Dr. Drumpflove

Če lahko pakman objavlja trič-trače iz ZDA politike bom tudi jaz nekaj prispeval:

DEMOCRATS' IT MAN IMRAN AWAN ABUSES WOMEN
What is Awan hiding and why are Democrats protecting him?
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/268687/...

In Congress (Al Franken, John Conyers), entertainment (Harvey Weinstein, Ben Affleck) and the establishment media (Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose), women are stepping up with charges of sexual harassment, and in some cases powerful men are stepping down. As this unfolds, one key abuser has managed to avoid both the outcry and the scrutiny he deserves.

Imran Awan, the IT man employed by Debbie Wasserman Schultz and other prominent Democrats, remains at the center of financial and security scandals. As Luke Rosiak of the Daily Caller reported, "multiple women" in relationships with Imran have "called Virginia law enforcement and alleged being abused by him."

Pomembno je, da zdaj vemo, da sodeluješ s fake news.

Trump je fake, vi ste pa faker than all of his ramblings!

Ljubljenje Islama kot da je ekvivalent vsem religijam.
Skrivanje za ideologijo ki jo je oboževal Hitler! National socializem!
Uvažanje migrantov ki uničuje svobodno državo!
Teroriziranje po univerzah z sjw literaturo!

Fun fact: Trump's Lies vs. Obama's


Comedy central.

https://twitter.com/dallasnews/status/9...

.@UofDallas researcher Ruth May is an expert in all things corporate in Russia and has worked to make connections in the trail of money flowing from Russian oligarchs to the GOP. This thread is her latest
https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/comm...

According to May, digging through campaign finance reports available to the public shows troubling connections between Russian donors, Trump and a number of GOP leaders. The trail traces through Vladimir Putin, state-owned banks and state-affiliated companies, oligarchs and subsequently GOP leaders. Len Blavatnik, Oleg Deripaska and Viktor Vekselberg, oligarchs with ties to Russian government, are all connected by their role in RUSAL a massive company of which they own 69%.

Billionaire, and dual U.S.-U.K citizen, Blavatnik contributed to PACs associated with @SenateMajLdr, @marcorubio, @ScottWalker, @LindseyGrahamSC, @JohnKasich, @SenJohnMcCain and @realdonaldtrump. Len Blavatnik, one of the largest donors to GOP political action committees in the 2015-16 election cycle, is just one of the concerning players.

Blavatnik is accompanied by Oleg Deripaska – one of the Kremlin’s favorite oligarchs who gave $10 million a year to Paul Manafort, Trump's former campaign manager, to push pro-Russian policy according to the @AP.

Viktor Vekselberg, one of the 10 richest men in Russia, has connections to at least two Americans who made significant contributions to GOP campaigns. At the center of all the money is the notorious Bank of Cyprus which has a long history of being a conduit for dirty money flowing in and out of Russia.
https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/comm...

Russia’s second largest state-owned bank VTB also quietly transferred $191 million into an offshore company which Yuri Milner then used to fund nearly half of a purchase of @Twitter in 2011. VTB was exposed in @ICIJorg’s #PanamaPapers in 2016 for facilitating the flow of billions of dollars to offshore companies linked to Putin, according to @McClatchyDC.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-...

You can't make this shit up

Beautiful. Jype would be proud of these new Swedes.

Cervantes je 16. dec 2017 ob 13:09 izjavil:

Zdaj bo potrebno importirat še ekvivalentno število hindujcev, da se situacija malo zbalansssira.

T.i. Avstralski pristop.

So, remind me, who's the real nazi again?

jype je 16. dec 2017 ob 15:00 izjavil:

So, remind me, who's the real nazi again?

Pac-Man je 16. dec 2017 ob 00:10 izjavil:

Komentar bivšega NSA-jevca

https://twitter.com/20committee/status/...

Piece goes beyond UNCLAS evidence, makes analytic leaps, but is basically correct. Close read reveals it's only partly about Russia.

jype je 16. dec 2017 ob 15:59 izjavil:

Ko zmanjka argumentov, je očitno treba začet risat stripe.

ko bi ga nekdo predstavil z konkretnimi dokazi in ne z žaljenjem ga nebi bolo treba...

