Forum » Problemi človeštva » Vmesne volitve v ZDA 2018
Vmesne volitve v ZDA 2018
Temo vidijo: vsi
Pac-Man ::
Best people.
https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/trum...
Whitaker is a former U.S. attorney in Iowa, but he was also involved in a Miami-based invention marketing company the Federal Trade Commission shut down last year, calling it a scam.
...
World Patent Marketing collected millions of dollars by promising starry eyed inventors it would turn their inventions into bestsellers.
...
Thousands of would-be inventors were ripped off in the scheme, the feds alleged. They lost as much as $400,000 apiece.
https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/worl...
https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/trum...
Whitaker is a former U.S. attorney in Iowa, but he was also involved in a Miami-based invention marketing company the Federal Trade Commission shut down last year, calling it a scam.
...
World Patent Marketing collected millions of dollars by promising starry eyed inventors it would turn their inventions into bestsellers.
...
Thousands of would-be inventors were ripped off in the scheme, the feds alleged. They lost as much as $400,000 apiece.
https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/worl...
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or
the convinced Communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and
fiction and the distinction between true and false no longer exist.
the convinced Communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and
fiction and the distinction between true and false no longer exist.
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenilo: Pac-Man ()
Pac-Man ::
Samo brez panike.
https://twitter.com/AshaRangappa_/statu...
STEP DOWN FROM THE LEDGE (FOR NOW) THREAD. (Warning: This might be a SPOOL). OK, here are my thoughts on Whitaker taking over the Mueller investigation and why I think we need to see how things unfold before losing it. To be clear, I do NOT think this is an ideal situation. BUT:
First, Whitaker has spoken and written publicly on the Mueller investigation. This clearly creates an appearance of a conflict of interest. He must consult with the ethics people as his former boss did and, if it is warranted, recuse. Period. But assuming he does not: First, as a commentator/pundit, you're expected to have an opinion on a given issue. But as discussed in the context of Strzok, et al., keep in mind that there is a very strong culture in DOJ to not let these views infect decisions. As a former USA, Whitaker knows this culture. Further, he has to document these decisions. The standard in the Special Counsel regulations for denying a request or recommendation of the Special Counsel is that it is "so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued." Whitaker would have to document and justify his decisions under this standard, knowing (especially with Dems in control of the House) that he would have to testify to them under oath. Flimsy or corrupt justifications would open him up to obstruction of justice.
Even if he wanted to "starve the investigation," the SC regs state that the budget for the coming year must be approved within 90 days of the fiscal year. The fiscal year already started on October 1, and so the budget is in place until Sept '19. The next approval is in June '19.
Another objection he made publicly is that going into Trump's finances would be crossing a red line. Remember that Mueller farmed out the Cohen case to SDNY. That is likely the thread that leads to the Trump Org, and it is not under Mueller. So that should not be an issue.
Important to keep in mind that his comments were made when he, like the rest of us, only knew what was public -- which, in summer '17, wasn't much. Since then, we've had indictments and guilty pleas on Manafort, Gates, Flynn, Papadopolous, Cohen, and a bunch of Russians. The amount of evidence that has been accumulated in an investigation of this scale cannot be overstated. Which brings it back to how hard it will be for him to justify blocking further steps under the standard outlined in #4, above. Not happening.
Also, at a personal level, until now his loyalty as Chief of Staff has been to Sessions -- someone he saw get berated, insulted, pressured, and humiliated by POTUS. He may have seen more cray behind the scenes. I wouldn't count on his loyalty suddenly switching to POTUS. Which brings me to: What would be the payoff? He's not going to be AG, this is temporary. If he has political ambitions he is much better off with Sessions as an ally and being respected in DOJ than hitching his wagon to Trump's (falling) star.
In short, the rules, culture, and incentives all point to just keeping what's happening on track, not going off a cliff, which would be professional suicide. I may be proven wrong, I hope I'm not.
https://twitter.com/AshaRangappa_/statu...
