Forum » Problemi človeštva » Imigrantski val 2.0
Imigrantski val 2.0
arnecan1 ::
Če beli evropski človek nikoli ne bi prišel v Afriko, bi danes Afričani še vedno s kamnitimi sekirami lovili antilope, povprečna življenska doba Afričanov bi pa bila 30 let.
To ne bi, ker ne bi bili izolirani v sedanjem svetu.
Bi jim pa bilo prihranjeno marsikaj, če jih ne bi kolonizirali in izkoriščali. Kot bi bilo sedaj marsikaj prihranjeno bivšim kolonizatorjem...
Ampak ja, za to razumeti je potrebno že nekaj inteligence, zato razumljivo, da imate nekateri s tem blazne težave
Ampak tudi Arabci so Vzhodno in osrednjo Afriko izkoriščali in odpeljali več sužnjev in še dalj časa kakor iz Zahodne Afrike.
Malidelničar ::
No ja, če smo povsem iskreni, Kongo RES ni dober primer. Ampak vseeno to ni opravičilo za množično priseljevanje v Evropo.
Poglejte kolonizirane in zaostale Azijce, ki so se sami pobrali: J. Koreja je bila leta 1950 na nivoju .... Gane!!! Pa poglejmo kakšna je situacija danes, oz. kako se je situacija spremenila že v osemdesetih. Nasploh so Azijci imeli Azijske tigre recimo že v osemdsetih in nato v devetdesetih.
Za Afriko mi je osebno najbolj žal, da so belci izgubili oblast v JAR, če ne bi to lahko bila cvetoča država, del Zahoda. Je pa zanimivo, ker se v JAR pripravlja predvolilna koalicija proti korumpiranemu Afriškemu nacionalnemu kongresu v sestavi, pazite zdaj to: Zuluji + Afrikanerji + Angleži + Mešanci (coloureds). To bo ful zanimivo.
Poglejte kolonizirane in zaostale Azijce, ki so se sami pobrali: J. Koreja je bila leta 1950 na nivoju .... Gane!!! Pa poglejmo kakšna je situacija danes, oz. kako se je situacija spremenila že v osemdesetih. Nasploh so Azijci imeli Azijske tigre recimo že v osemdsetih in nato v devetdesetih.
Za Afriko mi je osebno najbolj žal, da so belci izgubili oblast v JAR, če ne bi to lahko bila cvetoča država, del Zahoda. Je pa zanimivo, ker se v JAR pripravlja predvolilna koalicija proti korumpiranemu Afriškemu nacionalnemu kongresu v sestavi, pazite zdaj to: Zuluji + Afrikanerji + Angleži + Mešanci (coloureds). To bo ful zanimivo.
Don't invest like a Joe. Invest like a Simon.
lynxslo5 ::
Idi Amin je leta 72 Indijce pregnal iz Ugande in zaplenil njihovo premoženje, država pa je potem v nekaj mesecih totalno kolapsirala.
arnecan1 ::
Malidelničar je izjavil:
No ja, če smo povsem iskreni, Kongo RES ni dober primer. Ampak vseeno to ni opravičilo za množično priseljevanje v Evropo.
Poglejte kolonizirane in zaostale Azijce, ki so se sami pobrali: J. Koreja je bila leta 1950 na nivoju .... Gane!!! Pa poglejmo kakšna je situacija danes, oz. kako se je situacija spremenila že v osemdesetih. Nasploh so Azijci imeli Azijske tigre recimo že v osemdsetih in nato v devetdesetih.
Za Afriko mi je osebno najbolj žal, da so belci izgubili oblast v JAR, če ne bi to lahko bila cvetoča država, del Zahoda. Je pa zanimivo, ker se v JAR pripravlja predvolilna koalicija proti korumpiranemu Afriškemu nacionalnemu kongresu v sestavi, pazite zdaj to: Zuluji + Afrikanerji + Angleži + Mešanci (coloureds). To bo ful zanimivo.
Kaj pa Indijci? Misim, da predstavljajo kar konkreten odstotek prebivalstva.
fulk ::
Res morate vec virov prebrati da vidite kako podiljavi so bili nekateri narodi oz rase,ko si tam prisli belci.
Eni so res bili.
A potem so belci prišli zraven in dodatno premešali drek.
Kdo ni mešal dreka?
Kako veš, da prej ni bil večji drek?
A se vam zdi ok, da ste tako nasedli na anti-zahodno propagando in ne pogledate malo širše?
Zakaj tako iščete razloge, da smo zlobni in nič drugega?
Veš tisti Maori, ki jih danes tako cenimo kot pogumne domorodce?
Chatham Islands @ Wikipedia
Ngāti Mutunga and Ngāti Tama in turn saw the meeting as a precursor to warfare on the part of Moriori and responded. The Māori attacked and in the ensuing action killed over 260 Moriori. A Moriori survivor recalled: "[The Māori] commenced to kill us like sheep... [We] were terrified, fled to the bush, concealed ourselves in holes underground, and in any place to escape our enemies. It was of no avail; we were discovered and killed – men, women and children – indiscriminately".[37] A Māori chief, Te Rakatau Katihe, said in the Native Land Court in 1870: "We took possession ... in accordance with our custom, and we caught all the people. Not one escaped. Some ran away from us, these we killed; and others also we killed – but what of that? It was in accordance with our custom. I am not aware of any of our people being killed by them."[38][39]
Klali in posiljevali so čim so dobili priložnost. Domačini so jih še oskrbeli, ker so imeli "brodolom", tej pa so jih poklali.
Zakaj tega ne berete?
Dajte se že enkrat sprijaznit, judovska reinterpretacija vaše zgodovine vas je oprala in sedaj mislite, da ste najhujši osebki na tem planetu, a je ravno obratno, smo prvi, ki smo formalizirali pravice ljudi.
Prosim nehajte s tem.
Nehajte brati establišment literaturo, ker ta vas pere.
Res morate vec virov prebrati da vidite kako podiljavi so bili nekateri narodi oz rase,ko si tam prisli belci.
Eni so res bili.
A potem so belci prišli zraven in dodatno premešali drek.
Noro kako ste eni oprani da cutite white guilt.
Drugsce pa ursula van dracula pravi
"Ensuring Europe's survival is crucial, and welcoming 100 million migrants by 2100"
A res to rekla?
Jezus kristus, to jo treba ustavit nemudoma. Že covid scena je bila obupna, kaj šele to.
Sovražniki evrope.
Upam, da res pride kaka neodvisna desnica na oblast po celi evropi, to je šlo predaleč.
