarice so to?

One z nuklearnimi bombami.

-
The Strait of Gibraltar (the narrow waterway connecting the Atlantic Ocean to the Mediterranean Sea between Spain and Morocco) is only about 14 km (8.7 miles) wide at its narrowest point. This means much of it falls within the territorial seas (national waters) of the coastal states, rather than being entirely "international waters" or high seas.Spain claims a 12-nautical-mile territorial sea from its coast (including areas near the Bay of Algeciras and the northern side of the strait).
Morocco also claims a 12-nautical-mile territorial sea from its southern coast.
The United Kingdom (via the British Overseas Territory of Gibraltar) claims a 3-nautical-mile territorial sea around the Rock of Gibraltar (historically limited; it has the option to extend to 12 nm under UNCLOS but has not fully done so in all directions). This creates a small British-claimed zone on the northern side.

https://x.com/Gerashchenko_en/status/20...
Iran is demanding sovereign control over the Strait of Hormuz. If it succeeds in imposing this logic, it will undermine the very foundation of international maritime law. The Strait of Hormuz is an international strait governed by the regime of transit passage: passage cannot be arbitrarily prevented or made selective. If Iran succeeds, it will open a Pandora's box: other states will also decide they can act the same way.

Let's look at other straits that are critically important for the global economy:

-The Straits of Malacca and Singapore are the next most dangerous example. The Strait of Malacca is the world's busiest oil chokepoint, as well as one of the main corridors for common trade; studies estimate that about 20% of global maritime trade passes through the Strait of Malacca, amounting to approximately $2.4-2.5 trillion annually. In theory, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore could all seek to exert tighter control here. If even one of these countries were to impose a system of permits, selective inspections, or political restrictions, global trade would suffer.
- Bab-el-Mandeb is another example of how control over a narrow strait can quickly become a tool of war. In 2023, approximately 9.2 million barrels per day passed through it, but following the escalation, flows dropped to about 4.0-4.2 million barrels per day in 2024-2025. Formally, Yemen, Djibouti, and Eritrea may attempt to strengthen their control here, and effectively, armed non-state actors may also be involved. The threat is clear: whoever controls this chokepoint can sever the maritime link between Europe and Asia via the Red Sea and the Suez Canal.
- The Bosphorus and the Dardanelles are a separate case, as they are already subject to a specific regime under the Montreux Convention, and Türkiye has broader authority over military vessels. But that is precisely why this example is important. In the first half of 2025, approximately 3.7 million barrels per day of oil and petroleum products passed through the Turkish Straits, not counting grain and other Black Sea exports. The danger here lies elsewhere: the existing legal exception could become a justification for new exceptions in other straits.
- The Danish straits are a critical exit route from the Baltic Sea. In the first half of 2025, approximately 4.9 million barrels of oil and petroleum products passed through them daily. Formally, Denmark could impose stricter controls here, and in a broader regional sense, so could the states that control the approaches to the Baltic Sea. If Europe ever adopts a policy of selective access through such a strait, it would mean that even within the Euro-Atlantic space, freedom of navigation is no longer considered absolute. This would be a critical moment for maritime law.
- The Taiwan Strait is perhaps the most dangerous case in the long term. According to CSIS estimates, approximately $2.45 trillion worth of goods passed through it in 2022, accounting for more than one-fifth of global maritime trade. There is only one potential contender for political control here - China. If Beijing manages to impose a system where passage depends not on international rules but on Chinese jurisdiction, it will be a turning point. Then, not only regional security would be at risk, but also the very principle that major trade routes cannot be controlled by a single state through political decision. And since the Taiwan Strait is also linked to the risk of a major war between the US and China, maritime law here directly confronts the risk of global escalation.
- Arctic shipping routes demonstrate that this logic now extends beyond traditional straits. Russia regards the Northern Sea Route as a "historic national transport corridor" and demands compliance with the navigation rules established by Moscow; in 2024, the Northern Sea Route Administration issued 1,312 permits for 975 vessels. Canada, for its part, considers the Northwest Passage to be part of its internal waters, while the United States and other states disagree with this approach. Here, the risk is particularly significant for the future: if Arctic routes begin to be established as a licensed passage under the control of coastal states, this will provide yet another strong argument for those who wish to establish their own control in other areas.

So, control over sea lanes is becoming a new weapon. If Iran breaks this barrier in the Strait of Hormuz, other states will also begin competing for control of the seas. The next conflict may arise not only over territory, but over the right to determine who has access to global trade, energy, and naval traffic. This is the real danger: the Strait of Hormuz could lay the groundwork for many future wars.

Goran10 je danes ob 11:46:47 izjavil:

Droni so poceni. To lahko isto izvaja Oman pa Iran ne bi moral odpreti Hormuza to je poanta. Pa ne samo Oman vse zalivske države.

Poldi112 je danes ob 11:48:27 izjavil:

Goran10 je danes ob 11:46:47 izjavil:

Droni so poceni. To lahko isto izvaja Oman pa Iran ne bi moral odpreti Hormuza to je poanta. Pa ne samo Oman vse zalivske države.

In kako bodo zalivske države preživele vojno z Iranom? Ker Iran lahko preživi vojno z USA in njihovimi hlapci v regiji, medtem ko hlapci nimajo za burek proti Iranu.