Odkritje današnjega dneva: __int__

se reče temu slučajno operator overloading sicer?

karafeka je 25. jul 2025 ob 19:27:13 izjavil:

Ja, ti da mislit kak copy paste nateg so ti generative AI boti, folk pa meče milijarde noter.

Odgovor katerega mu je dal ai je bistveno boljši kot so ga na islotechu. Saj najbrž bi tudi na medoverju Dobil boljši odgovor.

Poglejmo kaj pravi deepse3k

The error occurs because the class `FullCool` does not properly initialize the `width` attribute due to two critical mistakes:

1. **Typo in Initializer**: The method name is `__int__` instead of `__init__`.
Python requires the initializer to be named `__init__` to be called automatically when creating an instance.

2. **Missing `self` Parameter in `call1`**:
The method `call1()` is defined without parameters, but it should be called without arguments. The issue here is actually that `call1` is a function, not a method, so it doesn't take `self`. The real problem is in the class definition.

### Corrected Code:
```python
class FullCool:
def __init__(self): # Corrected method name
self.width = 0 # Initialize the attribute

def call1():
fc = FullCool()
return fc

if __name__ == "__main__":
test1 = call1()
print(test1.width) # Output: 0
```

### Key Fixes:
1. Changed `__int__` to `__init__` (correct initializer name).
2. Ensured `__init__` includes `self` as the first parameter.
3. The `width` attribute is now properly initialized when `FullCool` is instantiated.

### Why the Error Occurred:
- Since `__int__` is not the initializer, it was never executed when creating `FullCool()`.
- The instance `fc` had no `width` attribute, causing `AttributeError` when accessed.

The corrected code will now output `0` as expected.

Zato pa so sedaj popularni coding agenti, ker sežejo dlje od avtocomplete

Je pa tema res povsem nedostojna za šlo tech.

Tega dela pa ne razumem:

2. **Missing `self` Parameter in `call1`**:
The method `call1()` is defined without parameters, but it should be called without arguments. The issue here is actually that `call1` is a function, not a method, so it doesn't take `self`. The real problem is in the class definition.

DamijanD je včeraj ob 06:07:55 izjavil:

Tega dela pa ne razumem:

2. **Missing `self` Parameter in `call1`**:
The method `call1()` is defined without parameters, but it should be called without arguments. The issue here is actually that `call1` is a function, not a method, so it doesn't take `self`. The real problem is in the class definition.

Tega nihče ne razume, še najmanj pa Zimonem in LLM, ki je to spesnil. HotBurek je dobil pravilni odgovor dobesedno v prvi repliki (pa ga niti ni zares potreboval). Tak copy-paste odgovor je pa čisti spam, na ravni LMGTFY odgovora.

Aja ob tem da se je llm sposoben revidirati v nekaj sekundah in prizna napako pri funkciji. Ti se ne boš nikoli.