Forum » Problemi človeštva » Dr. Drumpflove
Dr. Drumpflove
jype ::
krneki0001 je izjavil:
Hmm, v šestih dneh, ko sem bil v moskvi, ni bilo nobenega tako, da ti bolj malo verjamem, da jih je po 6 na dan.Seveda so bili, samo ti si gledal v drugo smer od črnih oblakov dima, ki so se valili s prizorišč.
Pac-Man ::
Lahko naklada, ampak takle mamo. Ponavadi je točen.
https://twitter.com/20committee/status/...
Since Big News in #KremlinGate is looming, it's time for a brief tweetstorm on what's really going on behind scenes with Team Mueller.
If you're surprised that #MoscowMisha is cooked, you've not been paying attention. Sr & Jr are both going down on a bunch of charges. Flynn, like Manafort, desperately wanted a deal from Mueller, but they had 0 to offer that DoJ didn't already have. So, they're screwed.
The Team Mueller + FBI/IC joint investigation here is truly massive; a CI inquiry this expansive hasn't been seen in DC since VENONA. Together, they're investigating HUNDREDS of targets for poss ties to Russian spies & mobsters. Public will be shocked when it comes out. These CI targets include WH officials; Trump associates, friends & family; journalists and lobbyists; even bloggers. It's a wide net.
It will take years for this CI inquiry to be concluded -- VENONA ran from 1943 to 1980, folks -- but the answers will stun the public. Anticipate a bunch of indictments in the next year or 2, perhaps many more in the long run; it depends how indictments rounds 1-5 go. The Russian conspiracy in DC took years to metastasize, it will take years to unravel it all. Marathon not sprint, as I say. Patience.
https://twitter.com/20committee/status/...
Since Big News in #KremlinGate is looming, it's time for a brief tweetstorm on what's really going on behind scenes with Team Mueller.
If you're surprised that #MoscowMisha is cooked, you've not been paying attention. Sr & Jr are both going down on a bunch of charges. Flynn, like Manafort, desperately wanted a deal from Mueller, but they had 0 to offer that DoJ didn't already have. So, they're screwed.
The Team Mueller + FBI/IC joint investigation here is truly massive; a CI inquiry this expansive hasn't been seen in DC since VENONA. Together, they're investigating HUNDREDS of targets for poss ties to Russian spies & mobsters. Public will be shocked when it comes out. These CI targets include WH officials; Trump associates, friends & family; journalists and lobbyists; even bloggers. It's a wide net.
It will take years for this CI inquiry to be concluded -- VENONA ran from 1943 to 1980, folks -- but the answers will stun the public. Anticipate a bunch of indictments in the next year or 2, perhaps many more in the long run; it depends how indictments rounds 1-5 go. The Russian conspiracy in DC took years to metastasize, it will take years to unravel it all. Marathon not sprint, as I say. Patience.
xmetallic ::
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watc...
Kaj bi sploh lahko šlo narobe?
Trump je zgolj omogočil, da imajo vso mentalni bolniki dostop do orožja. Tako tisti, ki imajo postavljeno zdravniško diagnozo kot tisti prikriti npr. liberalci.
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenilo: xmetallic ()
maco-maco ::
Trump je zgolj omogočil, da imajo vso mentalni bolniki dostop do orožja. Tako tisti, ki imajo postavljeno zdravniško diagnozo kot tisti prikriti npr. liberalci.
In ti si spet vesel? Ni mi jasno, kako nekateri ploskate, ko vam drugi dejansko delajo škodo.
Kaj?
Pac-Man ::
Wilbur je tudi v trumpovem razredu.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexand...
Fresh off a tour through Thailand, Laos and China, United States Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross Jr. picked up the phone on a Sunday afternoon in October to discuss something deeply personal: how much money he has. A year earlier, Forbes had listed his net worth at $2.9 billion on The Forbes 400, a number Ross claimed was far too low: He maintained he was closer to $3.7 billion. Now, after examining the financial-disclosure forms he filed after his nomination to President Donald Trump's Cabinet, which showed less than $700 million in assets, Forbes was intent on removing him entirely.
Ross protested, citing trusts for his family that he said he did not have to disclose in federal filings. "You're apparently not counting those, which are more than $2 billion," he said. When asked for documentation, the 79-year-old demurred, citing "privacy issues."
...
