Predsednik Trump

Nissan_GTR je 11. nov 2016 ob 15:45 izjavil:

LOL, zdej ko je Trump zmagal, bi se pa dekadentneži iz Kalifornije kar rade odcepili. Mislim, da 90% Američanov izven Kalifornije ne bi imelo nič proti, če se ti fanatiki odcepijo. Glavni nasprotniki odcepitve Kalifornije bi pa sigurno bili Demokrati, saj brez Kalifornije ne bi zmagali nobenih volitev še naslednjih 100 let.

Nissan_GTR je 11. nov 2016 ob 15:45 izjavil:

https://www.rt.com/usa/366378-calexit-c...

LOL, zdej ko je Trump zmagal, bi se pa dekadentneži iz Kalifornije kar rade odcepili. Mislim, da 90% Američanov izven Kalifornije ne bi imelo nič proti, če se ti fanatiki odcepijo. Glavni nasprotniki odcepitve Kalifornije bi pa sigurno bili Demokrati, saj brez Kalifornije ne bi zmagali nobenih volitev še naslednjih 100 let.

Cervantes je 11. nov 2016 ob 19:52 izjavil:

otago je 11. nov 2016 ob 19:36 izjavil:

@Spajky
Musomeli je tudi v default stanju cuden, oz. ima nenavaden humor, cudne kretnje.

Musso je že davno v penziji, kje ti žviš?
Soros me pa navdaja s strahom. Sploh nič ne tvita.

To ni res. Jon Voight in Clint Eastwood sta ga javno podprla.

Zakaj že ? Lepo reče da je politično neopredeljen pa je mir. Vsaj pri meni je tako. Ker mi je res vseeno kdo je na oblasti. Tako in tako se zmanipulirane agresivne ovce prerekajo kdo je levičar kdo je desničar, ta čas pa ga taisti oblastniki pijejo z Jelinčičem in se smejejo kako so vse nategnili in imajo naslednje 4 leta zagarantirano visoke prihodke za nič dela.

vostok_1 je 11. nov 2016 ob 21:02 izjavil:

Kdo pa nas bo napadel? Rusija?

Inside General Flynn’s brain

We live in a dangerous world marked by rapid technological change.

...

There are many sincere people in our government who, frankly, are paralyzed by this complexity and so actively choose or passively accept a defensive posture — reasoning that passivity is less likely to provoke our enemies and that specific threats can simply be anticipated, discovered, countered, or recovered from.

...

In truth, the only way to operate effectively within an infinitely complex environment is by orienting all decision making to a core set of principles — or a more apparent logic of action that enables realistic assessments of our enemies, our objectives, our means and of our methods of engagement.

President Ronald Reagan understood this. He was clear about the Soviet threat and their political ideology of communism and he led the country to deal with that adversary with the right balance of engagement and soft power.

...

I’ll touch on each of these truths in order.

First. There is no substitute for American power. Human nature is imperfect and prone to violence and conflict. Because of this reality, leaders and nations can reduce — but not eliminate — the danger of war.

This truth is not very popular in some circles. There are people who believe that history is irrevocably progressing towards an ever-improving future.

...

I don’t subscribe to this idea. While I am a firm believer in the application of all elements of national power and never telegraphing which ones you may or may not use, the reality is that just since 1960, there have been over 30 insurgencies, conflicts, and wars and, in two thirds of these cases, the bad guys won.

...

Coalitions are valuable and should be cultivated whenever possible, and new ones must be formed.

But, we are fundamentally responsible for securing the future of our people and we can pursue this goal boldly in the knowledge that doing so has the derivative effect of improving the lives of people around the globe.

Second. A strong defense is the best deterrent.

...

Retreat, retrenchment, and disarmament are historically a recipe for disaster.

For that reason, we must always be ready to deploy what Winston Churchill called “overwhelming power.” This posture will deter most aggressors most of the time and, when even the best deterrent sometimes fails, it will still defeat them at the lowest possible cost and risk.