STEP DOWN FROM THE LEDGE (FOR NOW) THREAD. (Warning: This might be a SPOOL). OK, here are my thoughts on Whitaker taking over the Mueller investigation and why I think we need to see how things unfold before losing it. To be clear, I do NOT think this is an ideal situation. BUT:
First, Whitaker has spoken and written publicly on the Mueller investigation. This clearly creates an appearance of a conflict of interest. He must consult with the ethics people as his former boss did and, if it is warranted, recuse. Period. But assuming he does not: First, as a commentator/pundit, you're expected to have an opinion on a given issue. But as discussed in the context of Strzok, et al., keep in mind that there is a very strong culture in DOJ to not let these views infect decisions. As a former USA, Whitaker knows this culture. Further, he has to document these decisions. The standard in the Special Counsel regulations for denying a request or recommendation of the Special Counsel is that it is "so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued." Whitaker would have to document and justify his decisions under this standard, knowing (especially with Dems in control of the House) that he would have to testify to them under oath. Flimsy or corrupt justifications would open him up to obstruction of justice.
Even if he wanted to "starve the investigation," the SC regs state that the budget for the coming year must be approved within 90 days of the fiscal year. The fiscal year already started on October 1, and so the budget is in place until Sept '19. The next approval is in June '19.
Another objection he made publicly is that going into Trump's finances would be crossing a red line. Remember that Mueller farmed out the Cohen case to SDNY. That is likely the thread that leads to the Trump Org, and it is not under Mueller. So that should not be an issue.
Important to keep in mind that his comments were made when he, like the rest of us, only knew what was public -- which, in summer '17, wasn't much. Since then, we've had indictments and guilty pleas on Manafort, Gates, Flynn, Papadopolous, Cohen, and a bunch of Russians. The amount of evidence that has been accumulated in an investigation of this scale cannot be overstated. Which brings it back to how hard it will be for him to justify blocking further steps under the standard outlined in #4, above. Not happening.
Also, at a personal level, until now his loyalty as Chief of Staff has been to Sessions -- someone he saw get berated, insulted, pressured, and humiliated by POTUS. He may have seen more cray behind the scenes. I wouldn't count on his loyalty suddenly switching to POTUS. Which brings me to: What would be the payoff? He's not going to be AG, this is temporary. If he has political ambitions he is much better off with Sessions as an ally and being respected in DOJ than hitching his wagon to Trump's (falling) star.
In short, the rules, culture, and incentives all point to just keeping what's happening on track, not going off a cliff, which would be professional suicide. I may be proven wrong, I hope I'm not.
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or
the convinced Communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and
fiction and the distinction between true and false no longer exist.
the convinced Communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and
fiction and the distinction between true and false no longer exist.
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenilo: Pac-Man ()
ZaphodBB ::
Trumpovi rasisti so že začeli z izgredi potem, ko so izgubili spodnji dom kongresa...
"Naši dedje so se borili za to, da lahko odločamo
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
Smrekar1 ::
Morali bi pa z 11, da bi bili izenačeni kljub goljufivim zemljevidom volilnih okrajev.
Nope. Demokrati so dobili 51,2% glasov in bodo imeli vsaj 51,2% sedežev v spodnjem domu parlamenta.
223/435 = ~0,512 oz. 51,2%.
Zemljevidi volilnih okrajev tokrat niso imeli skoraj nobenega učinka na končni rezultat, razen morda kolikor so zbili volilno udeležbo nekaterih skupin volivcev - kar je nemerljivo.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/201...
To seveda ne pomeni, da zadeva ni problematična.
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: Smrekar1 ()
ZaphodBB ::
Gerrymandering je problem samo kadar ga počnejo Republikanci.
"Naši dedje so se borili za to, da lahko odločamo
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
Poldi112 ::
Seveda ni, veva pa oba, da so te prakse večinoma plod republikancev.
Sicer so pa na Floridi z referendumom vrnili bivšim zapornikom volilno pravico. Tako da ena burleska manj v temu cvetu demokracije. :)
Sicer so pa na Floridi z referendumom vrnili bivšim zapornikom volilno pravico. Tako da ena burleska manj v temu cvetu demokracije. :)
Where all think alike, no one thinks very much.