So began the mystery of Wilbur Ross' missing $2 billion. And after one month of digging, Forbes is confident it has found the answer: That money never existed. It seems clear that Ross lied to us, the latest in an apparent sequence of fibs, exaggerations, omissions, fabrications and whoppers that have been going on with Forbes since 2004. In addition to just padding his ego, Ross' machinations helped bolster his standing in a way that translated into business opportunities.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexand...
Fresh off a tour through Thailand, Laos and China, United States Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross Jr. picked up the phone on a Sunday afternoon in October to discuss something deeply personal: how much money he has. A year earlier, Forbes had listed his net worth at $2.9 billion on The Forbes 400, a number Ross claimed was far too low: He maintained he was closer to $3.7 billion. Now, after examining the financial-disclosure forms he filed after his nomination to President Donald Trump's Cabinet, which showed less than $700 million in assets, Forbes was intent on removing him entirely.
Ross protested, citing trusts for his family that he said he did not have to disclose in federal filings. "You're apparently not counting those, which are more than $2 billion," he said. When asked for documentation, the 79-year-old demurred, citing "privacy issues."
...
So began the mystery of Wilbur Ross' missing $2 billion. And after one month of digging, Forbes is confident it has found the answer: That money never existed. It seems clear that Ross lied to us, the latest in an apparent sequence of fibs, exaggerations, omissions, fabrications and whoppers that have been going on with Forbes since 2004. In addition to just padding his ego, Ross' machinations helped bolster his standing in a way that translated into business opportunities.
Pac-Man ::
Dve stvari:
1) Direktor CIA nima prejemat predsednikovih navodil o tem kako & kaj naj preiskujejo. V navadnih razmerah bi bila to velika afera.
2) Kot kaže imajo Rusi dovolj, preko Putincepta in njihovega najljubšega oporečnika rušijo hišico iz kart.
https://theintercept.com/2017/11/07/dnc...
CIA Director Mike Pompeo met late last month with a former U.S. intelligence official who has become an advocate for a disputed theory that the theft of the Democratic National Committee’s emails during the 2016 presidential campaign was an inside job, rather than a hack by Russian intelligence.
Pompeo met on October 24 with William Binney, a former National Security Agency official-turned-whistleblower who co-authored an analysis published by a group of former intelligence officials that challenges the U.S. intelligence community’s official assessment that Russian intelligence was behind last year’s theft of data from DNC computers. Binney and the other former officials argue that the DNC data was “leaked,” not hacked, “by a person with physical access” to the DNC’s computer system.
In an interview with The Intercept, Binney said Pompeo told him that President Donald Trump had urged the CIA director to meet with Binney to discuss his assessment that the DNC data theft was an inside job. During their hour-long meeting at CIA headquarters, Pompeo said Trump told him that if Pompeo “want[ed] to know the facts, he should talk to me,” Binney said.
Wilson ima AMA.
https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comme...
1) Direktor CIA nima prejemat predsednikovih navodil o tem kako & kaj naj preiskujejo. V navadnih razmerah bi bila to velika afera.
2) Kot kaže imajo Rusi dovolj, preko Putincepta in njihovega najljubšega oporečnika rušijo hišico iz kart.
https://theintercept.com/2017/11/07/dnc...
CIA Director Mike Pompeo met late last month with a former U.S. intelligence official who has become an advocate for a disputed theory that the theft of the Democratic National Committee’s emails during the 2016 presidential campaign was an inside job, rather than a hack by Russian intelligence.
Pompeo met on October 24 with William Binney, a former National Security Agency official-turned-whistleblower who co-authored an analysis published by a group of former intelligence officials that challenges the U.S. intelligence community’s official assessment that Russian intelligence was behind last year’s theft of data from DNC computers. Binney and the other former officials argue that the DNC data was “leaked,” not hacked, “by a person with physical access” to the DNC’s computer system.
In an interview with The Intercept, Binney said Pompeo told him that President Donald Trump had urged the CIA director to meet with Binney to discuss his assessment that the DNC data theft was an inside job. During their hour-long meeting at CIA headquarters, Pompeo said Trump told him that if Pompeo “want[ed] to know the facts, he should talk to me,” Binney said.
Wilson ima AMA.
https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comme...
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenilo: Pac-Man ()
Pac-Man ::
Iz AMA
+As Trump and his ilk have taken total control of the Republican Party, who's left to return the party to more traditional Conservative values? Does the entire Republican brand have to be discarded and built anew?
-There are three kinds of Republicans today:
Trumpist True Believers -- a LOUD 30% of the GOP. He could literally declare he is a child-cannibal Satanist and they'd say, "MAAAAAGA Hell yeah!"