Kayzon ::
Da vidimo kaj so menili arabci o imigrantih iz Afrike,se dolgo pred tem preden so belci stopili v samo Afriko.
The American scholar Minoo Southgate has summarized, in her own words, the characteristics of blacks most commonly recorded by mid-Eastern writers: "In both Arab and Persian Islamic writings, blacks are accused of being stupid, untruthful, vicious, cowardly, sexually unbridled, ugly and distorted, excessively merry, and easily affected by food and drink." She also quotes a number of sources directly.
The first Arab scholar known to have commented on the low intelligence of blacks was Al Jahiz (d. 868 AD), who wrote, "We know that the Zanj [East Africans blacks] are the least intelligent and the least discerning of mankind, and the least capable of understanding the consequences of actions." Al Jahiz also claimed that "despite their dimness, their boundless stupidity, their obtuseness, their crude perceptions and their evil dispositions, they make long speeches." He concluded that "like the crow among mankind are the Zanj for they are the worst of men and the most vicious of creatures in character and temperament."
A century later, Maqdisi (also known as Al-Muqaddasi, fl. 966 AD) wrote that "the Africans are people of black color, flat noses, kinky hair, and little understanding or intelligence." The 12th century Arab geographer Muhammad al-Idrisi described blacks as having a "lack of knowledge and defective minds," adding, "Their ignorance is notorious; men of learning and distinction are almost unknown among them, and their kings only acquire what they know about government and justice from the instruction of learned visitors from farther north."
Another Arabic scholar, Ibn al-Faqih al-Hamadani, (c. 903 AD) wrote that "the people of Iraq . . . do not come out . . . overdone in the womb until they are burned, so that the child comes out something between black, murky, malodorous, stinking, and crinkly-haired, with uneven limbs, deficient minds, and depraved passions, such as the East Africans, the Somali, and other blacks who resemble them. The Iraqis are neither half-baked dough nor burned crust but between the two."
In 1343 AD, an anonymous Arab published a romance about Alexander the Great entitled Iskandarnamah in which he wrote that "the East Africans are slight-witted, and God, most high, has created them stupid, ignorant, and foul."
These observations were made of East African blacks with whom the Arabs were most familiar, but they knew something also of the blacks of southern Africa. The celebrated polymath Ibn Khaldun (1332 - 1406) wrote: "To the south there is no civilization in the proper sense. There are only humans who are closer to dumb animals than to rational beings. They live in thickets and caves, and eat herbs and unprepared grain. They frequently eat each other. They cannot be considered human beings."
Ibn Khaldun also wrote: "Therefore, the Negro nations are, as a rule, submissive to slavery, because Negroes have little that is human and have attributes that are quite similar to those of dumb animals." Khaldun could have been quoting Aristotle, who wrote that "it is clear that there are certain people who are free and certain who are slaves by nature, and it is both to their advantage, and just, for them to be slaves." Aristotle also likened slaves to animals, calling the ox the poor man's slave.
Persians who observed blacks reached similar conclusions. The geographer al-Qazwini (1203 - 1283) asserted that blacks are characterized by "weakness of intelligence," and Hudud al-Alam (c. 982 AD) wrote that "as regards southern countries, all their inhabitants are black on account of the heat of their climate . . . Most of them go naked. . . . They are people distant from the standards of humanity . . . Their nature is that of wild animals."
The Persian scholar Abu Rayhan al-Biruni did not comment on the intelligence of blacks but wrote (c.1030 AD) of what he considered their primitive nature: "[T]he Zanj [blacks] are so uncivilized that they have no notion of a natural death. If a man dies a natural death, they think he was poisoned. Every death is suspicious with them, if a man has not been killed by a weapon."
Maqdisi (fl. 966 AD) asserted of blacks that "there is no marriage among them; the child does not know his father, and they eat people." Some three centuries later, the Persian scholar Nasir al-Din Tusi (1201-1274) concluded that the human races had different levels of intellectual development and that East African blacks were at the lowest level: "If all types of men are taken, and one placed after another, the Negro from Zanzibar does not differ from an animal in anything except the fact that his hands have been lifted from the earth . . . Many have seen that the ape is more capable of being trained than the Negro, and is more intelligent."
In the 14th century, Several Arab and Persian scholars noted that blacks have strong sexual drives, large sex organs, a manic temperament (see "Galen on the Merriment of Blacks," AR, Dec. 2010) and a strong sense of rhythm. Dr. Southgate observes that "the notion of the blacks' unbridled sexuality occurs in many Arab and Persian Muslim sources, some of which reveal the white man's fear of the black man's superior sexual prowess."
Similar accounts are found in the One Thousand and One Nights, the collection of stories of largely 9th century Persian origin told by the young bride Scheherazade. These stories were translated in the 19th century by the British Arabist Richard Burton, who noted that there are several stories about Persian wives who seek satisfaction with black slaves. These "debauched women," he wrote, "prefer negroes on account of the size of their parts" and because "the deed takes a much longer time and this adds greatly to women's enjoyment."
Observations about black sexuality have been confirmed in contemporary times by Prof. Philippe Rushton, who has documented the large sex organs and strong sex drives of blacks, which he ascribes to high levels of testosterone.
The purpose of quoting these ancient authors is neither to belittle blacks nor, indeed, to accept the complete accuracy of their accounts. It was obviously wrong to describe blacks as animals or to claim that apes were more intelligent. Still, these accounts cannot be dismissed as mere prejudice or the desire to flatter one's own group by insulting others. Arabs and Persians recognized the intelligence of the Greeks, for example.
The American scholar Minoo Southgate has summarized, in her own words, the characteristics of blacks most commonly recorded by mid-Eastern writers: "In both Arab and Persian Islamic writings, blacks are accused of being stupid, untruthful, vicious, cowardly, sexually unbridled, ugly and distorted, excessively merry, and easily affected by food and drink." She also quotes a number of sources directly.
The first Arab scholar known to have commented on the low intelligence of blacks was Al Jahiz (d. 868 AD), who wrote, "We know that the Zanj [East Africans blacks] are the least intelligent and the least discerning of mankind, and the least capable of understanding the consequences of actions." Al Jahiz also claimed that "despite their dimness, their boundless stupidity, their obtuseness, their crude perceptions and their evil dispositions, they make long speeches." He concluded that "like the crow among mankind are the Zanj for they are the worst of men and the most vicious of creatures in character and temperament."