Walter Lippmann, leta 1922, o predpogoju za demokracijo.
Walter Lippmann, leta 1922, o predpogoju za demokracijo.
Smrekar1 ::
Zheegec ::
Morali bi pa z 11, da bi bili izenačeni kljub goljufivim zemljevidom volilnih okrajev.
Nope. Demokrati so dobili 51,2% glasov in bodo imeli vsaj 51,2% sedežev v spodnjem domu parlamenta.
223/435 = ~0,512 oz. 51,2%.
Zemljevidi volilnih okrajev tokrat niso imeli skoraj nobenega učinka na končni rezultat, razen morda kolikor so zbili volilno udeležbo nekaterih skupin volivcev - kar je nemerljivo.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/201...
To seveda ne pomeni, da zadeva ni problematična.
Te številke se bodo še spremenile. Jaz bi rekel, da bodo imeli Demokrati okoli 55% glasov na koncu štetja. Leta 2016 je ob takem času štetja imela Hillary Clinton samo ~500k glasov več, na koncu štetja pa ~3 miljone.
Ampak moramo pa priznati, da je noro smešno to, da so "family values" Republikanci raje glasovali za mrtvega lastnika bordelov, kot pa za demokrata.
"božja zapoved pravi; <Spoštuj očeta in mater>,
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: Zheegec ()
Zheegec ::
Kje je pa migrantska karavana? Gledam kaj pravita Trump in Fox News, pa ni več debate o migrantski karavani. Je izginila?
"božja zapoved pravi; <Spoštuj očeta in mater>,
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014
Zheegec ::
Menda je Mueller začel pisati končno poročilo. Izgleda, da ne bo nič več ovadb in česa drugega. Ta neumnost se bo MOGOČE končno zaključila?? Ali ne?
"božja zapoved pravi; <Spoštuj očeta in mater>,
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014
ZaphodBB ::
Kje je pa migrantska karavana? Gledam kaj pravita Trump in Fox News, pa ni več debate o migrantski karavani. Je izginila?
Po mojem je ravno tam kot Black Lives Matter...
"Naši dedje so se borili za to, da lahko odločamo
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
Zheegec ::
Ne vem, ne vem. Ta migrantska karavana je taka kriza in grožnja za Ameriko, pa nas Fox News in Trump ne obveščata več o tej grožnji. Ali jih ne briga za Ameriko? Zakaj so tako nepatriotski?
"božja zapoved pravi; <Spoštuj očeta in mater>,
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014
xxxul ::
tud cnn al pa ce ti je tako ljubse 24kur nimata na prvi strani vec nobene novice o tem kako ubogi honduraši pešačjo po Mehiki.... kako čudno.
Zheegec ::
tud cnn al pa ce ti je tako ljubse 24kur nimata na prvi strani vec nobene novice o tem kako ubogi honduraši pešačjo po Mehiki.... kako čudno.
Jap, zato ker dovolijo Fox News in Trumpu, da narekujejo agendo in novice. Ko Fox neha govoriti o tem, pa so tudi oni.
Še enkrat, kje je karavana?
"božja zapoved pravi; <Spoštuj očeta in mater>,
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014
xxxul ::
tud cnn al pa ce ti je tako ljubse 24kur nimata na prvi strani vec nobene novice o tem kako ubogi honduraši pešačjo po Mehiki.... kako čudno.
Jap, zato ker dovolijo Fox News in Trumpu, da narekujejo agendo in novice. Ko Fox neha govoriti o tem, pa so tudi oni.
Še enkrat, kje je karavana?
Musk jih z raketo fura na Mars mrbit - kaj misliš kje je?! šetajo in šetajo po Mehiki, in ugotavljajo da ni blo lahko bit Legionar v starem Rimu...
DarwiN ::
tud cnn al pa ce ti je tako ljubse 24kur nimata na prvi strani vec nobene novice o tem kako ubogi honduraši pešačjo po Mehiki.... kako čudno.