Opportunist Trumpists -- 40% don't like Trump, but won't say it out loud. They...just...want...a...tax...bill. This is the "But Gorsuch!" crowd.
Conservatives -- 30% who know what a clown show this is and want to get back to limited government conservatism.
+What kind of negative ads do you think would help against Trump? Don't give me that dems have to have a positive vision instant pundit crap. This isn't CNN. Obviously. But you damn well know the ads work.
-The trick would have been not just the spots themselves, but the horsepower to deliver the message. I would have targeted digital and cable to WI MI OH PA on how he's basically an amoral bastard who screws workers. That moved people in focus groups we did, but donors never wanted to fight until it was too late.
+What do you foresee for the future of the republican party? Do you think it will split? Reform under a different name? Go on as it has been?
-I think we're rapidly approaching a multi-party system, whether we like it or not. The GOP is hiving into a nationalist-populist Trump/Bannon party and a traditional conservative limited government party. The Democrats are hiving into an operational, technocratic Obamaish/Clintonish party and the Bernie Workers' Populist Front.
+How much do you think dissatisfaction with the "conservative movement" in its attempts to legislate moral issues such as homosexuality, abortion, etc. played into the election of Donald Trump, who would seem to be, more than anything, a sign of voters' rejection of traditional Republican values?
-I like to say there have been three major social battles in the last 20 years. Dems won two and the GOP won two, broadly speaking. The Democrats won on gay marriage and marijuana. Republicans won on gun control.
On gay marriage, society passed the evangelicals by. It's over. It's done. Now it's just edge cleanup details. On marijuana, same. America likes dope. The Sessions war-on-drugs is like waging a war on the Barbary Pirates.
On gun control, trust me, if you want to know why we took 1000 seats from the Democrats, it wasn't voter suppression, or gerrymandering, or the Koch Brothers. It was gun control. As long as gun control is a tentpole for Democrats, they're going to lose, and keep losing outside of major metros.
+As Trump and his ilk have taken total control of the Republican Party, who's left to return the party to more traditional Conservative values? Does the entire Republican brand have to be discarded and built anew?
-There are three kinds of Republicans today:
Trumpist True Believers -- a LOUD 30% of the GOP. He could literally declare he is a child-cannibal Satanist and they'd say, "MAAAAAGA Hell yeah!"
Opportunist Trumpists -- 40% don't like Trump, but won't say it out loud. They...just...want...a...tax...bill. This is the "But Gorsuch!" crowd.
Conservatives -- 30% who know what a clown show this is and want to get back to limited government conservatism.
+What kind of negative ads do you think would help against Trump? Don't give me that dems have to have a positive vision instant pundit crap. This isn't CNN. Obviously. But you damn well know the ads work.
-The trick would have been not just the spots themselves, but the horsepower to deliver the message. I would have targeted digital and cable to WI MI OH PA on how he's basically an amoral bastard who screws workers. That moved people in focus groups we did, but donors never wanted to fight until it was too late.
+What do you foresee for the future of the republican party? Do you think it will split? Reform under a different name? Go on as it has been?
-I think we're rapidly approaching a multi-party system, whether we like it or not. The GOP is hiving into a nationalist-populist Trump/Bannon party and a traditional conservative limited government party. The Democrats are hiving into an operational, technocratic Obamaish/Clintonish party and the Bernie Workers' Populist Front.
+How much do you think dissatisfaction with the "conservative movement" in its attempts to legislate moral issues such as homosexuality, abortion, etc. played into the election of Donald Trump, who would seem to be, more than anything, a sign of voters' rejection of traditional Republican values?
-I like to say there have been three major social battles in the last 20 years. Dems won two and the GOP won two, broadly speaking. The Democrats won on gay marriage and marijuana. Republicans won on gun control.
On gay marriage, society passed the evangelicals by. It's over. It's done. Now it's just edge cleanup details. On marijuana, same. America likes dope. The Sessions war-on-drugs is like waging a war on the Barbary Pirates.
On gun control, trust me, if you want to know why we took 1000 seats from the Democrats, it wasn't voter suppression, or gerrymandering, or the Koch Brothers. It was gun control. As long as gun control is a tentpole for Democrats, they're going to lose, and keep losing outside of major metros.
Pac-Man ::
MAGA, ne?
https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/9...
Asked why President Trump didn’t take questions from reporters today, Sarah Sanders said, “It was at the Chinese insistence there were no questions today.”