A century later, Maqdisi (also known as Al-Muqaddasi, fl. 966 AD) wrote that "the Africans are people of black color, flat noses, kinky hair, and little understanding or intelligence." The 12th century Arab geographer Muhammad al-Idrisi described blacks as having a "lack of knowledge and defective minds," adding, "Their ignorance is notorious; men of learning and distinction are almost unknown among them, and their kings only acquire what they know about government and justice from the instruction of learned visitors from farther north."
Another Arabic scholar, Ibn al-Faqih al-Hamadani, (c. 903 AD) wrote that "the people of Iraq . . . do not come out . . . overdone in the womb until they are burned, so that the child comes out something between black, murky, malodorous, stinking, and crinkly-haired, with uneven limbs, deficient minds, and depraved passions, such as the East Africans, the Somali, and other blacks who resemble them. The Iraqis are neither half-baked dough nor burned crust but between the two."
In 1343 AD, an anonymous Arab published a romance about Alexander the Great entitled Iskandarnamah in which he wrote that "the East Africans are slight-witted, and God, most high, has created them stupid, ignorant, and foul."
These observations were made of East African blacks with whom the Arabs were most familiar, but they knew something also of the blacks of southern Africa. The celebrated polymath Ibn Khaldun (1332 - 1406) wrote: "To the south there is no civilization in the proper sense. There are only humans who are closer to dumb animals than to rational beings. They live in thickets and caves, and eat herbs and unprepared grain. They frequently eat each other. They cannot be considered human beings."
Ibn Khaldun also wrote: "Therefore, the Negro nations are, as a rule, submissive to slavery, because Negroes have little that is human and have attributes that are quite similar to those of dumb animals." Khaldun could have been quoting Aristotle, who wrote that "it is clear that there are certain people who are free and certain who are slaves by nature, and it is both to their advantage, and just, for them to be slaves." Aristotle also likened slaves to animals, calling the ox the poor man's slave.
Persians who observed blacks reached similar conclusions. The geographer al-Qazwini (1203 - 1283) asserted that blacks are characterized by "weakness of intelligence," and Hudud al-Alam (c. 982 AD) wrote that "as regards southern countries, all their inhabitants are black on account of the heat of their climate . . . Most of them go naked. . . . They are people distant from the standards of humanity . . . Their nature is that of wild animals."
The Persian scholar Abu Rayhan al-Biruni did not comment on the intelligence of blacks but wrote (c.1030 AD) of what he considered their primitive nature: "[T]he Zanj [blacks] are so uncivilized that they have no notion of a natural death. If a man dies a natural death, they think he was poisoned. Every death is suspicious with them, if a man has not been killed by a weapon."
Maqdisi (fl. 966 AD) asserted of blacks that "there is no marriage among them; the child does not know his father, and they eat people." Some three centuries later, the Persian scholar Nasir al-Din Tusi (1201-1274) concluded that the human races had different levels of intellectual development and that East African blacks were at the lowest level: "If all types of men are taken, and one placed after another, the Negro from Zanzibar does not differ from an animal in anything except the fact that his hands have been lifted from the earth . . . Many have seen that the ape is more capable of being trained than the Negro, and is more intelligent."
In the 14th century, Several Arab and Persian scholars noted that blacks have strong sexual drives, large sex organs, a manic temperament (see "Galen on the Merriment of Blacks," AR, Dec. 2010) and a strong sense of rhythm. Dr. Southgate observes that "the notion of the blacks' unbridled sexuality occurs in many Arab and Persian Muslim sources, some of which reveal the white man's fear of the black man's superior sexual prowess."
Similar accounts are found in the One Thousand and One Nights, the collection of stories of largely 9th century Persian origin told by the young bride Scheherazade. These stories were translated in the 19th century by the British Arabist Richard Burton, who noted that there are several stories about Persian wives who seek satisfaction with black slaves. These "debauched women," he wrote, "prefer negroes on account of the size of their parts" and because "the deed takes a much longer time and this adds greatly to women's enjoyment."
Observations about black sexuality have been confirmed in contemporary times by Prof. Philippe Rushton, who has documented the large sex organs and strong sex drives of blacks, which he ascribes to high levels of testosterone.
The purpose of quoting these ancient authors is neither to belittle blacks nor, indeed, to accept the complete accuracy of their accounts. It was obviously wrong to describe blacks as animals or to claim that apes were more intelligent. Still, these accounts cannot be dismissed as mere prejudice or the desire to flatter one's own group by insulting others. Arabs and Persians recognized the intelligence of the Greeks, for example.
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenilo: Kayzon ()
D3m ::
Res morate vec virov prebrati da vidite kako podiljavi so bili nekateri narodi oz rase,ko si tam prisli belci.
Eni so res bili.
A potem so belci prišli zraven in dodatno premešali drek.
Noro kako ste eni oprani da cutite white guilt.
No, to so samo gola dejstva.
Zgleda so preveč zate, jih težko sprejmeš in potem se skrivaš za takimi nebulozami
Jup. Jest10 ima white guilt......karkoli to pomeni za Slovenca.
|HP EliteBook|R5 6650U|
jest10 ::
Kako prozorna "obramba" svojih faljenih dojemanj. Zajokaš "white guilt" in si kao zmagal debato
c3p0 ::
PovemVfaco je izjavil:
Par minut ne mine od tvojega jokanja nad ad hominemi, do tega, da si s svojim freshman filo priročnikom rit obrišeš. To nima veze s kulturo, ampak s tvojim zapravljanjem cajta, avtizmom in glupostjo, nerd.
Did I hit a nerve (again)?
Malidelničar je izjavil:
Kayzon: Morda, ampak koliko lahko to sploh ukinejo? Nimajo pooblastil kot Kitajci. Plus ostanejo mobiteli. Tu sem osebno kar skeptičen IMHO.
Btw. baje je nova žrtev, en mlad 24-letni protestnik je umrl zaradi strela z gumijastim nabojem v prsa.
Plus imeli smo prve spopade med domačini (predvsem mladi belci iz navijaških klubov, ki so se organizirali) in priseljenci oz. potomci priseljencev. Tako, da lahko je ta strah pred organiziranimi belci ustavil divjanje.
Kolikor sem videl, so organizirane tolpe belskih rasistov (tako bodo oklicani) varovali razne trgovinice po mestih pred opustošenjem, pardon, razdelitvijo dobrin med revne.
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: c3p0 ()
c3p0 ::
Res morate vec virov prebrati da vidite kako podiljavi so bili nekateri narodi oz rase,ko si tam prisli belci.
Eni so res bili.
A potem so belci prišli zraven in dodatno premešali drek.
Noro kako ste eni oprani da cutite white guilt.