Karavana kot takšna je bila zgolj postranska novica. Glavna novica je bila propaganda, fake news in fear-mongering s strani fašističnega US režima in fake news propagandnih medijev tipa Fox News. Zdaj ko je vse to nenadoma splahnelo, MSM nima o čem več poročat.
Medtem pa sta Dumpo in Fox delala galamo o največji invaziji, ki naj bi uničila Ameriko... Zdaj pa naenkrat črički z desne strani.
You don't see faith healers working in hospitals
for the same reason you don't see psychics winning the lottery!
for the same reason you don't see psychics winning the lottery!
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: DarwiN ()
VaeVictis ::
Ruth Bader Ginsburg je padla in si zlomila tri rebra, ter je v bolnici
Če se upokoji, bo predsednik Trump v svojem prvem mandatu postavil že tretjega ustavnega sodnika!
Če se upokoji, bo predsednik Trump v svojem prvem mandatu postavil že tretjega ustavnega sodnika!
VaeVictis ::
BLUE WAVE
Midterm election most House seats lost by President's party in power;
2010 Obama: -63
1994 Clinton: -52
1958: Eisenhower: -48
1974 Ford (Nixon): -48
1966 Johnson: -47
1946 Truman: -45
2006 Bush: -30
1950 Truman: -29
1982 Reagan: -26
2018 Trump: -26
Midterm election most House seats lost by President's party in power;
2010 Obama: -63
1994 Clinton: -52
1958: Eisenhower: -48
1974 Ford (Nixon): -48
1966 Johnson: -47
1946 Truman: -45
2006 Bush: -30
1950 Truman: -29
1982 Reagan: -26
2018 Trump: -26
DarwiN ::
VaeVictis, a v alternativnem vesolju so že znani končni rezultati? V naši realnosti namreč še vedno štejejo glasove v določenih bitkah.
Sicer pa ja. Modri val je nekak zatajil. The struggle is real. Desna stran je prežeta s korupcijo in moralnim bankrotom. Te infestacije ne bo zlahka odstraniti.
Sicer pa ja. Modri val je nekak zatajil. The struggle is real. Desna stran je prežeta s korupcijo in moralnim bankrotom. Te infestacije ne bo zlahka odstraniti.
You don't see faith healers working in hospitals
for the same reason you don't see psychics winning the lottery!
for the same reason you don't see psychics winning the lottery!
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: DarwiN ()
jype ::
Glede na to, da že zdaj nadzorujejo vse tri veje oblasti, bo antifa očitno kmalu uporabljala 2. amandma.
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenilo: jype ()
dice7 ::
SimplyMiha je izjavil:
Se splača vlagat v ta produktCe pa komu ne verjet je pa to kapitalistu
Pac-Man ::
Svoje je povedal že Darwin.
Po projekciji 538 bodo demokrati pobrali 37 sedežev. Takrat zadeva zgleda malo bolj valovito.
https://twitter.com/smotus/status/10603...
FiveThirtyEight now estimates Dems have picked up 37 House seats. Of the 18 midterm elections of the past 70 years, this is the 6th largest House seat loss for the president’s party.
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or
the convinced Communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and
fiction and the distinction between true and false no longer exist.
the convinced Communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and
fiction and the distinction between true and false no longer exist.
Zheegec ::
Še enkrat, kje je karavana?
Na poti proti meji ZDA.
Si ziher? Naenkrat ni več novinarjev tam, Trump je ne omenja več. Kaj se je nenadoma zgodilo? Ni več grožnja za Ameriko? Čudno...
"božja zapoved pravi; <Spoštuj očeta in mater>,
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014
jb_j ::
Kje je pa migrantska karavana? Gledam kaj pravita Trump in Fox News, pa ni več debate o migrantski karavani. Je izginila?
Sj nekak je za razumet, prvo ostra retorika,
potem pa ukrepi. (sedaj jih bodo ustavljal že v državah prehoda, kar je nekak logičn)
In se mi sprašujemo o migrantski karavani, tukaj, v Sloveniji?