The Chinese government never wants to take questions from US reporters. In the past American presidents have insisted upon it as a demonstration of standing up for the freedoms our nation believes in.
Here’s President George W Bush with the Chinese President in Shanghai taking a couple questions
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index...
here’s President Obama and President Xi taking a couple questions in China
https://www.uschina.org/china-hub/remar...
here’s President Bill Clinton holding a joint presser with the Chinese President at the WH, where questions came on Taiwan, human rights and Tiananmen Square.
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=...
Here's a good @joshgerstein story from 2014 illustrating previous president fighting for ability of journalists to ask questions at joint presser with President Xi
https://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/...
There’s nothing strong about acceding to the wishes of an oppressive Communist government by going along with its contempt for freedom of the press. One can issue as many condemnations of Communism as one wants on paper; they’re meaningless if one then bows to totalitarianism.
https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/9...
Asked why President Trump didn’t take questions from reporters today, Sarah Sanders said, “It was at the Chinese insistence there were no questions today.”
The Chinese government never wants to take questions from US reporters. In the past American presidents have insisted upon it as a demonstration of standing up for the freedoms our nation believes in.
Here’s President George W Bush with the Chinese President in Shanghai taking a couple questions
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index...
here’s President Obama and President Xi taking a couple questions in China
https://www.uschina.org/china-hub/remar...
here’s President Bill Clinton holding a joint presser with the Chinese President at the WH, where questions came on Taiwan, human rights and Tiananmen Square.
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=...
Here's a good @joshgerstein story from 2014 illustrating previous president fighting for ability of journalists to ask questions at joint presser with President Xi
https://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/...
There’s nothing strong about acceding to the wishes of an oppressive Communist government by going along with its contempt for freedom of the press. One can issue as many condemnations of Communism as one wants on paper; they’re meaningless if one then bows to totalitarianism.
Pac-Man ::
Schindler o pee tapes.
http://observer.com/2017/11/spy-circles...
...
As I’ve written about the Steele dossier, although a great deal of its raw intelligence has turned out to be true, large portions reek of disinformation— including the most salacious bits.
...
To sum up, the idea that President Trump has been caught on tape doing something sordid is inherently in the realm of the possible. But has he been? Here’s where things get tricky, fast. I’ve investigated this issue for the past couple years. I’ve talked to dozens of well-placed sources (many of them longtime spy-friends), and I can share with you some basic conclusions.
As many as a dozen intelligence services worldwide, on four continents, are in possession of some sort of “Trump tape” featuring sexual escapades of a controversial nature; in some cases, the women involved appear to be underage. Some of these tapes have been shared with the Mueller investigation.
One Western intelligence agency with a solid professional reputation is in possession of an unpleasant Trump tape that they assess “with high confidence” is bona fide, i.e. exactly what it appears to be. They obtained the tape from a trusted source who plausibly had access to it. Over the decades, Trump has traveled widely—including to Russia more than once—and thereby exposed himself to surreptitious filming in numerous countries.
However, here’s the rub: Many of the “Trump tapes” floating around in spy circles worldwide cannot be verified, while some of them are obvious fakes. The Western spy agency that’s holding a Trump tape they’re pretty sure is real has also been approached two other times with tapes that were less solid—and one of them was transparently fake.
It’s obvious to savvy Western counterspies that someone is spreading fake Trump tapes—not all of them high quality—to muddy the waters. The obvious suspect, of course, is the Kremlin. Since the Russians know all about President Trump’s decades of personal antics, including what kompromat exists on him, they appear to be pushing dubious and unverifiable tapes, some of them obviously fake, to create chaos and confusion.
...
This, then, is yet another successful Kremlin spy operation, one more grand provocation to mess with our Western heads. Although Vladimir Putin is deeply disappointed with President Trump, who has failed to get sanctions lifted off Russia, much less make Washington and Moscow close partners in anything, keeping an increasingly damaged and ineffectual president in the White House, who’s incapable of accomplishing much except rage-tweeting, suits Moscow’s foreign policy needs just fine.
http://observer.com/2017/11/spy-circles...
...
As I’ve written about the Steele dossier, although a great deal of its raw intelligence has turned out to be true, large portions reek of disinformation— including the most salacious bits.
...
To sum up, the idea that President Trump has been caught on tape doing something sordid is inherently in the realm of the possible. But has he been? Here’s where things get tricky, fast. I’ve investigated this issue for the past couple years. I’ve talked to dozens of well-placed sources (many of them longtime spy-friends), and I can share with you some basic conclusions.