V bistvu so hudi rasisti, ker človeka zreducirajo na barvo kože in se grejo neke kolektivne krivde. Še najbolj ironično pa je, da so sami Slovani, ki smo zgodovinsko bili precej opresirani in zasužnjevani.
Kako prozorna "obramba" svojih faljenih dojemanj. Zajokaš "white guilt" in si kao zmagal debato
Kje se je pa zmotil?
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: c3p0 ()
D3m ::
Kako prozorna "obramba" svojih faljenih dojemanj. Zajokaš "white guilt" in si kao zmagal debato
Glede na tvoje prepričanje ni daleč stran od resnice, da si.
|HP EliteBook|R5 6650U|
jest10 ::
Tebi se en kurac sanja o mojem prepričanju. Samo fino te zapeče, ko se omeni dejstva, da so ga belci fino srali v preteklosti. Zgleda je bolečina tako huda, da te oropa zmožnosti treznega razmišljanja in znaš samo še jokati o white guilt. Tvoj kolega pa o židovski zaroti
lynxslo5 ::
Imperije so imeli tudi Mongoli, Arabci in Turki. Počeli so hude zločine. Samo njim ne pride na pamet, da bi se šli nek "guilt", kot to počnejo Evropejci.
D3m ::
Tebi se en kurac sanja o mojem prepričanju. Samo fino te zapeče, ko se omeni dejstva, da so ga belci fino srali v preteklosti. Zgleda je bolečina tako huda, da te oropa zmožnosti treznega razmišljanja in znaš samo še jokati o white guilt. Tvoj kolega pa o židovski zaroti
Belci?
Ahhhh kje. Ti imaš napačne predstave in slabe zaključke.
Imperije so imeli tudi Mongoli, Arabci in Turki. Počeli so hude zločine. Samo njim ne pride na pamet, da bi se šli nek "guilt", kot to počnejo Evropejci.
Pa Azteki in Grki ter Rimljani in Vikingi.
|HP EliteBook|R5 6650U|
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: D3m ()
fulk ::
Tebi se en kurac sanja o mojem prepričanju. Samo fino te zapeče, ko se omeni dejstva, da so ga belci fino srali v preteklosti. Zgleda je bolečina tako huda, da te oropa zmožnosti treznega razmišljanja in znaš samo še jokati o white guilt. Tvoj kolega pa o židovski zaroti
Ti si zgleda mojster ignoriranja dejstev.
No pol pa se dobita s pegausem in odjebita skupaj v afriko se kesat.
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: fulk ()
arnecan1 ::
Hja, tudi Bantu etnična skupina je ne tako dolgo nazaj razširila svoj etnični prostor. Na račun druge etnične skupnosti.
Khoisan, San in razna "pigmejska plemena" so bila potisnjena daleč na jug ali v pragozdove. Koliko jih je umrlo, lahko samo ugibamo, saj ni pisnih virov. Sigurno ni šlo ves čisto, ampak je koga tudi "uzela magla". Med ruandskim pokolom je procentualno največje izgube doživela skupnost Twa. Rwandan genocide @ Wikipedia
Približno 10.000 od 30.000 jih je bilo masakriranih. Ljudstvo Twa v Ruandi so praprebivalci, tam so živeli pred Bantu etnijo. So ti. "pigmejci" kot smo včasih rpavili. Twa @ Wikipedia
Skratka, skoraj ni ljudstva, ki ni nad drugim plemenom zagrešilo genocid ali vsaj zločin enkrat v svoji zgodovini. Tisti številčnejši ali tehnološko bolj razviti, so bili pri tem bolj uspešni. In tudi to je prekletstvo Belega človeka, Ki j med drugim dosegel ukinitev suženjstva, enakopravnost žensk, manjšin in verskih manjšin, osnovne človekove pravice, da ne omenimo medicinskega in tehnološkega napredka, kateri je omogočil, da povprečna starost pri smrti ni več 30 let.
Kromanjonci nad neandertalci, Bantu nad pigmejci, Arabci nad črnci, Berberi, Indijci.. Kitajci nad Tibetanci in Mongoli, ti so potem uslugo vrnili, Rimljani nad Germani in nato obratno, Azijska nomadska ljudstva nad Evropejci, Evropejci nato nad Azijci in Afričani, magrebške države nad sredozemskimi evropskimi državami, Francozi nato nad njimi, Angleži nad Irci, Skandinavci nad Laponci, Eskimi baje nad Vikingi na Grenlandiji, Maori nad Moriori....
Da ne naštevam, niso Evropejci najbolj hudobni na svetu in tudi niso zagrešili največ grozodejstev. Imeli so smolo, da so to delali v času, ko je bilo pisanje dosegljivo vsakomur in so celo obstajali časniki, medtem ko je večina drugih zločinov bila storjena v času, ko se je to prenašalo samo z legendami ali pa je bila literatura zelo pomanjkljiva, saj sta o tem pisala smao 2 ali trije ljudje, pa še oni niso opozarjali na krivice, ampak so samo obskurno omenili kakšno "preganjanje" nevernikov, kateri so si to tako ali tako prislužili. In tudi današnja klima dopušča samo, da je bel človek zloben, drugi dosti manj.
Khoisan, San in razna "pigmejska plemena" so bila potisnjena daleč na jug ali v pragozdove. Koliko jih je umrlo, lahko samo ugibamo, saj ni pisnih virov. Sigurno ni šlo ves čisto, ampak je koga tudi "uzela magla". Med ruandskim pokolom je procentualno največje izgube doživela skupnost Twa. Rwandan genocide @ Wikipedia
Približno 10.000 od 30.000 jih je bilo masakriranih. Ljudstvo Twa v Ruandi so praprebivalci, tam so živeli pred Bantu etnijo. So ti. "pigmejci" kot smo včasih rpavili. Twa @ Wikipedia
Skratka, skoraj ni ljudstva, ki ni nad drugim plemenom zagrešilo genocid ali vsaj zločin enkrat v svoji zgodovini. Tisti številčnejši ali tehnološko bolj razviti, so bili pri tem bolj uspešni. In tudi to je prekletstvo Belega človeka, Ki j med drugim dosegel ukinitev suženjstva, enakopravnost žensk, manjšin in verskih manjšin, osnovne človekove pravice, da ne omenimo medicinskega in tehnološkega napredka, kateri je omogočil, da povprečna starost pri smrti ni več 30 let.