Antifa bi bilo treba zakonsko prepovedati, ker ne delajo drugega kot vandalizem in povzročajo nasilje po celem svetu.

US left wing groups travelled to Germany for the G20 Summit last July to meet with Al qaeda and ISIS leaders and plot the destruction of President Trump, secret FBI investigation reveals

Je dala Hillary Clinton umoriti priznanega zdravnika?

http://novice.svet24.si/clanek/novice/s...

Kako omogocit prepoved kaksnih skupin, ki ti niso vsec? Podtaknes ljudi not ki se delajo da so pripadniki te skupine. Zacnejo delat prepovedane stvari in nevsecnosti. Nato celotno skupino obtozis. V medijih jih predstavis v najslabsi mozni luci. Dobis politicno podporo in prepoves vsakrsno delovanje skupine.

Zabavno, ZaphodBB je anifa, kdo bi si mislil.

ZaphodBB je 16. dec 2017 ob 16:55 izjavil:

Ti zdaj po novem zagovarjaš jypetovo tezo, da antifa did nothing wrong?

Antifa can do no wrong.

ADIJOOO1 je 16. dec 2017 ob 16:58 izjavil:

Haaaa seveda je kriva. Hillary je krvoločen demorkat to ne more nobeden zanikati destibilizacija libije, podpora Isis-u ščitenje moža ob raznih seksualnih škandalih...

Nonsense. Ti ne razumeš kako resnični svet deluje, ker si shizofren, zato potem rad ponavljaš teorije zarote, tako kot vsi tebi podobni pacienti.

https://twitter.com/TeaPainUSA/status/9...

Mueller: "Remember the transition emails I requested?"

White House: "You mean the 630 we turned over to you?"

Mueller: "Good news. I found the other 50,000.

https://www.axios.com/scoop-mueller-obt...

Special Counsel Robert Mueller has obtained “many tens of thousands" of Trump transition emails, including emails of Jared Kushner, transition team sources tell Axios.

...

The sources say Mueller obtained the emails from the General Services Administration, the government agency that hosted the transition email system, which had addresses ending in “ptt.gov," for Presidential Transition Team.

Charging "unlawful conduct," Kory Langhofer, counsel for the transition team, wrote in a letter to congressional committees Saturday that "career staff at the General Services Administration ... have unlawfully produced [transition team] private materials, including privileged communications, to the Special Counsel's Office."

https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/sta...

Why are Trump’s lawyers upset that Mueller obtained transition emails from a government agency? (Hint: They’re just playing politics, but this is a bad sign for them.)

Today @axios reported that Mueller obtained tens of thousands of emails from the General Services Administration, which possessed them.

@axios reported that the emails included very frank discussions as well as emails from Jared Kushner. Trump’s team was unaware that Mueller possessed the emails and were surprised when Mueller’s team asked questions based on the emails. Now Trump’s team has written a letter to Congress, complaining that some of the materials were “susceptible to privilege claims.” So what does this mean?

First of all, it’s not unusual at all for prosecutors to obtain emails from other parties. That’s extremely common in white collar criminal investigations and is not improper. What *is* unusual here is that Mueller obtained emails from GSA even though he could have obtained (many of) the same emails from lawyers for the Trump Transition.

Typically, in a white collar case, prosecutors obtain as many emails and documents as possible from defense attorneys instead of from another source. That’s because the defense team would review the emails, take out the ones that are not relevant, sort the emails, and put them in a format could be useable by Mueller. When a prosecutor obtains emails from a third party, usually irrelevant emails aren’t sorted out. So why would Mueller get the emails from GSA instead?

One reason comes to mind. Mueller was concerned that he wouldn’t receive all of the emails if he obtained them from the Trump team. That’s surprising and suggests that he has reason to distrust Trump’s team. It appears that obtaining the documents from GSA also allowed Mueller to surprise witnesses who were not prepared to talk about emails that they didn’t think he had.

I doubt that’s why Mueller obtained emails from GSA because any good lawyer would have reviewed the emails with their client anyway prior to an interview. Either the defense lawyers were incompetent or they weren’t surprised as they’re letting on.

