SSD za sistemski disk

Han je 2. nov 2015 ob 22:21 izjavil:

Hitrost zapisovanja ima večjo.

LuiIII je 2. nov 2015 ob 19:45 izjavil:

Kako je kaj z dobavljivostjo Samsung 950pro oz kakšnega drugega NVMe SSD-ja pri nas?

SuperVeloce je 3. nov 2015 ob 14:04 izjavil:

ja. čekiraj še garancijo. 5 let je tovarniške, ne vem pa koliko leclerc da

r3dkv1c4 je 3. nov 2015 ob 15:20 izjavil:

SuperVeloce je 3. nov 2015 ob 14:04 izjavil:

ja. čekiraj še garancijo. 5 let je tovarniške, ne vem pa koliko leclerc da

Ni pomembno kaj trgovina ponudi.

hojnikb je 3. nov 2015 ob 17:39 izjavil:

http://www.anandtech.com/show/9756/the-...

tl;dr

šrot za tako ceno. Grabte bx100, dokler je še :)

Kingston seems to have pulled a Samsung and entered this device into the infamous hardware lottery. if you have version 5.05 of this device, then you are good to go and will achieve all rated speeds, power consumption, etc for it. This version of the device is manufactured in Taiwan.

As of version 5.06, it is a total crapshoot if you will get a good drive manufactured in Taiwan or one from their other manufacturing sites in China. The mainland Chinese versions to put it nicely, don't even come close to the rated read/write speeds for this particular device, with write speeds falling from the advertised rate to a max of 240 mb/s on SATA III (device is officially rated at over 500 mb/s write speeds and the 5.05 version regularly achieves 540 mb/s).

There are similar warnings and whatnot about this issue about the drive on other sites, with some customers going so far as accusing Kingston of bait-n-switch after submitting the 5.05 to all of the review sites where it was benchmarked and scored numerous high marks and then almost immediately (within two months) releasing the 5.06 into the retail market.

*update 1/12/14* Firmware is not the issue, Kingston switched to asynchronous NAND

Seems I found the real culprit after speaking with several SSD experts on various tech forums, get ready for a class action lawsuit Kingston. Here's the scam, Kingston switched to cheap asynchronous memory chips that don't run in parallel after the first few months of production.

That means single channel bandwidth instead of multiple channels like earlier v300 SSD's. Instead of running at 200mhz, its running at 66mhz. This effects read and write speeds enormously.

Kingston hid this fact by using solvent on the original labeling of the memory chips, then printed their own logo on top. Kingston does not manufacture any memory themselves. When SSD was shipped out for review it used quality Toshiba 19nm NAND but Kingston used solvent on chips labels and printed their own. This was odd, but the reason for it soon became obvious. After only a few months they switched to inferior quality chips with the same Kingston label.

D3m je 3. nov 2015 ob 18:27 izjavil:

hojnikb je 3. nov 2015 ob 17:39 izjavil:

http://www.anandtech.com/show/9756/the-...

tl;dr

šrot za tako ceno. Grabte bx100, dokler je še :)

Bojo morali pa čudežni firmware ven dati, da jih reši.

VERDICT : Crucial's BX200 currently suffers too many issues to warrant a recommendation. Just for fun, we went back to the company's C300, the first SATA 6Gb/s solid-state drive to hit the market, as a comparison point. It surfaced in 2010 and obliterated the BX200 in every test we ran. Even the BX100, the BX200's predecessor, is superior in every way.