Kromanjonci nad neandertalci, Bantu nad pigmejci, Arabci nad črnci, Berberi, Indijci.. Kitajci nad Tibetanci in Mongoli, ti so potem uslugo vrnili, Rimljani nad Germani in nato obratno, Azijska nomadska ljudstva nad Evropejci, Evropejci nato nad Azijci in Afričani, magrebške države nad sredozemskimi evropskimi državami, Francozi nato nad njimi, Angleži nad Irci, Skandinavci nad Laponci, Eskimi baje nad Vikingi na Grenlandiji, Maori nad Moriori....
Da ne naštevam, niso Evropejci najbolj hudobni na svetu in tudi niso zagrešili največ grozodejstev. Imeli so smolo, da so to delali v času, ko je bilo pisanje dosegljivo vsakomur in so celo obstajali časniki, medtem ko je večina drugih zločinov bila storjena v času, ko se je to prenašalo samo z legendami ali pa je bila literatura zelo pomanjkljiva, saj sta o tem pisala smao 2 ali trije ljudje, pa še oni niso opozarjali na krivice, ampak so samo obskurno omenili kakšno "preganjanje" nevernikov, kateri so si to tako ali tako prislužili. In tudi današnja klima dopušča samo, da je bel človek zloben, drugi dosti manj.
Malidelničar ::
arnecan1: V Franciji so številni obravnavali to smrt tega Nahela v smislu, zakaj ste pa Francozi prišli v Alžirijo in vse kolonije izropali. Spregledujejo pa, da so Francozi ogromno investirali v kolonije (železnice, namakanje, zgradbe, ceste itd.) in da je Alžirija kot uradno del celinske Francije imela isto pozicijo kot ostala Francija, a so kljub temu ob alžirski vojni za neodvisnost morali iz Alžirije zbežati vsi domačini belci, t.i. pieds noirs (med znanimi Francozi, ki so bili pieds-noirs so recimo Louis Althusser, Albert Camus, Yves Saint-Laurent).
Don't invest like a Joe. Invest like a Simon.
arnecan1 ::
Malidelničar je izjavil:
arnecan1: V Franciji so številni obravnavali to smrt tega Nahela v smislu, zakaj ste pa Francozi prišli v Alžirijo in vse kolonije izropali. Spregledujejo pa, da so Francozi ogromno investirali v kolonije (železnice, namakanje, zgradbe, ceste itd.) in da je Alžirija kot uradno del celinske Francije imela isto pozicijo kot ostala Francija, a so kljub temu ob alžirski vojni za neodvisnost morali iz Alžirije zbežati vsi domačini belci, t.i. pieds noirs (med znanimi Francozi, ki so bili pieds-noirs so recimo Louis Althusser, Albert Camus, Yves Saint-Laurent).
Če greš v drugo državo, si se dolžan obnašati v skladu z zakonom in običaji te države. Torej si se že prej strinjal, da boš svoj način življenja prilagodil načinu življenja svoje gostiteljice v čim večji možni meri, minimalno pa tako, da ne boš s svojim obnašanjem povzročal trenja.
Kdor tega ni sposoben, gre pač nazaj v izvorno državo ali kam drugam, kjer bo lahko živel v običaju s svojo kulturi, vero in običaji. Tako bi npr. lahko Nahel odšel živet v Katar ali Jemen, kateri je kulturno bolj blizu njegovi vzgoji, ne pa da je svoj način življenja vsiljeval avtohtoni okolici. To je najkrajša pot do incidentov in nasilja. kar se je v tem primeru tudi zgodilo.
jest10 ::
Tebi se en kurac sanja o mojem prepričanju. Samo fino te zapeče, ko se omeni dejstva, da so ga belci fino srali v preteklosti. Zgleda je bolečina tako huda, da te oropa zmožnosti treznega razmišljanja in znaš samo še jokati o white guilt. Tvoj kolega pa o židovski zaroti
Ti si zgleda mojster ignoriranja dejstev.
No pol pa se dobita s pegausem in odjebita skupaj v afriko se kesat.
No, še en debil, ki super paše v moj sestavek, se je pofočkal
nejclp ::
arnecan1 ::
nejclp ::
arnecan1 ::
nejclp ::
arnecan1 ::
Ha, kakšne plastične operacije? Za Holoba ali Nahela, supergenijalec?
Se opravičujem, post sem poslal v napačno temo, nisem računal, da maš take reflekse in da ves čas zagoniš tukaj.
Opravičilo sprejeto.
Za odvezo pojdi v Marseille gasiti požgane avte. Upam, da preživiš.
nejclp ::
Ti si zgleda mojster ignoriranja dejstev.
No pol pa se dobita s pegausem in odjebita skupaj v afriko se kesat.
Zakaj ne odjebeš v Rusijo, tam je trenutno raj za nacije?
Saj ne vem ali naj ti odgovorim tukaj ali na forumu "Loža"?
Ja lej, vprašal sem, kako je Nahel vsiljeval svoj način življenja okolici, tako da lahko na to odgovoriš tukaj, če si v dvomih.
arnecan1 ::
Ti si zgleda mojster ignoriranja dejstev.
No pol pa se dobita s pegausem in odjebita skupaj v afriko se kesat.
Zakaj ne odjebeš v Rusijo, tam je trenutno raj za nacije?
Saj ne vem ali naj ti odgovorim tukaj ali na forumu "Loža"?
Ja lej, vprašal sem, kako je Nahel vsiljeval svoj način življenja okolici, tako da lahko na to odgovoriš tukaj, če si v dvomih.
Zakaj ga ne obiščeš in vprašaš sam? Baje ima pri sebi 72 devic. Se bosta fajn imela.
P.S.: Glede tvojega naivnega vprašanja pa samo, sprehodi se brez spremstva domačinov v predmestjih Pariza ali Marseilla, ker tvorijo emigranti večino in slovijo kot problematični in nekateri celo za no-go cone.
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: arnecan1 ()
nejclp ::
Ti si zgleda mojster ignoriranja dejstev.
No pol pa se dobita s pegausem in odjebita skupaj v afriko se kesat.
Zakaj ne odjebeš v Rusijo, tam je trenutno raj za nacije?
Saj ne vem ali naj ti odgovorim tukaj ali na forumu "Loža"?
Ja lej, vprašal sem, kako je Nahel vsiljeval svoj način življenja okolici, tako da lahko na to odgovoriš tukaj, če si v dvomih.
Zakaj ga ne vprašaš sam? Baje ima pri sebi 72 devic?
P.S.: Glede tvojega naivnega vprašanja pa samo, sprehodi se brez spremstva domačinov v predmestjih Pariza ali Marseilla, ker tvorijo emigranti večino in slovijo kot problematični in nekateri celo za no-go cone.