Kolk smo mi sprejel vojnih beguncev, Nemci, (Francozi, Italjani ne vem zihr) so jih levji delež. (iz bližnjega vzhoda in afrike)
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: jb_j ()
Zheegec ::
potem pa ukrepi. (sedaj jih bodo ustavljal že v državah prehoda, kar je nekak logičn)
To se počne že desetletja. Prejšnja "karavana" ni nikoli prispela v US, večina jih je ostala v Mehiki. S to bo najbrž isto. Ampak od 6. novembra do danes se ni popolnoma nič spremenilo. Pa smo vseeno še 6. novembra na veliko poslušali, kako je to "grožnja" in "nevarnost za državo". Potem pa nenadoma nič več. Še Pentagon je umaknil ime operacije "Operation Faithful Patriot" in preimenoval operacijo v nič. Le zakaj?
"božja zapoved pravi; <Spoštuj očeta in mater>,
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014
jb_j ::
potem pa ukrepi. (sedaj jih bodo ustavljal že v državah prehoda, kar je nekak logičn)
To se počne že desetletja. Prejšnja "karavana" ni nikoli prispela v US, večina jih je ostala v Mehiki. S to bo najbrž isto. Ampak od 6. novembra do danes se ni popolnoma nič spremenilo. Pa smo vseeno še 6. novembra na veliko poslušali, kako je to "grožnja" in "nevarnost za državo". Potem pa nenadoma nič več. Še Pentagon je umaknil ime operacije "Operation Faithful Patriot" in preimenoval operacijo v nič. Le zakaj?
Najbrž se je karavana začela razbijat, ko so bile novice, da gre na mejo vojska,
in bodo vsak kamen migrantov nad policiste upošteval kot strelno orožje in primerno s tem tudi ukrepal.
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: jb_j ()
Zheegec ::
In zakaj so se prejšnje karavane isto "razbile", čeprav ni bilo enakih groženj in vojske na meji?
In zakaj je morala vojska na mejo iti tja ravno ~60 dni pred predvidenim prihodom karavane v US (če bi prišla), namesto recimo ~40 dni pred prehodom karavane v US (kar bi seveda bilo pred volitvami)? Zakaj je bila karavana "grožnja" še 6. novembra, 8. novembra pa ni več, čeprav se ni popolnoma nič spremenilo v teh dveh dneh kar se tiče karavane?
Pač priznajte - Trump je uporabil karavano za strašenje ubogih desničarjev pred volitvami. In ker se desničarji noro ustrašijo čisto vsake namišljene grožnje je to pomagalo Republikancem, da so izgubili samo ~30 sedežev v kongresu.
Še par mesecev, pa bo ISIS zavzel Texas, ali o čem se je govorilo leta 2014. Pa Ebola seveda.
In zakaj je morala vojska na mejo iti tja ravno ~60 dni pred predvidenim prihodom karavane v US (če bi prišla), namesto recimo ~40 dni pred prehodom karavane v US (kar bi seveda bilo pred volitvami)? Zakaj je bila karavana "grožnja" še 6. novembra, 8. novembra pa ni več, čeprav se ni popolnoma nič spremenilo v teh dveh dneh kar se tiče karavane?
Pač priznajte - Trump je uporabil karavano za strašenje ubogih desničarjev pred volitvami. In ker se desničarji noro ustrašijo čisto vsake namišljene grožnje je to pomagalo Republikancem, da so izgubili samo ~30 sedežev v kongresu.
Še par mesecev, pa bo ISIS zavzel Texas, ali o čem se je govorilo leta 2014. Pa Ebola seveda.
"božja zapoved pravi; <Spoštuj očeta in mater>,
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014
Poldi112 ::
Where all think alike, no one thinks very much.
Walter Lippmann, leta 1922, o predpogoju za demokracijo.
Walter Lippmann, leta 1922, o predpogoju za demokracijo.
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: Poldi112 ()
Smrekar1 ::
Te številke se bodo še spremenile. Jaz bi rekel, da bodo imeli Demokrati okoli 55% glasov na koncu štetja. Leta 2016 je ob takem času štetja imela Hillary Clinton samo ~500k glasov več, na koncu štetja pa ~3 miljone.