As many as a dozen intelligence services worldwide, on four continents, are in possession of some sort of “Trump tape” featuring sexual escapades of a controversial nature; in some cases, the women involved appear to be underage. Some of these tapes have been shared with the Mueller investigation.
One Western intelligence agency with a solid professional reputation is in possession of an unpleasant Trump tape that they assess “with high confidence” is bona fide, i.e. exactly what it appears to be. They obtained the tape from a trusted source who plausibly had access to it. Over the decades, Trump has traveled widely—including to Russia more than once—and thereby exposed himself to surreptitious filming in numerous countries.
However, here’s the rub: Many of the “Trump tapes” floating around in spy circles worldwide cannot be verified, while some of them are obvious fakes. The Western spy agency that’s holding a Trump tape they’re pretty sure is real has also been approached two other times with tapes that were less solid—and one of them was transparently fake.
It’s obvious to savvy Western counterspies that someone is spreading fake Trump tapes—not all of them high quality—to muddy the waters. The obvious suspect, of course, is the Kremlin. Since the Russians know all about President Trump’s decades of personal antics, including what kompromat exists on him, they appear to be pushing dubious and unverifiable tapes, some of them obviously fake, to create chaos and confusion.
...
This, then, is yet another successful Kremlin spy operation, one more grand provocation to mess with our Western heads. Although Vladimir Putin is deeply disappointed with President Trump, who has failed to get sanctions lifted off Russia, much less make Washington and Moscow close partners in anything, keeping an increasingly damaged and ineffectual president in the White House, who’s incapable of accomplishing much except rage-tweeting, suits Moscow’s foreign policy needs just fine.
Pac-Man ::
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/11/09/polit...
President Donald Trump's long-time confidant Keith Schiller privately testified that he rejected a Russian offer to send five women to then private-citizen Trump's hotel room during their 2013 trip to Moscow for the Miss Universe pageant, according to multiple sources from both political parties with direct knowledge of the testimony.
Schiller, Trump's former bodyguard and personal aide, testified that he took the offer as a joke, two of the sources said. On their way up to Trump's hotel room that night, Schiller told the billionaire businessman about the offer and Trump laughed it off, Schiller told the House intelligence committee earlier this week.
...
Multiple sources said the offer to send women to Trump's room came from a Russian who was accompanying Emin Agalarov, a pop star whose father is a billionaire oligarch close to Russian President Vladimir Putin and who worked with Trump to bring the pageant to Moscow. But Schiller said the offer did not come from Agalarov himself, the sources said, disputing the Daily Caller report on that matter.
Kdo misli, da si Trump par minut kasneje ni zaželel šestorčka s petimi brhkimi Rusinjami?
President Donald Trump's long-time confidant Keith Schiller privately testified that he rejected a Russian offer to send five women to then private-citizen Trump's hotel room during their 2013 trip to Moscow for the Miss Universe pageant, according to multiple sources from both political parties with direct knowledge of the testimony.
Schiller, Trump's former bodyguard and personal aide, testified that he took the offer as a joke, two of the sources said. On their way up to Trump's hotel room that night, Schiller told the billionaire businessman about the offer and Trump laughed it off, Schiller told the House intelligence committee earlier this week.
...
Multiple sources said the offer to send women to Trump's room came from a Russian who was accompanying Emin Agalarov, a pop star whose father is a billionaire oligarch close to Russian President Vladimir Putin and who worked with Trump to bring the pageant to Moscow. But Schiller said the offer did not come from Agalarov himself, the sources said, disputing the Daily Caller report on that matter.
Kdo misli, da si Trump par minut kasneje ni zaželel šestorčka s petimi brhkimi Rusinjami?
Scaramouche ::
Scaramouche ::
ah zvonenje po toči, nekateri pač ne morete verjeti da je predsednik,sej vam bo enkrat ratalo...
Do takrat pa jok in stok...
Do takrat pa jok in stok...
ZaphodBB ::
Scaramouche je izjavil:
vemo doma imaš pa slikco ane Tinker Bell..Ja, imam.
Epic shit.
"Naši dedje so se borili za to, da lahko odločamo
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
VaeVictis ::
BTW tole je pa ena izmed najboljših analiz posledic ameriških volitev.