Baje da gre za napačno interpretacijo, je Žižek rekel, da gre za 72 rozin in ne devic. Tisto z devicami naj bi bilo dodano ali kako, zaradi marketinga, tako da so se vsi umrli jihadisti dobro zajebali.
Vprašanje ni prav nič naivno, konkretno je, tako kot je bila konkretna tvoja trditev.
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: nejclp ()
arnecan1 ::
Ti si zgleda mojster ignoriranja dejstev.
No pol pa se dobita s pegausem in odjebita skupaj v afriko se kesat.
Zakaj ne odjebeš v Rusijo, tam je trenutno raj za nacije?
Saj ne vem ali naj ti odgovorim tukaj ali na forumu "Loža"?
Ja lej, vprašal sem, kako je Nahel vsiljeval svoj način življenja okolici, tako da lahko na to odgovoriš tukaj, če si v dvomih.
Zakaj ga ne vprašaš sam? Baje ima pri sebi 72 devic?
P.S.: Glede tvojega naivnega vprašanja pa samo, sprehodi se brez spremstva domačinov v predmestjih Pariza ali Marseilla, ker tvorijo emigranti večino in slovijo kot problematični in nekateri celo za no-go cone.
Baje da gre za napačno interpretacijo, je Žižek rekel, da gre za 72 rozin in ne devic. Tisto z devicami naj bi bilo dodano ali kako, zaradi marketinga, tako da so se vsi umrli jihadisti dobro zajebali.
Vprašanje ni prav nič naivno, konkretno je, tako kot je bila konkretna tvoja trditev.
Žižek? Ki govori o transspolnih čebelah?
Njeeee, zadnje čase je izgubil kompas.
nejclp ::
Ha, celo našel
Kakšnih transpolnih čebelah? Kolikor vem, je on proti ideji, da bi bila za afirmacijo spola potrebna zgolj samoidentifikacija, fluidnost spola se mu zdi pa sploh komična, en daljši tekst je objavil na to temo.
Žižek? Ki govori o transspolnih čebelah?
Njeeee, zadnje čase je izgubil kompas.
Kakšnih transpolnih čebelah? Kolikor vem, je on proti ideji, da bi bila za afirmacijo spola potrebna zgolj samoidentifikacija, fluidnost spola se mu zdi pa sploh komična, en daljši tekst je objavil na to temo.
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: nejclp ()
arnecan1 ::
Ha, celo našel
Saj pravim, Žižek je to nekritično pobral od nekega islamističnega prijatelja. Tako kakor o transpolnih čebelah in o tem, da bo arabska pomlad razsvetlila mračni islam. Nič od tega ni res in se tudi ni uresničilo.
Sicer pa, kaj pomenijo tvoje in Žižkove "rozine" za muslimane Houri @ Wikipedia
- "the people of the right, how ˹blessed˺ will they be"[28] 56:22[29] and they will have "houris maidens with intensely black eyes set against the whiteness of their irises"
- "untouched beforehand by man or jinn"
- "with large and beautiful eyes"
- "splendid companions"
- "companions of modest gaze well matched"
- "bright-eyed damsels in sheltered in pavilions"
Nekako se mi ne zdi, da opisujejo rozine. Če pa, potem pa v zelo fetiš way.
they are generally said to be composed of saffron from the feet to the knees, musk from the knees to the breast, amber from the breast to the neck, and camphor from the neck to the head.[37] Working often with multiples of seven, the traditionalists have described them as wearing seventy to 70,000 gowns, through which even the marrow of their bones can be seen because of the fineness of their flesh, reclining on seventy couches of red hyacinth encrusted with rubies and jewels, and the like. The ḥūr do not sleep, do not get pregnant, do not menstruate, spit, or blow their noses, and are never sick
WTF? Če nekdo tako opisuje rozine, ima velike psihološke probleme. Samo to bom rekel.
nejclp ::
Valjda imami ne bojo rozine propagirali, kakšna motivacija bi pa to bila, za samomorilske jihadiste? A jim nič ne privoščiš, da se tako kraljevsko zajebejo?
Ampak, jaz odgovorim na vse, kar ti vprašaš, ti pa nikoli na moja vprašanja.
Kakšne trans čebele?
In, kako je Nahel vsiljeval svoj način življenja okolici?
Ampak, jaz odgovorim na vse, kar ti vprašaš, ti pa nikoli na moja vprašanja.
Kakšne trans čebele?
In, kako je Nahel vsiljeval svoj način življenja okolici?
nejclp ::
Hej, iz tvojega vira:
It has traditionally been believed that the houris are beautiful women who are promised as a reward to believing men,[80] with numerous hadith and Quranic exegetes describing them as such.[81] In recent years, however, some have argued that the term ??r refers both to pure men and pure women (it being the plural term for both the masculine and feminine forms which refer to whiteness) and the belief that the term houris only refers to females who are in paradise is a misconception.
It has traditionally been believed that the houris are beautiful women who are promised as a reward to believing men,[80] with numerous hadith and Quranic exegetes describing them as such.[81] In recent years, however, some have argued that the term ??r refers both to pure men and pure women (it being the plural term for both the masculine and feminine forms which refer to whiteness) and the belief that the term houris only refers to females who are in paradise is a misconception.
arnecan1 ::
Valjda imami ne bojo rozine propagirali, kakšna motivacija bi pa to bila, za samomorilske jihadiste? A jim nič ne privoščiš, da se tako kraljevsko zajebejo?
Ampak, jaz odgovorim na vse, kar ti vprašaš, ti pa nikoli na moja vprašanja.
Kakšne trans čebele?
In, kako je Nahel vsiljeval svoj način življenja okolici?
1. Confessions of a Radioactive Mind Slavoj Žižek https://compactmag.com/article/confessi...
If we read this description from our human standpoint, does it not render a weird matriarchal caste society? All the work is done by bees appropriately named workers: They are feminine, with their reproductive organs remaining undeveloped, so they aren’t sexualized, but literally trans-sexual. The sexual intercourse (impregnation) between a queen bee and the drones happens only once in their lifetime: After intercourse, drones die, while the queen gathers enough sperm to last for her entire life. So if the queen is a she and a drone a he, what are the workers? To use today’s nonbinary parlance, are the workers not precisely they? Bees thus form the only known society in which the large majority are “they,” while the worst fate awaits the masculine drones.
Do we not find here, in nature itself, the truth of the model society many among us today strive for?