Tudi številke sedežev se znajo na koncu še malo spremeniti, ampak govorimo o odstotni točki sem ali tja. Kakorkoli, groteske v stilu Madžarske ne bo.
Ampak moramo pa priznati, da je noro smešno to, da so "family values" Republikanci raje glasovali za mrtvega lastnika bordelov, kot pa za demokrata.
Oja, definitivno. Res me zanima ali bo imel dva mandata.
Po projekciji 538 bodo demokrati pobrali 37 sedežev. Takrat zadeva zgleda malo bolj valovito.
Pred volitvami so ocenili, da je najverjetnejši rezultat 36-39 sedežev.
Bolj v sredini bi bili samo v primeru, da bi Demokratom uspelo pridobiti 37,5 sedeža.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/20...
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: Smrekar1 ()
jype ::
Najbolj pomembno je, da ga. Pelosi trenutno nima dovolj podpore, da bi postala vodja koalicije v Kongresu.
Zheegec ::
Najbolj pomembno je, da ga. Pelosi trenutno nima dovolj podpore, da bi postala vodja koalicije v Kongresu.
To je very good. Samo bo težka.
"božja zapoved pravi; <Spoštuj očeta in mater>,
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014
ne govori pa o spoštovanju sodstva."
Janez Janša, 29.04.2014
Pac-Man ::
FFS
https://twitter.com/ddale8/status/10609...
Today, Trump said: "I don't know Matt Whitaker."
In a Fox and Friends interview a month ago, Trump said: "I know Matt Whitaker."
video:
https://twitter.com/LisPower1/status/10...
Trump today: "I don't know Matt Whitaker. He worked for Jeff Sessions ... but I didn't know Matt Whitaker"
Trump on Fox & Friends a month ago: "I can tell you Matt Whitaker's a great guy, I know Matt Whitaker"
It's almost like he lies about everything.
https://twitter.com/ddale8/status/10609...
Today, Trump said: "I don't know Matt Whitaker."
In a Fox and Friends interview a month ago, Trump said: "I know Matt Whitaker."
video:
https://twitter.com/LisPower1/status/10...
Trump today: "I don't know Matt Whitaker. He worked for Jeff Sessions ... but I didn't know Matt Whitaker"
Trump on Fox & Friends a month ago: "I can tell you Matt Whitaker's a great guy, I know Matt Whitaker"
It's almost like he lies about everything.
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or
the convinced Communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and
fiction and the distinction between true and false no longer exist.
the convinced Communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and
fiction and the distinction between true and false no longer exist.
jype ::
Na zapadu ništa novo.
No, razen tega, da se ruski troli praktično ne oglašajo več. Loocas?
Tudi količina pro-trump youtube komentarjev je nenavadno močno upadla.
No, razen tega, da se ruski troli praktično ne oglašajo več. Loocas?
Tudi količina pro-trump youtube komentarjev je nenavadno močno upadla.
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenilo: jype ()
SimplyMiha ::
Se ne rabijo oglašat, nasilni levičarji ste dost učinkoviti pri uničevanju lastne pozicije.
jype ::
SimplyMiha je izjavil:
Se ne rabijo oglašat, nasilni levičarji ste dost učinkoviti pri uničevanju lastne pozicije.V ponedeljek pa še nismo bili?
jb_j ::
ok. pozabmo za minuto, neumne izjave. (vključno z 999999999999999 mojimi)
republikanci so dali predlog za prepoved,
pridobitve državljanstva iz drugih držav. (praktično vsem)
(v sloveniji so se imenovali izbrisani, in je država plačevala denarne kazni zaradi tega)
koliko "izbrisanih" imajo trenutno zda na svojem ozemlju,
je veliko hujši problem.
je pa na mestu vprašanje,
ali si horda ljudi, zasluži sploh vprašanje do pridobitva državljanstva?
po mojem mnenju ne,
razen, če so vojne razmere v njihovih državah.
ali če so eksistenčno življensko ogroženi.
