ZDA, volitve 2016 in politična ureditev

Pa se le enkrat strinjava. Drumpf je tumpast.

http://www.vox.com/2016/7/21/12247074/d...

Donald Trump’s NATO comments are the scariest thing he’s said

Wednesday night, Donald Trump said something that made a nuclear war between the United States and Russia more likely. With a few thoughtless words, he made World War III — the deaths of hundreds of millions of people in nuclear holocaust — plausible.

This probably scans like hyperbole, the kind of thing you hear a lot in politics. I assure you, it’s not. Not this time.

What Trump said, in an interview published by the New York Times, is that he wouldn’t necessarily defend the United States’ allies in NATO if they were attacked by a foreign power. This extended, Trump said, to the Baltic countries right on Russia’s border — countries Russia might conceivably invade.

...

The consequences are hard to overstate. He is trashing one of the foundations of the postwar European order, which has helped guaranteed peace on the continent for 70 years. And by equivocating on whether he would defend the Baltics, he creates a dangerous amount of uncertainty among Russians as to how seriously the US takes its NATO treaty commitments — the kind of uncertainty that, yes, could spark an actual conflict between the US and Russia.

In njegovi zavezniki to pozicijo zagovarjajo, npr. Newt Gingrich, ki je v 90ih zagovarjal širitev nata.

https://twitter.com/davidgrayrhodes/sta...

"Estonia is in the suburbs of St Petersburg... I'm not sure I would risk nuclear war" @newtgingrich @CBSThisMorning

http://fas.org/man/nato/news/1996/19600...

House Speaker Newt Gingrich has strongly endorsed a
bipartisan bill designed to help provide emerging democracies in
Eastern and Central Europe with resources they need to meet the
military criteria for membership in the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization (NATO).

Dreck, čisti dreck, tudi če Drumpf izgubi. Dvom je pognojen.

Zgleda, da bo definitivno zmagal Trump. Kako to vemo? Ker se Jajo že slini zraven.

razerznak je 22. jul 2016 ob 12:48 izjavil:

Historic speech #trumptrain

Na žalost je povedal kar nekaj resnice, če ne celo preveč. Igra pač politično igro, kot vsak ki želi biti predsednik, blatijo drug drugega, ampak njega še najbolj. CNN/BBC itd pa označuje njegove govore kot "dark" xD. Me zanima, kakšne spremembe čakajo medije (če sploh), če zmaga Trumpus.

prox je 22. jul 2016 ob 04:42 izjavil:

HEJ DOLAN DRUMPF!!!! BEAT THIS!

Trump se je že norčeval iz maloumnih, tako da bodo to kar lepo izkoristili...

http://observer.com/2016/07/wikileaks-p...

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/07...

to orban, take rabimo v evropi ne pa brezjajćnike cmerkote

Soroševi roza klovni na posnetku.

december 2015



Ve o čem govori in deluje odprt za nove ideje. Meni najbolj zanimiv del je bil okrog 21. minute, o sporazumu z Iranom.

https://medium.com/@theonlytoby/history...

It's how it works.

Wikileaks Proves Primary Was Rigged: DNC Undermined Democracy

To je bilo že razvidno v "exit polls", kjer je bila razlika tudi dvomestna. Sedaj imamo pa dokaz, kako so Bernija načrtno zje*ali.

Mislim, da bo naslednji predsednik USA kar Trump. Če si ne bi izbral Penca kot VP, bi dobil vsaj 2/3 gladov Bernija, tako pa verjetno sploh ne bodo šli volit ali bodo pa volili "Zeleno stranko," ki pa itak nima nikakršnih možnosti.

13 + write-in.

United States presidential election, 2016 @ Wikipedia

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/judy-fran...

P.S.

Za izvolitev rabiš 270 elektorjev, to možnost imajo samo 4 + write in.

Problem podpornikov Hillary je da ne vedo da bodo izglasovali the lesser of two evils, samo bi morali trumpa izglasovat da orng zajebe stvar, tako da politika več ne more servirat debila kot Killary, dati nasprotnika za še večjega debila v upanju da narod vedno potegne kratko..

Oba sta obupna kandidata, ljudje bi morali bojkotirat ali izbrat Trumpa...

Berni Sandals še vedno podpira Hillary, kljub leakanim emailom ki nakazujejo korupcijo in favoriziranje znotraj stranke.

btw, za tiste ki ste ne-presenetljivo že pozabili kdo je Berny Sandals - to je star lunatični socialist, ki je kampanijo zgradil na domnevnem boju proti korupciji, korporativizmu in denarju v politiki, ter potem prodal svoje gibanje skorumpirani korporativni cipi, za dva lončka pudinga in spodnje mesto na pogradu v domu za ostarele.

RIP Sanderistas, no-one will remember you.

Že pogledal. Dejansko kar dobro narejen, čeprav izpusti ven vsaj pol stvari glede Clinton posla z Rusi za uranijevo rudo.

Po zadnji anketi CNN Trump vodi proti Killary 48-45. Glede na to, da je CNN znan kot Clinton News Network, je prednost verjetno še večja.

http://motherboard.vice.com/read/all-si...