2. Nahel praktično ni hodil v šolo. Preprodajal je mamila. Večkrat se je upiral aretaciji, nazadnje en teden pred smrtjo in zaradi tega si je tudi zaslužil poziv na sodišče. Česar ni dočakal. Njegova mati je pozivala k nasilju. Protestniki zažigajo avte, pretepajo domačine, kradejo trgovsko blago, odnašajo bankomate, vdirajo v banke.... in da ne pozabimo še na islamski vidik, ni tolerance do drugih, ni demokracije, prva je vera, ni integracije, se samo izolirajo....
Zakaj, le zakaj, ne delajo tako velikih problemov v Franciji živeči Vietnamci. V Franciji jih je namreč kar ca. 400.000. Pa jih skoraj ni zaznati v medijih zaradi kriminala. Zato, ker se Vietnamci držijo zakonov Francije, spoštujejo domačine in njihove običaje in se integrirajo. Vedo, da nimajo samo pravic, ampak tudi obveznosti. Medtem ko bi Arabci uživali samo prednosti, dolžnosti pa ne. Imeli bi socialne podpore in bele ženske. Ni pa šolanja, ni pravega odnosa do dela, ni pravega odnosa do države, do ustanov, do demokracije, do ločitve cerkvenih ustanov do države. Sem ti odgovoril?
Sicer pa malo prečitaj kaj drugega kakor Mladino, npr. Douglas Murraya : https://uptobox.com/1m0vzht0vuok
P.S.: Glede rozin pa ne, mišljene so bile ženske in ne sadje. Tako je zapisano v Koranu in tako so imami interpetirali že od samega začetka. In če je zapisano v Koranu so to Božje besede in o tem ni dvoma. Rozine so bile prvič omenjene šele nekaj let nazaj in nikdar prej. V članku pod "Elvisa Presleya videli živega."
nejclp ::
1. Confessions of a Radioactive Mind Slavoj Žižek https://compactmag.com/article/confessi...
If we read this description from our human standpoint, does it not render a weird matriarchal caste society? All the work is done by bees appropriately named workers: They are feminine, with their reproductive organs remaining undeveloped, so they aren’t sexualized, but literally trans-sexual. The sexual intercourse (impregnation) between a queen bee and the drones happens only once in their lifetime: After intercourse, drones die, while the queen gathers enough sperm to last for her entire life. So if the queen is a she and a drone a he, what are the workers? To use today’s nonbinary parlance, are the workers not precisely they? Bees thus form the only known society in which the large majority are “they,” while the worst fate awaits the masculine drones.
Do we not find here, in nature itself, the truth of the model society many among us today strive for?
Tole je pa še sveže, očitno sem prezrl.
Ampak kako da se ne strinjaš s tem, kar je napisal?
A si čez noč postal wokist in podpornik "LGBT+ ideologije"?
2. Nahel praktično ni hodil v šolo. Preprodajal je mamila. Večkrat se je upiral aretaciji, nazadnje en teden pred smrtjo in zaradi tega si je tudi zaslužil poziv na sodišče. Česar ni dočakal. Njegova mati je pozivala k nasilju. Protestniki zažigajo avte, pretepajo domačine, kradejo trgovsko blago, odnašajo bankomate, vdirajo v banke.... in da ne pozabimo še na islamski vidik, ni tolerance do drugih, ni demokracije, prva je vera, ni integracije, se samo izolirajo....
Zakaj, le zakaj, ne delajo tako velikih problemov v Franciji živeči Vietnamci. V Franciji jih je namreč kar ca. 400.000. Pa jih skoraj ni zaznati v medijih zaradi kriminala. Zato, ker se Vietnamci držijo zakonov Francije, spoštujejo domačine in njihove običaje in se integrirajo. Vedo, da nimajo samo pravic, ampak tudi obveznosti. Medtem ko bi Arabci uživali samo prednosti, dolžnosti pa ne. Imeli bi socialne podpore in bele ženske. Ni pa šolanja, ni pravega odnosa do dela, ni pravega odnosa do države, do ustanov, do demokracije, do ločitve cerkvenih ustanov do države. Sem ti odgovoril?
Ne, nisi. Res mi ni jasno, kako je Nahel vsiljeval svoj način življenja okolici, s tem, da ni hodil v šolo in s tem da je preprodajal mamila? Kako je to nekaj, kar naj bi pomenilo vsiljevanje načina življenja okolici? A ni mogoče obratno?
P.S.: Glede rozin pa ne, mišljene so bile ženske in ne sadje. Tako je zapisano v Koranu in tako so imami interpetirali že od samega začetka. In če je zapisano v Koranu so to Božje besede in o tem ni dvoma. Rozine so bile prvič omenjene šele nekaj let nazaj in nikdar prej. V članku pod "Elvisa Presleya videli živega."
Kako je zapisano v Koranu niti ni pomembno, pomembneje je, kako to imami interpretirajo. In jasno, interpretirajo tako, da gre za ženske in to, da gre za ženske je v muslimanskem svetu na splošno sprejeto, menda se ne bojo zaradi rozin razstreljevali, mora biti motivacija, anede?
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: nejclp ()
nejclp ::
Tole je pa še sveže, očitno sem prezrl.
Ampak kako da se ne strinjaš s tem, kar je napisal?
A si čez noč postal wokist in podpornik "LGBT+ ideologije"?
Aja, zdaj mi je jasno, retardiranci, ki ne razumejo, kaj je Žižek napisal, so ti povedali, kako moraš razmišljati.
Saj je v adendumu pod člankom, ki si ga linkal in ne prebral, Žižek napisal, glede Wrightovega bluzenja:
When Wright sees irony in the fact that “honeybees serve as perfect illustrations of communism—a political system closely aligned with Žižek’s own ideology,” he is talking pure nonsense. The one who misses the irony is Wright himself: Far from conceding some ground to gender ideology, my comment on bees is part of my critique of this ideology.
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: nejclp ()
arnecan1 ::
Tole je pa še sveže, očitno sem prezrl.
Ampak kako da se ne strinjaš s tem, kar je napisal?
A si čez noč postal wokist in podpornik "LGBT+ ideologije"?
Aja, zdaj mi je jasno, retardiranci, ki ne razumejo, kaj je Žižek napisal, so ti povedali, kako moraš razmišljati.
Saj je v adendumu pod člankom, ki si ga linkal in ne prebral, Žižek napisal, glede Wrightovega bluzenja:
When Wright sees irony in the fact that “honeybees serve as perfect illustrations of communism—a political system closely aligned with Žižek’s own ideology,” he is talking pure nonsense. The one who misses the irony is Wright himself: Far from conceding some ground to gender ideology, my comment on bees is part of my critique of this ideology.