najbrž bi moral bolj natančno opredelit,
katere in kakšne skupine ljudi bi lahko zaprosile za državljanstvo,
(organizirana skupina ljudi, ali ljudje, ki so res dejansko močno, življenjsko ogroženi)
republikanci so dali predlog za prepoved,
pridobitve državljanstva iz drugih držav. (praktično vsem)
(v sloveniji so se imenovali izbrisani, in je država plačevala denarne kazni zaradi tega)
koliko "izbrisanih" imajo trenutno zda na svojem ozemlju,
je veliko hujši problem.
je pa na mestu vprašanje,
ali si horda ljudi, zasluži sploh vprašanje do pridobitva državljanstva?
po mojem mnenju ne,
razen, če so vojne razmere v njihovih državah.
ali če so eksistenčno življensko ogroženi.
najbrž bi moral bolj natančno opredelit,
katere in kakšne skupine ljudi bi lahko zaprosile za državljanstvo,
(organizirana skupina ljudi, ali ljudje, ki so res dejansko močno, življenjsko ogroženi)
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: jb_j ()
jb_j ::
dejstva so takšna, če se v J ameriki priseljence morebitno spravi kolektivno v ZDA (pa recimo samo 10k)
dobi evropa upravičen razlog, da naredijo isto afričani,
in tisti med turčijo in arabci.
dejstva so, da evropa praktično vse sprejme,
če še zda pustijo takim skupinam ljudi, da vstopajo v državo.
lahko v evropi res nastane "kriza".
je pa problem,
S amerika in J
EU in afrika in del "baje bližnjega vzhoda" al kako
(so hude finančne razlike med revnimi)
(med bogatimi, nepredstavljive)
dobi evropa upravičen razlog, da naredijo isto afričani,
in tisti med turčijo in arabci.
dejstva so, da evropa praktično vse sprejme,
če še zda pustijo takim skupinam ljudi, da vstopajo v državo.
lahko v evropi res nastane "kriza".
je pa problem,
S amerika in J
EU in afrika in del "baje bližnjega vzhoda" al kako
(so hude finančne razlike med revnimi)
(med bogatimi, nepredstavljive)
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: jb_j ()
ferdov ::
Migracijska politika v USA gre približno takole:
ti prideš ilegalno - te aretirajo, popišejo in potem spustijo ter povedo, kdaj moraš priti na zaslišanje.
Trump je nekje trdil, evo - pa ne pridejo več
cca 80% jih pride.
12 % jih dobi dovoljenje za bivanje, ostali postanejo ilegalci brez vseh pravic in jih lahko kdorkoli deportira. Recimo takele : kanadski oficir
ti prideš ilegalno - te aretirajo, popišejo in potem spustijo ter povedo, kdaj moraš priti na zaslišanje.
Trump je nekje trdil, evo - pa ne pridejo več
cca 80% jih pride.
12 % jih dobi dovoljenje za bivanje, ostali postanejo ilegalci brez vseh pravic in jih lahko kdorkoli deportira. Recimo takele : kanadski oficir
Pac-Man ::
Bwahahaha.
https://twitter.com/marklowen/status/10...
In today’s @lemondefr: When #Trump received the leaders of #Estonia, #Latvia and #Lithuania, he began by blaming them for the war in Yugoslavia. It took them a few moments to realise he’d mixed up the Balkans and the Baltics.
https://twitter.com/marklowen/status/10...
In today’s @lemondefr: When #Trump received the leaders of #Estonia, #Latvia and #Lithuania, he began by blaming them for the war in Yugoslavia. It took them a few moments to realise he’d mixed up the Balkans and the Baltics.
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or
the convinced Communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and
fiction and the distinction between true and false no longer exist.
the convinced Communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and
fiction and the distinction between true and false no longer exist.
Vredno ogleda ...
| Tema | Ogledi | Zadnje sporočilo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tema | Ogledi | Zadnje sporočilo | |
| » | Late night show with Stephen Colbert (strani: 1 2 )Oddelek: Problemi človeštva | 7972 (5455) | Leaker49 |
| » | Trump parodije (strani: 1 2 3 )Oddelek: Sedem umetnosti | 17902 (8917) | zmaugy |