South Park s21e07 - Doubling Down
Whole thing is a reflection of trump and the election. Heidi is the trump voter who thinks shes may have made a mistake, is mocked for admitting her mistake and doubles down to become a racist by the end of the episode. The very first jump to garrison from the episode is when connection starts. The episode makes a hard point that if we don't forgive people for mistakes, why would they ever admit them? If you admit your mistake, but are rejected and mocked by the group you are admitting a fault too, you feel like you can't be part of that group and double down on your believes because your an outcast otherwise.
Zanimivo je pa to, da mediji in posledično Pac-Man s svojimi posti in polresnicami, posredno podirajo Trumpa, čeprav se tega sploh ne zavedajo.
Vsakič, ko mediji napišejo polresnico oz. se jih dobi na "laži" in ponižujejo Trumpove volivce jih še bolj pripeljejo do Trumpa.
Tako, da Pac-Man in mediji dobesedno pomagaju Trumpu za Trump 2020!
South Park s21e07 - Doubling Down
Whole thing is a reflection of trump and the election. Heidi is the trump voter who thinks shes may have made a mistake, is mocked for admitting her mistake and doubles down to become a racist by the end of the episode. The very first jump to garrison from the episode is when connection starts. The episode makes a hard point that if we don't forgive people for mistakes, why would they ever admit them? If you admit your mistake, but are rejected and mocked by the group you are admitting a fault too, you feel like you can't be part of that group and double down on your believes because your an outcast otherwise.
Zanimivo je pa to, da mediji in posledično Pac-Man s svojimi posti in polresnicami, posredno podirajo Trumpa, čeprav se tega sploh ne zavedajo.
Vsakič, ko mediji napišejo polresnico oz. se jih dobi na "laži" in ponižujejo Trumpove volivce jih še bolj pripeljejo do Trumpa.
Tako, da Pac-Man in mediji dobesedno pomagaju Trumpu za Trump 2020!
VaeVictis ::
ps: Recimo ena taka zanimiva primerjava dogodka na Japonskem, kjer mediji prirejajo zgodbo v lastno korist!
Trump dump: president throws entire box of fish food into precious koi carp pond (theguardian.com)
The Guardian is literally lying.
Wow, they did lie.
He spooned out small portions until the prime minister dumped what was left of his fish food before Trump, who then followed suit.
So many things this guy is bad at, so many scandals this guy is wrapped up in, I just don't understand why they have to try to spin such small, petty, insignificant bs like this.
WTF! CNN knowingly publishes FALSE article about the Koi fish. This is why they are fake news - they lie and cannot be trusted
from article: "Abe appeared to dump out his box ahead of Trump"
"Appeared"? As if there is some uncertainty? It's right there in the (unedited) video.
Trump dump: president throws entire box of fish food into precious koi carp pond (theguardian.com)
The Guardian is literally lying.
Wow, they did lie.
He spooned out small portions until the prime minister dumped what was left of his fish food before Trump, who then followed suit.
So many things this guy is bad at, so many scandals this guy is wrapped up in, I just don't understand why they have to try to spin such small, petty, insignificant bs like this.
WTF! CNN knowingly publishes FALSE article about the Koi fish. This is why they are fake news - they lie and cannot be trusted
from article: "Abe appeared to dump out his box ahead of Trump"
"Appeared"? As if there is some uncertainty? It's right there in the (unedited) video.
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenilo: VaeVictis ()
dice7 ::
Republikanci so zmagali, ker niso demokrati sposobni motivirati lastnih volilcev; vsaj tako pravijo rezultati zadnjih 4 volitev, kjer je stevilo republikanskih glasov bilo bolj ali manj isto, demokrati so pa (po 08) padali.
Satiricna internetna risanka je pa naredila satiricno analizo
Satiricna internetna risanka je pa naredila satiricno analizo
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: dice7 ()
ZaphodBB ::
Republikanci so zmagali, ker niso demokrati sposobni motivirati lastnih volilcev; vsaj tako pravijo rezultati zadnjih 4 volitev, kjer je stevilo republikanskih glasov bilo bolj ali manj isto, demokrati so pa (po 08) padali.
Ja tebi in tebi podobnim aktivistom se imamo zahvaliti. Hvala lepa dice7, keep up the good work.
"Naši dedje so se borili za to, da lahko odločamo
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
dice7 ::
Verjetno ponovno mesas vzroke in posledice. Gonja proti Trumpu ni izvolila Trumpa, gonja demokratov proti levicarjem je posredno izvolila Trumpa
ZaphodBB ::
Verjetno ponovno mesas vzroke in posledice. Gonja proti Trumpu ni izvolila Trumpa, gonja demokratov proti levicarjem je posredno izvolila Trumpa
Trumpa je izvolila naveličanost ljudstva z levičarskimi boleznimi kot je intersekcionalizem. Bolj ko boste glasni, manj vpliva boste imeli.
