Volitve v ZDA 2020

https://www.rt.com/usa/485620-biden-new...

Believe all women? New York Times only remembers its journalistic skepticism when it's Biden in the crosshairs

New York Times finally covers the woman who is accusing Biden of sexually assaulting her

The article states that she previously wrote nice things about Putin

“Ms. Reade said that she was not working for Russia and did not support Mr. Putin”

Lol ker naj bi pisala "lepe stvari" o Putinu ni mogoče, da bi jo Biden nadlegoval. Kako je to dvoje sploh povezano?

Vidim, da bo veliko patetike v ameriških medijih glede Bidna in kako sedaj diskreditirati metoo gibanje (no, tiste ki napadajo Sleepy Joea)

Fritz je 13. apr 2020 ob 07:43 izjavil:

So as of right now it's Trump versus Biden. An incompetent plutocrat president selling himself as an anti-establishment people's champion while simultaneously advancing garden variety Republican sociopathy, versus a warmongering authoritarian who is too demented to string a coherent sentence together and who is looking more and more credibly to be a rapist.

But the primary factor by far was domestic mass media propaganda. Propaganda during the primary season of course, with the billionaire press showing a very clear and undeniable bias against Bernie Sanders from the very beginning of the race. Had the Sanders campaign received a normal quality and quantity of mass media coverage for a candidate of his stature, he would doubtless have received far more support than he did. To deny that biased media messaging has an effect would be the same as denying that advertising, a trillion-dollar industry, has an effect.

https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/this...

Glede na to kako pozitivno mediji pišejo in poročajo o Trumpu, če zmaga še enkrat, kakšen izgovor bo pa potem!?

Pac-Man je 13. apr 2020 ob 10:37 izjavil:

Vazelin je 13. apr 2020 ob 02:04 izjavil:

Malo manj beri RT.

Tara Reade je jasna & glasna podpornica Sandersa. Obtožbe na njegov račun je obelodanila že pred enim letom, takrat je šlo za roke na ramenih in božanje vratu. In oggling njenih dolgih nog.

Ni bilo želenega učinka, zato smo zdaj prišli do digitalne manipulacije.

Če uporabimo postulat o Bernie Bros in MAGA botih kot drugi strani istega kovanca...

BTW, problem Tara Reade in Biden ni toliko Biden sam, večji problem je dvoličnost določenih medijev in ljudi pri zagovarjanju Bidena.

Pri obtožbah na račun Brett Kavanaugh se je ves čas govorilo, da je treba nujno verjeti ženski in da je nujno treba preveriti vse možne obtožbe.

Pa če gledamo po eni strani je šlo za "nižji" službeni položaj.

Sedaj pa praktično iste osebe pravijo, da se mora upoštevati proces in da je zadave itak zastarala in da je treba verjeti tudi moškemu.

Tudi mediji sami praktično nič ne poročajo o Tara Reade glede na vso poročanje, ki so ga imeli o dr. Christine Blasey Ford.

Bi bilo morda zanimivo pogledati vsa poste forumašev, kaj so takrat pravili in kaj sedaj pravijo.

Sedaj se je treba odločiti ali se upošteva ena pravila ali druga, obeh se enostavano ne more!

VaeVictis je 13. apr 2020 ob 10:08 izjavil:

Glede na to kako pozitivno mediji pišejo in poročajo o Trumpu, če zmaga še enkrat, kakšen izgovor bo pa potem!?

So mediji, ki pišejo negativno o Trumpu in so mediji, ki pišejo pozitivno o Trumpu. So mediji, ki pišejo negativno o Bidnu in so mediji, ki pišejo pozitivno o Bidnu. So mediji, ki pišejo negativno o Sandersu in so mediji, ki sploh ne pišejo o Sandersu.

Tako nekako. Kar se mene tiče, so v ZDA pred enako ušivo izbiro kot leta 2016.