Sem vedel, da boš nekaj našel in obrnil besede.
Pač sprijazni se, Žižek že zadnjih 10-15 let intelektualno popušča.
Leta pač.
nejclp ::
Pa že. Katere besede sem pa obrnil? Tip dejansko napiše, da se mu zdi svet kjer bi prevladala "gender ideologija" grozljiv, na desni ste pa prebutasti, da bi razumeli, da se strinjate z njim?
Kayzon ::
Dej odjebi nejc,pejt srat nekam drugam.
Afriski imigrant zabodel belca na vlaku,cel video spodaj.
Afriski imigrant zabodel belca na vlaku,cel video spodaj.
Kayzon ::
Video je seveda nedosegljiv..video spodaj na linku,prvi post.
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/433...
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/433...
arnecan1 ::
Video je seveda nedosegljiv..video spodaj na linku,prvi post.
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/433...
Wakanda forever.
Malidelničar ::
Na Nizozemskem bodo jeseni 2023 nove volitve.
Vlada ravnokar padla zaradi nestrinjanja posameznih koalicijskih partneric z azilnimi ukrepi:
Vir: Politico: Dutch government in crisis over asylum measures, Mark Rutte's 13-year stint as PM might come to an end as coalition is close to collapse.
https://www.politico.eu/article/dutch-g...
Vlada ravnokar padla zaradi nestrinjanja posameznih koalicijskih partneric z azilnimi ukrepi:
Vir: Politico: Dutch government in crisis over asylum measures, Mark Rutte's 13-year stint as PM might come to an end as coalition is close to collapse.
https://www.politico.eu/article/dutch-g...
Don't invest like a Joe. Invest like a Simon.
PovemVfaco ::
V bistvu so hudi rasisti, ker človeka zreducirajo na barvo kože in se grejo neke kolektivne krivde. Še najbolj ironično pa je, da so sami Slovani, ki smo zgodovinsko bili precej opresirani in zasužnjevani.
Solidarnost slovanskih ex-sužnjev z afriškimi ex-sužnji. Kot obsedenc z raso tega ne razumeš.
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: PovemVfaco ()
Kayzon ::
Glavni krivec je skoraj da fasisticna alt desna policija in rasizem so mladih ubogih imigrantov,ki si zelijo le boljsega zivljenja ter solanja.
Ter seveda kot pravi gospa profesionalka,Kriva sistemska diskriminacija, ne neuspešna integracija. Honk! Honk!
https://www.rtvslo.si/svet/evropa/socio...
Ter seveda kot pravi gospa profesionalka,Kriva sistemska diskriminacija, ne neuspešna integracija. Honk! Honk!
https://www.rtvslo.si/svet/evropa/socio...
arnecan1 ::
Glavni krivec je skoraj da fasisticna alt desna policija in rasizem so mladih ubogih imigrantov,ki si zelijo le boljsega zivljenja ter solanja.
Ter seveda kot pravi gospa profesionalka,Kriva sistemska diskriminacija, ne neuspešna integracija. Honk! Honk!
https://www.rtvslo.si/svet/evropa/socio...
Gospodična je akolit Mirovnega inštitua. Toliko o nepristranskosti. https://www.mirovni-institut.si/sodelav...
PovemVfaco je izjavil:
V bistvu so hudi rasisti, ker človeka zreducirajo na barvo kože in se grejo neke kolektivne krivde. Še najbolj ironično pa je, da so sami Slovani, ki smo zgodovinsko bili precej opresirani in zasužnjevani.
Solidarnost slovanskih ex-sužnjev z afriškimi ex-sužnji. Kot obsedenc z raso tega ne razumeš.
Večina ljudi je nekoč bila odvisna od nekoga. Turki so zasužnjevali Slovane, Angleže njihovi lastni fevdalci, nas Avstrijci, črnce v Afriki Arabci in njihovi lastni poglavarji, nato so jih prodajali za delovno silo na plantaže, itd....... nekoč to moraš preboleti, drugače ne boš napredoval.
Gledam ta nov film, kako spreminjamo zgodovino. The Woman King The Woman King @ Wikipedia
lynxslo5 ::
Glavni krivec je skoraj da fasisticna alt desna policija in rasizem so mladih ubogih imigrantov,ki si zelijo le boljsega zivljenja ter solanja.
Ter seveda kot pravi gospa profesionalka,Kriva sistemska diskriminacija, ne neuspešna integracija. Honk! Honk!
https://www.rtvslo.si/svet/evropa/socio...
Kadar ima članek na MMC podpis B.V., to je Boris Vasev, potem ga moraš preskočit. Ta Bolgarski levičarski ekstremist vidi rasizem in nacizem pod vsakim kamnom. Na twitterju pa on piše, da so tudi slovenske zastave, ki so obešene na slovenskih šolah, znak nacizma. Za Palestince pa Vasev pravi, da imajo pravico do svoje države, Slovencem pa pravico do svoje države odreka.
nejclp ::
Hudiča, a ni uporaba orodij zahodne demokracije znak uspešne integracije? Saj ne protestirajo zato, ker so burke prepovedane.
PovemVfaco ::
Večina ljudi je nekoč bila odvisna od nekoga. Turki so zasužnjevali Slovane, Angleže njihovi lastni fevdalci, nas Avstrijci, črnce v Afriki Arabci in njihovi lastni poglavarji, nato so jih prodajali za delovno silo na plantaže, itd....... nekoč to moraš preboleti, drugače ne boš napredoval.
Gledam ta nov film, kako spreminjamo zgodovino. The Woman King The Woman King @ Wikipedia
Če ne boš prebolel, ne boš napredoval. Ker si konzervativc, itak nočeš napredovat, tako da ma smisel, da jokaš tud nad filmi.
Vredno ogleda ...
Tema | Ogledi | Zadnje sporočilo | |
---|---|---|---|
Tema | Ogledi | Zadnje sporočilo | |
» | RTV prispevek (strani: 1 2 3 4 … 75 76 77 78 )Oddelek: Loža | 399296 (600) | Gagatronix |
» | Kanadsko prebivalstvo se je prvič povečalo za več kot 1 milijon (Letna rast 2,7%) (strani: 1 2 3 4 )Oddelek: Loža | 22693 (2301) | Mr.B |
⊘ | Kako dvigniti populacijo starjoče Evrope? (strani: 1 2 3 4 … 22 23 24 25 )Oddelek: Problemi človeštva | 101708 (75390) | vostok_1 |