"Naši dedje so se borili za to, da lahko odločamo
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
dice7 ::
Pa vendar se kolicinsko to ljudstvo v zadnjih 8 letih ni spremenilo. Torej vzrok ni v tem imaginarnem povecanju republikanskih volilcev oz 'folka ki se je navelical SJW bulsita'
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: dice7 ()
ZaphodBB ::
Pa vendar se kolicinsko to ljudstvo v zadnjih 8 letih ni spremenilo. Torej vzrok ni v tem imaginarnem povecanju republikanskih volilcev oz 'folka ki se je navelical SJW bulsita'
Bova videla 2020, ko bo šla demokratska stranka na volitve s parolo "kill all white cis men". Boš povedal kako se je obneslo.
"Naši dedje so se borili za to, da lahko odločamo
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
RedDrake ::
Pa vendar se kolicinsko to ljudstvo v zadnjih 8 letih ni spremenilo. Torej vzrok ni v tem imaginarnem povecanju republikanskih volilcev oz 'folka ki se je navelical SJW bulsita'
Uggh.
Ti ne gre logika najbolje, eh?
Družboslovec, verjetno?
Ljudje, ki imajo solidno liberalne vrednote in so naveličani SJW bulshita, pač ne volijo nikogar, čeprav so večinoma volili "leve" stranke.
Rezultat je, da se konzervativcem viša relativni delež.
In bolj boste SJW-ji histerični, bolj akuten bo ta problem za vas.
Nehajte si zatiskati oči in sprejmite dejstvo, da t.i. "identitarian politics" povzroča propad levih strank.
Ker vsakdo ima še nekoga nad seboj na "žrtveni" lestvici, ki je še večja žrtev.
In bolj vam tupimo, da je polovica ljudi na levi strani IQ krivulje, bolj silite v stvari, ki tem ljudem ne bodo všeč.
In potem se greste double-down (ali pa infinite-down) in ti ljudje bodo nehali volit za vaše ideje.
Konzervativci bodo pa prevzeli oblast s 33% procenti, kot je to že kdaj bilo v zgodovino, in potem naredili štalo.
Ampak krivec - vzrok - boste pa vi - retardirani SJW-ji, ki živite v tako izolirani odmevni sobici, da ne zmorete predvideti kakšni bodo rezultati vaših politik čez deset let.
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: RedDrake ()
Truga ::
ZaphodBB ::
Zal se to ne bo zgodilo, ker so demokrati kreteni. Ce bi si upali to narest bi vsaj zmagali, tko pa so raje vlekli tisto hillary na volitve.
Hahahahahahahaha.
p.s.: Bernie je zapravil vse možnosti progresivcem za zmago. Ljudje bodo rajši volili dobesedno Hitlerja kot Bernija ali pa Corbyna, da o Mescu niti ne govorimo.
"Naši dedje so se borili za to, da lahko odločamo
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
Zgodovina sprememb…
- spremenil: ZaphodBB ()
ZaphodBB ::
In zato ste se jim intersekcionalni feministi odločili pomagat? How sweet of you.
"Naši dedje so se borili za to, da lahko odločamo
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
Pac-Man ::
Republikanci so zmagali, ker niso demokrati sposobni motivirati lastnih volilcev; vsaj tako pravijo rezultati zadnjih 4 volitev, kjer je stevilo republikanskih glasov bilo bolj ali manj isto, demokrati so pa (po 08) padali.
Zadnje volitve so bile v torek. Totalen poraz trumpizma.
Poleg tega imajo zelo veliko možnost dobiti senatorja iz Alabame. Republikanski kandidat je kot 30-something lovil najstnice, tudi 14-letnico, alabamski republikanci pa ugotavljajo, da to ni n'č tazga.
Še ena mojstrovina:
https://twitter.com/thehill/status/9287...
Top Alabama Republican responds to Moore allegations: I'd trust Putin over Washington Post
jype ::
ZaphodBB ::
Bernie would have won. Hillary je pa itak isto kot Trump, samo brez demence.