Že pred veliko časa sem postavil trditev, da bo Trump ukinil demokracijo, njegovi zagovorniki so se zelo zabavali ob tem. Tipo očitno ne more več skrivati svojih predstav o tem, kaj pomeni biti POTUS: "The president's authorithy is TOTAL":



Očitno torej je, kaj (poleg totalne nesposobnosti in nevednosti, konstantnega laganja, nepotizma, konflikta s celim svetom, zatona moči in vpliva ZDA v svetu, med sabo popolnoma sprtega naroda...) čaka Američane, če tega psihopata ponovno izvolijo. Diktatura in norost ranga naci Nemčije.

ZDA :
https://www.motherjones.com/food/2020/0...

-valvoline- je 14. apr 2020 ob 10:09 izjavil:

ZDA :
https://www.motherjones.com/food/2020/0...

kaj pa 1.5m razdalje??

Profesionalna rokoborba je na Floridi razglašena za dejavnost ključnega pomena in se kot taka lahko izvaja tudi v času karantene.
Da žena ustanovitelja WWE vodi pro-Trump super PAC zagotovo ni imelo nobenega vpliva.

https://twitter.com/Mdixon55/status/125...

https://twitter.com/JoyAnnReid/status/1...

Neither JFK not LBJ were particularly liberal. They were politicians who could be moved, by the arc of history and events and by determined movements. The relentless push of movements is what made these imperfect men enact civil rights and voting rights. Bernie clearly gets that. And he clearly knows that his movement is in a position to push for more progressive policy, and that millions of Americans losing their health insurance at once and instant economic want due to the pandemic and maybe a depression creates the need for Biden to rethink some ideas.

There is so much opportunity among normie moderate and liberal Democrats, progressives and yes Never Trumpers to drag this country out of this mess and negotiate a new, saner future where we put up guardrails against the next disaster, why would anyone refuse to be at that table? That table will get messy and loud and there will be arguments over what can and should be done. But other than Trumpers, everyone else WANTS it done.

Most people want to live in a country where states don't have to bid against each other for ventilators and hospitals have PPE. Most Americans want to have a president who is prepared and listens to warnings and science so when disasters strike at least we are ready. Most people want to know that the poor and middle class and small businesses won't have the floor drop from beneath them w/ every disaster.

I thought the ideal outcome for 2020, especially given what happened in 2016 was for the election to produce a woman president. I am extremely disappointed that the Dem electorate looked at some really great choices of women candidates (Sens Harris & Warren especially) & said no. But that was not my call. A call was made. And now it's time to decide: are you going to be at that table to negotiate a better future, or are you going to peace out and just let the future happen? I don't think anyone is obligated to beg y'all to make a choice. Do what you want. But just accept that what you are doing IS choosing. Choosing to keep things as they are: as dangerous as that is in particular for people of color, Muslims, immigrants, LGBT folk and women, or to be at the table to negotiate something new. Ok I'm done auntie-ranting. Be blessed.

jp, njega je res zdelalo.
pred predsedovanjem je bil kot fantič

Moderator pravi, da tale govor 'stabilnega genija' sodi sem:

Let, let me put it very simply. I’m just going to put it very simply. The President of the United States has the authority to do what the President has the authority to do, which is very powerful. The President of the United States calls the shots. If we weren’t here for the states, you woulda had a problem in this country like you’ve never seen before. We were here to back them up. And we back and we more than back them up. We did a job that nobody ever thought was possible. It’s a decision of the President of the United States. Now with that being said, we’re gonna work with the states, because it’s very important. You have local governments. They’re pinpointed. And really, you talk about, uh, it’s like a microchip. They’re pinpointed. We have local governments. Hopefully they’ll do a good job. And if they don’t do a good job, I step in so fast. But no, they can’t do anything without the approval of the President of the United States. When somebody is President of the United States, the authority is total. You have a couple of bands of, uh, Democratic governors, but, uh, they will agree to it, they will agree to it, but, uh, the authority of the President of the United States having to do with the subject we’re talking about is total.

Tu je še kontekst, ki ga je prijazno dobavil ... imena se žal ne spomnim. Kakorkoli, hvala
https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/do...

Počasi bo kar treba v inštitucijo.

