Primerjava vojaške tehnike

Smrekar1 je 29. apr 2016 ob 08:53 izjavil:

Invictus je 29. apr 2016 ob 08:44 izjavil:

Nekoč... Če... Trenutno je precej v pi***...

Zato ga še ne uporabljajo. Vsekakor je iskanje hroščev v programju nekaj kar se da urediti v pol leta.

Invictus je 29. apr 2016 ob 18:44 izjavil:

BorutK-73 je 29. apr 2016 ob 17:48 izjavil:

Pa je vam jasno da letalonosilka ni nikoli sama, vedno ima spremstvo: vsaj ena podmornica, rušilci, tanker, letala... Sovražna podmornica nikoli ne bi prišla blizu.

Poglej zgoraj post, ko so Francozi potopili VSE...

7982884e je 30. apr 2016 ob 07:54 izjavil:

Invictus je 29. apr 2016 ob 18:44 izjavil:

BorutK-73 je 29. apr 2016 ob 17:48 izjavil:

Pa je vam jasno da letalonosilka ni nikoli sama, vedno ima spremstvo: vsaj ena podmornica, rušilci, tanker, letala... Sovražna podmornica nikoli ne bi prišla blizu.

Poglej zgoraj post, ko so Francozi potopili VSE...

kater post?
rad bi vir, ki ni samo "v blogpostu pred leti je pisalo".

ker tole je taka neumnost kot tisti su-24, ki s svojo elektroniko vakuumskih cevi skuri cel rušilec, ko se zapelje čez.

noraguta je 30. apr 2016 ob 17:17 izjavil:

Je bil gor objavlen link.

the Saphir has quietly slipped in the heart of the screen formed by the American frigates protecting the aircraft carrier while avoiding the cons-sensing ubiquitous air assets. On the morning of the last day, the order of light was finally given, allowing the Sapphire fictitiously sink the Theodore Roosevelt and most of his escort.

7982884e je 30. apr 2016 ob 19:04 izjavil:

noraguta je 30. apr 2016 ob 17:17 izjavil:

Je bil gor objavlen link.

ja, link, v ki se sklicuje na cachano verzijo umaknjenega blogposta, v katerem je vse, kar piše, to:

the Saphir has quietly slipped in the heart of the screen formed by the American frigates protecting the aircraft carrier while avoiding the cons-sensing ubiquitous air assets. On the morning of the last day, the order of light was finally given, allowing the Sapphire fictitiously sink the Theodore Roosevelt and most of his escort.

itak, kar na sredo se bo prikradla podmornica, noben sonar je ne bo zaznal, in pol bo potapljala ladje lepo počasi, eno za drugo.

tako pač pravi par stavkov v francoščini, zato zdaj vemo, kako bi stvar izgledala v dejanskih vojnih situacijah, ane.

ZbitaGrinta je 30. apr 2016 ob 16:12 izjavil:

Top 10 Best Fighter Jets, Military Fighter Planes in the World.

ŽIVA RESNICA

Mr.B je 30. apr 2016 ob 20:01 izjavil:

Aktivni sonar ima dve težavi.
1. uporaba le tega, bi na široko oznanila tudi tvojo(je) podmornice ki so del skupine...
2. Ker temeratura in slanost vode v pasovi deluje enako kot lomljene svetlobe s prizmo......

razerznak je 1. maj 2016 ob 02:05 izjavil:

Za razliko tale "dela" ne pa nek f35

Smrekar1 je 3. maj 2016 ob 09:27 izjavil:

F-35B je v operativni uporabi od 29.7.2015, F-35A bo v operativni uporabi letos. Ne slediš ravno, kajne?

Smrekar1 je 3. maj 2016 ob 09:27 izjavil:

Ne, ni težko vedeti. Dovolj je to, da so se odločili, da bodo imeli celih 12 PAK FA in so raje napovedali zamenjavo zastarelih Su-27 z malenkost moderniziranimi Su-27, ki so jim dali števliko 35, da zadeva ne bi bila preveč očitna.

noraguta je 3. maj 2016 ob 11:09 izjavil:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/che...

ZbitaGrinta je 3. maj 2016 ob 12:06 izjavil:

rusija ima najboljše letalo tukaj sploh ni dvoma

ZbitaGrinta je 3. maj 2016 ob 13:24 izjavil:

no ja svetla je prihodnost ameriškega letalstva 70% letal je zastarelih tista ta nova pa se bojujejo v hangerjih na simulacijah saj ne vem ali bi se jokal ali smejal

F-22's latest problem: Can't win over cheaper rivals in close-range fights. The United States has invested about $80 billion into its Raptor fleet, which, at only 187 planes, has cost the country around $420 million apiece and has become the most expensive addition ever to the Air Force's arsenal. According to a new report published in the latest edition of Combat Aircraft Monthly, though, the state-of-the-art jet has failed missions that put it up against the Eurofighter Typhoon, a simpler aircraft utilized by German pilots that costs a comparable measly $200 million apiece. Mysteries remain as to why the US Air Force's F-22 Raptor pilots continue to experience symptoms of oxygen deprivation in the sky, but now a new question is being asked: does history's costliest jet compare with its half-price counterparts?