All Signs Point to Russia Being Behind the DNC Hack

In the wee hours of June 14, the Washington Post revealed that “Russian government hackers” had penetrated the computer network of the Democratic National Committee.

...

CrowdStrike linked both groups to “the Russian government’s powerful and highly capable intelligence services.” APT 29, suspected to be the FSB, had been on the DNC’s network since at least summer 2015. APT 28, identified as Russia’s military intelligence agency GRU, had breached the Democrats only in April 2016, and probably tipped off the investigation. CrowdStrike found no evidence of collaboration between the two intelligence agencies inside the DNC’s networks, “or even an awareness of one by the other,” the firm wrote.

...

On June 15 a Wordpress blog popped up out of nowhere. And, soon, a Twitter account, @GUCCIFER_2. The first post and tweet were clumsily titled: “DNC’s servers hacked by a lone hacker.” The message: that it was not hacked by Russian intelligence. The mysterious online persona claimed to have given “thousands of files and mails” to Wikileaks

...

Two days later, Wikileaks published a massive 88 gigabyte encrypted file as “insurance.” This file, which Julian Assange could unlock by simply tweeting a key, is widely suspected to contain the DNC cache.

...

on July 22, just after Trump was officially nominated and before the Democratic National Convention got under way, Wikileaks published more than 19,000 DNC emails with more than 8,000 attachments

...

This tactic and its remarkable success is a game-changer: exfiltrating documents from political organisations is a legitimate form of intelligence work. The US and European countries do it as well. But digitally exfiltrating and then publishing possibly manipulated documents disguised as freewheeling hacktivism is crossing a big red line and setting a dangerous precedent: an authoritarian country directly yet covertly trying to sabotage an American election.

...

The forensic evidence that links network breaches to known groups is solid: used and reused tools, methods, infrastructure, even unique encryption keys. For example: in late March the attackers registered a domain with a typo—misdepatrment[.]com—to look suspiciously like the company hired by the DNC to manage its network, MIS Department. They then linked this deceptive domain to a long-known APT 28 so-called X-Tunnel command-and-control IP address, 45.32.129[.]185.

One of the strongest pieces of evidence linking GRU to the DNC hack is the equivalent of identical fingerprints found in two burglarized buildings: a reused command-and-control address—176.31.112[.]10—that was hard coded in a piece of malware found both in the German parliament as well as on the DNC’s servers. Russian military intelligence was identified by the German domestic security agency BfV as the actor responsible for the Bundestag breach. The infrastructure behind the fake MIS Department domain was also linked to the Berlin intrusion through at least one other element, a shared SSL certificate.

...

The metadata in the leaked documents are perhaps most revealing: one dumped document was modified using Russian language settings, by a user named “Феликс Эдмундович,” a code name referring to the founder of the Soviet Secret Police, the Cheka, memorialised in a 15-ton iron statue in front of the old KGB headquarters during Soviet times. The original intruders made other errors: one leaked document included hyperlink error messages in Cyrillic, the result of editing the file on a computer with Russian language settings. After this mistake became public, the intruders removed the Cyrillic information from the metadata in the next dump and carefully used made-up user names from different world regions, thereby confirming they had made a mistake in the first round.

Then there is the language issue. “I hate being attributed to Russia,” the Guccifer 2.0 account told Motherboard, probably accurately. The person at the keyboard then claimed in a chat with Motherboard's Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai that Guccifer 2.0 was from Romania, like the original Guccifer, a well-known hacker. But when asked to explain his hack in Romanian, he was unable to respond colloquially and without errors. Guccifer 2.0’s English initially was also weak, but in subsequent posts the quality improved sharply, albeit only on political subjects, not in technical matters—an indication of a team of operators at work behind the scenes.

...

Both APT 28 and Guccifer were using French infrastructure for communications.

...

Guccifer 2.0’s availability to the journalists was also surprising, and something new altogether.

The combative yet error-prone handling of the Guccifer account is in line with the GRU’s aggressive and risk-taking organizational culture and a wartime mindset prevalent in the Russian intelligence community. Russia’s agencies see themselves as instruments of direct action, working in support of a fragile Russia under siege by the West, especially the United States.

...

The metadata show that the Russian operators apparently edited some documents, and in some cases created new documents after the intruders were already expunged from the DNC network on June 11. A file called donors.xls, for instance, was created more than a day after the story came out, on June 15, most likely by copy-pasting an existing list into a clean document.

...

the DNC operation is unlikely to remain an exception. The political influencing as well as the deception worked, at least partly. The DNC’s ability to use its opposition research in surprise against Trump has been blunted, and some media outlets lampooned Clinton—not a bad outcome for an operation with little risk or cost for the perpetrators.

Another takeaway: the deception does not have to be executed with perfection; it is sufficient simply to spread doubt. High journalistic standards, paradoxically, work in GRU’s favour, as stories come with the Kremlin’s official denials casting doubt as well as pundits second-guessing even solid forensic evidence. If other intelligence agencies also assess that this operation was a success, even if only a moderate one, then more such false flag influence operations are likely in future elections, especially in Europe.

