Ukrajina Part II

l0g1t3ch je 24. mar 2022 ob 21:29 izjavil:

korenje3 je 24. mar 2022 ob 21:27 izjavil:

Kaj je z vami? Ruska letalska industrija je 100% neodvisna od zahoda. Imajo svojo proizvodnjo elektronskih komponent in vsega kar rabijo.

Nekatere stvari uvozijo zaradi nizke cene, samo jih lahko zamenjajo, saj imajo zagotovljeno lastno proizvodnjo.

Zakaj so potem kupovali tuja letala?

Aaaa se res, ker so njihova jajca

A si nepismen? Saj si v citiranem delu... eh, brezveze.

l0g1t3ch je 24. mar 2022 ob 21:32 izjavil:

Pa ti povej zakaj imajo boeinge in airbuse?

Zakaj jih ima sploh kdorkoli.


Chinese Boeing jet crashes in mountains with 132 on board, no sign of survivors

Uf

https://www.reuters.com/business/aerosp...

Baje rusi vse sami naredijo

Vojna je slaba ideja. Sam je pa dobiček.

Ukraine National guard fighting.... Ukrainian territorial defense.
Why did you shoot ? Stop shooting is us!!
Why you didn't say it was you??

Razlog za manjšo rast MOEX danes je seveda prepoved short sellinga in prepoved prodaje delnic za tujce. So oligarhi še malo kupili, preden inflacija požre preveč.
Je pa index skoraj 50% od lanskoletnega vrha v rubljih, če pa to prenesemo na $/EUR pa to nanese skoraj 80%.
Kot zanimivost, Rusija se spogleduje s fixed foreign exchange rate (kot Turčija trenutno), kjer sami krijejo razliko do tržno sprejete vrednosti.
Ker časovne garancije za to menjavo ni, poročajo že o 30% preplačevanju tujih valut na črnem trgu.

Ne vem ali je to satira na Azovce ki v mini krilu bežijo v evropo pred Čečeni ali je Zahod res že tako nizko padel.

EU: Transgender 'Sex Work' Group Offers Ukrainian Refugees Help To 'Start Sex Work In Germany

Kako trendy je zadnje case podpirat neonaciste. Ja kulci ane

korenje3 je 24. mar 2022 ob 21:04 izjavil:

VladarP je 24. mar 2022 ob 21:00 izjavil:

https://www.24ur.com/novice/tujina/ukra...

Fajn zelene poteze.

Škoda da iran, irak, azerbaijan ne stopijo skupaj in zaprejo letalski promet. Potem bi bla res štala.

Azerbaijan? Irak? Komu bi zaprli promet Rusom?

spegli je 24. mar 2022 ob 22:27 izjavil:

A mamo kakiga ministra ko ni že bil udeležen v kazenskem postopku ?

Ja una za izobraževanje je tako nesposobna, da dvomim, da bi ji uspelo pri udeležbi.

cias je 24. mar 2022 ob 21:42 izjavil:

Uf

Kitajci so tega zapisa zelo veseli. Njihova tesna zaveznica je označila taiwan za državo

So le priznali, da je Taiwan država! Čestitam Rusija

gazibo je 24. mar 2022 ob 22:21 izjavil:

Kako trendy je zadnje case podpirat neonaciste. Ja kulci ane

Jah glej, samo učijo se od mojstrov.

Ya Nacist, video
https://twitter.com/christopherjm/statu...

https://newslanc.com/tsukerman-russian-...
https://ukrainesolidaritycampaign.org/2...
https://www.city-data.com/forum/europe/...



Nitka

https://twitter.com/b_judah/status/1507...

Today’s note from conversations with experts and officials:

— Russia can’t continue the campaign at current intensity beyond a month and will need to pause and regroup with fresh troops.
— Russia has too many fronts and not enough troops on Kyiv, Kharkiv and Mykolayiv lines.
— Russia needs fresh troops to maintain these operations: this can either come from upping military recruitment (prisoners/unemployed/re-enlisting conscripts/Chechens/mercenaries) or a general mobilisation.
— Consensus is Putin will want to avoid unpopular mass mobilisation.
— Militarily Russia no longer threatens Kyiv and is exposed on the western approaches of the city but does seriously threaten the Ukrainian army in the Donbas with encirclement.
— Russia has been improving its logistics in the past week but has serious communication problems.
— Russia’s maximalist regime change initial plan was utterly botched and now has no chance of success. The verdict is still out on the hastily improvised attempt to switch to a classic high intensity campaign to focus on conquering Ukraine’s southern and outer Donbas regions.
— Risk of a Russian military assault on Odessa is largely seen as passed as the numbers simply aren’t there and the Ukrainian army has held the line on the Mykolayiv front.
— However officials and experts are more worried than the conversation on Twitter where Ukraine advocacy predominates with a narrative of Kyiv having a chance of victory.
— Fears of a long, destructive, exhausting war with big ripple effects are high.
— Russia is very literally de-militarising Ukraine’s military industrial capacity from the air. Some think this impact could take over a decade to rebuild.
— Russia’s use of air power continues to be minimal due to Ukrainian denial and aversion to even greater civilian deaths.
— The exact state of the Ukrainian military in terms of losses is unknown but believed to also be considerable.
— Like Russia, Ukrainian military effectiveness is believed to also have peaked due to exhaustion and war damage on its terrain.
— There us a risk of Ukraine exhausting its armies in counter attacks.
— Officials nervous that Russia could use chemical weapons to terrorise Ukrainians and mobilise Russians for mass conscription with a false flag.
— However military analysts note they will make little impact on the battlefield greater use of explosives cannot already.
— Real apprehension that WMD use could see big public pressure for the West to act or trigger an escalatory spiral that could end up in NATO-Russia clashes.
— Fears if Russia launches serious cyberattack reprisals on Western critical infrastructure, there could be an escalatory spiral into direct clashes.
— Outbreak of general clashes short of nuclear war likely to advantage Putin with domestic moral boost and Western panic.
— However the base case is this settling into a war of attrition.
— One view is the battle lines will like a sort of gigantic version of the Donbas frontlines post-2014.
— Unclear who a war of attrition benefits on the ground: a war on Ukrainian territory is costly to them.
— Growing sense Ukrainian attrition means the West will have to do much, much more in terms of military support and financial support for Ukraine.
— Current support will have to transition from ad hoc to a more structured Lend Lease model such as used by Roosevelt.
— Sense that Western sanctions need to be tightened and have ever so slightly disappointed in impact, both on the ground and in the markets.
— Little credence given to Twitter narratives of Kremlin coups and regime cracks with Russia and its regime viewed as able to withstand.
— Growing sense that the sanctions necessary to do on Russia next if there is escalation are oil sanctions modelled on those employed on Iran.
— Inconclusive debate whether mass sanctions on FSB/SVR/siloviki middle management would be effective or not.
— Sense even if Russia surged troops in the spring no silver bullet to take Kyiv but it could consolidate its southern land bridge and maybe complete conquest of Donbas and advance east of Dnipr.
— Whether this happens depends on the battlefield itself over the next few weeks.
— How Russian and Ukrainian commanders fare in the field in the south-east is key. How quickly can Mariupol fall? Can the Ukrainian army fight off Russian encirclement?
— These highly unpredictable military outcomes will have political consequences for a ceasefire.
— If Putin can achieve those gains many diplomats feel he could declare a halt to regroup or even try for a longterm deal that rewarded him those regions alone.
— Ukrainian opinion fiercely opposed to any territorial concessions though.

FilipF je 24. mar 2022 ob 23:05 izjavil:

Ko sem to prebral:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-...
sem dojel, da smo na pravi strani zgodovine.

Lukašenko je rekao da raspoređivanje zapadnih mirovnih snaga u Ukrajini znači treći svjetski rat

Mene pa zanima tako formalno samo, Rusija ni napadla Ukrajine ampak samo "vstopila vanjo", kaj NATO preprečuje, da pošlje vojake not kot mirovnike v Ukrajino? Ne da se straljajo, samo da pomagajo tam? Zakaj formalno NATO ne sme v Ukrajino, Rusija pa lahko?

Batka + Rowan Atkinson, video. Tale batkin govor je zelo memebilen.

https://twitter.com/JuntaChronicles/sta...

Pac-Man je 25. mar 2022 ob 00:17 izjavil:

Ukrajinci so zasegli povoje proizvedene l. 1978. Nujna medicina jim je španska vas.

https://twitter.com/EuromaidanPR/status...

Ta je še bolj odbita: :D

https://twitter.com/M48330465/status/15...

fur80 je 24. mar 2022 ob 23:47 izjavil:

Lukašenko je rekao da raspoređivanje zapadnih mirovnih snaga u Ukrajini znači treći svjetski rat

Mene pa zanima tako formalno samo, Rusija ni napadla Ukrajine ampak samo "vstopila vanjo", kaj NATO preprečuje, da pošlje vojake not kot mirovnike v Ukrajino? Ne da se straljajo, samo da pomagajo tam? Zakaj formalno NATO ne sme v Ukrajino, Rusija pa lahko?

To je no go ker Nato nebi sam lepo gledal kako kako rusi lepo mečejo rakete na njihove sile. Potrebna bi bi bila no fly cona, ker pa je veliko ruskih raketnih in protiletalskih sistemov lociranih v rusiji in belorusiji to pomeni da bi bombe začele padat tudi tam. .....

Ker bi bil agresor?

https://twitter.com/phildstewart/status...
SCOOP - U.S. assesses up to 60% failure rate for some Russian missiles, officials say

https://twitter.com/phildstewart/status...
Russia running out of precision-guided munitions for its war in Ukraine, Pentagon's @ColinKahl says

jernejl je 25. mar 2022 ob 01:57 izjavil:

Lahko bi naredili podobno kot so s Srbijo. Miroljubno operacijo, s katero bi z letali poškodovali belorusko infrastrukturo ...

Lahko bi, pa si kljub temu, da jih Ukrajina moleduje na kolenih, ne upajo poslati niti avionov v njen zračni prostor, še šenkat kakšno staro letečo rusko kišto Ukrajini je problem (in ob uničeni ukrajinski infrastrukturi niti smisla nima več), kaj šele kaj več.
Pa je še nekaj razlik: Belorusija bi zelo verjetno prosila Ruse za pomoč, zadeva bi se tam še prej razvila v neposredni konflikt med Rusijo in Nato.

Ukraine prosecutor-general says Russian soldiers raped a woman after breaking into her home and killing her husband

https://www.businessinsider.com/ukraine...

To majo rusi v genih

competent leaders of the world.......

or are they?