ZbitaGrinta je 3. maj 2016 ob 13:34 izjavil:

New U.S Navy Ship Struggles in Test to Fend Off Attacking Boats http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...

Question: Those who do not know about your tanker will not know that you tank from the front, rather than the rear of the aircraft.

What advantages has this given you in operations?

Answer: A major advantage when combined with the IR cameras and illuminations is that we can operate at night as effectively as in the day.

The view is so crisp that we can see the receiver pilot’s teeth when he comes in for fuel.

It is absolutely amazing.

And teamwork is much better.

We can have a very integrated team of the pilot, co-pilot and ARO (Air Refueling Officer) working together on the flight deck to work the mission with the aircraft coming in for fuel.

...

Question: With the situational awareness which you have on the plane, you operate the plane often to the fighter rather than forging a track to which the fighter goes.

Could you describe that capability?

Answer: We have a very good communications suite, including SATCOM, on the aircraft, as well as Link 16.

So we can see the fighters in the battlespace and we can see their fuel loads and anticipate where the need for refueling might lie.

It is about positioning yourself efficiently to refuel fighters to get them back in the fight as rapidly as possible; it is not just about being a tracked gas station in the sky.

And with our communications capabilities we can act as a relay between the fighters and other assets in the battlespace and link back to the home base as needed as well.

We can function as a communications relay for the fighter fleet as well.

...

Question: How are the coalition partners responding to your tanker and your efforts?

Answer: We are the tanker of choice.

The amount of respect we are getting from being in the Middle East, I’ve never seen anywhere else. Especially from Marines and the U.S. Navy, we constantly hear: “We want you guys every time we’re going to do a strike package.”

So whenever there’s a strike package happening, they request us when possible: “We want the Aussie KC-30 tanker on board.“

...

With regard to the qualitative evolution of the tanker and its culture, the Air Commander Australia, Vice Air-Marshal Gavin Turnbull had this to say:

What we have given the tanker crew is what the fighter pilot experienced in the first decade of the 21st century.

We added Link 16 into the cockpit and suddenly they had situational awareness of the battlespace around them and could now work within the battlespace, rather than simply going to a tanker track and acting as a gas station in the sky waiting for the planes to come in to get gassed up.

This has meant changing the skill set for the tanker crew as well.

We need to have smart people with smart situational awareness combat skills rather than truck drivers. They now position themselves where they’re next needed.

They’re maintaining their awareness and they’re moving into the battle space, and the jets are coming off their targets and are surprised about how close the tanker is.

In fact, we’re starting to get the reverse complaint where pilots who are coming off targets don’t have time to think and reconfigure their airplane before they’re on the wing of the tanker getting some more fuel.

...

This was pointed out by Air Commodore Lennon, Commander of the Air Mobility Group, who discussed the case of working with a Marine Corps pilot over Iraq.

A USMC Hornet lost an engine, and was in danger of going down in an area where it might not be good for the pilot to land or bail out.

The KC-30A came to the Hornet and supported it as the aircraft had to fly down in a cascading pattern to get back to base.

“Link 16 can tell you where the assets are and the fuel status of the air combat force. But it cannot tell you about intentions.

You get that from listening to the chat.

In this case, the pilot was listening to the chat and discovered a problem.

He then flew to the problem.

The Marine Corps Hornet had lost an engine and could not stay level at the refueling speed, so they set up a descent pattern to work the problem.

They could not do that until they were outside of the core combat area.

They set up what is called a toboggan where you just slow the descent so the Hornet could keep up his speed to get refueled.

And of course as he transferred fuel, he got heavier which in turn made it more difficult to keep your speed up, but the tanker adjusted to the need for the Hornet.”

Air Commodore Lennon also highlighted an aspect of Tanker 2.0 in terms of new capaiblities as well.

“Airbus is working hard on building an autonomous boom where the boom will actually work out where the receptacle is and fly itself into contact.

This will ease the workload for the tanker crew, and provide significant capabilities to fuel new assets coming to the tanker, such as UAVs. It would be an important step forward.

If you have a good reliable autonomous system, then the boom operator is not tiring as quickly and so you can stay on station longer and enhance your persistence in the battle space.”

Isotropic je 5. maj 2016 ob 19:24 izjavil:

jah, ni novica, da so ameri zelo zanemarljali asw in protiminsko delovanje.

Isotropic je 6. maj 2016 ob 09:39 izjavil:

a kdo ve, če je res, da je t-72 (mogoče že brez era, vsaj boljši modeli) od spredi praktično neprebojen za 105mm nato apds, streljane s kakšnih 1500-2000m?

Pac-Man je 6. maj 2016 ob 17:50 izjavil:

T-50 s 6imi cigli :D

razerznak je 6. maj 2016 ob 18:01 izjavil:

bolje met cigle , kot pa nč (f35)

Isotropic je 6. maj 2016 ob 12:55 izjavil:

toliko je debela stena ali pri upoštevanju kota naleta 0°?

je pa zanimivo, da so novejši apfsds sestavljeni iz 2 puščic dejansko. prva sprozi era ipd. zadeve, druga pa prebije oklep. povezuje ju pa mufa, ker sta ena za drugo.