Democracies, finally, have a double disadvantage. General election campaigns and their ad-hoc organisations offer a soft, juicy target: improvised and badly secured networks, highly combustible content, all combined with a reluctance on the part of law enforcement agencies and private sector companies to wade into what could easily become a high-stakes political mess.

Pa kaj pol ? In komu koristi zmaga neoimperijalistične dropljače ki služi le Wall Streetu in 1% najbogatejših ?
Aja , svetemu Sorošu-Ološu , ki je med WW2 gestapu in SS prodajal rojake za pest drobiža.

Ne skrbi za moj življenski standard , se znam preživljati z lastnim delom , tako kot so se znali moji predniki.
Brez Wall Streeta , multinacionalk ,bank ,izvedenskih bančnih instrumentov , delnic in tajkunov , prekupčevalcev ter ostalih parazitov ki samo zajedajo delovne ljudi in živijo na naših žuljih.
Bo potrebno obračunati z njimi tako kot smo v YU z buržuju , cerkvijo , kapitalisti in kulaki.
USA pa naj ostanejo na svoji strani atlantika , če ne se bodo tudi oni krvavo useknili.



P.S.
Fašizem sta USA in EU !

Kaksni so argumenti proti Hillary?
Edini resni, ki sem ga doslej slisal, je da prevec blizu Wall Streetu.

Seznam proti Trumpu je neskoncen.
Glavni je, da laze vsakih 5 minut in niti priblizno ni jasno kaj naj bi izvolil. Morda je res nor.

Mus material za vse trumpiste

Trump, februar 2011: Gadafijevo pobijanje je potrebno ustaviti.



V zameno želi samo nekaj libijske nafte. Ker je humanitarc.

Trump, avgust 2011: Še vedno bi pomagal upornikom.



Vmes je preračunal, da bo to vredno 50-75% libijske nafte. Ker je humanitarc in uspešen poslovnež.

Trump, oktober 2011: Jezen, ker je Gadafi ujet, ZDA pa nimajo 50% libijske nafte. Pa še v Iranu bi bilo potrebno izvest državni udar in prevzet nafto. Ergo - Obama je luzer.



Oranžni je nor.

kow je 25. jul 2016 ob 22:53 izjavil:

Kaksni so argumenti proti Hillary?
Edini resni, ki sem ga doslej slisal, je da prevec blizu Wall Streetu.

Da je totalno skorumpirana, do te mere da ogroža nacionalno varnost (privat serverji)? Da jemlje podkupnine od tujih ne-demokratičnih sil? Da je objektivno odgovorna za destabilizacijo BV? Da je z ustrahovanjem žrtev, pomagala svojemu posiljevalskemu možu prikrivat spolne napade? Da laže in prikriva resnico non stop, tudi v zvezi z državno varnostjo?

Trumpu se očita imaginarne zadeve (kaj NAJ BI storil, ker je "bad guy"), medtem ko ima Hilari dejansko umazano politično kariero.

1) patoloski laznivec
Ne verjamem. Vsakega, ki je v politiki dovolj casa, lahko proglasis za patoloskega laznivca.
Clintonova se mi zdi precej konsistentna v svoji politiki. Trump se zdi blizje patoloskemu laznivcu.
Ta teden se je med intervjujem HVALIL kako je skromen.

2) skorumpiranost
Zakaj? Saudijci? Ameriska povezanost z njimi je stara ze desetletja in pod Obamo se od njih odmikajo.
Ne vidim, da bi se pod Clintonovo to spremenilo.

3) privat serverji in ogrozanje nacionalne varnosti
Potencialno so lahko Rusi ali Kitajci dobili interno korespondenco. Trump? Pravi, da bo prekinil sporazum z Iranci.
Kdo ogroza nacionalno varnost?

4) odgovorna za destabilizacijo BV?
V solo nisi hodil? BV je nestabilen vse od propada Otomanskega cesarstva.

5) Da je z ustrahovanjem žrtev, pomagala svojemu posiljevalskemu možu prikrivat spolne napade?
To sploh ne bom komentiral.

6) Trumpu se očita imaginarne zadeve (kaj NAJ BI storil, ker je "bad guy"), medtem ko ima Hilari dejansko umazano politično kariero.
Trump je pac sele vstopil v politiko. Je pa ocitno, da je kot poslovnez velik nategun.

maš posnetek?
Tko, da slišim zgodbico iz njegovih ust in ne preko 10 prevodov in rekla kazala.

Robert Kagan and Other Neocons Are Backing Hillary Clinton

As the co-founder of the neoconservative think tank Project for the New American Century, Kagan played a leading role in pushing for America’s unilateral invasion of Iraq, and insisted for years afterwards that it had turned out great.

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s know-nothing isolationism has led many neocons to flee the Republican ticket. And some, like Kagan, are actively helping Clinton, whose hawkishness in many ways resembles their own.

The way they described Clinton’s foreign policy vision suggested that if elected president in November, she will escalate tensions with Russia, double down on military belligerence in the Middle East and generally ignore the American public’s growing hostility to intervention.

Ampak "progresivni levičarji" podpirajo Hilari, ker je Trump "preveč nevaren"

v cem je sploh fora glede na to da oba promovirata foreign interventions?