One important issue I should note is that typically prosecutors cannot obtain emails from a third party without using a search warrant, not a subpoena. If that happened here, it would mean a federal judge found that there was good reason to believe that a crime was committed and the emails contained evidence of a crime

In any event, when a prosecutor obtains emails from a third party, privileged documents are not removed. Typically prosecutors use “taint teams” to remove privileged documents before the prosecution team reviews them. If Mueller obtained a privileged email, the defense would be able to exclude it as evidence at trial. Typically all that happens is that the defense raises the issue with the prosecutor, and if the prosecutor agrees it is privileged, they return the privileged document.

Disputes over privilege are common when prosecutors obtain emails and documents from third parties. That’s very common. What’s uncommon is what the Trump lawyers did here. Instead of sending a letter to Mueller, the attorneys sent a letter to Congress. Why? Probably to try to feed the growing effort to fire Mueller and/or try to discredit him to Congressional Republicans. Note also that the lawyers *don’t* say that the emails are privileged. They merely claim that some of the emails are “susceptible to privilege claims.” That’s weak language that suggests they’re not confident they have a strong claim that some of the emails are privileged.

The biggest conclusion I’d draw from their letter is that they’re concerned about Mueller’s investigation and are doing whatever they can to discredit it. Their claims themselves are weak and are meant to persuade people who know nothing about criminal investigations.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada...

Če je Mueller res storil tako osnovnošolsko napako, potem bo Trump novi balkanski bojevnik.

ZaphodBB je 17. dec 2017 ob 12:51 izjavil:

Svašta. Če ne bi imel dvojnih meril, potem res ne bi imel nobenih meril.

But... Her emails!

ZaphodBB je 17. dec 2017 ob 12:51 izjavil:

To je očitno omiljena metoda neo-totalitarnih globokih državnih aparatov, da se izognejo odgovornosti kadar njihove operacije spodletijo.

Neverjetno pronicljiv opis Trumpovega režima!

ZaphodBB je 17. dec 2017 ob 13:07 izjavil:

zmanjšujejo vpliv državnega aparata na življenja ljudi

No health care, no problems! At least not for long, anyway.

ZaphodBB je 17. dec 2017 ob 13:14 izjavil:

A ti si tudi en od unih oseb z nizkim verbalnim IQ, ki ne razume razlike med javnim in državnim?

Ne, si pa ti eden izmed tistih, ki so mu všeč zdravstveni sistemi, ki nimajo vrst, ker si jih velika večina prebivalstva ne more privoščiti in zato lahko doma umirajo v bolečinah, medtem ko ti uživaš v hitri in kvalitetni storitvi.

Well done! Your literary worse then ten Hitler's.

ZaphodBB je 17. dec 2017 ob 13:21 izjavil:

Jaz uživam v hitri in kvalitetni storitvah, ker si jih lahko privoščim. Kljub temu, da sicer že plačujem precej visoke zneske za zastonj zdravstveni sistem.

In kljub vsemu se še vedno nisi preselil v obljubljeno deželo, kjer ti tega ne bi bilo treba - predvidevam da zato, ker se režim tam ne vtika dovolj v življenja ljudi.

ZaphodBB je 17. dec 2017 ob 13:23 izjavil:

Pa ne da bi ti kaj dosti vedel o tem kaj pomeni beseda dolžnost.

Dolžnost je sprejeti ljudi, ki se pojavijo na mejah brez dokumentov in v skladu z lokalno in mednarodno zakonodajo poskrbeti, da so ustrezno obravnavani. Dolžnost se je boriti zoper fašizem z vsemi sredstvi. Dolžnost je izpolniti svoj del družbene pogodbe.

Ampak ti si samo izkoristil ugodnosti, tvoja dolžnost je pa zdaj izogibanje obveznostim, ker si desničar, tako kot Trump.

ZaphodBB je 17. dec 2017 ob 13:32 izjavil:

Oprosti, meni za tvoj sprevrženi moralni kodeks ni kaj dosti mar.

Vem, ti se ravnaš po Trumpovem.