Fritz je 15. apr 2020 ob 09:16 izjavil:

Ja, bojijo se, kaj bodo naredili Sandersovi volivci. In ti Bidna ne bodo podprli, če ne bo sprejel vsaj dela politik, ki jih je zagovarjal Sanders.

Saj jih je. Poleg tega njegova politika niti ni nekaj strašno drugačna od Sandersove. Marsikateri koraki so samo bolj realni, recimo javna zdravstvena zavarovalnica.

Potem pa imas tudi argumente kot so:

Bolje da Biden zamenja Ginsbergovo, kot Trump, etc. Kot da nista oba - Biden in Trump konservativca. In katerikoli bi jo zamenjal ne bo izbral tako levega sodnika/co kot je RBG -> torej je samo razlika da bo Biden sel malo manj v desno kot Trump.

Tako je s tem centrizmom - Ko so republikanci na oblasti se vse pomakne desno, ko pride demokratski centrist, pa se ne pomakne levo ampak se naredi kompromis da bi dobil "desne glasove" se minimalno premakne v levo, ce se sploh kaj. In s tem imas konstanten premik v desno.

Ce Biden zmaga in dobi se drug mandat je velika verjetnost da bo 2028 potem spet zmagal republikanec, medtem ko se v teh 8 letih ne bo naredilo nic kaj dosti progresivnega. Ce zmaga Trump pa je moznost (ceprav seveda zelo majhna) da je kaj bolj progresivnega na menuju 2024.

Medtem pa od $18 tisoc dolarjev kolikor bo placal vsak american v davkih za prvi corona bill dobi nazaj $1.2 tisoc ostalo pa gre bogatim. Socializem je res super (samo za bogate, za normalne in revne pa je najslabsa stvar na svetu).

Mah, oboji delajo za bogat sloj za one spodaj se jim pa jebe. Neke razlike v programih pa so samo zato da imajo iluzijo izbire.

Studija pravi da bi na koncu Sandersov nacrt bil cenejsi od tega kar imajo zdaj (s tem da vi dosti vec ljudi bilo pokritih), tako da ne vem od kot si vzel podatke da bi bila drazja.

Taking into account both the costs of coverage expansion and the savings that would be achieved through the Medicare for All Act, we calculate that a single-payer, universal health-care system is likely to lead to a 13% savings in national health-care expenditure, equivalent to more than US$450 billion annually (based on the value of the US$ in 2017). The entire system could be funded with less financial outlay than is incurred by employers and households paying for health-care premiums combined with existing government allocations. This shift to single-payer health care would provide the greatest relief to lower-income households. Furthermore, we estimate that ensuring health-care access for all Americans would save more than 68 000 lives and 1.73 million life-years every year compared with the status quo.

Evo tudi Dennis Quaid je opravil v Hollywoodu glede na liberalne snežinke, ki banajo vse reveže, ki si upajo ne-kritizirati Trumpa
https://www.24ur.com/novice/korona/igra...

Če pogledate preteklost je zelo malo predsednikov osvojilo drugi mandat med recesijo. Mislim da ravno eden Težka naloga za Trumpa. Četudi je na drugi strani Biden oz. Hilary under disguise.

Vazelin je 15. apr 2020 ob 13:55 izjavil:

Četudi je na drugi strani Biden oz. Hilary under disguise.

Hillary ni izgubila zaradi programa, ampak ker dovolj velikemu delu populacije ni bila všečna.

Biden tega problema zaenkrat nima. Bo pa dark money naredil vse, da ga dobi.





nit o Čajni v DCju:

https://twitter.com/TheRickWilson/statu...

Long email chain viz China with a conservative policy type w whom I've maintained strained by mostly cordial disagreement viz Trump. This person is in that "I hate him but I have to work in DC and my think tank wants XXXXX policy outcomes."
Set THAT aside for a moment.
"Why won't you attack China?" is the summary of their latest.