Third. Regime types matter. A prudent foreign policy is attentive to the types of regimes and their ideologies when discerning friends, foes, opportunities, and perils. Again, Reagan distinguished sharply between stable and liberal, democratic regimes on one hand, and totalitarian regimes — often animated by a wicked ideology — on the other. He rightly considered the former to be more reliable allies.

That said, we need to be clear about who we fight.

...

Relatedly, and my fourth point: We must think — and act — geopolitically.

A prudent foreign policy considers threats, interests, and opportunities based on the imperatives of world politics rather than vague notions of cosmic justice or “international morality.”

While those ideas are fine for the ivory tower, they are not rooted in the real world that we all live in today.

...

We should assail isolationism, any form of American withdrawal, and the fallacy of moral equivalence. But we should also not believe for a second that exporting democracy the world over will work either. However, we should also never be ashamed of our American values.

...

Five. We need to embrace American exceptionalism. Threats abroad are not addressed solely by military action. Instead, we need to understand that a successful foreign policy depends on a long-term strategy that combines economic prosperity at home, robust American military power, and the vitality of the American way of life.

...

Today and tomorrow’s environment dictates innovative force structure, interoperable technology, clear and simple policy and doctrine beyond the current construct.

And NOW is the time to get rid of the wasteful programs and choose only those that actually work.

...

The people of the United States deserve nothing less than our best effort and what they want is the unvarnished truth about what we are facing.

They also want to know that there are those willing to make the tough decisions on their behalf.

Because what they do know is that there are men and women serving in our armed forces, many in this room tonight, as Abraham Lincoln stated, who are willing to give the last true measure of devotion in service to our nation.

jype je 11. nov 2016 ob 22:18 izjavil:

xmetallic> Človekve pravice po evropsko. Če ne ustreza eliti sledi kazen. Smeš povedat kar želiš razen tistega česar ne smeš. Svoboda izražanja pa taka.

In vendar so Trumpovi govori direkten vzrok za porast nasilja pred, med in po volitvah. Če je svoboda govora neomejena, potem ne smeš omejevati ali celo sankcionirati tega, da se nekdo javno zlaže (kot se je Janša glede tega, da je neka ženska prostitutka, čeprav ni).

xmetallic je 11. nov 2016 ob 22:46 izjavil:

jype je 11. nov 2016 ob 22:18 izjavil:

xmetallic> Človekve pravice po evropsko. Če ne ustreza eliti sledi kazen. Smeš povedat kar želiš razen tistega česar ne smeš. Svoboda izražanja pa taka.

In vendar so Trumpovi govori direkten vzrok za porast nasilja pred, med in po volitvah. Če je svoboda govora neomejena, potem ne smeš omejevati ali celo sankcionirati tega, da se nekdo javno zlaže (kot se je Janša glede tega, da je neka ženska prostitutka, čeprav ni).

Zakaj bi kaznoval nekoga za laž? Pravica vsakega posameznika je da pove kar hoče če tudi je to laž. Zakaj si prepričan da je laž? Mogoče je pa res mislil da je prostitutka oziroma jo ima za le to? Zdej človek še svoje mnenje ne sme imet o nekom, nečem ker so vsi postali občutljivi.

Ne zagovarjam tega kriminalca sem pa proti kaznovanju osebe ker je izrazila svoje mnenje, ki naj bi bila pravica vsakega človeka.

jype je 11. nov 2016 ob 23:57 izjavil:

pirat> posluša Trump nasvete drugih? Tudi če so politični nasprotniki?

xxxul je 12. nov 2016 ob 00:13 izjavil:

Mah kmalu bo treba sprejet da obstaja nova bolezen, Trumpofobija:

People with Trumpofobia tend to feel uneasy in any area they believe could harbor Trump supporters or that have visible signs of their presence, such as Trump pictures. If Trumpofobics see a picture of Trump, they may not enter the general vicinity until they have overcome the panic attack that is often associated with their phobia. Some people scream, cry, have emotional outbursts, experience trouble breathing, sweating or even heart palpitations when they come in contact with Trump and/or his supporters. In some extreme cases, even a likeness or a realistic drawing of Trump can also trigger intense fear.