Lepo napreduješ. Še pol leta ti dam, pa boš imel v podpisu "Bill Clinton is a rapis. INFOWARS.COM" :)
"Naši dedje so se borili za to, da lahko odločamo
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
ZaphodBB ::
Ti imaš tako malo občutka za detajle, da se ti slon in krava zdita isto.
"Naši dedje so se borili za to, da lahko odločamo
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
dice7 ::
Ljudje, ki imajo solidno liberalne vrednote in so naveličani SJW bulshita, pač ne volijo nikogar, čeprav so večinoma volili "leve" stranke.
Rezultat je, da se konzervativcem viša relativni delež.
Kolikor sem spremljal volitve je padec demokratom prispevala izdaja Sandersa in ostale neoliberarne cirecare. Ce imas kaksen link, ki podpira tvoje trditve pa kar na plano
Nehajte si zatiskati oči in sprejmite dejstvo, da t.i. "identitarian politics" povzroča propad levih strank.
Ker vsakdo ima še nekoga nad seboj na "žrtveni" lestvici, ki je še večja žrtev
Jaz sem kritik identitarian politike, predalckanje je voda na mlin predvsem raznim belim supremacistom
In bolj vam tupimo, da je polovica ljudi na levi strani IQ krivulje, bolj silite v stvari, ki tem ljudem ne bodo všeč.
Kaj pa ljudem z nizkim IQjem ni vsec?
In potem se greste double-down (ali pa infinite-down) in ti ljudje bodo nehali volit za vaše ideje.Hillary niso sli voliti, ker bi imela "slabe ideje", glede na to da njene slabe ideje niso nikoli bile debatirane - samo njeni skandali. Tako, kot se a Trumpa ni volilo, ker ima slabe (ali dobre) ideje, ampak zato, ker je alfa samec, ki bo razburkal mocvirje, in ker je smesen na twitterju
Konzervativci bodo pa prevzeli oblast s 33% procenti, kot je to že kdaj bilo v zgodovino, in potem naredili štalo.
Ampak krivec - vzrok - boste pa vi - retardirani SJW-ji, ki živite v tako izolirani odmevni sobici, da ne zmorete predvideti kakšni bodo rezultati vaših politik čez deset let.
ZaphodBB ::
Jaz sem kritik identitarian politike, predalckanje je voda na mlin predvsem raznim belim supremacistom
hahahahaha
"Naši dedje so se borili za to, da lahko odločamo
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
o lastni usodi - ne o usodi drugih ljudi." -jype
krneki0001 ::
In bolj vam tupimo, da je polovica ljudi na levi strani IQ krivulje, bolj silite v stvari, ki tem ljudem ne bodo všeč.
Kaj pa ljudem z nizkim IQjem ni vsec?
Vedno se mi je zdelo, da so tisti na levi strani mal omejeni, ampak nikoli si pa nisem mislil, da bo to celo Dice7 potrdil.
SimplyMiha ::
krneki0001 ::
Hillary niso sli voliti, ker bi imela "slabe ideje", glede na to da njene slabe ideje niso nikoli bile debatirane - samo njeni skandali. Tako, kot se a Trumpa ni volilo, ker ima slabe (ali dobre) ideje, ampak zato, ker je alfa samec, ki bo razburkal mocvirje, in ker je smesen na twitterju
Navadni delavci so šli tudi volit za trumpa, ker je že na začetku povedal, da bo zahteval da se industrija vrne nazaj v usa in to ponavljal. S tem je dobil kar nekaj glasov, ker delavec, ki je sit, mu je vseeno kaj in kdo bo na oblasti, dokler bo on imel kaj za delat in bo plačo dobival redno.
gruntfürmich ::
No, potem imajo pa demokrati naslednji mandat prakticno zagotovljen
se ti vidi da levičarji ne razumete ekonomije.
"Namreč, da gre ta družba počasi v norost in da je vse, kar mi gledamo,
visoko organizirana bebavost, do podrobnosti izdelana idiotija."
Psiholog HUBERT POŽARNIK, v Oni, o smiselnosti moderne družbe...
visoko organizirana bebavost, do podrobnosti izdelana idiotija."
Psiholog HUBERT POŽARNIK, v Oni, o smiselnosti moderne družbe...
krneki0001 ::
No, potem imajo pa demokrati naslednji mandat prakticno zagotovljen
Zanimivo je to, da se je industrija resnično začela vračat v usa. in tudi tisti, ki imajo tam že fabrike, so dobili "popust" pri davkih, zato so hitro začeli še graditi dodatne fabrike (subaru, ford,...) in zaposlovati nove ljudi.