For the good of the order, some notes:

A. Pointing out Trump's denial, delay, and deception doesn't excuse China.
B. Folks who oppose Trump from the right have been FAR less starry-eyed about Xi than Trump.
C. China's lies about Coronavirus didn't stop Trump from getting intel about its realities. He just chose not to believe our intel agencies, as he frequently does. He's taken the word of foreign powers on a wide spectrum of issues (cf Putin, MBS, Kim Jong Un, et al.)
D. This is such a transparent hunt for a boogeyman to cover his own failings it hardly bears mentioning. "Conservatives" trying to make this the centerpiece of a pushback are betting Trump won't flip AGAIN. One phone call with Xi and it'll be all, "Xi is my friend. I have a great relationship with Xi. We shared chocolate cake. He did everything right." This pattern has become very well established. (Bannon's leprous funk is all over this strategy, btw.) Witness Trump's SUDDEN reversal on trying to "brand" the virus as "Wuhan Flu" or the "China Virus." Xi popped Trump's leash and President Cuckley knuckled under and bowed. Hasn't used it since. Every strongman knows how to play Trump, and does.
E. Want a talk about the supply chain? Go for it. MIGHT want to focus on the CURRENT crisis first, though.
F. Also, China's expanding power is, in part, a result of Trump's abandonment of our role in the world.
G. For now, "CHYNA" is another Trump excuse, not a reason.
H. A number of the GOP's China hawks have adopted the nationalist populist fantasy that America is crying out to pay $29 for a toilet brush or $3000 for an iPhone. Tell me MORE about markets.

Anyway, just a little anthropology for you.

Proceed with your day.

VaeVictis je 15. apr 2020 ob 17:07 izjavil:

Brez teleprompterja, samo zapiski:


Primerjaj s tole hot mess:

kaj so me pobrisali, bidena rasisti se najbolj radi volijo, on je podpiral segregacijo, se dobi youtube, poglejte si

pa tudi ni treba se pretvarjati da nima demence, saj imata oba

edini ko je bil resno pametn je bil yang na celih volitvah

Vazelin je 15. apr 2020 ob 18:21 izjavil:

Mene predvsem zanima, kdo bo demokratski podpredsedniški kandidat. Ker tale ima potem veliko šans, da rata predsednik

kakšen je sploh postopek da zaradi demence predsednika vodenje države prevzame podpredsednik?

tone31 je 15. apr 2020 ob 18:20 izjavil:

pa tudi ni treba se pretvarjati da nima demence, saj imata oba

edini ko je bil resno pametn je bil yang na celih volitvah

zato bi bilo pa treba omejiti starost kandidatov na 65

Pac-Man ...

Če ne vidiš zatona Bidena v zadnjih letih, si očitno edini (no ja poleg MSM, ki ima glavo v pesku).

Verjameš pa lahko, da bo na prvi debati tole Trump ornk izkoristil, plus v vseh svojih reklamah.

Že levičarji na veliko govorijo o tem, desničerjev tokrat sploh ne mislim omenjati!

Že na vseh demokratstih debatah je bil Biden obupen, pa je bila večina ljudi zelo prijazna do njega.

Pac-Man je 15. apr 2020 ob 21:26 izjavil:

MAGA folk v Michiganu se je odločil, da so sodišča lejm in so pričeli s praktično implementacijo. Livestream:

https://www.facebook.com/detroitfreepre...

povsem primerna oblika protesta, kar se tiče korone tako ni povečanega tveganja

to misliš tisti del ko niso v avtih? imaš prav, čeprav se še vedno vsaj približno držijo narazen :)

https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/...

Trying to imagine people going around after 9/11 saying "You know, the flu kills 60,000 a people a year so not sure what the big deal is here!" and how the people *now* making that same argument would have received it then.

We completely transformed nearly every facet of American public life and governance after 9/11 (way too much in many ways!) We entered into the longest war in US history.

We created a new cabinet agency with constantly growing budgets and permanent security bureaucracies. All driven by a political discourse driven by a reactionary rhetoric of a clash of civilizations. We spent trillions of dollars all around the principle of #NeverForget

And now some of the loudest, most vicious voices in the debate over the Global War on Terror are watching tens of thousands of Americans dying - at home, in nursing homes, in veterans homes - and saying: eh. What's the big deal?